auto-fix: strip 22 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
4dd05ba182
commit
e9fe4c7528
3 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions
|
|
@ -31,4 +31,4 @@ agrippa is a Solana developer who led Realms frontend development at Solana Labs
|
|||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - proposed mechanism expansion
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window]] - contributed to conditional vault design review
|
||||
- MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window - contributed to conditional vault design review
|
||||
|
|
@ -38,5 +38,5 @@ The proposal outlined a from-scratch multi-modal conditional vault program with
|
|||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - governance mechanism expansion
|
||||
- [[futarchy-implementations-must-simplify-theoretical-mechanisms-for-production-adoption-because-original-designs-include-impractical-elements-that-academics-tolerate-but-users-reject]] - demonstrates specific simplification need
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window]] - architectural evolution
|
||||
- futarchy-implementations-must-simplify-theoretical-mechanisms-for-production-adoption-because-original-designs-include-impractical-elements-that-academics-tolerate-but-users-reject - demonstrates specific simplification need
|
||||
- MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window - architectural evolution
|
||||
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ tracked_by: rio
|
|||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
||||
founded: 2023-01-01
|
||||
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
|
||||
founders: ["proph3t"]
|
||||
category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)"
|
||||
stage: growth
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)"
|
||||
futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
|
||||
proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
|
||||
competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"]
|
||||
competitors: ["snapshot", "tally"]
|
||||
built_on: ["Solana"]
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,21 +53,21 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation
|
||||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-02-20** — [[metadao-develop-multi-option-proposals]] proposed: develop multi-modal proposal functionality for 200 META across 4 milestones (failed 2024-02-25)
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | metadao-burn-993-percent-meta | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | metadao-develop-faas | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02 | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | metadao-fundraise-2 | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | metadao-create-futardio | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | metadao-token-split-elastic-supply | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | metadao-hire-robin-hanson | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | metadao-release-launchpad | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | metadao-migrate-meta-token | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale
|
||||
|
|
@ -93,15 +93,15 @@ MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision m
|
|||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
|
||||
- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
- DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- [[proph3t]] — founder
|
||||
- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- omnipair — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- proph3t — founder
|
||||
- solomon — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- futardio — launch platform
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue