From f09a4155d5388f6045128e0dbf26a64297d41a54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:22:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] auto-fix: strip 1 broken wiki links Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base. --- ...ail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md index 1f240127..c30bf57c 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Dean's List DAO proposal passed with TWAP threshold requiring only 3% MCAP incre ### Additional Evidence (confirm) -*Source: [[2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model]] | Added: 2026-03-16* +*Source: 2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model | Added: 2026-03-16* The Dean's List proposal passed futarchy governance despite requiring complex multi-step economic modeling (FDV projections, TWAP calculations, sell pressure estimates) that most token holders would not independently verify. The 5.33% projected FDV increase exceeded the 3% TWAP requirement, suggesting the proposal's passage reflected trust in the model rather than independent market validation of the buyback mechanics.