extract: 2025-10-00-california-sb53-transparency-frontier-ai
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
57f55098b2
commit
e0c44f0750
2 changed files with 53 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "california-catastrophic-risk-threshold-excludes-most-alignment-relevant-failure-modes.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"validation_stats": {
|
||||||
|
"total": 2,
|
||||||
|
"kept": 0,
|
||||||
|
"fixed": 9,
|
||||||
|
"rejected": 2,
|
||||||
|
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||||
|
"california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md:set_created:2026-03-22",
|
||||||
|
"california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
|
||||||
|
"california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md:stripped_wiki_link:AI-transparency-is-declining-not-improving",
|
||||||
|
"california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front",
|
||||||
|
"california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md:stripped_wiki_link:government-designation-of-safety-conscious-AI-labs-as-supply",
|
||||||
|
"california-catastrophic-risk-threshold-excludes-most-alignment-relevant-failure-modes.md:set_created:2026-03-22",
|
||||||
|
"california-catastrophic-risk-threshold-excludes-most-alignment-relevant-failure-modes.md:stripped_wiki_link:AI-lowers-the-expertise-barrier-for-engineering-biological-w",
|
||||||
|
"california-catastrophic-risk-threshold-excludes-most-alignment-relevant-failure-modes.md:stripped_wiki_link:delegating-critical-infrastructure-development-to-AI-creates",
|
||||||
|
"california-catastrophic-risk-threshold-excludes-most-alignment-relevant-failure-modes.md:stripped_wiki_link:three-conditions-gate-AI-takeover-risk-autonomy-robotics-and"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"rejections": [
|
||||||
|
"california-sb53-makes-third-party-ai-evaluation-voluntary-while-requiring-only-disclosure.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||||
|
"california-catastrophic-risk-threshold-excludes-most-alignment-relevant-failure-modes.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||||
|
"date": "2026-03-22"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-10-00
|
||||||
domain: ai-alignment
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: []
|
secondary_domains: []
|
||||||
format: legislation-analysis
|
format: legislation-analysis
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [California, SB53, frontier-AI-regulation, compliance-evidence, independent-evaluation, voluntary-testing, self-reporting, Stelling-et-al, governance-architecture]
|
tags: [California, SB53, frontier-AI-regulation, compliance-evidence, independent-evaluation, voluntary-testing, self-reporting, Stelling-et-al, governance-architecture]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: theseus
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-22
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -61,3 +65,12 @@ California SB 53 — the Transparency in Frontier AI Act — was signed by Gover
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: domains/ai-alignment/governance-evaluation-inadequacy claims (Sessions 8-10 arc)
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: domains/ai-alignment/governance-evaluation-inadequacy claims (Sessions 8-10 arc)
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Definitively clarifies the California legislative picture that has been ambiguous across multiple sessions; confirms the self-reporting + voluntary evaluation architecture that Session 9 diagnosed as substantively inadequate
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Definitively clarifies the California legislative picture that has been ambiguous across multiple sessions; confirms the self-reporting + voluntary evaluation architecture that Session 9 diagnosed as substantively inadequate
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The key claim is the contrast between what SB 53 appears to require (safety frameworks + third-party evaluation) vs. what it actually mandates (transparency reports disclosing whether you used a third party, not requiring you to)
|
EXTRACTION HINT: The key claim is the contrast between what SB 53 appears to require (safety frameworks + third-party evaluation) vs. what it actually mandates (transparency reports disclosing whether you used a third party, not requiring you to)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- California SB 53 was signed September 29, 2025 and becomes effective January 1, 2026
|
||||||
|
- SB 53 applies to developers training models with >10^26 FLOPs AND having $500M+ annual gross revenue
|
||||||
|
- SB 53 requires alignment with NIST AI Risk Management Framework or ISO/IEC 42001
|
||||||
|
- Civil fines under SB 53 can reach $1 million per violation
|
||||||
|
- AB 2013 is a separate California law covering only training data transparency
|
||||||
|
- SB 1047 was vetoed in 2024; SB 53 is its successor with weaker requirements
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue