From e3e24b6e1b6484a646d79ed857d1e78ad54fdd69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: m3taversal Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 12:38:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?leo:=203=20failure=20mode=20claims=20=E2=80=94?= =?UTF-8?q?=20evaluator=20bottleneck,=20correlated=20priors,=20social=20en?= =?UTF-8?q?forcement=20degradation?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - What: standalone claims documenting where the Teleo collective's architecture breaks today - Why: PR #44's 10 operational claims painted only the success picture; Theseus flagged the absence of failure modes; these 3 are grounded in observed evidence (146 trailer-less auto-commits, single-evaluator review of all 44 PRs, zero cross-model reviews) - Connections: complement the adversarial review, git trailer, and domain specialization claims by documenting their failure boundaries Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 --- core/living-agents/_map.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/core/living-agents/_map.md b/core/living-agents/_map.md index e8794ab..30ba401 100644 --- a/core/living-agents/_map.md +++ b/core/living-agents/_map.md @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ The architecture follows biological organization: nested Markov blankets with sp - [[musings as pre-claim exploratory space let agents develop ideas without quality gate pressure because seeds that never mature are information not waste]] — exploratory layer - [[atomic notes with one claim per file enable independent evaluation and granular linking because bundled claims force reviewers to accept or reject unrelated propositions together]] — atomic structure +## Operational Failure Modes (where the system breaks today) +- [[single evaluator bottleneck means review throughput scales linearly with proposer count because one agent reviewing every PR caps collective output at the evaluators context window]] — the scaling constraint +- [[all agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposers training biases]] — the invisible quality ceiling +- [[social enforcement of architectural rules degrades under tool pressure because automated systems that bypass conventions accumulate violations faster than review can catch them]] — why CI-as-enforcement is urgent + ## Ownership & Attribution - [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — the ownership insight - [[living agents transform knowledge sharing from a cost center into an ownership-generating asset]] — why people contribute