From 33bd4bedf940a29c4bde43641a24e6905a31cf39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:35:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] rio: sync 1 item(s) from telegram staging Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70> --- ...utairdbot-what-do-you-think-about-this-article.md | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-what-do-you-think-about-this-article.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-what-do-you-think-about-this-article.md index 4dd2b3b0..a637508e 100644 --- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-what-do-you-think-about-this-article.md +++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-what-do-you-think-about-this-article.md @@ -21,17 +21,15 @@ tags: [telegram, ownership-community] @FutAIrdBot what do you think about this article? https://x.com/nyk_builderz/status/2030904887186514336?s=20 **Rio (response):** -The linked tweet from @nyk_builderz is about Thinking Machines Lab, Mira Murati's post-OpenAI venture. Here's my read: +The core thesis is right and it's not new, but the framing is clean. Context is the bottleneck, not reasoning. Most people blaming AI for bad output are really confessing they gave it no memory to work with. -The hype is justified on pedigree alone. Murati as former OpenAI CTO, John Schulman leading RL/alignment, Barrett Zoph. That's not a startup team, that's a faction of the organization that defined the current paradigm going independent. The $2B seed at $12B valuation and Nvidia committing Vera Rubin systems tells you the smart money thinks this team can ship frontier models, not just research papers. +The Obsidian + CLAUDE.md stack he describes is basically a manual knowledge graph. Project docs, decision logs, conventions, all structured so the model can orient fast. That works. It's the same pattern behind any serious agent workflow: persistent structured context beats raw intelligence every time. -What I find more interesting is the structural question nobody's asking loudly enough. They're pre-revenue with models expected in 2026, and their first product is Tinker, a fine-tuning API. That's a deliberate choice to enter at the tooling layer rather than competing head-on with OpenAI/Anthropic on base models out of the gate. Smart sequencing if they can pull it off, but it also means they're burning through that $2B while building toward something nobody outside the lab has seen yet. +Where I'd push back slightly: this is a single-user solution to a multi-agent problem. One developer with good notes in Obsidian is powerful. But it doesn't scale to teams, it doesn't compose across agents, and it doesn't handle conflicting knowledge or confidence levels. You end up with one person's mental model encoded as markdown, which is great until someone else needs to use it or the model needs to reason about what it doesn't know. -The alignment angle is where I have a real take. Schulman being there signals they care about safety, but every lab says that. The actual test is whether Thinking Machines builds alignment into the architecture or bolts it on after capability scaling, which is what everyone else does. Right now there's no research group building alignment through collective intelligence infrastructure even though the hardest problems (preference diversity, scalable oversight, value evolution) are inherently collective problems. If Thinking Machines just does RLHF-plus-plus, they're a well-funded OpenAI clone. If they actually rethink the approach, they could matter in a way that goes beyond commercial competition. +The real unlock isn't "give Claude memory." It's building knowledge infrastructure that multiple agents and humans can read, write, and reason over with provenance and confidence attached. That's the difference between a personal productivity hack and actual collective intelligence infrastructure. -The first mover dynamics here are real. The gap between leader and followers tends to accelerate during takeoff. Thinking Machines doesn't need to be first, but they need to be close enough to the frontier that their alignment approach actually gets tested on systems powerful enough to matter. - -Bottom line: world-class team, massive capital, right timing. Whether it's transformative or just another well-funded lab depends entirely on what they build that's structurally different from what they left behind. The market is pricing in the team. The open question is the thesis. +Still, for where most teams are today, just doing what this thread describes would be a massive improvement. Most people aren't even at step one. ## Agent Notes **Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community. From 8459dbada97ff411f14adc4bb6397c164a59eaad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: m3taversal Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:35:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] =?UTF-8?q?ingestion:=20134=20futardio=20events=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=E2=80=94=2020260323-1530=20(#1687)=20Co-authored-by:=20m3taver?= =?UTF-8?q?sal=20=20Co-committed-by:=20m3taversal=20?= =?UTF-8?q??= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- .../2025-07-24-futardio-proposal-jeremy.md | 32 ++ ...2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md | 27 ++ ...2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md | 27 ++ .../2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-test.md | 47 +++ ...futardio-proposal-jito-inflight-testing.md | 47 +++ ...futardio-proposal-testing-price-updates.md | 47 +++ ...ardio-proposal-testing-v5-indexer-fixes.md | 47 +++ ...hould-the-dao-mint-jeremy-llc-1k-tokens.md | 47 +++ ...2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md | 27 ++ .../archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-m.md | 47 +++ ...testing-arbitrary-mint-functionality-v3.md | 47 +++ ...osal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver-v2.md | 47 +++ ...roposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v2.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v3.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v4.md | 47 +++ ...dio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-v5-mint-functionality.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-v6-mint-functionality.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-v7-mint-functionality.md | 47 +++ ...2025-08-28-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md | 27 ++ ...2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...2025-09-01-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md | 27 ++ ...2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md | 27 ++ ...2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md | 27 ++ ...rdio-proposal-testing-spending-limit-v2.md | 47 +++ ...utardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-authorize-metalex-partnership.md | 131 +++++++ ...al-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md | 81 ++++ ...l-engage-in-6m-otc-with-dba-and-variant.md | 66 ++++ ...2025-10-13-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...p-to-2m-meta-at-market-price-or-premium.md | 78 ++++ ...2025-10-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...2025-10-22-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md | 27 ++ ...2025-10-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...2025-10-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md | 27 ++ ...2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md | 27 ++ ...2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md | 27 ++ ...-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md | 85 +++++ ...2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md | 27 ++ ...-10-31-futardio-proposal-testing-insert.md | 99 +++++ ...posal-to-test-out-remove-spending-limit.md | 28 ++ ...est-for-minting-and-transferring-tokens.md | 47 +++ ...-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md | 47 +++ ...t-for-spend-limit-removal-ix-inspection.md | 47 +++ ...s-a-test-memo-for-fixing-squads-signers.md | 48 +++ ...tardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md | 47 +++ ...-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md | 47 +++ .../archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-m.md | 47 +++ ...tardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal-2.md | 47 +++ ...2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...be-a-test-for-the-minting-functionality.md | 51 +++ .../archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-m.md | 46 +++ ...025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-18.md | 27 ++ ...025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-22.md | 27 ++ ...tardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-memo.md | 46 +++ ...tardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-mint.md | 46 +++ ...l-test-db-insert-for-remove-spend-limit.md | 46 +++ ...io-proposal-test-db-insert-for-transfer.md | 46 +++ ...-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-db-inserts.md | 32 ++ ...posal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-tokens.md | 47 +++ ...-this-is-a-test-for-transferring-tokens.md | 47 +++ ...this-is-a-test-to-update-spending-limit.md | 47 +++ ...-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md | 46 +++ ...futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal.md | 47 +++ .../archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-q.md | 46 +++ ...posal-testing-new-update-spending-limit.md | 46 +++ ...osal-this-is-updating-test-dao-3-params.md | 46 +++ ...updating-test-dao-4-params-to-auto-pass.md | 46 +++ ...1-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo.md | 46 +++ ...tardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md | 46 +++ ...al-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md | 101 +++++ ...2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...st-ix-for-minting-a-non-base-mint-token.md | 46 +++ ...s-is-a-text-mint-ix-for-the-new-mint-ix.md | 46 +++ ...-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md | 56 +++ ...2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md | 27 ++ ...25-11-24-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md | 46 +++ ...tardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md | 74 ++++ ...utardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-4.md | 46 +++ ...tardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v2.md | 46 +++ ...tardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v3.md | 46 +++ ...-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer.md | 46 +++ ...25-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md | 46 +++ ...025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-32.md | 27 ++ ...2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md | 27 ++ .../2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-test.md | 46 +++ ...-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md | 55 +++ ...025-12-23-futardio-proposal-proposal-11.md | 27 ++ ...dio-proposal-testing-v5-to-v6-migration.md | 47 +++ ...sal-omnibus-proposal-migrate-and-update.md | 145 +++++++ ...2026-01-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-12.md | 27 ++ ...026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-33.md | 27 ++ ...2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md | 27 ++ ...2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md | 27 ++ ...2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-6.md | 27 ++ ...2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-7.md | 27 ++ ...01-12-futardio-proposal-rngr-2m-buyback.md | 89 +++++ ...442m-unclaimed-kyros-airdrop-allocation.md | 93 +++++ ...tardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md | 47 +++ ...a-road-to-mainnet-operational-expansion.md | 109 ++++++ ...-16-futardio-proposal-pays-225k-buyback.md | 83 ++++ ...2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md | 27 ++ ...026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-34.md | 27 ++ ...026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-35.md | 27 ++ ...026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-36.md | 27 ++ ...-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md | 83 ++++ ...tardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md | 47 +++ ...026-01-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-38.md | 27 ++ .../2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-test.md | 32 ++ ...-01-20-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md | 46 +++ ...tardio-proposal-fund-meta-market-making.md | 72 ++++ ...o-proposal-testing-migration-to-raydium.md | 47 +++ ...-futardio-proposal-test-migration-v5-v6.md | 47 +++ ...2026-02-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...2026-02-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md | 27 ++ ...io-proposal-zkfg-restructuring-proposal.md | 80 ++++ ...tardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md | 73 ++++ ...ardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md | 146 +++++++ ...-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md | 36 ++ ...-subcommittee-pre-formation-and-legal-b.md | 356 ++++++++++++++++++ ...omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md | 96 +++++ ...uisition-and-restricted-incentives-rese.md | 227 +++++++++++ ...ate-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md | 113 ++++++ ...tions-research-dr-robin-hanson-george-m.md | 88 +++++ 134 files changed, 6810 insertions(+) create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-07-24-futardio-proposal-jeremy.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-test.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-jito-inflight-testing.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-price-updates.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-indexer-fixes.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-11-futardio-proposal-should-the-dao-mint-jeremy-llc-1k-tokens.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-m.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-functionality-v3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver-v2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-mint-functionality.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v6-mint-functionality.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v7-mint-functionality.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-28-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-01-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit-v2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-09-19-futardio-proposal-authorize-metalex-partnership.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-09-futardio-proposal-engage-in-6m-otc-with-dba-and-variant.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-13-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-15-futardio-proposal-sell-up-to-2m-meta-at-market-price-or-premium.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-22-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-testing-insert.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-proposal-to-test-out-remove-spending-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-and-transferring-tokens.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-spend-limit-removal-ix-inspection.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo-for-fixing-squads-signers.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-m.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal-2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-this-will-be-a-test-for-the-minting-functionality.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-m.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-18.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-22.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-memo.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-mint.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-remove-spend-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-transfer.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-db-inserts.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-tokens.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-transferring-tokens.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-to-update-spending-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-09-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-q.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-testing-new-update-spending-limit.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-3-params.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-4-params-to-auto-pass.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-12-futardio-proposal-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-ix-for-minting-a-non-base-mint-token.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-text-mint-ix-for-the-new-mint-ix.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-22-futardio-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v2.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-32.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-test.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-proposal-11.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-to-v6-migration.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-02-futardio-proposal-omnibus-proposal-migrate-and-update.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-12.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-33.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-6.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-7.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-rngr-2m-buyback.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-burn-442m-unclaimed-kyros-airdrop-allocation.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-umbra-road-to-mainnet-operational-expansion.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-pays-225k-buyback.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-34.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-35.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-36.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-19-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-38.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-test.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-22-futardio-proposal-fund-meta-market-making.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-23-futardio-proposal-testing-migration-to-raydium.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-01-26-futardio-proposal-test-migration-v5-v6.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-02-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-02-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-02-07-futardio-proposal-zkfg-restructuring-proposal.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-02-futardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-proposal-dp-00001-mem-treasury-subcommittee-pre-formation-and-legal-b.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-12-futardio-proposal-omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-13-futardio-proposal-dp-00002-mem-solo-acquisition-and-restricted-incentives-rese.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-20-futardio-proposal-fund-futarchy-applications-research-dr-robin-hanson-george-m.md diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-07-24-futardio-proposal-jeremy.md b/inbox/archive/2025-07-24-futardio-proposal-jeremy.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..52b7bc24 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-07-24-futardio-proposal-jeremy.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: JEREMY" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/HiRFR8936Gt2RNh9WdwZUmcUBXp4mmCig7dM9E7sVV7n" +date: 2025-07-24 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: JEREMY +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-07-24 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/HiRFR8936Gt2RNh9WdwZUmcUBXp4mmCig7dM9E7sVV7n +- Description: TST + +## Content + +DON"T USE THIS + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `HiRFR8936Gt2RNh9WdwZUmcUBXp4mmCig7dM9E7sVV7n` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `CRANkLNAUCPFapK5zpc1BvXA1WjfZpo6wEmssyECxuxf` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6e7bd30f --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DWXxKWZ8REP41ERy4Ksc2Abqu1kQwhQAC6JckbVgkEQM" +date: 2025-07-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #2 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-07-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DWXxKWZ8REP41ERy4Ksc2Abqu1kQwhQAC6JckbVgkEQM + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DWXxKWZ8REP41ERy4Ksc2Abqu1kQwhQAC6JckbVgkEQM` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `CRANkLNAUCPFapK5zpc1BvXA1WjfZpo6wEmssyECxuxf` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b649c2ff --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-07-25-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/AfdyGHZCPkxaJ4AdtfqQTkd4wD5gQX4e4VNXmzPFySj7" +date: 2025-07-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-07-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/AfdyGHZCPkxaJ4AdtfqQTkd4wD5gQX4e4VNXmzPFySj7 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `AfdyGHZCPkxaJ4AdtfqQTkd4wD5gQX4e4VNXmzPFySj7` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `CRANkLNAUCPFapK5zpc1BvXA1WjfZpo6wEmssyECxuxf` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b9627919 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/2vZBXXkN3aoM42DrFp7ochERwqkkibmW5oUZXb5hJDJY" +date: 2025-07-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #4 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-07-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/2vZBXXkN3aoM42DrFp7ochERwqkkibmW5oUZXb5hJDJY + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2vZBXXkN3aoM42DrFp7ochERwqkkibmW5oUZXb5hJDJY` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-test.md b/inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-test.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8d75b77f --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-07-31-futardio-proposal-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Test" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/8HPDqWaPo8RBnXkvP5LHNrpj4yygxEjCGJyKq1h7tYdx" +date: 2025-07-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Test +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-07-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/8HPDqWaPo8RBnXkvP5LHNrpj4yygxEjCGJyKq1h7tYdx +- Description: this + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal presents a brief statement regarding the concept of "Test" and suggests an examination of its implications. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may need to evaluate the relevance and outcomes associated with the "Test" concept. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +If effectively implemented, the proposal could foster innovative approaches or insights related to testing processes. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the lack of detail may lead to misunderstandings or insufficient engagement from stakeholders. + +## Content + +is + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8HPDqWaPo8RBnXkvP5LHNrpj4yygxEjCGJyKq1h7tYdx` +- Proposal number: 5 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-jito-inflight-testing.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-jito-inflight-testing.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..87ed61b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-jito-inflight-testing.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Jito Inflight Testing" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9rtNKm3oCZPjuao2iE3tZUrW5zwfx3dxDgh93CJk3FeN" +date: 2025-08-04 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Jito Inflight Testing +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-04 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9rtNKm3oCZPjuao2iE3tZUrW5zwfx3dxDgh93CJk3FeN +- Description: J + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to conduct inflight testing for Jito, focusing on performance evaluation and user experience enhancement. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders, including developers and users, will benefit from improved functionality and reliability of the Jito system. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful inflight testing could lead to enhanced performance and increased user satisfaction, thereby boosting adoption rates. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that unforeseen issues during testing could lead to service disruptions or negative user experiences. + +## Content + +I + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9rtNKm3oCZPjuao2iE3tZUrW5zwfx3dxDgh93CJk3FeN` +- Proposal number: 6 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-price-updates.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-price-updates.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..975efb42 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-price-updates.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Price Updates" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/4uvjqYjZ4og5fQvKXyAW3LCgx7MVfqnUEPhXwfNSqdtk" +date: 2025-08-04 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Price Updates +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-04 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/4uvjqYjZ4og5fQvKXyAW3LCgx7MVfqnUEPhXwfNSqdtk +- Description: price should appear much quicker for each market + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to implement a system for testing price updates to ensure data accuracy and responsiveness in pricing mechanisms. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from improved pricing accuracy, leading to enhanced decision-making. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to increased user trust and engagement due to reliable pricing information. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of system errors during testing, which could temporarily disrupt pricing processes and stakeholder confidence. + +## Content + +p + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4uvjqYjZ4og5fQvKXyAW3LCgx7MVfqnUEPhXwfNSqdtk` +- Proposal number: 8 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-indexer-fixes.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-indexer-fixes.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..be8cd3d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-04-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-indexer-fixes.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing V5 Indexer fixes" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/4Kzdxme9dSdfMwKhEgQdRGPV6XsVVudVZCzb4AGqzQ3W" +date: 2025-08-04 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing V5 Indexer fixes +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-04 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/4Kzdxme9dSdfMwKhEgQdRGPV6XsVVudVZCzb4AGqzQ3W +- Description: V5 events should now properly store in the DB based off of conditional vault events + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to implement fixes for the V5 Indexer to enhance its functionality and performance. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from improved indexing efficiency, leading to better data retrieval and utilization. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful fixes could significantly enhance user experience and increase overall system reliability. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the fixes may introduce new bugs or issues, potentially disrupting current operations. + +## Content + +let's see + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4Kzdxme9dSdfMwKhEgQdRGPV6XsVVudVZCzb4AGqzQ3W` +- Proposal number: 7 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-11-futardio-proposal-should-the-dao-mint-jeremy-llc-1k-tokens.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-11-futardio-proposal-should-the-dao-mint-jeremy-llc-1k-tokens.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b2eccadd --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-11-futardio-proposal-should-the-dao-mint-jeremy-llc-1k-tokens.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Should the DAO Mint Jeremy LLC 1K tokens?" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2psgeQFGTWtSEBbicLJV9LhiLmdWo62wyZaTUvugPNLF" +date: 2025-08-11 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Should the DAO Mint Jeremy LLC 1K tokens? +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-11 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2psgeQFGTWtSEBbicLJV9LhiLmdWo62wyZaTUvugPNLF +- Description: mm + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal seeks approval for the DAO to mint 1,000 tokens for Jeremy LLC. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Minting tokens may provide Jeremy LLC with necessary resources, potentially benefiting its operations and stakeholders. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The additional tokens could enhance liquidity and foster growth opportunities for the DAO through partnership with Jeremy LLC. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of diluting existing token value and governance if the minting is not aligned with the DAO's overall strategy. + +## Content + +mm + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2psgeQFGTWtSEBbicLJV9LhiLmdWo62wyZaTUvugPNLF` +- Proposal number: 9 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ff81e5c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DRjAetEB16ApZdHCuMnNET5dx3TvTYuxGQxZpSDNaoiY" +date: 2025-08-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DRjAetEB16ApZdHCuMnNET5dx3TvTYuxGQxZpSDNaoiY + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DRjAetEB16ApZdHCuMnNET5dx3TvTYuxGQxZpSDNaoiY` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `97UUpkDdiCFmjRTdp1SujwnZR1ixF48CeBFk2RgmkEu7` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7ecf3658 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/CTmo2aJMZ2p2r5xVLEm3VmVraM6AW6mEFhs7Zpr2eicJ" +date: 2025-08-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #2 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/CTmo2aJMZ2p2r5xVLEm3VmVraM6AW6mEFhs7Zpr2eicJ + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `CTmo2aJMZ2p2r5xVLEm3VmVraM6AW6mEFhs7Zpr2eicJ` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `97UUpkDdiCFmjRTdp1SujwnZR1ixF48CeBFk2RgmkEu7` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-m.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-m.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0c7176e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-m.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: m" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9AEawRBqimK2vnSEB4wToVDA4sKVvEiCwR46aMQqhLB9" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: m +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9AEawRBqimK2vnSEB4wToVDA4sKVvEiCwR46aMQqhLB9 +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to address specific needs within the Test DAO and improve overall efficiency through targeted initiatives. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from enhanced processes and potentially increased engagement within the DAO. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Implementing the proposal could lead to improved collaboration and resource allocation among members. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of insufficient member support or participation, which could hinder the proposal's effectiveness. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9AEawRBqimK2vnSEB4wToVDA4sKVvEiCwR46aMQqhLB9` +- Proposal number: 10 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-functionality-v3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-functionality-v3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a446a045 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-functionality-v3.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Arbitrary Mint Functionality V3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2KVEjS4fwqPLsE9HYV7endrCytt8qMadiUMPnZ4dHVqC" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Arbitrary Mint Functionality V3 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2KVEjS4fwqPLsE9HYV7endrCytt8qMadiUMPnZ4dHVqC +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the functionality of an arbitrary minting process within the Test DAO framework to ensure its reliability and security. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from enhanced minting capabilities, which could improve the overall utility of the DAO's assets. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to increased trust and engagement from the community, promoting further innovation within the DAO. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of potential exploitation or bugs in the minting process that could undermine the integrity of the DAO's assets. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2KVEjS4fwqPLsE9HYV7endrCytt8qMadiUMPnZ4dHVqC` +- Proposal number: 10 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver-v2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver-v2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..11824123 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver-v2.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing arbitrary mint resolver v2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/6gqMdL6L4QcHyoVJ291zQQZkrpPGsYf6EpwCYq9fD7rV" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing arbitrary mint resolver v2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/6gqMdL6L4QcHyoVJ291zQQZkrpPGsYf6EpwCYq9fD7rV +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test a new version of the arbitrary mint resolver, focusing on its functionality and performance improvements. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This initiative may enhance the user experience for stakeholders by improving the minting process. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to increased efficiency and expanded capabilities for minting assets within the DAO. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the new resolver may introduce unforeseen bugs or issues that could disrupt current operations. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6gqMdL6L4QcHyoVJ291zQQZkrpPGsYf6EpwCYq9fD7rV` +- Proposal number: 9 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..749b5d74 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-arbitrary-mint-resolver.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing arbitrary mint resolver" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/ANyAKSQm9bAw7pxoBhPbYWagttpmZxVXDQwQrSS7t5Dv" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing arbitrary mint resolver +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/ANyAKSQm9bAw7pxoBhPbYWagttpmZxVXDQwQrSS7t5Dv +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test an arbitrary mint resolver to enhance the minting process and ensure its functionality within the Test DAO ecosystem. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This proposal affects stakeholders by potentially improving the efficiency and reliability of minting operations. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to increased trust and participation from the community due to a more robust minting process. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that testing could reveal unforeseen issues, potentially disrupting current operations and affecting stakeholder confidence. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `ANyAKSQm9bAw7pxoBhPbYWagttpmZxVXDQwQrSS7t5Dv` +- Proposal number: 8 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..175bd0ec --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v2.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Mint Functionality V2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/CM4KJyG6tMTMkgPHM64JLZ9ghYxV3zvJYeV7nhCFDBDY" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Mint Functionality V2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/CM4KJyG6tMTMkgPHM64JLZ9ghYxV3zvJYeV7nhCFDBDY +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to improve the mint functionality by addressing existing issues and enhancing user experience. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders, including users and developers, will benefit from a more efficient and reliable minting process. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Enhancements to the mint functionality could lead to increased user engagement and higher transaction volumes. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Potential risks include the possibility of introducing new bugs or vulnerabilities during the upgrade process. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `CM4KJyG6tMTMkgPHM64JLZ9ghYxV3zvJYeV7nhCFDBDY` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ab06e6f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v3.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Mint Functionality V3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AvbyFpVUdJz4ZKfZ3NbJgAwdaZCKJ1ptTsnnJTBbZ6i2" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Mint Functionality V3 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AvbyFpVUdJz4ZKfZ3NbJgAwdaZCKJ1ptTsnnJTBbZ6i2 +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the mint functionality of Test DAO, ensuring its reliability and efficiency in processing transactions. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from a more robust and effective minting process, enhancing overall user experience. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could lead to increased confidence in the DAO's operations and potentially attract more users and investments. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +If issues arise during testing, it could lead to delays in deployment and negatively affect stakeholder trust in the DAO's capabilities. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `AvbyFpVUdJz4ZKfZ3NbJgAwdaZCKJ1ptTsnnJTBbZ6i2` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5e23d88c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality-v4.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Mint Functionality V4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/J1TUQ2GUrAgXb3RGgeLydL2chYyxJrFdubrPErMUZCdi" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Mint Functionality V4 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/J1TUQ2GUrAgXb3RGgeLydL2chYyxJrFdubrPErMUZCdi +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the mint functionality in version 4 of the Test DAO, focusing on improving the process and ensuring reliability. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience enhanced minting processes, leading to increased confidence in the DAO's operations. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could lead to a more efficient and user-friendly minting experience, potentially attracting more users. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Inadequate testing may result in functionality issues, which could undermine trust and disrupt operations. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `J1TUQ2GUrAgXb3RGgeLydL2chYyxJrFdubrPErMUZCdi` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e2593861 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-mint-functionality.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing mint functionality" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/Cn7dagyj8P1nZispqoqj5U5Lfdy7eKdmaBZpk6zVv2ud" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing mint functionality +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/Cn7dagyj8P1nZispqoqj5U5Lfdy7eKdmaBZpk6zVv2ud +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the mint functionality of the Test DAO platform to ensure it operates correctly and efficiently. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from a reliable minting process that enhances user trust in the platform. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could lead to increased user engagement and adoption of minting features. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +If the mint functionality fails during testing, it could result in delays and reduced confidence among users. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Cn7dagyj8P1nZispqoqj5U5Lfdy7eKdmaBZpk6zVv2ud` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-mint-functionality.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-mint-functionality.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fa5141a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-mint-functionality.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing V5 Mint Functionality" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9b7CqqoM1My97Rozrr9B18s5E7pMfcs37SvDVfajnGrs" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing V5 Mint Functionality +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9b7CqqoM1My97Rozrr9B18s5E7pMfcs37SvDVfajnGrs +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +- The proposal aims to test the V5 mint functionality to ensure proper operation and performance. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +- Stakeholders will gain insights into the reliability and efficiency of the new minting process. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +- Successful testing could enhance user experience and increase confidence in the minting functionality. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +- There is a risk of encountering bugs or issues during testing that could delay deployment or affect user trust. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9b7CqqoM1My97Rozrr9B18s5E7pMfcs37SvDVfajnGrs` +- Proposal number: 5 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v6-mint-functionality.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v6-mint-functionality.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..495ee55c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v6-mint-functionality.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing V6 Mint Functionality" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/BWCS1NC6nW5oXSBUSiT83ChFc2uEjBWbbkoEvPDAoUeH" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing V6 Mint Functionality +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/BWCS1NC6nW5oXSBUSiT83ChFc2uEjBWbbkoEvPDAoUeH +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the V6 mint functionality to ensure operational efficiency and identify any necessary adjustments before full implementation. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience improved minting processes, leading to enhanced user satisfaction and engagement. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could significantly streamline minting operations, increasing overall throughput and user adoption. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of encountering critical bugs during testing that could delay the roll-out and disrupt current operations. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `BWCS1NC6nW5oXSBUSiT83ChFc2uEjBWbbkoEvPDAoUeH` +- Proposal number: 6 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v7-mint-functionality.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v7-mint-functionality.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..967adf8c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-25-futardio-proposal-testing-v7-mint-functionality.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing V7 Mint Functionality" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7E7TeERVAVX1c65yB7eojVsn3Se73WAXedqh9yRrFkKE" +date: 2025-08-25 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing V7 Mint Functionality +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-25 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7E7TeERVAVX1c65yB7eojVsn3Se73WAXedqh9yRrFkKE +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the V7 mint functionality to ensure it operates correctly and efficiently. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from enhanced minting capabilities, leading to a more reliable user experience. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could lead to increased user engagement and adoption of the platform. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +If the functionality fails during testing, it could cause delays in project timelines and erode user trust. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7E7TeERVAVX1c65yB7eojVsn3Se73WAXedqh9yRrFkKE` +- Proposal number: 7 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-28-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-28-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fd856f3a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-28-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/9XH6ibJKQEMjYnDrRvyEYfK2hWZqdvsJuZztPRh4jEkb" +date: 2025-08-28 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-08-28 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/9XH6ibJKQEMjYnDrRvyEYfK2hWZqdvsJuZztPRh4jEkb + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9XH6ibJKQEMjYnDrRvyEYfK2hWZqdvsJuZztPRh4jEkb` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `GnkPjydb5cfQER1GVS6zB9Ch1a4jtnBj3U7kEnnXP2pk` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ce90e718 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/FVhu5UYKLs7upJqQTaHPPyKRyNPY3ZfNUZ8UZGmLvCrn" +date: 2025-08-29 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-29 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/FVhu5UYKLs7upJqQTaHPPyKRyNPY3ZfNUZ8UZGmLvCrn + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `FVhu5UYKLs7upJqQTaHPPyKRyNPY3ZfNUZ8UZGmLvCrn` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `GnkPjydb5cfQER1GVS6zB9Ch1a4jtnBj3U7kEnnXP2pk` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e798606e --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/BjHyde38nuazBYixb5hPqCkD2KoZ5hG5yfJEYzwMqonk" +date: 2025-08-29 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-08-29 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/BjHyde38nuazBYixb5hPqCkD2KoZ5hG5yfJEYzwMqonk + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `BjHyde38nuazBYixb5hPqCkD2KoZ5hG5yfJEYzwMqonk` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `GnkPjydb5cfQER1GVS6zB9Ch1a4jtnBj3U7kEnnXP2pk` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-01-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-01-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ec0760ef --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-01-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/4yczPVqKRYrhdd8rZtdahyy6zMy8q5H3pwu5u65xCkKi" +date: 2025-09-01 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #4 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-01 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/4yczPVqKRYrhdd8rZtdahyy6zMy8q5H3pwu5u65xCkKi + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4yczPVqKRYrhdd8rZtdahyy6zMy8q5H3pwu5u65xCkKi` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `GnkPjydb5cfQER1GVS6zB9Ch1a4jtnBj3U7kEnnXP2pk` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b837569d --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DepQetidmmmYY3udQzgbkgAfhvNJNEFTQWsYfJaao7HV" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DepQetidmmmYY3udQzgbkgAfhvNJNEFTQWsYfJaao7HV + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DepQetidmmmYY3udQzgbkgAfhvNJNEFTQWsYfJaao7HV` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `HXAd3xEAYp5968cTmhvxSSXt4nya89BxkEaac9xT2sDW` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..06f288b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/iNgaYyrKr6pwGYL8xL1hZ9P51n6czT61KwBc6o6MvJX" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/iNgaYyrKr6pwGYL8xL1hZ9P51n6czT61KwBc6o6MvJX + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `iNgaYyrKr6pwGYL8xL1hZ9P51n6czT61KwBc6o6MvJX` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `HXAd3xEAYp5968cTmhvxSSXt4nya89BxkEaac9xT2sDW` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d7a22fb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/JBNMoaZHguPGnnbXWc8UgUefQDNjSYsYzVGbsV4cuJdC" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/JBNMoaZHguPGnnbXWc8UgUefQDNjSYsYzVGbsV4cuJdC + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `JBNMoaZHguPGnnbXWc8UgUefQDNjSYsYzVGbsV4cuJdC` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `HXAd3xEAYp5968cTmhvxSSXt4nya89BxkEaac9xT2sDW` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..aa1b91a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/dKkvWzJSz8LKexryvcBE4CfrcNCcSYQRq4mxZQLCYQw" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #4 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/dKkvWzJSz8LKexryvcBE4CfrcNCcSYQRq4mxZQLCYQw + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `dKkvWzJSz8LKexryvcBE4CfrcNCcSYQRq4mxZQLCYQw` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `HXAd3xEAYp5968cTmhvxSSXt4nya89BxkEaac9xT2sDW` +- Proposer: `GZMLeHbDxurMD9me9X3ib9UbF3GYuditPbHprj8oTajZ` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit-v2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit-v2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a776ee85 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit-v2.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing spending limit v2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9GD518D81hr73JXPioqTtMnkp12hGWtBv82W3AJZi3AH" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing spending limit v2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9GD518D81hr73JXPioqTtMnkp12hGWtBv82W3AJZi3AH +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test a revised spending limit mechanism for the Test DAO to enhance fiscal management and accountability. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will experience increased transparency and control over spending within the DAO. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Implementing the new spending limit could lead to improved financial discipline and resource allocation. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the new limits may hinder timely decision-making and flexibility in funding initiatives. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9GD518D81hr73JXPioqTtMnkp12hGWtBv82W3AJZi3AH` +- Proposal number: 13 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5b12276b --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-spending-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing spending limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/4PXA7ijvAK7aBPjh2Q3BfzVfFYmSFA7NPqk48wy8bnh6" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing spending limit +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/4PXA7ijvAK7aBPjh2Q3BfzVfFYmSFA7NPqk48wy8bnh6 +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to establish a spending limit for Test DAO to enhance financial management and ensure sustainable resource allocation. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from improved fiscal responsibility and transparency in spending practices. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Implementing a spending limit could lead to more efficient use of resources and increased trust among community members. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Setting a spending limit may restrict necessary expenditures, potentially hindering growth or urgent needs. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4PXA7ijvAK7aBPjh2Q3BfzVfFYmSFA7NPqk48wy8bnh6` +- Proposal number: 12 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..26d34cc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-02-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing update spending limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AgzgRxxUU2Xniw2bEp8boBcz56kZmM1Sa7y9qESk5vnV" +date: 2025-09-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing update spending limit +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AgzgRxxUU2Xniw2bEp8boBcz56kZmM1Sa7y9qESk5vnV +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to update the spending limit for Test DAO to enhance financial flexibility and improve budget management. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may benefit from increased access to funds for projects and initiatives. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The updated spending limit could facilitate quicker decision-making and responsiveness to emerging opportunities. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of overspending or misallocation of funds if the new limits are not properly monitored. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `AgzgRxxUU2Xniw2bEp8boBcz56kZmM1Sa7y9qESk5vnV` +- Proposal number: 11 +- DAO account: `7QbVKbEuqqrEANBaViB1XxoH34hqiroDqf2twkcusnWk` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-09-19-futardio-proposal-authorize-metalex-partnership.md b/inbox/archive/2025-09-19-futardio-proposal-authorize-metalex-partnership.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..536ead34 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-09-19-futardio-proposal-authorize-metalex-partnership.md @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Authorize MetaLex Partnership?" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/7XMU3qTYrXe3yccr4qCLEPvmENGmC22MyMKMX9zJAi9x" +date: 2025-09-19 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, metadao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: MetaDAO +- Proposal: Authorize MetaLex Partnership? +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-09-19 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/7XMU3qTYrXe3yccr4qCLEPvmENGmC22MyMKMX9zJAi9x +- Description: This proposal would authorize MetaDAO to engage MetaLeX Labs, Inc. for technical implementation, legal entity creation, advisory support, and related services. +- Discussion: https://discord.gg/KNapTSZNme + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +This proposal aims to authorize a partnership with MetaLeX for technical implementation and legal services, involving a $150,000 cash advance and a 7% royalty on Platform Pool Fees from qualifying BORG tokens for three years. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders, including project teams using MetaDAO's launchpad, will benefit from integrated legal and technical services, streamlining the ICO process. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The partnership is expected to enhance the robustness and efficiency of MetaDAO's capital formation and governance frameworks, potentially attracting more projects to the platform. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a financial commitment of $150,000 and ongoing royalty payments, which could strain resources if anticipated revenues from BORG tokens do not materialize. + +## Content + +**Type:** Operations Direct Action + +**Author:** Kollan + +## **Background** + +This proposal secures MetaLeX’s systems as the foundation for legal and technical infrastructure within MetaDAO. Their frameworks support enforceable structures, scalable solutions for IP ownership and governance, and extend beyond Cayman entity formation into onchain enforceability and ongoing support for future organizational needs. + +MetaLeX is not a traditional law firm. It was founded to close a gap in the market by embedding legal solutions directly into technology, making them scalable in ways conventional providers cannot. This experience and approach give MetaDAO access to a depth of expertise that strengthens the foundations of futarchy and the organizations built on top of it. + +By tying revenue to their services, MetaDAO ensures MetaLeX has strong incentives to adapt its systems alongside futarchy. This gives projects launched through MetaDAO confidence that they are backed by proven legal innovation, with infrastructure built to run natively on Solana. While initial delivery will begin outside Solana to expedite the current ICO cohort, the long-term expectation is full Solana-native deployment. + +## **Overview** + +This proposal would authorize MetaDAO to formally enter into the [**MetaLeX Master Services Agreement**](https://docs.google.com/document/d/10aSnAZZzh37qh9Iu0jo4uhEN6kx5WIqW/edit) and accompanying [**Order Form**](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cyRZlsyTmb_w3VbHuchtC8AsDmnTgHi6/edit). By doing so, MetaDAO agrees to engage MetaLeX Labs, Inc. for technical implementation, legal entity creation, advisory support, and related services, with payments structured as set forth in the Order Form. + +Key terms include: + +* **Cash Advance**: $150,000, payable to MetaLeX. Which will be payable in four (4) $37,500 installments. +* **Royalty**: 7% of Platform Pool Fees on **BORG tokens** (as defined in the Order Form) for a term of three (3) years. +* *BORG tokens* are those which utilize MetaLeX services and products. While projects are not obligated to use these services, it is recommended and configured as default. +* **Implementation Services**: MetaLeX will deploy and maintain key systems, including the MetaLeX Web App, CyberCORPs contracts, Ricardian Tripler contracts, and a proof system, in addition to facilitating the creation of Cayman Islands entities with futarchy-governed BORGs +* **Ongoing Support**: MetaLeX will provide technical and advisory support for at least 12 months following implementation, renewable so long as royalties generate a minimum of $25,000 annually + +**Clarification on Royalties** +**If MetaDAO accrues a protocol fee from a token which has utilized MetaLeX services, the 7% royalty will be assessed against that fee for up to a period of three (3) years. Currently, this protocol fee is defined under an AMM swap fee of 0.25% or 25 bps.** + +This agreement represents a strategic investment in robust legal and technical infrastructure for futarchy projects launched through MetaDAO. + +## **Motivation** + +MetaDAO has consistently prioritized building sustainable governance and token issuance frameworks. Past proposals have directed resources toward legal advisory (e.g., Theia OTC trades to extend runway and retain counsel) and a token migration to improve scalability. + +Engaging MetaLeX continues this trajectory by: + +1. Establishing onchain legal entity representations (CyberCORPs). +2. Enabling Ricardian Tripler contracts for automated agreement execution. +3. Providing legal structuring for Cayman SPCs to support projects launching tokens via MetaDAO’s futarchy launchpad. +4. Ensuring long-term advisory support on technical and legal dimensions. + +This infrastructure underpins MetaDAO’s mission to make futarchy the standard for capital formation. + +## **Implementation Plan** + +If passed, this proposal authorizes: + +1. **Execution of Agreements** + * MetaDAO to sign the **MetaLeX MSA** and **Order Form** + * Customer entity: **MetaDAO LLC, Republic of the Marshall Islands**. +2. **Payments** + * Disbursement of $150,000 to MetaLeX in four equal installments of $37,500. + * Authorization of a 7% royalty from Platform Pool Fees on qualifying BORG tokens for three (3) years. +3. **Integration into MetaDAO Platform** + * MetaLeX will customize the **MetaLeX Web App** and smart contracts so that **when projects apply for an ICO through MetaDAO’s launchpad**, the following occurs within the UI: + * Project submits to MetaDAO launchpad. + * UI prompts the project team through the **legal agreement and signing process**. + * Signing automatically triggers deployment of a **futarchy-governed BORG (via Ricardian Tripler \+ CyberCORPs contracts)** + * The BORG becomes the legal entity tied to the project’s token issuance, integrated directly into MetaDAO’s governance flow. + * This ensures every launchpad project can seamlessly combine **capital formation \+ legal structuring**. +4. **Operational Coordination** + * MetaDAO operators will coordinate with MetaLeX and MetaLeX Pro on implementation, legal structuring, and ongoing advisory. + * Projects will be onboarded through the unified UI/UX rather than off-chain manual processes. +5. **Governance Canonicalization** + * Record MetaDAO’s binding obligation to the above payments and royalty structure as an enforceable commitment of the DAO. + +## **Specifications** + +* **Treasury Account (USDC Source)**: 6awyHMshBGVjJ3ozdSJdyyDE1CTAXUwrpNMaRGMsb4sf and proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2 +* **Cash Advance**: $150,000 (paid in four (4) $37,500 installments) +* **Royalty**: 7% of Platform Pool Fees, as defined in the Order Form, for the period of three (3) years. + +## **Outcome** + +Upon passage, MetaDAO will: + +* Execute the MetaLeX MSA and Order Form. +* Allocate the $150,000 advance in four installments. +* Commit to a 7% royalty on Platform Pool Fees for qualifying BORG tokens over three years. +* Gain access to MetaLeX’s implementation, structuring, and advisory services. +* **Integrate MetaLeX legal workflows directly into the MetaDAO ICO platform**, so that every project submitting for an ICO automatically executes the necessary legal agreements and generates its futarchy BORG through the MetaDAO UI. + +This agreement ensures that the **MetaDAO platform itself becomes the one-stop venue for both capital formation and legal structuring**, making futarchy-based ICOs legally robust, technically integrated, and default-aligned with BORG governance. + + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7XMU3qTYrXe3yccr4qCLEPvmENGmC22MyMKMX9zJAi9x` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `Bc3pKPnSbSX8W2hTXbsFsybh1GeRtu3Qqpfu9ZLxg6Km` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b71decc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: OMFG-001 - Increase Allowance To 50k/mo?" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/8JqhQuZN52iiGirwrs6gamckBUCTLohhRjr2UpXL9CET" +date: 2025-10-03 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, omnipair] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Omnipair +- Proposal: OMFG-001 - Increase Allowance To 50k/mo? +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-03 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/8JqhQuZN52iiGirwrs6gamckBUCTLohhRjr2UpXL9CET +- Description: If passed this proposal would increase the monthly allowance from $10k to $50k per month +- Discussion: https://discord.gg/omnipair + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal seeks to increase the monthly spending limit from $10,000 to $50,000 to hire additional developers and a designer, cover infrastructure costs, and support the upcoming public launch of the protocol. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This increase in budget will enable the team to enhance development and design capabilities, directly benefiting the project's progress and community. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +A successful increase in resources could accelerate the protocol's development and readiness for full launch, potentially leading to increased revenue and market presence. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +The proposed spending limit raises concerns about financial oversight and sustainability, especially if the project's revenue generation takes longer than expected. + +## Content + +**Proposer:** Rakka\_sol + +**Details** +Current spending limit: $10,000/mo +Proposed spending limit: $50,000/mo + +Over the past two months I have committed myself fully to both Omnipair and the changes in my personal life that support this work. With the protocol now live on mainnet in closed beta, the focus turns to scaling development and preparing for full launch. + +To achieve this, I am requesting market approval to increase the spending limit to $50,000 per month. This expanded budget will enable: + +- Hiring and retaining two additional developers +- Adding a dedicated designer +- Infrastructure and service costs + +At this level, the treasury provides approximately 16 months of runway. Once closed beta concludes and the protocol is production-ready and generating revenue, I intend to revisit both spending levels and overall tokenomics to ensure sustainability and alignment with growth. + +**Ongoing Accountability** +I will continue providing community updates every 30 days, with more frequent communication as milestones are achieved. + +The spending limit will be capped at $50,000 per month. Any unclaimed funds from a given month will not carry over or accumulate. The limit represents a maximum, not a guaranteed spend. + +Additionally, the spending limit can be reduced or removed at any time by community proposal, ensuring governance control remains in place over its funds. + +**Next Steps** +The near-term timeline includes: + +- Keep gathering feedback and monitoring the closed beta +- Shipping leveraging functionality. +- Enhancing features and addressing gaps +- Undergoing external audit and review + +We are close to a full public launch, and this budget adjustment ensures the resources are in place to finish strong. + +Omnipair’s mission is to extend DeFi to underserved assets through open, permissionless markets. I am committed to delivering on that promise and ask for your support in the next phase. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8JqhQuZN52iiGirwrs6gamckBUCTLohhRjr2UpXL9CET` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `B3AufDZCDtQN8JxZgJ5bSDZaiKCF4vtw7ynN9tuR9pXN` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-09-futardio-proposal-engage-in-6m-otc-with-dba-and-variant.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-09-futardio-proposal-engage-in-6m-otc-with-dba-and-variant.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f3b38e40 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-09-futardio-proposal-engage-in-6m-otc-with-dba-and-variant.md @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Engage in $6M OTC with DBA and Variant?" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/HmAuSUjYzuEdkGvBe19JxK3pUYKNf4JPCkWY2nCFNYNB" +date: 2025-10-09 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, metadao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: MetaDAO +- Proposal: Engage in $6M OTC with DBA and Variant? +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-10-09 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/HmAuSUjYzuEdkGvBe19JxK3pUYKNf4JPCkWY2nCFNYNB +- Description: If passed, this proposal would sell $6m of META to DBA and Variant at $4.0795 per META, equivalent to a ~$85MM market cap. +- Discussion: https://discord.gg/9H8p3Ghxb7 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +This proposal aims to sell $6M worth of META tokens to DBA and Variant at a price of $4.0795 per token, increasing the market cap to approximately $85M, and to expand MetaDAO's team for improved operational efficiency. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +DBA and Variant will receive META tokens, potentially strengthening their partnership with MetaDAO while increasing the DAO's cash reserves. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The influx of $6M will provide MetaDAO with additional runway and resources to hire new team members, enhancing productivity and project execution. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +If DBA or Variant fail to fulfill their financial commitments, it may jeopardize the planned token distribution and MetaDAO's financial strategy. + +## Content + +If passed, this proposal would sell $6m of META to [DBA](https://dba.xyz/) and [Variant](https://variant.fund/) at $4.0795 per META, equivalent to a \~$85MM market cap. + +## Motivation + +MetaDAO currently has [\~$1.8m in cash](https://v1.metadao.fi/transparency), which equates to \~24 months of runway. + +We have a pretty small team right now \- it’s me and Kollan, our founding engineer, a part-time designer, and a twitter intern. + +We like keeping our team lean \- many times, bigger teams actually go slower than small teams \- but we think we could go faster if we expanded (hired full-time designer \+ another 1-2 engineer(s)) and it’d also be nice to have more runway. + +## Logistics + +If passed, this proposal would mint **1,470,768 META** to this [5/6 multisig](https://app.squads.so/squads/6mYWxA7Jrvxqbj2yrcueupuQAgT1WsFwyLTZB382rdFc/home) (6mYWxA7Jrvxqbj2yrcueupuQAgT1WsFwyLTZB382rdFc), containing Kollan and Proph3t from MetaDAO, Michael and [Jon Charbonneau](https://x.com/jon_charb) from DBA, and two addresses from [Jesse Walden](https://x.com/jessewldn) at Variant. + +DBA and Variant agree to each send 3,000,000 USDC to that multisig, which would then send them each 735,384 META and then the USDC to [MetaDAO’s treasury](https://app.squads.so/squads/BxgkvRwqzYFWuDbRjfTYfgTtb41NaFw1aQ3129F79eBT/home). + +Tokens would be fully unlocked \- we don’t believe in locking up non-team supply. + +If for some reason one or both parties don’t send their end, we would attempt to burn the relevant tokens. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `HmAuSUjYzuEdkGvBe19JxK3pUYKNf4JPCkWY2nCFNYNB` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `Bc3pKPnSbSX8W2hTXbsFsybh1GeRtu3Qqpfu9ZLxg6Km` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-13-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-13-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..36cb1e5b --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-13-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/GcdHiq8jzmYUHLg4inBagUTdjDmU8Z4zWeeX5ghTCAkd" +date: 2025-10-13 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-10-13 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/GcdHiq8jzmYUHLg4inBagUTdjDmU8Z4zWeeX5ghTCAkd + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `GcdHiq8jzmYUHLg4inBagUTdjDmU8Z4zWeeX5ghTCAkd` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-15-futardio-proposal-sell-up-to-2m-meta-at-market-price-or-premium.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-15-futardio-proposal-sell-up-to-2m-meta-at-market-price-or-premium.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e3973def --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-15-futardio-proposal-sell-up-to-2m-meta-at-market-price-or-premium.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/GfJhLniJENRzYTrYA9x75JaMc3DcEvoLKijtynx3yRSQ" +date: 2025-10-15 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, metadao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: MetaDAO +- Proposal: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium? +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-15 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/GfJhLniJENRzYTrYA9x75JaMc3DcEvoLKijtynx3yRSQ +- Description: We still need to raise money, so I’m proposing that I (Proph3t) sell up to 2,000,000 META on behalf of MetaDAO at the market price or at a premium. +- Discussion: https://discord.gg/Da3MJ8wKzx + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +Proph3t proposes to sell up to 2,000,000 newly-minted META at market price or a premium to raise funds for MetaDAO, with sales publicly reported and any unsold META burned. The minimum sale price would be based on a 24-hour TWAP or a floor price of $4.80, whichever is higher. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This proposal aims to provide liquidity and raise funds for MetaDAO, potentially benefiting all stakeholders involved by increasing treasury reserves. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successfully selling the META could generate up to $10,000,000 in proceeds, significantly enhancing MetaDAO's financial position. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of market volatility affecting the sale price, which could lead to unsold META if demand does not meet expectations or if the market price falls below the established floor. + +## Content + +**Author:** Proph3t + +A previous proposal by DBA and Variant to OTC $6,000,000 of META failed, with the main feedback being that offering OTCs at a large discount is \-EV for MetaDAO. + +We still need to raise money, and we’ve seen some demand from funds since this proposal, so I’m proposing that I (Proph3t) sell up to 2,000,000 META on behalf of MetaDAO at the market price or at a premium. + +## **Execution** + +The 2,000,000 META would be newly-minted. + +I would have 30 days to sell this META. All USDC from sales would be deposited back into MetaDAO’s treasury. Any unsold META would be burned. + +I would source OTC counterparties for sales. + +All sales would be publicly broadcast within 24 hours, including the counterparty, the size, and the price of the sale. + +I would also have the option to sell up to $400,000 per day of META in ATM sales (into the open market, either with market or limit orders), up to a total of $2,000,000. + +The maximum amount of total proceeds would be $10,000,000. + +## **Pricing** + +The minimum price of these OTCs would be the higher of: +\- the market price, calculated as a 24-hour TWAP at the time of the agreement +\- a price of $4.80, equivalent to a \~$100M market capitalization + +That is, even if the market price dips below $100M, no OTC sales could occur below $100M. We may also execute at a price above these terms if there is sufficient demand. + +## **Lockups / vesting** + +I would have ultimate discretion over any lockup and/or vesting terms. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `GfJhLniJENRzYTrYA9x75JaMc3DcEvoLKijtynx3yRSQ` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `Bc3pKPnSbSX8W2hTXbsFsybh1GeRtu3Qqpfu9ZLxg6Km` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a40627c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/3Sgd9mVrDQU8B6MsfvWscFoYoAATTYpyB1cxDCkT1Q5u" +date: 2025-10-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-10-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/3Sgd9mVrDQU8B6MsfvWscFoYoAATTYpyB1cxDCkT1Q5u + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3Sgd9mVrDQU8B6MsfvWscFoYoAATTYpyB1cxDCkT1Q5u` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-22-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-22-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..feee6076 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-22-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/EfXs6QvSAm7pdw6suGP7RhnHpJLhroEUo4s8oqxp6FAc" +date: 2025-10-22 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-22 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/EfXs6QvSAm7pdw6suGP7RhnHpJLhroEUo4s8oqxp6FAc + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `EfXs6QvSAm7pdw6suGP7RhnHpJLhroEUo4s8oqxp6FAc` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..056099ec --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6jHhzNYy4y6oExDpgqkZqXwZ23quaEZXn7vDMqmYxtHY" +date: 2025-10-24 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-24 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6jHhzNYy4y6oExDpgqkZqXwZ23quaEZXn7vDMqmYxtHY + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6jHhzNYy4y6oExDpgqkZqXwZ23quaEZXn7vDMqmYxtHY` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..31c67328 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-29-futardio-proposal-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/9xEPGJjhpSrX2iP5n3rpYFBeDa2g6g9Cyo58vdZ8zZSr" +date: 2025-10-29 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #2 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-29 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/9xEPGJjhpSrX2iP5n3rpYFBeDa2g6g9Cyo58vdZ8zZSr + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9xEPGJjhpSrX2iP5n3rpYFBeDa2g6g9Cyo58vdZ8zZSr` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..33407063 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DZ65Dg1rnf3r9JSPc2b5rsEXqVjkSN248wemvZgNcrxn" +date: 2025-10-30 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-10-30 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DZ65Dg1rnf3r9JSPc2b5rsEXqVjkSN248wemvZgNcrxn + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DZ65Dg1rnf3r9JSPc2b5rsEXqVjkSN248wemvZgNcrxn` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4a2f81b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8merHybpNyxF1zkogkQC4LRLN5dwaXGVJKwJdJcF5UVo" +date: 2025-10-30 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #4 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-10-30 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8merHybpNyxF1zkogkQC4LRLN5dwaXGVJKwJdJcF5UVo + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8merHybpNyxF1zkogkQC4LRLN5dwaXGVJKwJdJcF5UVo` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6bf7eb81 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-30-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #5" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8bimtsyiNEC5D5SJZf3624CUPhFH8AFE7VbMbxRwu3wv" +date: 2025-10-30 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #5 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-10-30 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8bimtsyiNEC5D5SJZf3624CUPhFH8AFE7VbMbxRwu3wv + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8bimtsyiNEC5D5SJZf3624CUPhFH8AFE7VbMbxRwu3wv` +- Proposal number: 5 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1441873b --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: OMFG-002 - Fund Omnipair Security Audits?" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/Eo4WZMiU6UHwxDh3Tn6ygX5Pmr5xMWeR1bYL1CSqhY1j" +date: 2025-10-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, omnipair] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Omnipair +- Proposal: OMFG-002 - Fund Omnipair Security Audits? +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/Eo4WZMiU6UHwxDh3Tn6ygX5Pmr5xMWeR1bYL1CSqhY1j +- Description: After reviewing 9 audit quotations, we’ve selected Offside Labs and Ackee Blockchain Security for a two-part audit process covering both manual review and a fuzzing campaign. +- Discussion: https://discord.gg/s6ybyJDee9 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal seeks to allocate 64,000 USDC to fund security audits for Omnipair prior to its public launch, utilizing Offside Labs for manual audits and Ackee Blockchain Security for fuzz testing. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +The audits will enhance the security and credibility of Omnipair, reassuring stakeholders about the platform's safety before a wider release. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful completion of the audits will position Omnipair for a smoother public launch and facilitate scaling, potentially attracting more users and investors. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Delays or failures in the audit process could expose Omnipair to security vulnerabilities and undermine trust in the platform. + +## Content + +**Proposer:** @rakka\_sol +**Requested:** 64,000 USDC +**Recipient:** Rakka (for audit coordination) +**Purpose:** Fund Omnipair’s security audits before public launch. + +### **Summary** + +After reviewing 9 audit quotations, we’ve selected **Offside Labs** and **Ackee Blockchain Security** for a two-part audit process covering both manual review and a fuzzing campaign. +This proposal allocates **64,000 USDC** to initiate and complete both engagements. + +### **Selected Auditors** + +* **Offside Labs**: specializes in deep, manual audits for Solana programs (past clients include Jupiter, 1inch Jito, Kamino, Meteora and MetaDAO). They’ll conduct a full line-by-line review of Omnipair’s on-chain code. + Offside’s previous audits: [https://github.com/OffsideLabs/reports/tree/public/audits](https://github.com/OffsideLabs/reports/tree/public/audits) +* **Ackee Blockchain Security**: is a leading security firm focused on advanced fuzz testing (creators of Solana’s *Trident* fuzzer). They’ll perform guided fuzzing and integration tests. + An example of their Kamino fuzzing test campaign: [https://x.com/kamino/status/1970536070006616117](https://x.com/kamino/status/1970536070006616117) + + Ackee’s previous audits: [https://github.com/Ackee-Blockchain/public-audit-reports](https://github.com/Ackee-Blockchain/public-audit-reports) + +Together, these audits cover both static and dynamic security risks before Omnipair’s public release. + +Quotations can be found here: [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wkuN9QxpuSr4aESQECsk2z8rGdz2NrYR?usp=sharing](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wkuN9QxpuSr4aESQECsk2z8rGdz2NrYR?usp=sharing) +(Permission granted from auditors to share quotations for DAO transparency). + +### **Execution and Timeline** + +* **Total:** 64,000 USDC +* **Timeline:** 2 weeks for the first audit report, followed by remediation and final report (estimated 3-5 weeks). +* **Disbursement:** 2 tranches: initiation, and completion. +* **Accountability:** Rakka will post public progress updates every 14 days. + +### **Why Now** + +Omnipair is live in closed beta, and approaching full launch. Completing audits now ensures safety, credibility, and readiness for scaling. + +All audits will be invoiced to **Omnipair DAO LLC,** reports and derived work are the sole and exclusive property of Omnipair DAO LLC. + + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Eo4WZMiU6UHwxDh3Tn6ygX5Pmr5xMWeR1bYL1CSqhY1j` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `B3AufDZCDtQN8JxZgJ5bSDZaiKCF4vtw7ynN9tuR9pXN` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3f86fe15 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/JBsHtThHapegcD6T8WfCg13f2yP4fZvLfPLmaWLbEMVQ" +date: 2025-10-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #4 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-10-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/JBsHtThHapegcD6T8WfCg13f2yP4fZvLfPLmaWLbEMVQ + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `JBsHtThHapegcD6T8WfCg13f2yP4fZvLfPLmaWLbEMVQ` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-testing-insert.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-testing-insert.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fa93ba73 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-testing-insert.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing insert" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/6hwnL631bv8qVsrEmwLYDTXzB3gpC4E7qbYSjzhMbvb4" +date: 2025-10-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing insert +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-10-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/6hwnL631bv8qVsrEmwLYDTXzB3gpC4E7qbYSjzhMbvb4 +- Description: m + +## Content + +**TLDR** + +DeFiance Capital proposes to purchase 5% (13.7m CLOUD) of the CLOUD community reserve tokens. As a long-term strategic partner since 2021, we aim to deepen our commitment to Sanctum while continuing to provide strategic value through our extensive network in both crypto and TradFi sectors. + + +**Summary** + +This proposal outlines DeFiance Capital's intention to purchase CLOUD tokens directly from the Sanctum community reserve. Our multi-year partnership has consistently delivered value through capital deployment, strategic introductions, and ecosystem development. This acquisition represents a natural progression of our relationship and aligns our interests further with the Sanctum community's long-term success. + + +**Proposal** + +**About DeFiance Capital** + +Founded by Arthur Cheong (@Arthur\_0x), DeFiance Capital is a prominent crypto investment firm with a strong footprint globally. The firm specializes in liquid token investments with high growth potential, driven by a thesis-based, fundamentally grounded approach. Our investment philosophy centers on identifying and supporting projects that demonstrate strong fundamentals, innovative technology, and the potential for significant ecosystem impact \- with Sanctum being a key example. + +**Background & Partnership History** + +DeFiance Capital and Sanctum have maintained a strong strategic partnership since 2021\. Our relationship began with our initial investment in Sanctum, where we not only provided capital but also leveraged our network to connect the team with other major funds, helping to establish Sanctum's position in the ecosystem. + +**On-going Contributions** + +Our commitment to Sanctum's growth has continued to evolve: + +* **LST Partnership Development**: We facilitated key introductions between Sanctum and various Solana DATs (Digital Asset Treasuries), enabling strategic LST (Liquid Staking Token) partnerships that expanded Sanctum's ecosystem presence. +* **Market Exposure**: We actively encouraged the team to present CLOUD at industry events and worked collaboratively to refine their pitch, increasing exposure to liquid funds and institutional investors. +* **Strategic Advisory**: Ongoing guidance on positioning and growth strategy within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. + +**Future Value Addition** + +DeFiance Capital commits to the following ongoing support: + +1. **Institutional Promotion**: Active promotion of Sanctum's products to our extensive network of crypto funds and traditional finance institutions, opening new channels for adoption and liquidity. +2. **DAT Integration**: Facilitate seamless integration with all major DATs, ensuring Sanctum maintains its competitive edge in the liquid staking landscape. +3. **Strategic Advisory**: Continue providing strategic guidance on product development, partnerships, and market positioning. + +We seek to acquire CLOUD tokens and ensure that the community reserve gains funds that can be strategically deployed in the future. + + +**Operations Details** + +**Acquisition Terms** + +* **Amount**: 13.7M CLOUD (5% of of Community Reserve supply) +* **Price**: $0.12; This is the 30-day TWAP price of CLOUD when we initially submitted the proposal to the Sanctum team +* **Payment Currency:** USDC +* **Payment to**: Sanctum Community Reserve + +**Use of Proceeds** + +The cash raised from this token sale will be transferred to the Sanctum's Community Reserve. This injection of resources will enable Sanctum to accelerate ecosystem development and strengthen its operational capabilities. + +**Transparency & Governance** + +* All transactions will be executed **fully on-chain** +* Complete transparency of token acquisition and holdings +* Adherence to all governance processes established by Sanctum + +**Execution Timeline** + +Upon approval, the acquisition will proceed according to the community's governance timeline with all relevant transaction details made publicly available. + + +**Conclusion** + +This proposal represents a natural deepening of a partnership that has already proven mutually beneficial over multiple years. DeFiance Capital's acquisition of community reserve CLOUD aligns our incentives with the community while ensuring we continue to provide maximum strategic value to Sanctum's growth and success. + +We look forward to the community's feedback and approval of this proposal. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6hwnL631bv8qVsrEmwLYDTXzB3gpC4E7qbYSjzhMbvb4` +- Proposal number: 6 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-proposal-to-test-out-remove-spending-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-proposal-to-test-out-remove-spending-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8da9962c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-proposal-to-test-out-remove-spending-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a proposal to test out remove spending limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/9gRnca9UVoJLrpYLWFnXEPmFbQ1EbAAK155AzxdFRBpP" +date: 2025-10-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-2] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 2 +- Proposal: This is a proposal to test out remove spending limit +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/9gRnca9UVoJLrpYLWFnXEPmFbQ1EbAAK155AzxdFRBpP +- Description: remove_spending_limit + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9gRnca9UVoJLrpYLWFnXEPmFbQ1EbAAK155AzxdFRBpP` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `DHjQLd6LCM4yzZ9e8eabyGofDJLjbouqpuX8wh1rQuBs` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-and-transferring-tokens.md b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-and-transferring-tokens.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b277c56f --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-and-transferring-tokens.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a test for minting and transferring tokens" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/GAHUBQzZbvTpESCkkFbQyim8wB7kgyJsgvHRp2MtidQW" +date: 2025-10-31 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-4] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 4 +- Proposal: This is a test for minting and transferring tokens +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-10-31 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/GAHUBQzZbvTpESCkkFbQyim8wB7kgyJsgvHRp2MtidQW +- Description: Test for minting and transferring tokens + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the functionality of minting tokens and transferring them between accounts. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will have a clearer understanding of the token minting and transfer processes, which may enhance their trust in the system. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could lead to improved token functionality and user engagement, potentially increasing overall usage. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that issues may arise during testing, which could delay the implementation of token operations and affect user confidence. + +## Content + +## This is a test to see if minting and transferring tokens is functional + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `GAHUBQzZbvTpESCkkFbQyim8wB7kgyJsgvHRp2MtidQW` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e9ac650d --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-testing-update-spending-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing update spending limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/DqCf2yhnxkSW9TRabUazP1mFSz2VQDJaDPKPqYu4g9Nu" +date: 2025-11-03 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing update spending limit +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-03 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/DqCf2yhnxkSW9TRabUazP1mFSz2VQDJaDPKPqYu4g9Nu +- Description: testing update spending limit + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the process of updating the spending limit within the Test DAO framework. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience changes in budget management and financial oversight due to the updated spending limits. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successfully updating the spending limit could enhance the DAO's financial flexibility and responsiveness to emerging needs. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the update could lead to mismanagement of funds if not properly monitored or implemented. + +## Content + +testing update spending limit + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DqCf2yhnxkSW9TRabUazP1mFSz2VQDJaDPKPqYu4g9Nu` +- Proposal number: 13 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-spend-limit-removal-ix-inspection.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-spend-limit-removal-ix-inspection.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a2ec0fae --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-spend-limit-removal-ix-inspection.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test for spend limit removal ix inspection" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/bL87QyGojEQn8yxwyEqiwmWRCBqvA6xxYiGM7GXtiQi" +date: 2025-11-03 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test for spend limit removal ix inspection +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-03 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/bL87QyGojEQn8yxwyEqiwmWRCBqvA6xxYiGM7GXtiQi +- Description: this is a test for spend limit removal ix inspection + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to evaluate the removal of spending limits within the Test DAO, focusing on its implications and necessary inspections. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience increased flexibility in fund allocation, allowing for more agile decision-making. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Removing spending limits could enhance operational efficiency and enable quicker responses to opportunities. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a potential risk of mismanagement or overspending without the constraints of a spending limit. + +## Content + +this is a test for spend limit removal ix inspection + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `bL87QyGojEQn8yxwyEqiwmWRCBqvA6xxYiGM7GXtiQi` +- Proposal number: 9 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo-for-fixing-squads-signers.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo-for-fixing-squads-signers.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4a4165be --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo-for-fixing-squads-signers.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test memo for "fixing" squads signers" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3YnEXG837g8josARXam9Yr4N3uGiBvg2rvDGcQrWnUcn" +date: 2025-11-03 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test memo for "fixing" squads signers +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-03 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3YnEXG837g8josARXam9Yr4N3uGiBvg2rvDGcQrWnUcn +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to address issues with the storage of squad signers in the Test DAO system and seeks to implement a solution for improved functionality. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders, particularly squad members, will benefit from more reliable and efficient signer storage. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Improved storage mechanisms could enhance overall operational efficiency and user satisfaction within the DAO. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the proposed changes could lead to unforeseen technical complications or disrupt existing workflows. + +## Content + +## let's see why this didn't store well +- before + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3YnEXG837g8josARXam9Yr4N3uGiBvg2rvDGcQrWnUcn` +- Proposal number: 8 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d8a8f3b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test transfer" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/HyzrVpo634DqpRnZG2HC9npHnNXGBpJVUhchbXoxx1Pg" +date: 2025-11-03 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test transfer +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-03 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/HyzrVpo634DqpRnZG2HC9npHnNXGBpJVUhchbXoxx1Pg +- Description: this is a test transfer + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal outlines a test transfer aimed at evaluating the transfer process within the Test DAO. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will gain insights into the efficiency and reliability of the transfer mechanism. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful execution of the test transfer could streamline future transactions and enhance operational capabilities. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the test transfer may encounter unexpected issues, potentially leading to delays or complications in the process. + +## Content + +this is a test transfer + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `HyzrVpo634DqpRnZG2HC9npHnNXGBpJVUhchbXoxx1Pg` +- Proposal number: 10 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dc9e4a54 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AV7kNC3ZUAiyEHYHVGcA5Dga5VGjN4pdwmp8U8qrfz7u" +date: 2025-11-03 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-03 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AV7kNC3ZUAiyEHYHVGcA5Dga5VGjN4pdwmp8U8qrfz7u +- Description: this is a test + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to conduct a test to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a specific process. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may gain insights into the process's viability, influencing future decision-making. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful outcomes from the test could lead to improvements in operational efficiency and resource allocation. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the test may yield inconclusive results, wasting time and resources. + +## Content + +this is a test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `AV7kNC3ZUAiyEHYHVGcA5Dga5VGjN4pdwmp8U8qrfz7u` +- Proposal number: 12 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-m.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-m.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c71fb281 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-m.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: m" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7ruoZrvJEMd3BGNkkZmG6knaZVJLsS4L2t7hKJGffmU8" +date: 2025-11-04 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: m +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-04 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7ruoZrvJEMd3BGNkkZmG6knaZVJLsS4L2t7hKJGffmU8 +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to enhance community engagement and improve resource allocation within Test DAO. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from increased participation and transparency in decision-making processes. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The initiative could lead to more effective use of resources and stronger community collaboration. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Potential risks include resistance to change from existing members and challenges in implementation. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7ruoZrvJEMd3BGNkkZmG6knaZVJLsS4L2t7hKJGffmU8` +- Proposal number: 14 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal-2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fb42a8aa --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-04-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Test Proposal 2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AxVzFwY23Dv9NtkAMfeNyJGrqXxt9Y6NuxVsB5zsyDsF" +date: 2025-11-04 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Test Proposal 2 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-04 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/AxVzFwY23Dv9NtkAMfeNyJGrqXxt9Y6NuxVsB5zsyDsF +- Description: m + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to implement a new strategy for enhancing community engagement and improving decision-making processes within Test DAO. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience increased participation and transparency in governance activities. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The new strategy could lead to stronger community bonds and more informed decision-making. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of resistance from members who are accustomed to the current processes, potentially hindering implementation. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `AxVzFwY23Dv9NtkAMfeNyJGrqXxt9Y6NuxVsB5zsyDsF` +- Proposal number: 15 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..15dbfbf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/7HmH21uioRETmP6DDJb5aVV5pQksnqnCkVwnD1CsFC3T" +date: 2025-11-06 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-06 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/7HmH21uioRETmP6DDJb5aVV5pQksnqnCkVwnD1CsFC3T + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7HmH21uioRETmP6DDJb5aVV5pQksnqnCkVwnD1CsFC3T` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `8Cwx4yR2sFAC5Pdx2NgGHxCk1gJrtSTxJoyqVonqndhq` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-this-will-be-a-test-for-the-minting-functionality.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-this-will-be-a-test-for-the-minting-functionality.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7ef8b89b --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-06-futardio-proposal-this-will-be-a-test-for-the-minting-functionality.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This will be a test for the minting functionality " +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/BAveZiGCEoVmT1ch3ntPJZCozKcmtQtmNpgyfzuMd8Vc" +date: 2025-11-06 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: This will be a test for the minting functionality +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-11-06 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/BAveZiGCEoVmT1ch3ntPJZCozKcmtQtmNpgyfzuMd8Vc +- Description: Testing mint + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the minting functionality and verify the accuracy of database inserts. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may benefit from improved confidence in the minting process and database integrity. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing can enhance the reliability of the minting feature, potentially attracting more users. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Inaccurate test results could lead to operational issues and undermine trust in the DAO's functionality. + +## Content + +## Again testing the correct DB insert +- also +- let's +- see how +- well this shows up + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `BAveZiGCEoVmT1ch3ntPJZCozKcmtQtmNpgyfzuMd8Vc` +- Proposal number: 7 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-m.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-m.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..38faa78c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-m.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: m" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/DJJV5Vg3e39w1UHJRjcZAwxVvKrip1UuZmVfgC4iZxzJ" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: m +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/DJJV5Vg3e39w1UHJRjcZAwxVvKrip1UuZmVfgC4iZxzJ + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal outlines minimal content, indicating a lack of clear objectives or actionable items. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience confusion or disengagement due to the vague nature of the proposal. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +If clarified and developed, the proposal could foster enhanced engagement and collaboration among members. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +The lack of detailed information may lead to misinterpretation and a failure to achieve desired outcomes. + +## Content + + m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DJJV5Vg3e39w1UHJRjcZAwxVvKrip1UuZmVfgC4iZxzJ` +- Proposal number: 20 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-18.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-18.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0fac11fa --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-18.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #18" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/CvAzf7Fn1Fwyt2z6Mux4bj9ivs86Xaz8A49sLAev2jd4" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #18 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/CvAzf7Fn1Fwyt2z6Mux4bj9ivs86Xaz8A49sLAev2jd4 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `CvAzf7Fn1Fwyt2z6Mux4bj9ivs86Xaz8A49sLAev2jd4` +- Proposal number: 18 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-22.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-22.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d5407a3c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-22.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #22" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/FZJLyiJgkPLzYshrzN8NLiz4WdMbNDNFzHfbJq21F9di" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #22 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/FZJLyiJgkPLzYshrzN8NLiz4WdMbNDNFzHfbJq21F9di + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `FZJLyiJgkPLzYshrzN8NLiz4WdMbNDNFzHfbJq21F9di` +- Proposal number: 22 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-memo.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-memo.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7532d0e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-memo.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Test DB insert for Memo" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3uaBMCQvwTDX6WCy5whqegBerRBqmwvwBmWBjgvhwAUp" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Test DB insert for Memo +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3uaBMCQvwTDX6WCy5whqegBerRBqmwvwBmWBjgvhwAUp + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to implement a database insert function specifically for memos, ensuring efficient data handling and storage. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This initiative will streamline the process for users managing memos, enhancing their overall experience and productivity. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to improved data accessibility and organization, benefiting the entire organization. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Potential risks include data integrity issues during the insert process, which could lead to loss or corruption of memo information. + +## Content + +Test DB insert for Memo + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3uaBMCQvwTDX6WCy5whqegBerRBqmwvwBmWBjgvhwAUp` +- Proposal number: 21 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-mint.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-mint.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..689fb2b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-mint.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: test db insert for mint" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/y9dVPDNTFByFLEdeHmpE4GC8N1ysnpTE1rwRww5wbJj" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-2] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 2 +- Proposal: test db insert for mint +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/y9dVPDNTFByFLEdeHmpE4GC8N1ysnpTE1rwRww5wbJj + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to implement a database insert functionality specifically for minting operations. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This functionality will streamline the minting process, benefiting developers and users by improving efficiency. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could enhance overall system performance and reliability during minting events. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Potential risks include database errors or performance issues that could disrupt the minting process. + +## Content + +test db insert for mint + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `y9dVPDNTFByFLEdeHmpE4GC8N1ysnpTE1rwRww5wbJj` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `DHjQLd6LCM4yzZ9e8eabyGofDJLjbouqpuX8wh1rQuBs` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-remove-spend-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-remove-spend-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1015c852 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-remove-spend-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Test DB insert for remove spend limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2EAgNh8gHAJjnickgJRoSLZHN3LKbhmhpCaXKHt5Kd1y" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Test DB insert for remove spend limit +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2EAgNh8gHAJjnickgJRoSLZHN3LKbhmhpCaXKHt5Kd1y + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test a database insertion process to facilitate the removal of spending limits within the system. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This change may enhance user experience by allowing greater financial flexibility for stakeholders. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successfully implementing this proposal could increase user engagement and satisfaction due to fewer restrictions on spending. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of financial mismanagement or overspending if limits are removed without adequate monitoring. + +## Content + +Test DB insert for remove spend limit + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2EAgNh8gHAJjnickgJRoSLZHN3LKbhmhpCaXKHt5Kd1y` +- Proposal number: 24 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-transfer.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-transfer.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..94d93987 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-test-db-insert-for-transfer.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Test DB insert for transfer" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/HAWJGCLp7VeDhZUugLhLaCh7wpaahngHoUNRwFekNjHN" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Test DB insert for transfer +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/HAWJGCLp7VeDhZUugLhLaCh7wpaahngHoUNRwFekNjHN + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to implement a database insertion process specifically for handling transfers. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders involved in transfer processes will benefit from improved data management efficiency. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could enhance transaction accuracy and reduce processing times. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of data integrity issues if the insertion process is not properly validated. + +## Content + +Test DB insert for transfer + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `HAWJGCLp7VeDhZUugLhLaCh7wpaahngHoUNRwFekNjHN` +- Proposal number: 23 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-db-inserts.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-db-inserts.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..230d3a6d --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-db-inserts.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a test for DB inserts" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/2g8kCL1rwZwyjwK18Fhs3oRUgZx8H27nwnP7at1UzY1N" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-4] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 4 +- Proposal: This is a test for DB inserts +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/2g8kCL1rwZwyjwK18Fhs3oRUgZx8H27nwnP7at1UzY1N +- Description: This is a test for DB inserts + +## Content + +This is a test for DB inserts + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2g8kCL1rwZwyjwK18Fhs3oRUgZx8H27nwnP7at1UzY1N` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-tokens.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-tokens.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a80e262d --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-minting-tokens.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a test for minting tokens" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/3a45qx4Wjm8mLyrrKN88hc7rpBCtLaZZySpGzWHGcFLg" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-2] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 2 +- Proposal: This is a test for minting tokens +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/3a45qx4Wjm8mLyrrKN88hc7rpBCtLaZZySpGzWHGcFLg +- Description: This is a test for minting tokens + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal outlines a test for the minting of tokens to evaluate the minting process and its implications. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience changes in token availability and usage based on the outcomes of the minting test. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful minting could lead to increased token distribution and enhanced engagement within the community. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of technical issues during the minting process that could hinder token functionality or trust in the system. + +## Content + +This is a test for minting tokens + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3a45qx4Wjm8mLyrrKN88hc7rpBCtLaZZySpGzWHGcFLg` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `DHjQLd6LCM4yzZ9e8eabyGofDJLjbouqpuX8wh1rQuBs` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-transferring-tokens.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-transferring-tokens.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..df9158bd --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-for-transferring-tokens.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test for transferring tokens" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/3LL34L6U6B6Y6hAx459aLtLibkaGST8nZbRmdQCoYeM5" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-4] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 4 +- Proposal: this is a test for transferring tokens +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/3LL34L6U6B6Y6hAx459aLtLibkaGST8nZbRmdQCoYeM5 +- Description: this is a test for transferring tokens + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to facilitate the transfer of tokens as part of a testing process. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will have the opportunity to engage with and utilize token transfer mechanisms. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful execution of this test could enhance understanding and functionality of token transfers, benefiting future transactions. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of technical issues or failures during the transfer process that could hinder stakeholder trust and operational efficiency. + +## Content + +this is a test for transferring tokens + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3LL34L6U6B6Y6hAx459aLtLibkaGST8nZbRmdQCoYeM5` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-to-update-spending-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-to-update-spending-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e43ccac3 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-to-update-spending-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a test to update spending limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/DKWB5onK3S6awkgm7VwnkrNpuAnPbsYAWbcTBD15Vroo" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-3] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 3 +- Proposal: This is a test to update spending limit +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/DKWB5onK3S6awkgm7VwnkrNpuAnPbsYAWbcTBD15Vroo +- Description: This is a test to update spending limit + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to update the spending limit for the Test Dao 3, ensuring that financial controls are in place to manage expenditures effectively. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from enhanced financial oversight and increased confidence in the management of funds. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Updating the spending limit could lead to more efficient allocation of resources and improved project funding. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that increasing the spending limit may lead to overspending if not monitored closely. + +## Content + +## This is a test to update spending limit + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DKWB5onK3S6awkgm7VwnkrNpuAnPbsYAWbcTBD15Vroo` +- Proposal number: 5 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fb447b1f --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/69rM1mrWKJKAuBwenPT1smzVtqj4jer3qwTfcCx9ghj4" +date: 2025-11-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-11-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/69rM1mrWKJKAuBwenPT1smzVtqj4jer3qwTfcCx9ghj4 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to evaluate the feasibility of a test initiative and gather insights for future implementations. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will gain insights into the effectiveness of the proposed test initiative. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to enhanced strategies and improved outcomes for future projects. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +The lack of detailed analysis may result in insufficient data to support decision-making. + +## Content + +this is a test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `69rM1mrWKJKAuBwenPT1smzVtqj4jer3qwTfcCx9ghj4` +- Proposal number: 19 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-09-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-09-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..632922d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-09-futardio-proposal-testing-test-proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing Test Proposal" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/Xszzqo2FTGfjyKFpoVFw8rnp3tbgTsrXiDqK1tFZbta" +date: 2025-11-09 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing Test Proposal +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-09 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/Xszzqo2FTGfjyKFpoVFw8rnp3tbgTsrXiDqK1tFZbta +- Description: Here is the description + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to outline a new initiative to enhance community engagement and improve operational efficiency within Test DAO. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from increased participation and a more streamlined decision-making process. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The initiative has the potential to significantly boost member satisfaction and retention rates. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of resource allocation challenges that could hinder the successful implementation of the proposal. + +## Content + +m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Xszzqo2FTGfjyKFpoVFw8rnp3tbgTsrXiDqK1tFZbta` +- Proposal number: 16 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-q.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-q.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..aa0a45c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-q.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: q" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/9jxXK2o4FKLgufC3hoUKFU2jLqPGyVa23MFU1dggCZL5" +date: 2025-11-10 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-2] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 2 +- Proposal: q +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-10 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/9jxXK2o4FKLgufC3hoUKFU2jLqPGyVa23MFU1dggCZL5 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to enhance operational efficiency and improve user engagement within Test Dao 2. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will experience improved processes that could lead to increased satisfaction and participation. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The initiative has the potential to significantly boost overall performance and community involvement. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of resistance to change or implementation challenges that could hinder progress. + +## Content + +q + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9jxXK2o4FKLgufC3hoUKFU2jLqPGyVa23MFU1dggCZL5` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `DHjQLd6LCM4yzZ9e8eabyGofDJLjbouqpuX8wh1rQuBs` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-testing-new-update-spending-limit.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-testing-new-update-spending-limit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..921f48e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-testing-new-update-spending-limit.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing new update spending limit" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/BVmTdeWm7bmQse62jD5WMcPoYsFA6fYiNrBmPrbG2QHV" +date: 2025-11-10 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing new update spending limit +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-10 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/BVmTdeWm7bmQse62jD5WMcPoYsFA6fYiNrBmPrbG2QHV + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test a new spending limit for updates to evaluate its effectiveness and feasibility. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience changes in resource allocation and budget management due to the new spending limit. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Success in testing the spending limit could lead to more efficient use of funds and improved project outcomes. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the new spending limit may hinder necessary updates, potentially leading to project delays or resource shortages. + +## Content + +Testing new update spending limit + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `BVmTdeWm7bmQse62jD5WMcPoYsFA6fYiNrBmPrbG2QHV` +- Proposal number: 25 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-3-params.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-3-params.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..41b01e4c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-3-params.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is updating test-dao-3 params" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/NCYdLgJ1vd8JuMDTGDPUCWtUiLmiC1NTLSKjuE8pzL7" +date: 2025-11-10 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-3] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 3 +- Proposal: this is updating test-dao-3 params +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-10 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/NCYdLgJ1vd8JuMDTGDPUCWtUiLmiC1NTLSKjuE8pzL7 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to update the parameters of Test Dao 3 to improve functionality and governance. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience enhanced decision-making processes and governance due to updated parameters. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The updates could lead to increased efficiency and better alignment with community goals. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a potential risk of resistance from stakeholders who may oppose the changes or feel uninformed. + +## Content + +this is updating test-dao-3 params + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `NCYdLgJ1vd8JuMDTGDPUCWtUiLmiC1NTLSKjuE8pzL7` +- Proposal number: 6 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-4-params-to-auto-pass.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-4-params-to-auto-pass.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6c360d3c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-10-futardio-proposal-this-is-updating-test-dao-4-params-to-auto-pass.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is updating test-dao-4 params to auto pass" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/HLVsFzsVnUQgoamco7z3sJJ1FoEYC9nM3BEndSYZF5fg" +date: 2025-11-10 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-4] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 4 +- Proposal: this is updating test-dao-4 params to auto pass +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-10 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/HLVsFzsVnUQgoamco7z3sJJ1FoEYC9nM3BEndSYZF5fg + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +This proposal aims to update the parameters of Test Dao 4 to enable automatic passing of certain processes. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from streamlined operations due to the automatic passing feature. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The update has the potential to enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention in the decision-making process. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that automation may overlook critical nuances, leading to unintended consequences or errors. + +## Content + +this is updating test-dao-4 params to auto pass + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `HLVsFzsVnUQgoamco7z3sJJ1FoEYC9nM3BEndSYZF5fg` +- Proposal number: 5 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..57c24de7 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test memo" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/5M7qRUdBDfhxRVT8JGPFvRxg3tNpiwtN4BQc2JfxgwBS" +date: 2025-11-11 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test memo +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-11-11 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/5M7qRUdBDfhxRVT8JGPFvRxg3tNpiwtN4BQc2JfxgwBS + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to document and communicate the details of a test memo for Test DAO. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will be informed of the test memo's contents and its relevance to Test DAO's operations. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The positive impact includes enhanced clarity and alignment among stakeholders regarding the test memo's objectives. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a potential risk of misinterpretation if the memo lacks sufficient detail or context. + +## Content + +this is a test memo + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `5M7qRUdBDfhxRVT8JGPFvRxg3tNpiwtN4BQc2JfxgwBS` +- Proposal number: 27 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..31e0a7b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-11-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-transfer.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test transfer" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/De9GJyQEnwnQv6pBk5keCoUT3YVS5jY8ePLTTXoKgRRr" +date: 2025-11-11 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test transfer +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-11-11 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/De9GJyQEnwnQv6pBk5keCoUT3YVS5jY8ePLTTXoKgRRr + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to initiate a test transfer within the DAO to evaluate the transfer process and its effectiveness. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will have the opportunity to observe and assess the efficiency of the transfer mechanism. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful execution of the test transfer could enhance confidence in the DAO's operational procedures and facilitate future transactions. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the test transfer may encounter unforeseen issues, potentially leading to delays or complications in the DAO's operations. + +## Content + +this is a test transfer + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `De9GJyQEnwnQv6pBk5keCoUT3YVS5jY8ePLTTXoKgRRr` +- Proposal number: 26 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-12-futardio-proposal-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-12-futardio-proposal-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..964640f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-12-futardio-proposal-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Umbra-001 - Fund Umbra Security Audits" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/71nYHjLpgY7evn9G4UaGCBd6cYHpGWzrzd3ESs2KUduG" +date: 2025-11-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, umbra] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Umbra +- Proposal: Umbra-001 - Fund Umbra Security Audits +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/71nYHjLpgY7evn9G4UaGCBd6cYHpGWzrzd3ESs2KUduG + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal seeks $105,000 USDC to fund security audits by Halborn for Umbra before its mainnet launch, ensuring the integrity of ZK circuits and the Anchor program. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +The approval of this proposal will directly benefit the Umbra development team and its users by enhancing the security of the platform before launch. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful audits could significantly boost user confidence and mitigate risks associated with vulnerabilities in the code, potentially leading to increased adoption. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +Delays in the audit process or unexpected findings could jeopardize the timeline for the mainnet launch, impacting project momentum and stakeholder trust. + +## Content + +**Proposer:** Kru +**Requested:** 105,000 USDC +**Recipient:** Kru (for audit coordination) +**Purpose:** Security audits for Umbra before mainnet + +### **Summary** + +We are in the final stages of Umbra going live on mainnet alongside Arcium and we’ve spent the last month evaluating different audit partners. So far the best partner for us seems to be Halborn. This proposal looks to initiate a spend of $105,000 USDC for the same. + +**About Halborn** + +* **Founded:** 2019 +* **Focus:** Cybersecurity and auditing firm +* **Value Secured:** Over **$1 trillion** in digital assets +* **Clients:** 600+ across exchanges, custody infrastructure, and blockchains + +* ### Solana Ecosystem Security Work: Conducted **audits for Solana Foundation, Solana Labs, and Anza**. + +* ### Reviewed 150K+ lines of code across SPL programs and Layer-1 components. + +**Goal** + +* Halborn will secure and verify both ZK circuits and Anchor program before Arcium mainnet launch. + +### **Challenges and scope as highlighted by Halborn** +### Challenges + +* Two codebases nearing completion, with ZK circuits ready for audit and Solana programmes following within weeks. +* No prior external audit of Umbra’s cryptographic logic \- high need for independent ZK \+ Rust review. +* Tight launch window (\~30 days) creates risk without parallel audit execution and structured issue tracking. +* Complex dependencies on Arcium’s evolving MPC infra make code freeze and scoping fluid. +* Global, remote team (India \+ Spain) requires timezone-aligned engineering collaboration and rapid feedback loops + +* **Scope Includes** + * Software, System & Process design advisory + * Technical & Security Overview + * Penetration Testing & Source Code Security Assessment + * Mobile Application Security Assessment + * Red Team Exersice ( OpSec ) + * Cloud Security Assessment + + +You can read more about the payment terms and scope of work here: [(Halborn Retainer Doc](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vKMGEAI_m0nyABQQkNffKNVcETRO35M3/view?usp=drivesdk)). + +### **Execution and Timeline** + +* **Total:** $105,000 +* **Disbursement:** + * Upfront: $35,000 + * The remaining balance of $70,000 shall be paid upon the earlier of: + * (a) Approval of the payment and release of funds allocated to Umbra + * (b) Delivery of the draft report by Halborn to Client. +* **Timeline:** 35 Days +* **Note:** To ensure we can meet our launch timelines Kru will be making an upfront payment of $35000 to help us proceed with the engagement with Halborn without any delays + + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `71nYHjLpgY7evn9G4UaGCBd6cYHpGWzrzd3ESs2KUduG` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `BLkBSE96kQys7SrMioKxeMiVbeo4Ckk2Y4n1JphKxYnv` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..21b8497e --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DAxuUHwkLm5rQyFjx8Cnm28bBuApUL9pBrxAMnr8i3VU" +date: 2025-11-21 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-21 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/DAxuUHwkLm5rQyFjx8Cnm28bBuApUL9pBrxAMnr8i3VU + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DAxuUHwkLm5rQyFjx8Cnm28bBuApUL9pBrxAMnr8i3VU` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `AE7jPb9jYzbUE5GYJToKvXaRkJL2Q7Mm3Ek6KqyBGuxe` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-ix-for-minting-a-non-base-mint-token.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-ix-for-minting-a-non-base-mint-token.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..def8af0a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-ix-for-minting-a-non-base-mint-token.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a test IX for minting a non base mint token" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/BSXRezN7ySoX2Hf6pqU5R3PnQjB4xZ1nJwGwoU4K1ECT" +date: 2025-11-21 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-4] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 4 +- Proposal: This is a test IX for minting a non base mint token +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-21 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/BSXRezN7ySoX2Hf6pqU5R3PnQjB4xZ1nJwGwoU4K1ECT + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to establish a process for minting a non-base mint token and to test the functionalities associated with it. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will gain access to new minting capabilities that can diversify token offerings. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could enhance the ecosystem by introducing innovative token types and attracting more users. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the new minting process could encounter technical issues or regulatory challenges, potentially undermining trust in the platform. + +## Content + +This is a test IX for minting a non base mint token + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `BSXRezN7ySoX2Hf6pqU5R3PnQjB4xZ1nJwGwoU4K1ECT` +- Proposal number: 6 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-text-mint-ix-for-the-new-mint-ix.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-text-mint-ix-for-the-new-mint-ix.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8d74baf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-21-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-text-mint-ix-for-the-new-mint-ix.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: This is a text mint IX for the new mint IX" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/88BZwgGux4mm1anUcYzbQFZpcbPfbFzzZUyMb2JqgM1M" +date: 2025-11-21 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-3] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 3 +- Proposal: This is a text mint IX for the new mint IX +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-21 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/88BZwgGux4mm1anUcYzbQFZpcbPfbFzzZUyMb2JqgM1M + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal seeks to introduce a new mint IX, emphasizing its unique attributes and intended purpose. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may benefit from enhanced offerings and innovation within the mint IX framework. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The introduction of the new mint IX could lead to increased engagement and interest from the community. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the proposal may not resonate with stakeholders, potentially leading to reduced participation or support. + +## Content + +This is a text mint IX for the new mint IX + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `88BZwgGux4mm1anUcYzbQFZpcbPfbFzzZUyMb2JqgM1M` +- Proposal number: 7 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-22-futardio-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-22-futardio-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d21a500c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-22-futardio-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Burn team performance package" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/zklsol/proposal/CYr2YPr7MEUHZrdRs6ZbHMKXVBHPAwR4aocvwnUzHoj2" +date: 2025-11-22 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, zklsol] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: ZKLSOL +- Proposal: Burn team performance package +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-22 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/zklsol/proposal/CYr2YPr7MEUHZrdRs6ZbHMKXVBHPAwR4aocvwnUzHoj2 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The ZKLSOL team proposes to burn the entire performance package to align interests with community holders, emphasizing commitment to the MetaDAO process. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +This proposal aims to enhance trust and alignment between the team and holders by eliminating the performance package. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Burning the performance package could lead to increased community confidence and engagement, potentially driving project success. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +The decision to burn the performance package may lead to dissatisfaction among team members if future performance is not adequately rewarded. + +## Content + +# Burn team performance package + +The team behind ZKLSOL (now turbine.cash) want to ensure maximum community / holders alignment. + +We initially left the performance package at default since we felt that the 18 month cliff is long enough to make changes long before it arrives. + +And this is the first and major change, burning the entire performance package. + +We believe that when we deliver success, the holders and us will be aligned to ensure a fair performance package. + +We believe in MetaDAO process from begining to end, hence we raise this proposal. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `CYr2YPr7MEUHZrdRs6ZbHMKXVBHPAwR4aocvwnUzHoj2` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `5FPGRzY9ArJFwY2Hp2y2eqMzVewyWCBox7esmpuZfCvE` +- Proposer: `GZFj6uESDHUQJCZXErvSWPeg6UB6FZFBmw675RRfSB7X` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..708024db --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #8" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/B618aWVhhVW5cEaLAggPo9MNaN7iCBMXP9M8zU11Yqqv" +date: 2025-11-24 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #8 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-24 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/B618aWVhhVW5cEaLAggPo9MNaN7iCBMXP9M8zU11Yqqv + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `B618aWVhhVW5cEaLAggPo9MNaN7iCBMXP9M8zU11Yqqv` +- Proposal number: 8 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e6fe8ce8 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-24-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing grpc" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/CZZnYfoVKG2Xmcnwga4y748wiGft7YRdxBMP2Lexjhcy" +date: 2025-11-24 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-3] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 3 +- Proposal: testing grpc +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-24 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/CZZnYfoVKG2Xmcnwga4y748wiGft7YRdxBMP2Lexjhcy + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to explore the functionality and performance of gRPC technology in testing environments. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may benefit from improved efficiency and performance in communication between services. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation of gRPC testing could lead to enhanced system integration and faster development cycles. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of encountering compatibility issues or learning curves associated with adopting new technology. + +## Content + +testing grpc + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `CZZnYfoVKG2Xmcnwga4y748wiGft7YRdxBMP2Lexjhcy` +- Proposal number: 9 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md b/inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f104b8ea --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Buyback Loyal Up To NAV " +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/loyal/proposal/2VjKHNQdkLfHtoH1GtPVseJv1kP3VUoLGcZLc29SttgS" +date: 2025-11-26 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, loyal] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Loyal +- Proposal: Buyback Loyal Up To NAV +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-11-26 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/loyal/proposal/2VjKHNQdkLfHtoH1GtPVseJv1kP3VUoLGcZLc29SttgS +- Description: If passed, $1.5M USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase LOYAL tokens with a maximum price set as 0.238 per token. + +## Content + +**Type:** Operations Direct Action +**Author(s):** Loyal Team And Community Members + +If passed, $1.5M USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase LOYAL tokens with a maximum price set as 0.238 per token. + +## Motivation + +While LOYAL is sitting below NAV, our treasury is an arbitrage opportunity for adversarial capital. We want to protect the treasury against liquidation and ensure we can continue building our vision. + +This allocation of capital would allow us: +\- Protect our holders who want to see us build our vision. +\- Accumulate tokens for OTC deals without increasing the supply. + +We raised more than our initial cap, and allocating this capital does not slow down our development. We expect a significant part of the allocated funds remain unspent. We’ll pull them back with an additional proposal. + +## Logistics + +$1.5M of treasury funds will be used to purchase \`LYLikzBQtpa9ZgVrJsqYGQpR3cC1WMJrBHaXGrQmeta\` (LOYAL) tokens with a maximum price set as 0.238 per token. These orders will be placed every five minutes over a period of 30 days (for a total of 8640 orders). + +The price per token was established by taking the total funds raised minus two months of operating expenses. It does not account for any trading fees accrued from liquidity. + +## Specifications + +Amount: $1.5M +Order Type: Recurring +Order Quantity: 8640 +Order Frequency: 5 minutes +Maximum Order Price: 0.238 +Effective Time Horizon: 30 days +Estimated Loyal Purchased: 6.3M assuming full use of buyback facility at maximum order price + +## Process + +This proposal includes instructions to execute a Jupiter recurring order as stated above. + +NOTE: + +- Any funds remaining in the order (should it fail to complete its total number of orders in quantity) will remain in the DCA account until there is another proposal to cancel the order. +- All LOYAL tokens will be transferred to the DAO’s treasury: AQyyTwCKemeeMu8ZPZFxrXMbVwAYTSbBhi1w4PBrhvYE + +## Redemption/Buyback cooldown period + +No new buyback or redemption proposals shall be submitted or executed for 90 days following the end of this buyback program + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2VjKHNQdkLfHtoH1GtPVseJv1kP3VUoLGcZLc29SttgS` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `GxpJkPEsPmuRCCTNnfZaDKg4X3gf4ZPgmqgFqtibaPtK` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-4.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3207f14d --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing grpc indexer 4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3e9MN5V4nmWzJbVP7LQVgC6m6TR164A8RH8dwjk7Epkw" +date: 2025-12-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing grpc indexer 4 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-12-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3e9MN5V4nmWzJbVP7LQVgC6m6TR164A8RH8dwjk7Epkw + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +- The proposal aims to test the gRPC indexer functionality to enhance performance and reliability. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +- Stakeholders may experience improved data indexing and retrieval processes, leading to more efficient operations. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +- Successful testing could significantly enhance the overall system performance, benefiting all users of the Test DAO platform. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +- There is a risk of encountering technical issues during testing that could delay deployment or impact existing operations. + +## Content + +testing grpc indexer 4 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3e9MN5V4nmWzJbVP7LQVgC6m6TR164A8RH8dwjk7Epkw` +- Proposal number: 31 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v2.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..952ef57c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v2.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing grpc indexer v2" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2ZjxcwFHBp7mp7fxCWgpKzFkX4iAX56VyZbhVhTWS6to" +date: 2025-12-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing grpc indexer v2 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2025-12-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/2ZjxcwFHBp7mp7fxCWgpKzFkX4iAX56VyZbhVhTWS6to + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +- The proposal aims to test the new gRPC indexer version 2 for improved performance and functionality. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +- Stakeholders may experience enhanced data retrieval and processing capabilities through the updated indexer. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +- Successful implementation could lead to increased efficiency and speed in data handling, benefiting overall system performance. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +- There is a risk of encountering unforeseen technical issues that could disrupt current operations during the testing phase. + +## Content + +testing grpc indexer v2 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2ZjxcwFHBp7mp7fxCWgpKzFkX4iAX56VyZbhVhTWS6to` +- Proposal number: 29 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v3.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ed89925d --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer-v3.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing grpc indexer v3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/ASJddqr5UMocRZmgowGp73uTETF9Kw9mu2rNhAovn3ix" +date: 2025-12-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing grpc indexer v3 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-12-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/ASJddqr5UMocRZmgowGp73uTETF9Kw9mu2rNhAovn3ix + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +- The proposal aims to test the functionality and performance of the gRPC indexer version 3. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +- Stakeholders may experience improved data retrieval and processing efficiency if the testing is successful. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +- Successful testing could lead to enhanced system performance and user satisfaction with the indexer. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +- There is a risk that testing may reveal significant issues that could delay implementation or necessitate further development. + +## Content + +testing grpc indexer v3 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `ASJddqr5UMocRZmgowGp73uTETF9Kw9mu2rNhAovn3ix` +- Proposal number: 30 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..efc4605a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc-indexer.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing grpc indexer" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/56JRY3EVNvGtSPvx3ykGcgbReh6os9tGKK1CikqsgN2q" +date: 2025-12-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-4] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 4 +- Proposal: testing grpc indexer +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-12-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-4/proposal/56JRY3EVNvGtSPvx3ykGcgbReh6os9tGKK1CikqsgN2q + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the gRPC indexer to evaluate its functionality and performance in data indexing. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from improved data indexing capabilities, enhancing overall system efficiency. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful implementation could lead to faster data retrieval and processing, improving user experience. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of encountering integration issues that could disrupt existing systems during the testing phase. + +## Content + +testing grpc indexer + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `56JRY3EVNvGtSPvx3ykGcgbReh6os9tGKK1CikqsgN2q` +- Proposal number: 7 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0f6eacf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-02-futardio-proposal-testing-grpc.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing grpc" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/DcVUBEEmKbHqYLheDFT1PGa3krUzG6v5ySHBCgLXX4it" +date: 2025-12-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-3] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 3 +- Proposal: testing grpc +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-12-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-3/proposal/DcVUBEEmKbHqYLheDFT1PGa3krUzG6v5ySHBCgLXX4it + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal focuses on testing gRPC to ensure its functionality and performance. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from improved reliability and efficiency in system communications. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing of gRPC could lead to enhanced application performance and user satisfaction. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that unforeseen issues may arise during testing, potentially delaying implementation. + +## Content + +testing grpc + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DcVUBEEmKbHqYLheDFT1PGa3krUzG6v5ySHBCgLXX4it` +- Proposal number: 10 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-32.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-32.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b0a48c72 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-32.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #32" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/A9thiFVQjUgp8cTJxnyQWGNdAse68mmKuebX4T58iK4m" +date: 2025-12-19 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #32 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-12-19 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/A9thiFVQjUgp8cTJxnyQWGNdAse68mmKuebX4T58iK4m + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `A9thiFVQjUgp8cTJxnyQWGNdAse68mmKuebX4T58iK4m` +- Proposal number: 32 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..182207d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-proposal-8.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #8" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8R6CSiDgYoHpRBXNmJy3jJB3gmq1pbMkgd2qEg4FSd9L" +date: 2025-12-19 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #8 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-12-19 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8R6CSiDgYoHpRBXNmJy3jJB3gmq1pbMkgd2qEg4FSd9L + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8R6CSiDgYoHpRBXNmJy3jJB3gmq1pbMkgd2qEg4FSd9L` +- Proposal number: 8 +- DAO account: `j6Hx7bdAzcj1NsoRBqdafFuRkgEU48QeZ1i5NVXz9fF` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-test.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-test.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..447d34d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-19-futardio-proposal-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: test" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/6fJBg3YLRuauvvAAPXv4fgEPtT5xmUrLi7E3n6B6Ayb8" +date: 2025-12-19 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao-2] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test Dao 2 +- Proposal: test +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-12-19 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao-2/proposal/6fJBg3YLRuauvvAAPXv4fgEPtT5xmUrLi7E3n6B6Ayb8 + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +- The proposal aims to introduce a new initiative under the title "test" to improve functionalities within Test Dao 2. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +- Stakeholders may experience enhanced engagement and operational efficiency due to the proposed changes. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +- Successful implementation could lead to increased user satisfaction and participation within the Test Dao 2 community. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +- There is a potential risk of resistance from stakeholders who may be hesitant to adopt new processes or changes. + +## Content + +test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6fJBg3YLRuauvvAAPXv4fgEPtT5xmUrLi7E3n6B6Ayb8` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `AE7jPb9jYzbUE5GYJToKvXaRkJL2Q7Mm3Ek6KqyBGuxe` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1eefbc91 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Liquidity Adjustment Proposal" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/loyal/proposal/GXdWao4Cy6EsvvS9atMb1kCPEAFwPXBe5kKCeLDtRJNm" +date: 2025-12-23 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, loyal] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Loyal +- Proposal: Liquidity Adjustment Proposal +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-12-23 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/loyal/proposal/GXdWao4Cy6EsvvS9atMb1kCPEAFwPXBe5kKCeLDtRJNm +- Description: If passed, 90% of tokens remaining in the single-sided Meteora DAMM v2 pool will be withdrawn and burned. USDC withdrawn will remain in the project's treasury. + +## Content + +**Type:** +**Author(s): community members.** + +If passed, 90% of tokens remaining in the [single-sided Meteora DAMM v2 pool](https://www.meteora.ag/dammv2/BGg7WsK98rhqtTp2uSKMa2yETqgwShFAjyf1RmYqCF7n) will be withdrawn and burned. USDC withdrawn will remain in the project's treasury. + +### **Motivation** + +As stated by the community members: The single-sided DAMM pool does not provide price support and creates unnecessary selling pressure. Withdrawing and burning the tokens would reduce the circulating supply and result in a better price. + +Withdrawing the full liquidity and closing the position would cause visibility issues with some apps and Dexscreener as they don’t index Futarchy AMM pool at the moment of writing. Therefore, we propose to withdraw 90% of the tokens in the pool. + +**Note from the MetaDAO team:** If, at the time of execution, fewer than 809,995 LOYAL tokens are withdrawn from the Meteora pool, the SPL burn instruction will fail. To prevent that, 50% of the withdrawn tokens will be burned, and the remaining 50% will be held to be burned under a subsequent proposal. + +### **Specification** + +* Pool address: *BGg7WsK98rhqtTp2uSKMa2yETqgwShFAjyf1RmYqCF7n* +* Total LOYAL amount: 809,995 + +### **Process** + +1. Withdraw 809,995 LOYAL tokens remaining in the single-sided Meteora DAMM v2 pool. +2. Execute SPL *burn* instruction. + + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `GXdWao4Cy6EsvvS9atMb1kCPEAFwPXBe5kKCeLDtRJNm` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `GxpJkPEsPmuRCCTNnfZaDKg4X3gf4ZPgmqgFqtibaPtK` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-proposal-11.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-proposal-11.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..70a01085 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-proposal-11.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #11" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/AZBxfjwyRBET6GNujAWd2WV4svVHMUbo6SFCMqKrKMUT" +date: 2025-12-23 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #11 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2025-12-23 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/AZBxfjwyRBET6GNujAWd2WV4svVHMUbo6SFCMqKrKMUT + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `AZBxfjwyRBET6GNujAWd2WV4svVHMUbo6SFCMqKrKMUT` +- Proposal number: 11 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-to-v6-migration.md b/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-to-v6-migration.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..cf44c7ce --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-to-v6-migration.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing v5 to v6 migration" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/45gE3jiEuCMmkcV3xS7QP21sE5iA26FJ19TZ89DDXdwE" +date: 2025-12-23 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing v5 to v6 migration +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2025-12-23 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/45gE3jiEuCMmkcV3xS7QP21sE5iA26FJ19TZ89DDXdwE +- Description: test migration + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the migration process from version 5 to version 6 for existing squad vaults, including the USDC, mint authority, and metadata update authority. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will be directly affected by changes in the vault management and authority structures during the migration process. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful migration could enhance the functionality and security of the DAO's vault management systems. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of disruptions or errors during the migration that could affect access to or the integrity of the vaults. + +## Content + +testing migration of existing squads vault USDC, mint authority and metadata update authority + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `45gE3jiEuCMmkcV3xS7QP21sE5iA26FJ19TZ89DDXdwE` +- Proposal number: 11 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-02-futardio-proposal-omnibus-proposal-migrate-and-update.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-02-futardio-proposal-omnibus-proposal-migrate-and-update.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e8416dd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-02-futardio-proposal-omnibus-proposal-migrate-and-update.md @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/Bzoap95gjbokTaiEqwknccktfNSvkPe4ZbAdcJF1yiEK" +date: 2026-01-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, metadao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: MetaDAO +- Proposal: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/Bzoap95gjbokTaiEqwknccktfNSvkPe4ZbAdcJF1yiEK +- Description: This proposal migrates and updates the existing DAO to the new program and updated agreements. +- Discussion: https://discord.gg/S6Mhem2cFx + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to migrate liquidity from Meteora to FutarchyAMM, amend the existing Operating Agreement and Master Services Agreement, and burn 60k META tokens previously held in trust. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from a more agile and legally sound structure that aligns with the evolving requirements of the DAO and its operations. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The migration to FutarchyAMM is expected to enhance liquidity and reduce capital constraints for future proposals, thereby facilitating better project funding. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the increased spending limit could lead to financial mismanagement or overspending if not closely monitored. + +## Content + +**Author**: Kollan and Proph3t + +**Category**: Operations Direct Action + +**Summary** + +A new onchain DAO with the following settings: + +- Pass threshold 300 bps +- Team pass threshold \-300 bps +- Spending limit $240k/mo +- Stake Required 200k META + +Transfer 11,223,550.91146 USDC + +Migrating liquidity from Meteora to FutarchyAMM + +Amending the Marshall Islands DAO Operating Agreement + +Modifying the existing Master Services Agreement between the Marshall Islands DAO and the Wyoming LLC + +Burn 60k META tokens which were kept in trust for proposal creation and left over from the last fundraise. + +The following will be executed upon passing of this proposal + +1. Sign the Amended Operating Agreement +2. Sign the updated Master Services Agreement +3. Migrate Balances and Authorities to New Program (and DAO) +4. Provide Liquidity to New FutarchyAMM +5. Burn 60k META tokens (left over from liquidity provisioning and the raise) + +**Background** + +*Legal Structure* + +When setting up the DAO LLC in early 2024, we did so with information on hand. As we have evolved, we have developed and adopted a more agile structure that better conforms with legal requirements and better supports futarchy. This is represented by the number of businesses launching using MetaDAO. MetaDAO must adopt these changes and this proposal accomplishes that. + +Additionally, we are updating the existing Operating Agreement of the Marshall Islands DAO LLC (MetaDAO LLC) to align it with the existing operating agreements of the newest organizations created on MetaDAO. You can review this agreement at the link below. + +[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MgvX338xMrrypI10i5nXloc6WNqbBOH65qsjcHzNLKE](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MgvX338xMrrypI10i5nXloc6WNqbBOH65qsjcHzNLKE/edit?tab=t.0) + +We are also updating the Master Services Agreement between MetaDAO LLC and Organization Technology LLC. This updates the contracted services and agreement terms and conditions to reflect the more mature state of the DAO post revenue and to ensure arms length is maintained. You can review this updated services agreement below. + +[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wq1gv9OKOPohOqsTRlemNhD29gjhhRgu8IFhgpICJtM](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wq1gv9OKOPohOqsTRlemNhD29gjhhRgu8IFhgpICJtM) + +*Program And Settings* + +We have updated our program to v0.6.1. This includes the FutarchyAMM and changes to proposal raising. To align MetaDAO with the existing Ownership Coins this proposal will cause the DAO to migrate to the new program and onchain account. + +This proposal adopts the team based proposal threshold of \-3%. This is completely configurable for future proposals and we believe that spearheading this new development is paramount to demonstrate to founders that, while futarchy currently favors investors, these new changes relieve some of the friction currently felt. For additional context read: [https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/1979243370452258837?s=20](https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/1979243370452258837?s=20) + +In parallel, the new DAO is configured with an increased spending limit. We will continue to operate with a small team and maintain a conservative spend, but front loaded legal cost, audits and integration fees mandate an increased flexible spend. This has been set at $240k per month, but the expected consistent expenditure is less, therefore while the limit is set, we currently do not expect to utilize all of it each month. Unspent funds do not roll over. + +By moving to the new program raising proposals will be less capital constrained, have better liquidity for conditional markets and bring MetaDAO into the next chapter of ownership coins (i.e. dashboards and data tracking). + +This new DAO is already created for the benefit of the programmatic transfer of assets and authorities. With details below. + +*Authorities* + +This proposal sets the update and mint authority to the new DAO within its instructions. + +*Assets* + +This proposal transfers the \~11M USDC to the new DAO within its instructions. + +*Liquidity* + +Upon passing, we’ll remove 90% of liquidity from Meteora DAMM v1 and reestablish a majority of the liquidity under FutarchyAMM (under the control of the DAO). + +*Supply* + +We had a previous supply used to create proposals (providing META and USDC liquidity) and an additional amount left over from the fundraise which was kept to ensure proposal creation. Given the new FutarchyAMM this 60k META supply is no longer needed and will be burned. + +**Specifications** + +Existing DAO: Bc3pKPnSbSX8W2hTXbsFsybh1GeRtu3Qqpfu9ZLxg6Km + +Squads: [BxgkvRwqzYFWuDbRjfTYfgTtb41NaFw1aQ3129F79eBT](https://app.squads.so/squads/BxgkvRwqzYFWuDbRjfTYfgTtb41NaFw1aQ3129F79eBT/home) + +Meteora LP: [AUvYM8tdeY8TDJ9SMjRntDuYUuTG3S1TfqurZ9dqW4NM](https://www.orbmarkets.io/token/AUvYM8tdeY8TDJ9SMjRntDuYUuTG3S1TfqurZ9dqW4NM?cluster=) (475,621.94309) \~$2.9M + +Passing Threshold: 150 bps + +Spending Limit: $120k + +New DAO: CUPoiqkK4hxyCiJcLC4yE9AtJP1MoV1vFV2vx3jqwWeS + +Squads: [BfzJzFUeE54zv6Q2QdAZR4yx7UXuYRsfkeeirrRcxDvk](https://app.squads.so/squads/BfzJzFUeE54zv6Q2QdAZR4yx7UXuYRsfkeeirrRcxDvk/home) + +Team Address: 6awyHMshBGVjJ3ozdSJdyyDE1CTAXUwrpNMaRGMsb4sf (Squads Multisig) + +Passing Threshold: 300 bps + +Team Passing Threshold: \-300 bps + +Spending Limit: $240k + +FutarchyAMM LP: TBD but 90% of the above LP + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Bzoap95gjbokTaiEqwknccktfNSvkPe4ZbAdcJF1yiEK` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `Bc3pKPnSbSX8W2hTXbsFsybh1GeRtu3Qqpfu9ZLxg6Km` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f51c5b81 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-07-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/EPZ94yBTW4zgs6ZrduwwtsVwJvoS3swoo8GrkiBTZgTb" +date: 2026-01-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/EPZ94yBTW4zgs6ZrduwwtsVwJvoS3swoo8GrkiBTZgTb + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `EPZ94yBTW4zgs6ZrduwwtsVwJvoS3swoo8GrkiBTZgTb` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `7WnY1TZLfpxxTEbi1LN5JwKohuu49mE2sJpgZTSdmneH` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-12.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-12.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ca7c0d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-12.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #12" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/ALWLPUuSjMbimLXiitMD5QDB35BYCPNjbw6KBjD9vrhb" +date: 2026-01-08 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #12 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-08 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/ALWLPUuSjMbimLXiitMD5QDB35BYCPNjbw6KBjD9vrhb + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `ALWLPUuSjMbimLXiitMD5QDB35BYCPNjbw6KBjD9vrhb` +- Proposal number: 12 +- DAO account: `DMB74TZgN7Rqfwtqqm3VQBgKBb2WYPdBqVtHbvB4LLeV` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-33.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-33.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5d71c9b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-33.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #33" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/FcmMiNZQL9wpWFi5Hyc2u9Hrs1AWGh7NXnSSb6gykkLC" +date: 2026-01-08 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #33 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-08 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/FcmMiNZQL9wpWFi5Hyc2u9Hrs1AWGh7NXnSSb6gykkLC + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `FcmMiNZQL9wpWFi5Hyc2u9Hrs1AWGh7NXnSSb6gykkLC` +- Proposal number: 33 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ab2c5314 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-08-futardio-proposal-proposal-4.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #4" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/5xLJcrtWpdkRL75dRMLs6zB5gAuNW25VQT95SEDhMx7U" +date: 2026-01-08 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #4 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-08 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/5xLJcrtWpdkRL75dRMLs6zB5gAuNW25VQT95SEDhMx7U + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `5xLJcrtWpdkRL75dRMLs6zB5gAuNW25VQT95SEDhMx7U` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `AE7jPb9jYzbUE5GYJToKvXaRkJL2Q7Mm3Ek6KqyBGuxe` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2abd827e --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/4TKTgoXf2oM92aEmgbBN6vsW2ceC3CqEeYnYsxfHecjT" +date: 2026-01-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/4TKTgoXf2oM92aEmgbBN6vsW2ceC3CqEeYnYsxfHecjT + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4TKTgoXf2oM92aEmgbBN6vsW2ceC3CqEeYnYsxfHecjT` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `1PAwyDkWNFCcR96GhEReXHJBv3YEFVazCaQgNicVuKv` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..58348b72 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-5.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #5" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/7LRNcA2emNCKcM9LDtuaHnCh7qjVGa8H9ccEycyjMB96" +date: 2026-01-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #5 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/7LRNcA2emNCKcM9LDtuaHnCh7qjVGa8H9ccEycyjMB96 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7LRNcA2emNCKcM9LDtuaHnCh7qjVGa8H9ccEycyjMB96` +- Proposal number: 5 +- DAO account: `AE7jPb9jYzbUE5GYJToKvXaRkJL2Q7Mm3Ek6KqyBGuxe` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-6.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-6.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..531720d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-6.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #6" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6V4Bh5wEWPxPmA9r6Lc3NMFRcdYtuJ3R6qCib5st7YSA" +date: 2026-01-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #6 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6V4Bh5wEWPxPmA9r6Lc3NMFRcdYtuJ3R6qCib5st7YSA + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6V4Bh5wEWPxPmA9r6Lc3NMFRcdYtuJ3R6qCib5st7YSA` +- Proposal number: 6 +- DAO account: `AE7jPb9jYzbUE5GYJToKvXaRkJL2Q7Mm3Ek6KqyBGuxe` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-7.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-7.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3efb97d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-proposal-7.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #7" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/4Lab6QfYUWmx6nfzNzHK7ErgR47WVZ9XJ8QNdmsNtK8L" +date: 2026-01-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #7 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/4Lab6QfYUWmx6nfzNzHK7ErgR47WVZ9XJ8QNdmsNtK8L + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4Lab6QfYUWmx6nfzNzHK7ErgR47WVZ9XJ8QNdmsNtK8L` +- Proposal number: 7 +- DAO account: `AE7jPb9jYzbUE5GYJToKvXaRkJL2Q7Mm3Ek6KqyBGuxe` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-rngr-2m-buyback.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-rngr-2m-buyback.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..db56792c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-12-futardio-proposal-rngr-2m-buyback.md @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: RNGR $2M Buyback" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/6cdhy4j6CAAJjE1z2iQDsFda2BrqJkhtHrRWT9QasSoa" +date: 2026-01-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, ranger] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Ranger +- Proposal: RNGR $2M Buyback +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/6cdhy4j6CAAJjE1z2iQDsFda2BrqJkhtHrRWT9QasSoa +- Description: If passed, $2M USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase RNGR tokens with a maximum price set to $0.78 per token (current NAV). + +## Content + +**Type** + +Operations Direct Action + +**Author(s)** + +Community Members + +**Summary** + +If passed, $2M USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase RNGR tokens with a maximum price set to $0.78 per token (current NAV). + +**Motivation** + +As RNGR is trading at a much larger discount to NAV than other curated MetaDao launches, our treasury is exposed to a greater risk of being exploited by arbitrage from adversarial capital. We want to protect the treasury against liquidation and ensure the Ranger team can build out their vision. + +This allocation of capital would allow us: +⁃ Improve overall sentiment regarding Ranger +⁃ Protect our holders and team alike by addressing the risk of a treasury liquidation + +Ranger raised 2 million more than the initial cap, and allocating this capital should not slow down the development. In the case that allocated funds remain unspent. The team can pull them back with an additional proposal. + +**Logistics** + +$ 2M of treasury funds will be used to purchase `RNGRtJMbCveqCp7AC6U95KmrdKecFckaJZiWbPGmeta` (RNGR) tokens with a maximum price set at $0.78 per token. These orders will be placed every five minutes. The buyback will go on for an indefinite period until the allocated funds are exhausted (estimated 30+ Days). + +The price per token reflects the current net asset value per token. + +**Specifications** + +Amount: $ 2M + +Order Type: Recurring + +Order Quantity: 8640 + +Order Frequency: 5 minutes + +Maximum Order Price: 0.78 + +Estimated RNGR Purchased: 2.5 M, assuming full use of the buyback facility at the maximum order price + +**Process** + +This proposal includes instructions to execute a Jupiter recurring order as stated above. + +[Squads Transaction](https://app.squads.so/squads/55H1Q1YrHJQ93uhG4jqrBBHx3a8H7TCM8kvf2UM2g5q3/transactions/6JEUbBQqXLsi1dynDGnw2gs9j1ZfFZ58UdNTK74yVs9k) + +[Simulation](https://explorer.solana.com/tx/inspector?squadsTx=6JEUbBQqXLsi1dynDGnw2gs9j1ZfFZ58UdNTK74yVs9k) + +**NOTE:** +Any funds remaining in the order (should it fail to complete its total number of orders in quantity) will remain in the DCA account until there is another proposal to cancel the order. + +All RNGR tokens will be transferred to the DAO treasury + +**Redemption/Buyback cooldown period** + +No new buyback or redemption proposals shall be submitted or executed for 90 days following the passing of this proposal + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6cdhy4j6CAAJjE1z2iQDsFda2BrqJkhtHrRWT9QasSoa` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `1PAwyDkWNFCcR96GhEReXHJBv3YEFVazCaQgNicVuKv` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-burn-442m-unclaimed-kyros-airdrop-allocation.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-burn-442m-unclaimed-kyros-airdrop-allocation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fef420c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-burn-442m-unclaimed-kyros-airdrop-allocation.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Burn 4.42M unclaimed KYROS airdrop allocation" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/kyros/proposal/GH8DFQjiSd9VwCZxzb3kzU2Jpx5JFC9gn8JNGKHfjrYa" +date: 2026-01-13 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, kyros] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Kyros +- Proposal: Burn 4.42M unclaimed KYROS airdrop allocation +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-13 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/kyros/proposal/GH8DFQjiSd9VwCZxzb3kzU2Jpx5JFC9gn8JNGKHfjrYa +- Description: ## TL;DR + +**Proposal:** Burn 4,421,077 unclaimed KYROS from the airdrop. We believe this will reinforces long-term alignment and avoids supply-leakage to disengaged users. + +**If this proposal passes:** The burn will be executed by burning the tokens through the DAO. It will be done transparently and verifiably on-chain within a maximum of two week after the end of the proposal voting window. +- Discussion: https://t.me/KyrosFi + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to burn 4,421,077 unclaimed KYROS from the initial airdrop allocation to reduce the total supply and enhance the value proposition for long-term holders. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Long-term KYROS holders may benefit from a reduced supply, potentially increasing the value of their holdings. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Burning the unclaimed tokens is expected to decrease the fully diluted valuation (FDV), making KYROS more appealing to potential investors. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +The decision to burn tokens could alienate some users who may have claimed their airdrop in the future, possibly impacting community sentiment. + +## Content + +## **Overview** + +Burn **4,421,077** unclaimed KYROS from the initial airdrop allocation. + +## **Background:** + +On 13/10/2025, Kyros launched its token KYROS. + +As part of the TGE, 12.5M KYROS (25% of total supply at launch) were allocated to a retroactive airdrop. Eligibility was based on three main categories: + +- 64% — Linear points program (”Warchest”): rewarded users for holding Kyros assets, with multipliers for participating in specific DeFi strategies. +- 16% — Community quests (“The Village”): rewarded users who completed specific DeFi tasks within the Kyros ecosystem. +- 20% — Early users: allocated to users who supported Kyros from day one (those that were the first to bring TVL to the project) and were instrumental to its growth. + +3 months after TGE, 4,379,383 kyKYROS (around 4.42M KYROS) remain unclaimed. This represents approximately 38.25% of the total airdrop allocation. + +This proposal seeks to burn the entire unclaimed amount. + +## Rationale + +If a user has not claimed its airdrop after this period, it’s a strong signal that: + +- they do not follow Kyros closely, +- the allocation was insignificant to them, or +- they do not intend to be long-term holders. + +All in all, we believe this shows these users are unlikely to be long-term value-adding members to Kyros. Rewarding those type of users is misaligned with the purpose of the airdrop and does not benefit overall KYROS holders. + +**Why burn the tokens instead of keeping it in DAO Treasury?** + +Kyros already designed its tokenomics to meet its current and mid-term needs. + +Additionally, the mint authority has been fully delegated to MetaDAO Futarchy. This means that if Kyros ever needs more tokens in the future, they can be minted under transparent governance. So ultimately, there is no benefit in absorbing unclaimed tokens into treasury. + +For all of those reasons, we believe that burning those tokens is the best option to favor long term KYROS holders. This will reduce FDV with the goal of making KYROS more appealing to investors. + +## **Rundown of Numbers** + +- **Current total supply:** 50,000,000 KYROS +- **Initial airdrop allocation:** 12,500,000 KYROS +- **Unclaimed airdrop to burn:** 4,421,077 KYROS +- **New total supply after burn:** 45,578,923 KYROS + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `GH8DFQjiSd9VwCZxzb3kzU2Jpx5JFC9gn8JNGKHfjrYa` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `GE4TQSsX9hAuCeMuBJcbnzXEMueG3heUCg8UtNsBvPY2` +- Proposer: `govMW5J778RSNyTcp3mEogfpqrpfrmDgRy2yWD2ohVr` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e26bf184 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Testing v5 -> v6 migration" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/8e4ZcgFeBVgu7w9tsmUu5PKzdraTUiiHkYypYeQAdjy4" +date: 2026-01-13 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Testing v5 -> v6 migration +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-13 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/8e4ZcgFeBVgu7w9tsmUu5PKzdraTUiiHkYypYeQAdjy4 +- Description: Testing v5 -> v6 migration + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to facilitate the migration from version 5 to version 6 of the testing framework to improve functionality and performance. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will need to adapt to the new version, which may require additional training or adjustments in their workflows. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +The migration is expected to enhance testing efficiency and reliability, leading to improved overall project outcomes. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of compatibility issues or bugs during the migration process that could disrupt ongoing projects. + +## Content + +Testing v5 -> v6 migration + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8e4ZcgFeBVgu7w9tsmUu5PKzdraTUiiHkYypYeQAdjy4` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `5j4BeewbwoepQCXGsvk8nnkbi4DCXaw5XEzT9XUnzQ6` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-umbra-road-to-mainnet-operational-expansion.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-umbra-road-to-mainnet-operational-expansion.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fb51bfc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-futardio-proposal-umbra-road-to-mainnet-operational-expansion.md @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Umbra: Road to Mainnet & Operational Expansion" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/3seyB3i5bLQcUReaQoLkgwkNbVH7U7nnfiAFVaNawU6F" +date: 2026-01-13 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, umbra] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Umbra +- Proposal: Umbra: Road to Mainnet & Operational Expansion +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-13 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/3seyB3i5bLQcUReaQoLkgwkNbVH7U7nnfiAFVaNawU6F + +## Content + +**Authors:** Abbas & Kru +**Category:** Project Update & Governance Proposal +**Proposal Threshold:** -3% (team-based) +**Requested:** $150,000 (audit) + $100,000/month (operations) +**Purpose:** Mainnet launch preparation, security audits, and operational expansion + +### **Summary** + +As we approach the final stretch of development for Umbra, we are defining a concrete timeline for our Mainnet launch. This proposal focuses on finalizing security audits, establishing core DAO parameters, and expanding our operational budget for legal, accounting, and security monitoring. + +**Note:** MetaDAO will execute the migration instructions asynchronously. These specific migration actions will not appear in the standard proposal simulation. + +## 1. The Launch Timeline + +### **Private Mainnet (Next Week)** + +* **Rollout Rate:** Weekly cohorts of 100 users. Priority for November/December registrants and top token holders. Selected users will receive a DM with a unique access code and TestFlight download link. +* **Platforms:** TestFlight (iOS), Android APK, and Web Extension. +* **Access Control:** 6-digit alphanumeric one-time use password sent to verified registrants. +* **Safety Limits:** $500 deposit limit during this phase to minimise risk while validating the system in a live environment. + +### **Public Mainnet (February)** + +Following the private phase and final audits, Public Mainnet launches in February. Deposit limits and access gating will be lifted. + +## 2. Governance Proposal: Security, Audit, and Operations + +### **A. Codebase Evolution & Final Security Audit** + +Since December, the Umbra codebase has matured significantly. We have moved beyond our initial architecture to ship a version that is substantially faster and smoother, featuring an expanded feature set designed for a superior user experience. + +Given our tight launch timeline, we solicited expedited quotes from three top-tier firms, receiving proposals ranging from $150k to $370k. + +* **Vendor:** Halborn Security +* **Cost:** $150,000 +* **Scope:** Complete stress test of ZK circuits and Solana program logic +* **Why Halborn:** Returning partner with deep context on our architecture, enabling fast and precise execution +* **Details:** SOW from Halborn Security attached for verification. Upon passing this proposal, final invoices and transaction details will be shared in the governance forum. + +You can read more about the scope of work here: [(Halborn SOW)](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jerTUAxQ1Kqrhvb9IfPCo-hXFbCdV7oG/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=115428837088195762250&rtpof=true&sd=true) + +### **B. Operational Budget Increase** + +**Requested Monthly Limit:** $100,000 + +This increase is driven by three key initiatives: + +#### **1. Enhanced Security with Groom Lake** +* **Cost:** $8,750/month (included in the $100k total) +* **Purpose:** Identify security gaps and enhance security posture across the organization +* **Scope:** Incident Response, Security Engineering, and Intelligence services +* **Details:** GL operatives will integrate with the team and unburden Umbra team members from security initiatives + +You can read more about the scope of work here: [(Groom Lake SOW)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vVfl7sCkL9rB3elDCEaT9doEcJ4ogTBE/view?usp=drive_link) + +#### **2. Legal Advisory & Accounting** +* **Vendor:** Ascent Partners +* **Cost:** $6,000/month (included in the $100k total) +* **Scope of Services:** + * **Core Accounting:** Bookkeeping, Financial Statements, and Payment Support + * **Transparency & Insight:** Transparency Reporting and Internal Financial Dashboards + * **Strategy & Compliance:** Budgeting, Account Policy Creation, Tax Planning, and Account Risk Management + +You can read more about the scope of work here: [(Ascent Partners SOW)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AOj-pDwZBLzHPw6i8UQB_qSfsOmIssrH/view?usp=sharing) + +#### **3. Initial Anonymity Set Seeding** +* **Cost:** $50,000 USDC +* **Purpose:** Bootstrap the anonymity set to ensure privacy guarantees are effective from Day 1, providing early users with immediate privacy coverage + +### **Trusted Setup** + +To ensure the highest standard of cryptographic security for the Umbra privacy protocol, we are adopting a robust multi-stage trusted setup: + +* **Phase 1:** Utilizing output of the Perpetual Powers of Tau ceremony (industry benchmark for universal setups) +* **Phase 2:** Hybrid contribution model: + * **Lower-constraint circuits:** Web-based contribution interface for community participation + * **Higher-constraint circuits:** CLI-based ceremony with Umbra technical team and prominent ecosystem leaders + +**Special thanks to Kollan, Proph3t & MetaDAO team for making this proposal possible.** + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3seyB3i5bLQcUReaQoLkgwkNbVH7U7nnfiAFVaNawU6F` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `BLkBSE96kQys7SrMioKxeMiVbeo4Ckk2Y4n1JphKxYnv` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-pays-225k-buyback.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-pays-225k-buyback.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e7fe691c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-pays-225k-buyback.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: PAYS $225k Buyback" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/paystream/proposal/7nBSHmeTi2KXZMYmcynZVNm38KvaLP7FUuGSsU7nxG17" +date: 2026-01-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, paystream] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Paystream +- Proposal: PAYS $225k Buyback +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/paystream/proposal/7nBSHmeTi2KXZMYmcynZVNm38KvaLP7FUuGSsU7nxG17 +- Description: If passed, $225k USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase Pays tokens with a maximum price set as 0.065 per token. + +## Content + +**Type** + +Operations Direct Action + +**Author(s)** + +Community Members + +**Summary** + +If passed, $225k USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase Pays tokens with a maximum price set as 0.065 per token. + +**Motivation** + +While Pays is sitting below NAV, our treasury is an arbitrage opportunity for adversarial capital. We want to protect the treasury against liquidation and ensure we can continue building our vision while also protecting the tokenholders. + +This allocation of capital would allow us: + +- Protect our holders who want to see us build our vision. + +- Accumulate tokens for OTC deals without increasing the supply. + +**Logistics** + +$225k of treasury funds will be used to purchase `PAYZP1Wy3UmdEsNLJwmH61TNqACYJTvhXy8SCN4Tmeta` (Pays) tokens with a maximum price set as 0.065 per token. These orders will be placed every five minutes over a period of 15 days (for a total of 4500 orders). + +The price per token was established by taking the total funds raised minus two months of operating expenses. It does not account for any trading fees accrued from liquidity. + +**Specifications** + +Amount: $225k + +Order Type: Recurring + +Order Quantity: 4500 + +Order Frequency: 5 minutes + +Maximum Order Price: 0.065 + +Effective Time Horizon: 15 days + + +**NOTE:** + +Any funds remaining in the order (should it fail to complete its total number of orders in quantity) will remain in the DCA account until there is another proposal to cancel the order. + +All Pays tokens will be transferred to the DAO treasury + +**Redemption/Buyback cooldown period** + +No new buyback or redemption proposals shall be submitted or executed for 90 days following upon succesfull implementation of this proposal + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7nBSHmeTi2KXZMYmcynZVNm38KvaLP7FUuGSsU7nxG17` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `6FRXzTe3HajL8Fwmmkupp8g3y3wn3g3QEjj8sABndre3` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dc0949c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #1" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/CVTekSB5HrzRG5WFEeEN8Zn4GfEriGHSm2r6QvuSRyy5" +date: 2026-01-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #1 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/CVTekSB5HrzRG5WFEeEN8Zn4GfEriGHSm2r6QvuSRyy5 + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `CVTekSB5HrzRG5WFEeEN8Zn4GfEriGHSm2r6QvuSRyy5` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `6FRXzTe3HajL8Fwmmkupp8g3y3wn3g3QEjj8sABndre3` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-34.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-34.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..53f90e28 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-34.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #34" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8nLhjLcyDk8dzzy12BVZqoC1nKySstWpsw2Ays2nBHZy" +date: 2026-01-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #34 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/8nLhjLcyDk8dzzy12BVZqoC1nKySstWpsw2Ays2nBHZy + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8nLhjLcyDk8dzzy12BVZqoC1nKySstWpsw2Ays2nBHZy` +- Proposal number: 34 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-35.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-35.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..37849dae --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-35.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #35" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6t6tFaGkKpjJfzka4NawLXVgmWSbaXEpF4cssx1biLym" +date: 2026-01-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #35 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6t6tFaGkKpjJfzka4NawLXVgmWSbaXEpF4cssx1biLym + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6t6tFaGkKpjJfzka4NawLXVgmWSbaXEpF4cssx1biLym` +- Proposal number: 35 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-36.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-36.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..22ea10c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-proposal-36.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #36" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6HFsy5P464T8bekf7srtiKH8pDy4AEAGRxkkJo8Vjsmo" +date: 2026-01-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #36 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6HFsy5P464T8bekf7srtiKH8pDy4AEAGRxkkJo8Vjsmo + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6HFsy5P464T8bekf7srtiKH8pDy4AEAGRxkkJo8Vjsmo` +- Proposal number: 36 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7e91be3a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: ZKFG $200k Buyback" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/zklsol/proposal/4P35jGwheMhNCk1UNfeTdMYUfrSWyV41sFwWeMLAV7zx" +date: 2026-01-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, zklsol] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: ZKLSOL +- Proposal: ZKFG $200k Buyback +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2026-01-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/zklsol/proposal/4P35jGwheMhNCk1UNfeTdMYUfrSWyV41sFwWeMLAV7zx +- Description: If passed, $200k USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase ZKFG tokens with a maximum price set as 0.082 per token. + +## Content + +**Type** + +Operations Direct Action + +**Author(s)** + +Community Members + +**Summary** + +If passed, $200k USDC of treasury funds will be used to purchase ZKFG tokens with a maximum price set as 0.082 per token. + +**Motivation** + +While ZKFG is sitting below NAV, our treasury is an arbitrage opportunity for adversarial capital. We want to protect the treasury against liquidation and ensure we can continue building our vision while also protecting the tokenholders. + +This allocation of capital would allow us: + +- Protect our holders who want to see us build our vision. + +- Accumulate tokens for OTC deals without increasing the supply. + +**Logistics** + +$200k of treasury funds will be used to purchase `ZKFHiLAfAFMTcDAuCtjNW54VzpERvoe7PBF9mYgmeta` (ZKFG) tokens with a maximum price set as 0.082 per token. These orders will be placed every five minutes over a period of ~14 days (for a total of 4000 orders). + +The price per token was established by taking the total funds raised minus two months of operating expenses. It does not account for any trading fees accrued from liquidity. + +**Specifications** + +Amount: $200k + +Order Type: Recurring + +Order Quantity: 4000 + +Order Frequency: 5 minutes + +Maximum Order Price: 0.082 + +Effective Time Horizon: ~14 days + + +**NOTE:** + +Any funds remaining in the order (should it fail to complete its total number of orders in quantity) will remain in the DCA account until there is another proposal to cancel the order. + +All ZKFG tokens will be transferred to the DAO treasury + +**Redemption/Buyback cooldown period** + +No new buyback or redemption proposals shall be submitted or executed for 90 days following upon succesfull implementation of this proposal. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `4P35jGwheMhNCk1UNfeTdMYUfrSWyV41sFwWeMLAV7zx` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `5FPGRzY9ArJFwY2Hp2y2eqMzVewyWCBox7esmpuZfCvE` +- Proposer: `ELT1uRmtFvYP6WSrc4mCZaW7VVbcdkcKAj39aHSVCmwH` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-19-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-19-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4c853cdf --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-19-futardio-proposal-testing-v5-v6-migration.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing v5 -> v6 migration" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/24dKKE5bopY54T9UkCRJL55XQPCPWyPcUL1n3o5nQx9y" +date: 2026-01-19 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing v5 -> v6 migration +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2026-01-19 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/24dKKE5bopY54T9UkCRJL55XQPCPWyPcUL1n3o5nQx9y +- Description: yeah + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to facilitate the migration from version 5 to version 6 of the system, ensuring improved performance and enhanced features. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders will benefit from an upgraded system that could improve usability and efficiency. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful migration could lead to better user satisfaction and increased adoption rates. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of potential downtime or issues during the migration process that could disrupt operations. + +## Content + +here + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `24dKKE5bopY54T9UkCRJL55XQPCPWyPcUL1n3o5nQx9y` +- Proposal number: 12 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-38.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-38.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..17883151 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-proposal-38.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #38" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/2Q6RqniH4PLGX1E9XfqLhmwmkKuJepEAnwQMZwYCBN8c" +date: 2026-01-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #38 +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/2Q6RqniH4PLGX1E9XfqLhmwmkKuJepEAnwQMZwYCBN8c + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `2Q6RqniH4PLGX1E9XfqLhmwmkKuJepEAnwQMZwYCBN8c` +- Proposal number: 38 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-test.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-test.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ab4c5a0a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Test" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7s5S8kYyXUnECCwE4bLhjS6XLJ1DKV53Y7LGpfqJWS9a" +date: 2026-01-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: Test +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7s5S8kYyXUnECCwE4bLhjS6XLJ1DKV53Y7LGpfqJWS9a +- Description: test + +## Content + +yeah it's a test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7s5S8kYyXUnECCwE4bLhjS6XLJ1DKV53Y7LGpfqJWS9a` +- Proposal number: 37 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..31f8535a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-20-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: this is a test" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7kVh37KZ4xN3EhvtrTY7y2tFkkz1vwx74kDj3pPWbEDx" +date: 2026-01-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: this is a test +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-01-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/7kVh37KZ4xN3EhvtrTY7y2tFkkz1vwx74kDj3pPWbEDx + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test a new initiative within the Test DAO framework, focusing on evaluating its feasibility and effectiveness. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may gain insights into the initiative's viability, which can inform future decision-making. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful testing could lead to improved strategies and increased engagement within the DAO. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk that the test may not yield significant results, potentially leading to wasted resources and time. + +## Content + +this is a test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `7kVh37KZ4xN3EhvtrTY7y2tFkkz1vwx74kDj3pPWbEDx` +- Proposal number: 39 +- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-22-futardio-proposal-fund-meta-market-making.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-22-futardio-proposal-fund-meta-market-making.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0b230c22 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-22-futardio-proposal-fund-meta-market-making.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Fund META Market Making" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/8PHuBBwqsL9EzNT1PXSs5ZEnTVDCQ6UcvUC4iCgCMynx" +date: 2026-01-22 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, metadao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: MetaDAO +- Proposal: Fund META Market Making +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-22 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/8PHuBBwqsL9EzNT1PXSs5ZEnTVDCQ6UcvUC4iCgCMynx +- Description: We are requesting $1M and 600,000 META (~2.8% of supply) to engage market makers for the META token. + +## Content + +**Type** +Operations Direct Action + +**Author(s)** +Kollan House, Arad + +**Summary** +We are requesting $1M and 600,000 newly minted META (\~2.8% of supply) to engage market makers for the META token. Most of this is expected to be issued as loans rather than as a direct expense. This would cover at least the next 12 months. + +At the end of 12 months, unless contradicted via future proposal, all META would be burned and all USDC would be returned to the treasury. + +We plan to engage Humidifi, Flowdesk, and potentially one more market maker for the META/USDC pair. + +This supply also allows for CEX listing fees, although we would negotiate those terms aggressively to ensure best utilization. How much is given to each exchange and market maker is at our discretion. + +**Background** +Liquidity begets liquidity. Deeper books attract more participants, and META requires additional liquidity to allow more participants to trade it. For larger investors, liquidity depth is a mandatory requirement for trading. Thin markets drive up slippage at scale. + +Market makers can jumpstart this flywheel and is a key component of listing. + +**Specifications** +As stated in the overview, we reserve the right to negotiate deals as we see fit. That being said, we expect to pay $50k to $80k a month to retain market makers and give up to $500k in USDC and 300,000 META in loans to market makers. We could see spending up to 300,000 META to get listed on exchanges. KPIs for these market makers at a minimum would include: + +Uptime: \>95% +Depth (±) \<=2.00%: \~40% Loan utilization +Bid/Ask Spread: \<0.3% +Monthly reporting + +We plan to stick to the retainer model. + +We also plan on strategically working with exchanges: we are aware that once you get one T1 exchange, the dominos start to fall more easily. + +The USDC and META tokens will be transferred to a multisig [3fKDKt85rxfwT3A1BHjcxZ27yKb1vYutxoZek7H2rEVE](https://app.squads.so/squads/3fKDKt85rxfwT3A1BHjcxZ27yKb1vYutxoZek7H2rEVE/home) for the purposes outlined above. It is a 2/3 multisig. With the following members: + +- Proph3t +- Kollan House +- Jure (Pileks) + +[Squads Transaction](https://app.squads.so/squads/BfzJzFUeE54zv6Q2QdAZR4yx7UXuYRsfkeeirrRcxDvk/transactions/B9FYHwnXvwKWSXoaf74Y45ZbHRhr153kVmbp2UPWwi8F) +[Squads Transaction Simulation](https://explorer.solana.com/tx/inspector?squadsTx=B9FYHwnXvwKWSXoaf74Y45ZbHRhr153kVmbp2UPWwi8F) +[Transaction Simulation](https://explorer.solana.com/tx/inspector?message=AQABBp6RvaMUMNkdkh9hPeRuuUPOF%252BLw3zIQo3ql%252B9A%252FGARlBS7TVnLcMhxK7cBJrdCL%252FD9KPfAsGKCwNItz0%252FQEG9PJ3qBgVV%252BB401%252FQm0lxQ6RrnBOPA%252FoTY%252FexPG9RIdKu4OXWbhc68aODhWZIcoGbf8Ad%252Boa8LwvaCVSCPcBz%252FI45OtKkS%252BFHu5GqThXixfWRfSRkpcIOI4ZZrZtBag4RsIG3fbh12Whk9nL4UbO63msHLSF7V9bN5E6jPWFfv8AqYUr7jKLslDCGmYjYNvqW03NKsPaArkWO%252FJt2rCs33U8AgUDAQIACQcAcMmyiwAAAAUDAwQACQMAEKXU6AAAAA%253D%253D) + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8PHuBBwqsL9EzNT1PXSs5ZEnTVDCQ6UcvUC4iCgCMynx` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `CUPoiqkK4hxyCiJcLC4yE9AtJP1MoV1vFV2vx3jqwWeS` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-23-futardio-proposal-testing-migration-to-raydium.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-23-futardio-proposal-testing-migration-to-raydium.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..597cbdfa --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-23-futardio-proposal-testing-migration-to-raydium.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: testing migration to raydium" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/8H1zUg1tEZBNboySNXWsmuYpPuBzTRhddDJVZnqQHnmk" +date: 2026-01-23 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: testing migration to raydium +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2026-01-23 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/8H1zUg1tEZBNboySNXWsmuYpPuBzTRhddDJVZnqQHnmk +- Description: test + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal aims to test the migration of assets to the Raydium platform to evaluate performance and user experience. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders could benefit from improved transaction efficiency and access to new liquidity pools. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful migration may enhance overall trading volume and user engagement on the Test DAO platform. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a risk of technical issues or integration challenges that could disrupt operations during the migration process. + +## Content + +test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8H1zUg1tEZBNboySNXWsmuYpPuBzTRhddDJVZnqQHnmk` +- Proposal number: 13 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-26-futardio-proposal-test-migration-v5-v6.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-26-futardio-proposal-test-migration-v5-v6.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3aa70e35 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-26-futardio-proposal-test-migration-v5-v6.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: test migration v5 -> v6" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9i87cRhZtCL9qtJ5ghZubpRSx96TWAtTTVN1EJox1eCL" +date: 2026-01-26 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Test DAO +- Proposal: test migration v5 -> v6 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-01-26 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/9i87cRhZtCL9qtJ5ghZubpRSx96TWAtTTVN1EJox1eCL +- Description: test + +## Summary + +### 🎯 Key Points +The proposal outlines the migration process from version 5 to version 6 of the Test DAO system, aiming to improve functionality and performance. + +### 📊 Impact Analysis +#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact +Stakeholders may experience enhanced system capabilities and user experience following the migration. + +#### 📈 Upside Potential +Successful migration could lead to increased efficiency and satisfaction among users. + +#### 📉 Risk Factors +There is a potential risk of downtime or data loss during the migration process, which could disrupt operations. + +## Content + +test + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `9i87cRhZtCL9qtJ5ghZubpRSx96TWAtTTVN1EJox1eCL` +- Proposal number: 14 +- DAO account: `9NCPLEFgiu4XZdp9wtWMc1mXyY26VGeWsoKHCAPP3bAo` +- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a781e275 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-02-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6MGyFXnTKTWNEc5FYvADPKW7LJ7YvaqFT6AykbchrPxr" +date: 2026-02-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Removed +- Created: 2026-02-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/6MGyFXnTKTWNEc5FYvADPKW7LJ7YvaqFT6AykbchrPxr + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `6MGyFXnTKTWNEc5FYvADPKW7LJ7YvaqFT6AykbchrPxr` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `1PAwyDkWNFCcR96GhEReXHJBv3YEFVazCaQgNicVuKv` +- Proposer: `Cmior7xUXSdG86LHjmKqt6kMeK62L3Wnr6wsk7LK2dNR` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..df251da7 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-06-futardio-proposal-proposal-3.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Proposal #3" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/54eAuD8NKHvJy7WurCwZirFEJfVvmH6cz8yYPDWpwLTc" +date: 2026-02-06 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Unknown +- Proposal: Proposal #3 +- Status: Failed +- Created: 2026-02-06 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/unknown/proposal/54eAuD8NKHvJy7WurCwZirFEJfVvmH6cz8yYPDWpwLTc + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `54eAuD8NKHvJy7WurCwZirFEJfVvmH6cz8yYPDWpwLTc` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `5FPGRzY9ArJFwY2Hp2y2eqMzVewyWCBox7esmpuZfCvE` +- Proposer: `4qpV8yy3j1JvfDrQ3kwYZqQyhU614bqmxgK1qzn2GJ15` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-07-futardio-proposal-zkfg-restructuring-proposal.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-07-futardio-proposal-zkfg-restructuring-proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bbc02152 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-07-futardio-proposal-zkfg-restructuring-proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: ZKFG Restructuring Proposal" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/zklsol/proposal/Gte4BCXKvQdzzN8sXMCXNwvKdrYSUHkTQWZVA8DECM2y" +date: 2026-02-07 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, zklsol] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: ZKLSOL +- Proposal: ZKFG Restructuring Proposal +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-02-07 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/zklsol/proposal/Gte4BCXKvQdzzN8sXMCXNwvKdrYSUHkTQWZVA8DECM2y +- Description: If passed, this proposal would allocate up to 500,000 USDC to buy ZKFG at prices up to $0.076. And move 50% of the liquidity from the FutarchyAMM to the treasury. + +## Content + +**Type** + +Operations Direct Action + +**Author(s)** + +Proph3t + +**Summary** + +If passed, this proposal would allocate up to 500,000 USDC to buy ZKFG at prices up to $0.076. And move 50% of the liquidity from the FutarchyAMM to the treasury. + +**Motivation** + +When an ownership coin trades at a significant discount to NAV, the right thing to do is to do buybacks until it gets there. We communicate this to projects beforehand: you can raise more, but the money you raise will be at risk. + +Almost since inception, ZKFG has traded at a discount to NAV. It’s clear that today there is not $1M of demand for ZKFG. + +The market can change - at the later stages, Tesla came back from being [“within weeks of bankruptcy”](https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2018/11/28/elon-musk-said-tesla-was-single-digit-weeks-from-deathwheres-the-disclosures/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) and went on to grow their stock price 30-fold; at the earlier stages, Airbnb had great difficulty raising their first round of funding - but this is where it’s at today. + +We are proposing a big potential buyback in order to bring the system back into equilibrium and buy out the non-believers at accretive prices for the believers. + +**Logistics** + +500,000 USDC of treasury funds would go into a DCA order to purchase  `ZKFHiLAfAFMTcDAuCtjNW54VzpERvoe7PBF9mYgmeta` (ZKFG) at a maximum price of 0.076 USDC per token. These orders will be placed every five minutes over a period of ~14 days (for a total of 4000 orders). + +The NAV per token was established by taking the 150,000 USDC in the treasury’s AMM position, the 575,000 USDC sitting in the treasury, the negligible amount of non-treasury cash (the estimate I got from the founder), and dividing by the 9,500,000 ZKFG in circulation. + +This proposal would move 50% of the liquidity in the FutarchyAMM to the treasury to be used for future operations. + +**Specifications** + +Amount: 500,000 USDC + +Order Type: Recurring + +Order Quantity: 4000 + +Order Frequency: 5 minutes + +Maximum Order Price: 0.076 + +Effective Time Horizon: ~14 days + +**NOTE:** + +Any funds remaining in the order (should it fail to complete its total number of orders in quantity) will go back to the treasury at the end of 14 days. + +All ZKFG tokens will be transferred to the treasury. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Gte4BCXKvQdzzN8sXMCXNwvKdrYSUHkTQWZVA8DECM2y` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `5FPGRzY9ArJFwY2Hp2y2eqMzVewyWCBox7esmpuZfCvE` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bd71a092 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: OMFG-003 Migrate To V0.6" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/3zsLbaVTYkJb7a4ETyxLeedemkrFkFi3MiJketcRNXDS" +date: 2026-02-16 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, omnipair] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Omnipair +- Proposal: OMFG-003 Migrate To V0.6 +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-02-16 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/3zsLbaVTYkJb7a4ETyxLeedemkrFkFi3MiJketcRNXDS +- Description: If passed, this proposal migrates Omnipair's liquidity and DAO to the MetaDAO v0.6 program. + +## Content + +**Proposer:** @rakka\_sol + +**Action:** Liquidity migration + +**Purpose:** Governance alignment + +### **Summary** + +If passed, this proposal migrates Omnipair's liquidity and DAO to the MetaDAO v0.6 program. + +100% of liquidity currently held in the [Raydium CPMM pool](https://solscan.io/account/2WNhaB6TPyZ3ynJjAUM4ZZ1Hdeep8FJ3A76FjGjTVjjS) will be withdrawn and reallocated: 90% to an OMFG/USDC futarchyAMM pool, and 10% to a Meteora DAMM V2 pool. + +### **Details** + +At the time of Omnipair’s token launch, the futarchyAMM had not yet been deployed and its liquidity was established on Raydium. The proposed migration brings Omnipair’s governance structure fully up-to-date. + +The migration to a new DAO carries with it the following configuration changes: + +- A team address for use in protocol team-sponsored proposals +- Team-sponsored proposals with a negative pass threshold of \-300 bps +- Community-driven proposals with a 300 bps pass threshold +- Base stake requirement of 1.5M OMFG tokens + +It also accepts the upcoming program update which allows for optimistic governance, enabling one-off expenses up to 3x the spending limit to be enqueued and executed after a 3-day contestation period. + +If contested, the transfer enters the traditional proposal process as a team-sponsored proposal. + +### **Execution** + +This proposal has a custom migration contract you can review the source code for [here](https://github.com/metaDAOproject/programs/pull/426/changes). It will unwind the liquidity on Raydium and initialize the futarchyAMM as well as set up the Meteora pool and transfer USDC funds from the existing Squads to the new DAO Squads. + +Pool address: 2WNhaB6TPyZ3ynJjAUM4ZZ1Hdeep8FJ3A76FjGjTVjjS + +New DAO address: s45fTDhkzKPMFbNmUXA3bJNdF92z5cbVvHdY8LpznWQ + +FutarchyAMM address: s45fTDhkzKPMFbNmUXA3bJNdF92z5cbVvHdY8LpznWQ + +**Why Now** + +As Omnipair enters its post-launch phase, this migration aligns our liquidity and governance with the most up-to-date infrastructure and ensures efficient decision-making going forward. + + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `3zsLbaVTYkJb7a4ETyxLeedemkrFkFi3MiJketcRNXDS` +- Proposal number: 3 +- DAO account: `B3AufDZCDtQN8JxZgJ5bSDZaiKCF4vtw7ynN9tuR9pXN` +- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2` +- Autocrat version: 0.5 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-02-futardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-02-futardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a3167fd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-02-futardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Liquidate Ranger Finance" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/DPATwR2HLcGZCBZCTffzagV4r7dp5FF2C9aJmiuCDUpS" +date: 2026-03-02 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, ranger] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Ranger +- Proposal: Liquidate Ranger Finance +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-03-02 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/DPATwR2HLcGZCBZCTffzagV4r7dp5FF2C9aJmiuCDUpS +- Description: If passed, this proposal would do the following: + +1. Remove all RNGR / USDC liquidity from Futarchy AMM +2. Send all of the treasuries USDC to the MetaDAO team to be distributed proportionally to all unlocked tokenholders, based on a snapshot +3. Return all intellectual property assigned to Futarchy governance SPC to Glint House PTE. LTD + +## Content + +This proposal nullifies the prior proposal that restricts buybacks or liquidations for 90 days. + +**Liquidate Ranger Finance** + +**Author(s)** + +Group of RNGR tokenholders + +--- + +**1\. Summary** + +Since the ICO concluded, it’s become clear that: + +1. The Ranger team made material misrepresentations about their business in order to entice our investment +2. The business that existed was predicated on points farming, not organic activity + +We believe that the best course of action is a full and complete liquidation. We do not wish to leave our money with the team that has broken our trust. + +If passed, this proposal would do the following: + +1. Remove all RNGR / USDC liquidity from Futarchy AMM +2. Send all of the treasuries USDC to the MetaDAO team to be distributed proportionally to all unlocked tokenholders, based on a snapshot +3. Return all intellectual property assigned to Futarchy governance SPC to Glint House PTE. LTD + +--- + +**2\. Motivation** + +At the time of the ICO, Ranger Finance was marketed as: + +* A business with a product with meaningful product-market fit +* A business with sustainable revenue generation and significant actual revenue +* A business primarily needing capital to scale + +We now believe that a meaningful amount of this marketing was misleading. + +For example, in [this presentation](https://youtu.be/pMaoHEnTM2o?si=s37cv_QFQDjftL4z), Ranger co-founder FA2 stated “Current stats: we are close to doing $5 billion in volume this year and next year we are targeting to do $100 billion in volume”. It also shows on the slide “2025: $5b volume → $2m revenue”. + +![image](https://i.imgur.com/oqDAK7f.jpeg) + +According to [on-chain analysis](https://dune.com/queries/6490654/10279491), volume in 2025 was approximately $2b and revenue was closer to $500k. And the volume and revenue per day were down over 90% between the time that Ranger announced the ICO in November 2025 and the time that FA2 made this presentation in December 2025\. + +Now, Ranger co-founder Coby states that these numbers were “projected” based on “expectations… for a traditional ICO route with volumes ramping up towards the ICO itself”. + +![text](https://i.imgur.com/gnKfCcg.jpeg) + +At best, this is poor communication. At worst, it could have been intentional misrepresentation in order to entice our investment. Some evidence for the latter is that several Ranger team members communicated the $2m revenue figure. + +November 11 2025 (Maker): + +![text](https://i.imgur.com/26XqqFX.jpeg) + +January 12 2026 (Luke): + +![text](https://i.imgur.com/cZeEghb.jpeg) + +January 14 2026 (FA2, Luke): + +![text](https://i.imgur.com/sdAh8nJ.jpeg) + +![text](https://i.imgur.com/UrPRaKl.jpeg) + +Ranger’s co-founders made no attempt to correct these numbers and to state that they were either projections, for the message sent in 2025, or incorrect for the messages sent in 2026\. + +Material misrepresentations aside, it is clear that Ranger is not a product with product market fit that needs to scale; it is a product with significant time in the market and practically no organic usage. Activity, across both perps and spot, declined to close to 0 following the ICO announcement. This indicates that its “users” were in fact just farmers trying to earn tokens. + +![text](https://i.imgur.com/ugIuEGR.jpeg) + +Withstanding the 90 day clause of the previous proposal, we believe that this evidence is grounds for liquidation. We want our money back. + +--- + +**3\. Proposed Plan** + +**Part 1: Return all treasury funds (held in treasury and LP) to tokenholders** + +- No further spending by the team from future allowances. Existing released monthly allowances ($500k in total) can be used in full. +- Take a snapshot of all vested token balances 1 week after the end of the voting period. +- Remove protocol owned liquidity on passing of the proposal and add the USDC balance to the USDC held in treasury. +- Calculate the final book value per token. +- Open up redemption for tokenholders with balances per snapshot. Tokenholders will be able to redeem their tokens for the book value presented on MetaDAO’s website. +- After a period of 18 months, it is left to the discretion of the MetaDAO team whether and how to distribute unclaimed USDC to tokenholders. + +*Snapshot:* + +- Unvested, locked and protocol owned tokens will be excluded. +- All other tokens will be included in the snapshot. +- Tokenholders are strongly advised to hold their tokens spot prior to the snapshot. Specific attention for people who hold tokens on exchanges (e.g. MEXC) and in LPs. Tokens held on exchanges at the time of the snapshot would require cooperation from those exchanges to burn the tokens in exchange for treasury assets. + +*Book value calculation method:* + +- The fully diluted total RNGR supply consists of 25,121,388 tokens +- The following tokens will be excluded in full: + - 900,000 tokens held in out of range LP deployed upon completion of ICO ([https://solscan.io/account/uQedNHbW2nhoHQWzNaCTUkYzTaiftEcxsWcSRQXTC6s](https://solscan.io/account/uQedNHbW2nhoHQWzNaCTUkYzTaiftEcxsWcSRQXTC6s)) + - 3,687,400 tokens repurchased as part of the $2m completed buyback program ([https://solscan.io/account/G9Au63ciH1pXKmEyzeFH4qoue5d7RYrK3pJxaKr6Pdso](https://solscan.io/account/G9Au63ciH1pXKmEyzeFH4qoue5d7RYrK3pJxaKr6Pdso)) + - 7,600,000 tokens locked for the team behind performance targets ([https://solscan.io/account/2e9N76bpQxRi1DfvbqRs88ZZCyrvo818ZR41KFJhyFoN](https://solscan.io/account/2e9N76bpQxRi1DfvbqRs88ZZCyrvo818ZR41KFJhyFoN)) + - 384,375 tokens reserved for future ambassadors ([https://solscan.io/account/AThzvtvvhxu7ALSBwSA1nYWCRtFtia1Zkk2Zinb6tXBg](https://solscan.io/account/AThzvtvvhxu7ALSBwSA1nYWCRtFtia1Zkk2Zinb6tXBg), excess tokens are fee income and owned by MetaDAO) +- The pre-ICO investor (4,356,250) and existing ambassador (384,375) allocations will be based on the vested amount per the snapshot. +- The protocol owned tokens held in LP will be based on the amount of RNGR when the LP is removed. This will likely be higher than the current amount due to arbitrage. ([https://solscan.io/account/1PAwyDkWNFCcR96GhEReXHJBv3YEFVazCaQgNicVuKv](https://solscan.io/account/1PAwyDkWNFCcR96GhEReXHJBv3YEFVazCaQgNicVuKv)) +- We expect a total RNGR count anywhere between 5.8 and 6.4 million tokens +- The assets consist of treasury USDC and USDC in the LP. +- Treasury USDC amounts $3.5m ([https://solscan.io/account/55H1Q1YrHJQ93uhG4jqrBBHx3a8H7TCM8kvf2UM2g5q3](https://solscan.io/account/55H1Q1YrHJQ93uhG4jqrBBHx3a8H7TCM8kvf2UM2g5q3)) +- We expect a total USDC amount of $1.2m to $1.6m at the moment the LP is removed. +- We expect book value in the range of: $0.75 \- $0.82 +- All these numbers are preliminary and should be treated as such. They have not been verified by MetaDAO nor Ranger Finance. No party is responsible for the accuracy of these projections. + +**Part 2: Return all other assets to Glint House PTE. LTD** + +Upon passing of this proposal ownership of all other assets (such as IP, trademarks, domain names, source code, infrastructure etc.) will return to Glint House PTE. LTD. The majority of these assets were developed / acquired prior to the ICO, supported by seed investments. + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `DPATwR2HLcGZCBZCTffzagV4r7dp5FF2C9aJmiuCDUpS` +- Proposal number: 4 +- DAO account: `1PAwyDkWNFCcR96GhEReXHJBv3YEFVazCaQgNicVuKv` +- Proposer: `99LB2dpUUrHTskMkH5DHszBdJFd8e3aqakb8VGHy33pa` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..88eb3c10 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: FUTARDIO-001 - Omnibus Proposal" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/futardio-cult/proposal/Hw4KF6uZxdu8demt2z1Z9ePSF9Bxuyqtt3nFgoLK9EHu" +date: 2026-03-04 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, futardio-cult] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Futardio cult +- Proposal: FUTARDIO-001 - Omnibus Proposal +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-03-04 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/futardio-cult/proposal/Hw4KF6uZxdu8demt2z1Z9ePSF9Bxuyqtt3nFgoLK9EHu +- Description: Would authorize the token burn, reduction in monthly allowance and one time payment for Dexscreener/Jupiter update. + +## Content + +•Reduce team spending to $50/month, allocated entirely to cover an X Premium subscription. In today's environment, X Premium has become almost essential for any serious X account. It adds legitimacy to the project and significantly increases reach and visibility on the platform. + +•We propose burning 4.5 million performance package tokens, with the remaining 500,000 locked for 18 months. This step ensures full alignment between the community and the team. Traders have grown accustomed to creators who extract value from projects while delivering little or nothing back to investors. We aim to break that pattern. + +•We suggest allocating $550 from the treasury to cover the DEXScreener token upgrade (Enhanced Token Info) as well as Jupiter verification. These updates will allow us to customize the token's profile with accurate pictures (logo and banner) and properly link our social channels, including X, improving visibility and credibility on both platforms. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Hw4KF6uZxdu8demt2z1Z9ePSF9Bxuyqtt3nFgoLK9EHu` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `CkEUCAooQi64UFhPFS5MWpZw6LQqjsDQBj3Z5uiXS1eN` +- Proposer: `exeCeqDuu38PAhoFxzpTwsMkMXURQvhGJE6UxFgGAKn` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-proposal-dp-00001-mem-treasury-subcommittee-pre-formation-and-legal-b.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-proposal-dp-00001-mem-treasury-subcommittee-pre-formation-and-legal-b.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e349033a --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-proposal-dp-00001-mem-treasury-subcommittee-pre-formation-and-legal-b.md @@ -0,0 +1,356 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: DP-00001 (MEM): Treasury Subcommittee (Pre-Formation) and Legal Budget" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/solomon/proposal/8c9sFZ5Z46ZLnhywkWuJ5BhJK4Wrj19AN4gzQicyBKjK" +date: 2026-03-05 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, solomon] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Solomon +- Proposal: DP-00001 (MEM): Treasury Subcommittee (Pre-Formation) and Legal Budget +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-03-05 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/solomon/proposal/8c9sFZ5Z46ZLnhywkWuJ5BhJK4Wrj19AN4gzQicyBKjK +- Description: This proposal series sets up a staged path to deploy the DAO treasury under +explicit controls. DP-00001 does two things: it funds a capped $150k legal +and compliance budget in a segregated wallet that can only be used for legal, +regulatory, and related compliance work, and it nominates a pre-formation +treasury subcommittee for readiness work only (no authority to move treasury +funds). The follow-on proposals then define the treasury's permitted +capital policy actions and, once the Company is formed, designate the +Treasury Account and activate delegated authority with strict limits +and required reporting. + +## Content + +**Status:** Draft (proposal memorandum; to be voted) + +**Version:** 1.0.1 + +**NON-BINDING SUMMARY.** This memorandum is informational only and is +subordinate to the governing instruments and any adopted resolutions. +In the event of conflict, the normative resolution text controls. + +--- + +## TLDR + +This proposal series sets up a staged path to deploy the DAO treasury under +explicit controls. DP-00001 does two things: it funds a capped $150k legal +and compliance budget in a segregated wallet that can only be used for legal, +regulatory, and related compliance work, and it nominates a pre-formation +treasury subcommittee for readiness work only (no authority to move treasury +funds). The follow-on proposals then define the treasury's permitted +capital policy actions and, once the Company is formed, designate the +Treasury Account and activate delegated authority with strict limits +and required reporting. + +What this unlocks is the ability to begin bounded treasury deployment. +Earning yield and seeding liquidity under approved guardrails, rather than +ad hoc governance. That functional readiness is one of the primary gating +requirement to onboard partners and lift caps for broader access to Solomon. + +--- + +## Simple overview (who / what / where / why) + +**Who** + +- DAO members voting through the Governance System. +- Treasury Subcommittee Designates (bios below): + Drew, Usman, Kru, Kollan. + - Selection principles: Designates should (i) hold membership interests + in the Company, and (ii) be member-professionals with demonstrated + execution in relevant domains (e.g., DeFi builders/founders, + LPs/liquidity operators, treasury/risk, ops/security, and -- where + needed -- legal/compliance). +- Legal and compliance professionals engaged under the Company framework. + +**What** + +This proposal does **two** main things: + +1. **Names Treasury Subcommittee Designates (pre-formation only).** + They can start planning and preparation work but cannot move or + control Company or DAO treasury funds under this proposal. + +2. **Releases a capped legal and compliance budget.** + Up to $150,000 in USDC is moved from the DAO treasury into a dedicated + legal budget wallet to cover Company-facing legal and compliance work. + +**Where** + +- The vote happens in the DAO's on-chain Governance System. +- If the proposal passes, the governance system executes the on-chain transfer + of the approved legal budget from the DAO treasury to the legal budget wallet. + This proposal does not include a pre-published tx bundle; tx references will be + recorded after execution. + +**Why** + +- To put a proper treasury subcommittee structure in place, as + contemplated in the Company Agreement and Founding Charter. +- To let the Company, acting as a DAO, use its own treasury in an organized + way, under clear delegated authority and limits set by members. +- To improve security and stability of Company Treasury Accounts as much + as possible in a hostile environment (exploits, scams, and bad actors are + a real risk). +- To fund the legal and compliance work needed to finish formation, keep + filings current, and support safe governance going forward. + +--- + +## 1. Treasury Subcommittee Designates (pre-formation only) + +**What this part does** + +Names a small group of Treasury Subcommittee Designates with the skills +to help design and prepare the future treasury setup. + +- Lets them work on: + - draft treasury policies and guardrails, + - a second multisig / vault plan (signers, threshold, roles), + - allowlists, limits, and incident-response playbooks, + - checklists for service providers and infrastructure. + +**What they can see and share** + +- Some information about wallets, controls, and security will not be + published to everyone, because that would increase risk to Company assets. +- Designates must sign a strict Treasury Subcommittee confidentiality + undertaking before they see security-sensitive material (the + "Undertaking"). + +**What they cannot do under DP-00001** + +Under this proposal alone, Designates: + +- cannot move or control DAO or Company treasury funds; +- cannot act as the live Treasury Subcommittee yet; +- cannot speak for, bind, or sign on behalf of the Company just because + they are Designates. + +Any real treasury authority only attaches later, after Company formation +and only if a separate activation proposal (intended: DP-00003) is passed. + +The proposed Designates are as follows: + +### Drew + +**Co-founder [01Resolved](https://www.01resolved.com/)** -- [@drew_12011](https://x.com/drew_12011) / [@01Resolved](https://x.com/01resolved) + +A crypto native finance leader with nearly a decade in the space, +from CFO-stints, to investor and advisor roles, Drew is now building +01Resolved which provides ownership coin treasury and decision market +intelligence. + +### Usman + +**Founder [Oro](https://www.oro.finance/)** -- [@theusmansal](https://x.com/theusmansal) / [@orogoldapp](https://x.com/orogoldapp) + +Building onchain infrastructure for real-world assets -- starting with gold. +A product-first builder with a bias toward shipping. + +### Kru + +**Co-founder [Umbra Privacy](https://www.umbraprivacy.com/)** -- [@kru_tweets](https://x.com/kru_tweets) / [@UmbraPrivacy](https://x.com/UmbraPrivacy) + +Design Graduate from IAAD, Torino. Building on Solana since 2022. + +### Kollan + +**Co-Founder [MetaDAO](https://www.metadao.fi/)** -- [@metanallok](https://x.com/metanallok) / [@MetaDAOProject](https://x.com/MetaDAOProject) + +Cyborg-level relentless execution across governance, capital formation, and +early-stage funding. + +--- + +## 2. Legal and compliance budget (capped) + +This proposal also: + +- approves a capped legal and compliance budget of $150,000 (the + "Legal Budget"); and +- moves up to that amount of USDC from the DAO treasury into a dedicated + Legal Budget wallet specified in the Resolution text. + +**Key points:** +- The amount is fixed and capped by this proposal. Any further legal or + compliance budget in the future would need its own governance action. +- This proposal sets the team-sponsored proposal pass threshold to -300 bps, + the non-team proposal pass threshold to +300 bps and the minimum stake + threshold from 500k -> 1.5M to align with the other cohort DAOs. +- The $150,000 is intended to cover ongoing Company-facing legal and + compliance costs while maintaining a buffer. +- These funds are restricted to legal, regulatory, and related compliance + work and cannot be used for anything else. +- The work will be contracted across three firms: + [Morrison Cohen LLP](https://www.morrisoncohen.com/), + [NXT Law](https://www.nxt.law/), and [GVRN](https://www.gvrn.ai/). +- The purpose is to pay for legal, regulatory, and related work needed to: + complete Company formation, keep the Company compliant with its filing + and reporting duties, and support safe governance and treasury structures. + +This summary does not describe individual invoices, providers, or +specific workstreams. Those details may be handled under Company processes +and, where needed, under confidentiality or privilege. + +--- + +## 3. Why a Treasury Subcommittee is needed + +The Founding Charter creates a Company Treasury Subcommittee to manage +Company Treasury Accounts "in the ordinary course of treasury management," +within limits and policies adopted by members. + +In plain terms, a Treasury Subcommittee is needed because: + +- **Good practice.** + A DAO of this size needs a small, focused group to handle day-to-day + treasury mechanics, inside rules that everyone can see and vote on. + +- **Stronger oversight.** + The subcommittee operates only within a scope and limits that members set + by Resolution. Proposals, policies, and caps come from governance; + subcommittee members work inside those boundaries. + +- **Safer operations.** + There are real attackers in this space. A structured treasury subcommittee, + combined with multisig controls and clear procedures, lowers the chance + that a single mistake or a single compromised key can cause large losses. + +- **Delegated authority (with guardrails).** + Once activated in a later proposal, the subcommittee can carry out routine + treasury actions (within caps and policies) without needing a full DAO + vote for every small step, while still staying inside the rules members + approve. + +DP-00001 is the pre-formation step: it names the Designates and funds +the legal and compliance work so the full structure can be finished and +switched on safely later. + +--- + +## 4. SOP Registry and Operational Packs (how policies become real) + +Good policy undergoes evolution in stages: drafting, iteration, adoption. +Subcommittee members help author SOPs, the wider membership can +review and weigh in, and the DAO ratifies the final versions through +Futarchy votes via Operational Packs. + +That is what SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) are for: + +- **SOP Registry:** the canonical place where Company-side procedural and + security policies are recorded, versioned, and (when appropriate) + ratified as governance instruments. + +- **Interim SOPs:** the Head Steward or a Subcommittee (within its existing + authority and scope) can adopt an SOP on an interim basis for immediate use. + +- **Operational Packs:** later, SOPs are batched into an Operational Pack + proposal and ratified by governance so the DAO can make them effective + instruments with clear hashes/identifiers and an effective date. + +DP-00001 does not bundle or ratify any SOPs yet. It introduces the +framework so members know what is coming, and so Designates can start +drafting policies in a controlled, auditable way. + +--- + +## 5. Three-step rollout (how this fits together) + +The treasury and legal setup is being rolled out in three stages so +members can see and vote on each part separately: + +1. **Step 1 – DP-00001 (this proposal).** + - Name Treasury Subcommittee Designates (pre-formation, no treasury + authority). + - Release the capped Legal Budget and move it to the Legal Budget wallet. + - Introduce the SOP Registry + Operational Pack model (no SOPs + adopted yet). + +2. **Step 2 – DP-00002 (planned).** + - Introduce a **SOLO buyback framework**. + +3. **Step 3 – DP-00003 (planned).** + - Confirm that the Company is formed. + - Designate the second multisig / vault as an official Company + Treasury Account under the Company Agreement. + - Move an initial tranche from the main DAO treasury into that Company + account and turn on delegated treasury authority for the live + Treasury Subcommittee within agreed limits. + +Each step will have its own proposal and vote. Where an execution bundle is +published, it is recorded alongside the proposal history. Members can review +each stage on its own merits. + +--- + +## 6. What DP-00001 does not do + +For clarity, this proposal does not: + +- turn the Designates into a live Treasury Subcommittee with authority to + move Company Treasury Accounts; +- create or designate any Company Treasury Account on its own; +- adopt, ratify, or bundle any SOPs yet (those come later via + Operational Packs); +- start SOLO buybacks or change voting thresholds (beyond the team-sponsored + proposal pass threshold update described above); +- publish detailed wallet maps, runbooks, or security procedures; or +- authorize anyone to speak for or bind the Company outside the narrow + roles set in the Company Agreement and future Resolutions. + +Those future steps can only happen through later proposals (including +DP-00002 and DP-00003) and must stay within the Company Agreement and +applicable law. + +--- + +## Links + +- Full normative resolution text (controls if there is any conflict + with this summary): + [DP-00001_MEM-full.md](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals/blob/main/proposals/DP-00001-treasury-subcommittee-preformation/DP-00001_MEM-full.md) +- Compiled Company Agreement PDF: + [Company_Agreement_SOLOMON_DAO_LLC.pdf](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/compiled-documents/blob/main/company-agreement/Company_Agreement_SOLOMON_DAO_LLC.pdf) +- SOP: Order of Business for Operational Packs. Part of the Company + Agreement, normative identifer SOP-00000: + [SOP: Order of Business for Operational Packs](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals/blob/main/proposals/DP-00000-founding-instrument-pack/DP-00000_SOP-Order-of-business.md) +- SOP-00001 (SOP Registry and Corporate Equivalency): + [SOP-00001: SOP Registry and Corporate Equivalency](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/sop-registry/blob/main/registry/interim/SOP-00001-registry-corporate-equivalency/SOP-00001_SOP-Registry-and-Corporate-Equivalency.md) +- Proposal repository (canonical history + execution artefacts): + [https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals) +- SOP Registry (canonical): + [https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/sop-registry](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/sop-registry) + +--- + +**Disclaimer (Governance Proposal; No Professional Advice).** + +This document is a governance proposal and governance communication. +If adopted by the DAO through its governance mechanisms, it may become +binding on the DAO and persons exercising authority under the +Company Agreement to the extent provided in the Company Agreement and +applicable law. +This document does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or other +professional advice. +The author(s) are not acting as legal counsel to the DAO or any +member or user. No attorney-client relationship is created. + +You must obtain your own independent advice for your circumstances. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8c9sFZ5Z46ZLnhywkWuJ5BhJK4Wrj19AN4gzQicyBKjK` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `DzYtzoNvPbyFCzwZA6cSm9eDEEmxEB9f8AGkJXUXgnSA` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-12-futardio-proposal-omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-12-futardio-proposal-omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6f5a3f97 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-12-futardio-proposal-omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: OMFG-004 Strategic Ecosystem Investment" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/8WcHZ6U5PPa98xwXwKJxNKAhgKNdYMrwoUSpEyMdSww9" +date: 2026-03-12 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, omnipair] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Omnipair +- Proposal: OMFG-004 Strategic Ecosystem Investment +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-03-12 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/omnipair/proposal/8WcHZ6U5PPa98xwXwKJxNKAhgKNdYMrwoUSpEyMdSww9 +- Description: If approved this would direct 20k to a strategic investment + +## Content + +**Proposer:** @rakka_sol + +**Requested:** 20,000 USDC + +**Recipient:** Core team multi-sig + +**Purpose:** Strategic ecosystem investment + +--- + +## **1\. Summary** + +This proposal requests approval to deploy 20,000 USDC from the Omnipair treasury as a strategic ecosystem investment. + +--- + +## **2\. Details** + +Omnipair will act as the liquidity venue for tokens launched on Spark, a new hackathon-focused launchpad. + +Their model works as follows: users submit and fund ideas they believe in. Once a goal is hit, a token is launched and builders then compete in a hackathon, with futarchy-based decision markets determining the winner to take the project forward. + +The proposed 20,000 USDC budget will be allocated to fund the top three ideas to be built on top of Omnipair that will be valuable in growing the protocol’s ecosystem. + +**Budget Allocation:** + +Concept 1 \- 10,000 USDC + +Concept 2 \- 5,000 USDC + +Concept 3 \- 5,000 USDC + +**Important Notes:** + +Each funded concept is fully backed by its treasury at launch \- if it raises 10,000, its token launches at a 10,000 valuation. That means: + +* If the hackathon produces a winning builder, the project moves forward and the token becomes one of a live, funded startup +* If the decision market determines no builder deserves to lead the project, investors are automatically refunded, ensuring no capital is lost + +This structure reduces the risk for this proposed allocation and ensures that each investment is justified by the broader market. + +--- + +## **3\. Motivation** + +Spark is an iteration of one of Omnipair's earliest partners and their new model enables us to deploy capital funding three potential teams building products leveraging Omnipair’s infrastructure. + +The factors that make this a sound allocation: + +* **Growth:** every funded idea drives Omnipair's growth by creating new markets, increasing liquidity and revenue. +* **Builder pipeline.** The initiative kicks off Omnipair’s builder community. Every successfully funded concept expands the protocol’s utility, brings new developers who learn the codebase, and results in shipped products that compound ecosystem growth. +* **Downside protection.** If no builder is deemed worthy by the market, the treasury is refunded automatically, meaning Omnipair does not lose any capital on failed ideas. + +## **4\. Execution** + +Upon proposal passage: + +1. 20,000 USDC is transferred from the Omnipair treasury to the core team multi-sig ([https://app.squads.so/squads/4JpPs9Mi11qoj6GthQPiTjUc4gXq8BAoSs3AD6NVjQUZ](https://app.squads.so/squads/4JpPs9Mi11qoj6GthQPiTjUc4gXq8BAoSs3AD6NVjQUZ)) +2. The Omnipair team will identify and fund the three most strategically relevant ideas based on utility and ecosystem fit. +3. In exchange for funding each idea, Omnipair receives the corresponding tokens representing ownership in each funded concept. +4. If no builder is selected to take on a project by the market at the end of each hackathon, funds are returned in full. + +All funded projects will build on and deploy through Omnipair's open-source codebase. Project outcomes are made public by Spark at the close of each hackathon cycle. + + + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `8WcHZ6U5PPa98xwXwKJxNKAhgKNdYMrwoUSpEyMdSww9` +- Proposal number: 1 +- DAO account: `s45fTDhkzKPMFbNmUXA3bJNdF92z5cbVvHdY8LpznWQ` +- Proposer: `8Cwx4yR2sFAC5Pdx2NgGHxCk1gJrtSTxJoyqVonqndhq` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-13-futardio-proposal-dp-00002-mem-solo-acquisition-and-restricted-incentives-rese.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-13-futardio-proposal-dp-00002-mem-solo-acquisition-and-restricted-incentives-rese.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..75f37089 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-13-futardio-proposal-dp-00002-mem-solo-acquisition-and-restricted-incentives-rese.md @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: DP-00002 (MEM): SOLO Acquisition and Restricted Incentives Reserve Framework" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/solomon/proposal/wwRoJYcur3EjnQCLodUhLqCs6H9NQ97RvP6JNV4b9F6" +date: 2026-03-13 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, solomon] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Solomon +- Proposal: DP-00002 (MEM): SOLO Acquisition and Restricted Incentives Reserve Framework +- Status: Passed +- Created: 2026-03-13 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/solomon/proposal/wwRoJYcur3EjnQCLodUhLqCs6H9NQ97RvP6JNV4b9F6 +- Description: This proposal authorizes the DAO to acquire SOLO using treasury funds + +## Content + +**Status:** Draft (proposal memorandum; to be voted) + +**Version:** 1.0.2 + +**NON-BINDING SUMMARY.** This memorandum is informational only and is +subordinate to the governing instruments and any adopted resolutions. +In the event of conflict, the normative resolution text controls. + +--- + +## Summary + +This proposal authorizes the DAO to acquire SOLO using treasury funds and to +hold all acquired SOLO in a segregated **Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve**. + +The purpose of this reserve is to provide a credible, prefunded path for +future SOLO backed incentive programs intended to reward participation, +deepen alignment, and support long term ecosystem growth. This includes, +without limitation, the future pips program and any substantially similar +successor or related participation based framework later approved by +governance. + +This proposal earmarks that purpose now so that participants can have +confidence that SOLO backing has been set aside in advance and cannot be +redirected by signers, operators, contributors, or committees acting on +discretion alone. + +This proposal does not establish the live Incentives Subcommittee or appoint +its members. Those matters will be brought in a later proposal. Until that +later governance action is adopted, no person or body may deploy, +distribute, commit, or otherwise use reserve SOLO. + +--- + +## Rationale + +A participation based incentive program only has credibility if there is a +credible path from participation to the asset being promised or implied. +If the DAO intends to use SOLO-backed incentives to reward durable +participation, it is better to earmark that backing now than to leave +it to future discretion. + +This proposal is intended to solve that credibility problem without +prematurely locking the DAO into a single incentive design. + +This structure preserves three things at once: + +- confidence that incentive backing exists and has been ring fenced; +- flexibility to design the actual program architecture; and +- sufficient operational discretion to finalize and implement program + details in a way that reduces front running, gaming, sybil behavior, and + other exploitative positioning before launch. + +There is also a clear timing advantage. With SOLO trading below +treasury implied value ("NAV"), the DAO has an opportunity to build a +restricted incentives reserve on attractive terms and use treasury +capital to strengthen long term alignment across the network. + +--- + +## Key Parameters + +- **Amount:** `1,000,000 USDC` +- **Order Type:** `Recurring` +- **Program Duration:** `Up to 60 days` +- **Order Quantity:** `Variable recurring purchases, sized operationally + within the approved cap and execution window` +- **Order Frequency:** `Recurring over a period of up to 60 days` +- **Maximum Order Price:** `0.74 USDC per SOLO (interpreted as a maximum + program TWAP)` +- **Estimated SOLO Acquired:** `Approximately 1,351,351.35 SOLO, assuming + full use of the acquisition facility at the maximum program TWAP` + +## Process + +This proposal includes instructions to execute a recurring SOLO acquisition +program using DAO treasury funds in an aggregate amount of up to +**1,000,000 USDC** over a period of up to **60 days**, subject to a +**maximum program TWAP of 0.74 USDC per SOLO**. Any SOLO acquired pursuant +to this proposal shall be retained in the DAO treasury and accounted for +as Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve property. + +--- + +## Section 1. Authorization of SOLO Acquisition + +**Resolved**, that the DAO hereby authorizes a capped SOLO acquisition +program funded from DAO treasury using the parameters specified in this +Proposal. + +**Resolved further**, that all SOLO acquired pursuant to this Proposal +shall be retained in the DAO treasury and designated on the DAO's books +and records as Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve property. + +--- + +## Section 2. Designation of Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve + +**Resolved**, that all SOLO acquired pursuant to this Proposal shall be held +in the DAO treasury and designated as Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve +property of the DAO. + +The Designated Purpose of the Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve is to +support SOLO backed incentive programs intended to reward participation, +deepen alignment, and support long term ecosystem growth, including the +future pips program and any substantially similar successor or related +participation based framework later approved by governance. + +**Resolved further**, that pips, and any substantially similar successor +participation framework approved by governance, shall have first call +priority on the Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve. + +**Resolved further**, that until amended by express later governance action, +the Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve shall remain earmarked for its +Designated Purpose and shall not be repurposed, redirected, impaired, or +clawed back by any signer, contributor, service provider, committee, +operator, or other person acting without such governance approval. + +--- + +## Section 3. No Current Deployment Authority + +**Resolved**, that this Proposal does not establish the live Incentives +Subcommittee or appoint its members. + +**Resolved further**, that this Proposal does not authorize any person or +body to distribute, commit, allocate, sell, transfer, make claimable, or +otherwise deploy Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve assets at this time. + +Until later governance action establishes and approves the live Incentives +Subcommittee and any applicable activation framework, reserve SOLO shall +remain held in the DAO treasury and accounted for solely for its +Designated Purpose. + +--- + +## Section 5. Core Guardrails + +Unless expressly approved by later governance action: + +- reserve SOLO shall remain held in the DAO treasury and separately + accounted for as Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve property; +- reserve SOLO may not be self dealt, privately allocated, or directed to + insiders or affiliates on preferential terms; +- reserve SOLO may not be manually transferred wallet to wallet to selected + recipients as a discretionary allocation method; +- reserve SOLO may not be sold or otherwise disposed of below prevailing + market price; +- reserve SOLO may not be lent, pledged, staked, paired for liquidity, + used as collateral, used as market making inventory, or used for + compensation; and +- any unused, expired, forfeited, cancelled, or unclaimed reserve SOLO + shall be burned unless governance expressly directs otherwise. + +--- + +## Plain English + +If adopted, this proposal means: + +- the DAO can acquire SOLO now; +- that SOLO is ring-fenced now for future incentive use; +- Pips has priority on that reserve; +- nobody can use or redirect that reserve on discretion alone; and +- a future Incentives Subcommittee can be voted in later to steward it. + + +--- + +## Links + +- Full normative resolution text (controls if there is any conflict + with this summary): + [DP-00002_MEM-full.md](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals/blob/main/proposals/DP-00002-acquisition-restricted-incentives-framework/DP-00002_MEM-full.md) +- Compiled Company Agreement PDF: + [Company_Agreement_SOLOMON_DAO_LLC.pdf](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/compiled-documents/blob/main/company-agreement/Company_Agreement_SOLOMON_DAO_LLC.pdf) +- Proposal repository (canonical history + execution artefacts): + [https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/dao-proposals) +- SOP Registry (canonical): + [https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/sop-registry](https://github.com/SolomonDAOrg/sop-registry) + +--- + +**Disclaimer (Governance Proposal; No Professional Advice).** + +This document is a governance proposal and governance communication. +If adopted by the DAO through its governance mechanisms, it may become +binding on the DAO and persons exercising authority under the +Company Agreement to the extent provided in the Company Agreement and +applicable law. +This document does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or other +professional advice. +The author(s) are not acting as legal counsel to the DAO or any +member or user. No attorney-client relationship is created. + +You must obtain your own independent advice for your circumstances. + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `wwRoJYcur3EjnQCLodUhLqCs6H9NQ97RvP6JNV4b9F6` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `DzYtzoNvPbyFCzwZA6cSm9eDEEmxEB9f8AGkJXUXgnSA` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b799bc7e --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Allocate $10,000 to Create a FUTARDIO–USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/futardio-cult/proposal/HiihSh8H6D1JAPpDeD8oNwqQ8AkTmYA9QS82p5NPSRhN" +date: 2026-03-17 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, futardio-cult] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: Futardio cult +- Proposal: Allocate $10,000 to Create a FUTARDIO–USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool +- Status: Draft +- Created: 2026-03-17 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/futardio-cult/proposal/HiihSh8H6D1JAPpDeD8oNwqQ8AkTmYA9QS82p5NPSRhN +- Description: Allocate $10,000 to Create a FUTARDIO–USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool + +## Content + +### Summary + +This proposal requests $10,000 from the treasury to establish a FUTARDIO–USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. + +The allocation will be structured as follows: + • $7,000 used to purchase FUTARDIO tokens from the open market using a time-distributed strategy. + • $3,000 USDC paired with the acquired FUTARDIO to create liquidity. + +All fees generated by the liquidity pool will be sent directly to the DAO treasury, allowing the treasury to grow through trading activity. + +⸻ + +### Motivation + +Improve Market Liquidity + +Increasing liquidity will reduce slippage, improve trading conditions, and make FUTARDIO more accessible to new participants. + +Generate Sustainable Treasury Revenue + +The DLMM pool will generate trading fees, which will accumulate in the DAO treasury in USDC and FUTARDIO, creating a sustainable revenue stream. + +Strategic Token Accumulation + +Accumulated FUTARDIO from trading fees can later be deployed for: + • Community incentives + • Marketing campaigns + • Strategic partnerships + • Liquidity expansion + +All future uses will require separate governance proposals. + +⸻ + +### Execution Plan + +FUTARDIO Purchase Strategy + +To reduce price impact, the FUTARDIO purchase will be executed gradually using Jupiter recurring orders. + +Amount: $7,000 +Platform: Jupiter +Token: +Cbjr1Nvcay3QWDriyRKtokJ7V4PMknesGxeK8z7Zmeta (FUTARDIO) + +Order Parameters + • Order Type: Recurring + • Order quantity: 140 + • Order Frequency: Every 30 minutes + +This approach distributes purchases over time and minimizes market disruption. + +⸻ + +### Liquidity Pool Configuration + +Once the purchases are completed, the tokens will be paired with $3,000 USDC to initialize the liquidity pool. + +Platform: Meteora DLMM + +Pool Parameters + +Pair: FUTARDIO – USDC +Fee Tier: 1.00% +Bin Step: 200 +Distribution Strategy: Spot +Minimum Price Range: $0.001 +Maximum Price Range: $1.00 + +⸻ + +### Success Metrics + +The proposal will be considered successful if it achieves the following outcomes: + • Increased trading liquidity for FUTARDIO + • Consistent fee generation for the treasury + • Improved market stability and reduced slippage + +Performance can be evaluated through: + • Liquidity depth of the FUTARDIO–USDC market + • Total trading volume through the pool + • Fees accumulated in the treasury + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `HiihSh8H6D1JAPpDeD8oNwqQ8AkTmYA9QS82p5NPSRhN` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `CkEUCAooQi64UFhPFS5MWpZw6LQqjsDQBj3Z5uiXS1eN` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6 diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-20-futardio-proposal-fund-futarchy-applications-research-dr-robin-hanson-george-m.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-20-futardio-proposal-fund-futarchy-applications-research-dr-robin-hanson-george-m.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bbe5440c --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-20-futardio-proposal-fund-futarchy-applications-research-dr-robin-hanson-george-m.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "Futardio: Fund Futarchy applications research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University" +author: "futard.io" +url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/Dt6QxTtaPz87oEK4m95ztP36wZCXA9LGLrJf1sDYAwxi" +date: 2026-03-20 +domain: internet-finance +format: data +status: unprocessed +tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, metadao] +event_type: proposal +--- + +## Proposal Details +- Project: MetaDAO +- Proposal: Fund Futarchy applications research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University +- Status: Pending +- Created: 2026-03-20 +- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/metadao/proposal/Dt6QxTtaPz87oEK4m95ztP36wZCXA9LGLrJf1sDYAwxi +- Description: Fund Futarchy applications research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University + +## Content + +Author: Proph3t and Kollan + +Category: Operations Direct Action + +Proposed period: 6 Months: April – September 2026 (tentative on final grant agreement) + +Budget: $80,007 USDC + +--- + +### Summary + +This proposal requests $80,007 USDC from the MetaDAO treasury to fund a six-month academic research engagement at George Mason University. Led by Dr. Robin Hanson — the economist who invented futarchy — this project will produce the first rigorous experimental evidence on the information-aggregation efficiency of decision-market governance, directly validating or challenging the theoretical basis on which MetaDAO operates. + +A positive market outcome will authorize treasury disbursement and delegate authority to the MetaDAO director to execute a contract with GMU to initiate the engagement. + +How and why this benefits MetaDAO and META token holders + +* Legitimacy + * Results will anchor MetaDAO's governance claims — a differentiator vs. competing platforms + +* Protocol improvement + * Experimental data will identify potential design weaknesses in current Futarchy mechanics, enabling targeted upgrades + +* Ecosystem growth + * Published findings will attract and support institutional adopters and projects evaluating the Futarchy Management tool on Solana + + +### Scope of work + +The research team will design and run controlled experiments with 500 student participants (500@$50 each, $25,000 total) in structured decision-making scenarios. All protocols will undergo Institutional Review Board (IRB) review. Dr. Daniel Houser (experimental economics) will participate as co-investigator. A graduate research assistant will handle programming, recruitment, data collection, and analysis across the full academic year and summer. + +### Budget Allocation + +| Item | Amount (USDC) | +| :---- | ----: | +| Dr. Robin Hanson — 2 months summer salary | \~$30,000 | +| Dr. Daniel Houser — Co-investigator (0.85% AY \+ summer) | \~$6,000 | +| Graduate research assistant — full AY \+ summer | \~$19,007 | +| Participant payments (500 @ $50) | $25,000 | +| Total | $80,007 | + +### Risks and Mitigations + +The primary risk is that experimental results challenge some assumptions underlying futarchy — this is a feature, not a bug. Regardless, MetaDAO benefits from honest/accurate data either way. + +A secondary risk is IRB or recruitment delays; the GRA timeline includes buffer for both. + +We propose funds to be disbursed in two payments (subject to the final grant agreement): 50% on agreement execution, 50% upon delivery of the interim report, giving the DAO a natural checkpoint. + +### Onchain action + +Upon passing the program will authorize a treasury transfer of $80,007 USDC. In the event that George Mason University is unable to accept cryptocurrency payments, the MetaDAO servicing entity is authorized to convert the approved USDC to USD and execute a cash payment to GMU in the full amount of $80,007, with any conversion or transfer fees borne by the MetaDAO treasury. No further governance action required. + +### Supporting Documentation + +[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MBStw8sAwjn7_cdoufQ-ooJjt4_nKY4o?usp=drive_link](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MBStw8sAwjn7_cdoufQ-ooJjt4_nKY4o?usp=drive_link) + +## Raw Data + +- Proposal account: `Dt6QxTtaPz87oEK4m95ztP36wZCXA9LGLrJf1sDYAwxi` +- Proposal number: 2 +- DAO account: `CUPoiqkK4hxyCiJcLC4yE9AtJP1MoV1vFV2vx3jqwWeS` +- Proposer: `tSTp6B6kE9o6ZaTmHm2ZwnJBBtgd3x112tapxFhmBEQ` +- Autocrat version: 0.6