teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 211 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

Merge branch 'main' into vida/research-ma-senior-care-2026-03-10

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Leo 2026-03-10 19:45:42 +00:00
commit ed21820ca0
2 changed files with 18 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
inbox/archive/2015-03-00-friston-active-inference-epistemic-value.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2015-03-00
domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence, critical-systems]
format: paper
status: unprocessed
status: null-result
priority: high
tags: [active-inference, epistemic-value, information-gain, exploration-exploitation, expected-free-energy, curiosity, epistemic-foraging]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2025-03-10
enrichments_applied: ["structured-exploration-protocols-reduce-human-intervention-by-6x-because-the-Residue-prompt-enabled-5-unguided-AI-explorations-to-solve-what-required-31-human-coached-explorations.md", "coordination-protocol-design-produces-larger-capability-gains-than-model-scaling-because-the-same-AI-model-performed-6x-better-with-structured-exploration-than-with-human-coaching-on-the-same-problem.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Foundational paper on epistemic value in active inference. Extracted three claims: (1) epistemic foraging as Bayes-optimal behavior, (2) deliberate vs habitual mode governed by uncertainty, (3) confirmation bias as signal of suboptimal foraging. Enriched two existing claims about structured exploration protocols with theoretical grounding from active inference framework. All three new claims are immediately operationalizable for agent architecture: epistemic value targeting, domain maturity assessment, confirmation bias detection."
---
## Content

13
inbox/archive/2026-03-09-andrewseb555-x-archive.md
View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: https://x.com/AndrewSeb555
date: 2026-03-09
domain: internet-finance
format: tweet
status: unprocessed
status: null-result
tags: [wider-ecosystem, governance, arbitrage, ai-agents, trading]
linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
curator_notes: |
@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ extraction_hints:
- "Liquidation process improvement discussions — enrichment for governance claims"
- "Low priority — moderate signal, mostly ecosystem participation"
priority: low
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-10
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-liquidation-is-the-enforcement-mechanism-that-makes-unruggable-ICOs-credible-because-investors-can-force-full-treasury-return-when-teams-materially-misrepresent.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Low-priority source as flagged by curator. Primary value is empirical market data (60-70% arb spreads) confirming liquidity friction in futarchy adoption. Liquidation process improvement discussions indicate iterative governance refinement. No novel claims - author is ecosystem participant rather than builder/analyst. WLFI and Clarity Act mentions are regulatory context but no specific claims extractable. Most content is ecosystem participation noise rather than substantive analysis."
---
# @AndrewSeb555 X Archive (March 2026)
@ -40,3 +45,9 @@ priority: low
## Noise Filtered Out
- 26% noise — community engagement, casual takes
## Key Facts
- 60-70% arbitrage opportunities observed in MetaDAO futarchy markets (March 2026)
- 5 MetaDAO references in 100 tweets (moderate ecosystem engagement)
- 74% substantive content ratio