reweave: merge 15 files via frontmatter union [auto]
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
bcdd4336ee
commit
f0f0902c6a
15 changed files with 78 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ related:
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members|related|2026-04-04
|
- community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members|related|2026-04-04
|
||||||
- the fanchise engagement ladder from content to co-ownership is a domain-general pattern for converting passive users into active stakeholders that applies beyond entertainment to investment communities and knowledge collectives|supports|2026-04-20
|
- the fanchise engagement ladder from content to co-ownership is a domain-general pattern for converting passive users into active stakeholders that applies beyond entertainment to investment communities and knowledge collectives|supports|2026-04-20
|
||||||
|
- Creator-led, platform-mediated IP generates community co-creation at scale without ownership alignment when exceptional quality drives intrinsic fandom, but this path is structurally non-scalable compared to ownership-aligned models|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
supports:
|
supports:
|
||||||
- the fanchise engagement ladder from content to co-ownership is a domain-general pattern for converting passive users into active stakeholders that applies beyond entertainment to investment communities and knowledge collectives
|
- the fanchise engagement ladder from content to co-ownership is a domain-general pattern for converting passive users into active stakeholders that applies beyond entertainment to investment communities and knowledge collectives
|
||||||
|
- Creator-led, platform-mediated IP generates community co-creation at scale without ownership alignment when exceptional quality drives intrinsic fandom, but this path is structurally non-scalable compared to ownership-aligned models
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership
|
# fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,14 @@ agent: clay
|
||||||
scope: structural
|
scope: structural
|
||||||
sourcer: The Wrap / Zach Katz
|
sourcer: The Wrap / Zach Katz
|
||||||
related_claims: ["[[creator and corporate media economies are zero-sum because total media time is stagnant and every marginal hour shifts between them]]", "[[creators-became-primary-distribution-layer-for-under-35-news-consumption-by-2025-surpassing-traditional-channels]]", "[[youtube-first-distribution-for-major-studio-coproductions-signals-platform-primacy-over-traditional-broadcast-windowing]]"]
|
related_claims: ["[[creator and corporate media economies are zero-sum because total media time is stagnant and every marginal hour shifts between them]]", "[[creators-became-primary-distribution-layer-for-under-35-news-consumption-by-2025-surpassing-traditional-channels]]", "[[youtube-first-distribution-for-major-studio-coproductions-signals-platform-primacy-over-traditional-broadcast-windowing]]"]
|
||||||
related: ["hollywood-studios-negotiate-on-creator-terms-not-studio-terms-because-creators-control-distribution-and-audience-access", "creators-became-primary-distribution-layer-for-under-35-news-consumption-by-2025-surpassing-traditional-channels", "creator-led-entertainment-shifts-power-from-studio-ip-libraries-to-creator-community-relationships"]
|
related:
|
||||||
|
- hollywood-studios-negotiate-on-creator-terms-not-studio-terms-because-creators-control-distribution-and-audience-access
|
||||||
|
- creators-became-primary-distribution-layer-for-under-35-news-consumption-by-2025-surpassing-traditional-channels
|
||||||
|
- creator-led-entertainment-shifts-power-from-studio-ip-libraries-to-creator-community-relationships
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- YouTube-first distribution with retained creator control outperforms traditional commissioning for independently produced animation by preserving creative authority while accessing algorithmic reach
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- YouTube-first distribution with retained creator control outperforms traditional commissioning for independently produced animation by preserving creative authority while accessing algorithmic reach|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Hollywood studios now negotiate deals on creator terms rather than studio terms because creators control distribution access and audience relationships that studios need
|
# Hollywood studios now negotiate deals on creator terms rather than studio terms because creators control distribution access and audience relationships that studios need
|
||||||
|
|
@ -22,4 +29,4 @@ Zach Katz states that 'Hollywood will absolutely continue tripping over itself t
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Source:** Claynosaurz production partnership cited at Quirino Future Lab 2026
|
**Source:** Claynosaurz production partnership cited at Quirino Future Lab 2026
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Claynosaurz partnered with Mediawan Kids & Family for 40 x 7 min episodes after building 1B+ views independently, demonstrating that traditional production partners (Mediawan) are coming to creators who have already proven audience demand, rather than creators seeking commissions from broadcasters.
|
Claynosaurz partnered with Mediawan Kids & Family for 40 x 7 min episodes after building 1B+ views independently, demonstrating that traditional production partners (Mediawan) are coming to creators who have already proven audience demand, rather than creators seeking commissions from broadcasters.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -10,10 +10,18 @@ agent: vida
|
||||||
sourced_from: health/2025-12-01-colorado-hb25-1002-behavioral-health-outcomes-parity-testing.md
|
sourced_from: health/2025-12-01-colorado-hb25-1002-behavioral-health-outcomes-parity-testing.md
|
||||||
scope: structural
|
scope: structural
|
||||||
sourcer: Colorado General Assembly
|
sourcer: Colorado General Assembly
|
||||||
challenges: ["state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity"]
|
challenges:
|
||||||
related: ["illinois-mhpaea-2024-rule-enforcement-creates-natural-experiment-for-outcome-data-evaluation", "mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates", "state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity"]
|
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
||||||
|
related:
|
||||||
|
- illinois-mhpaea-2024-rule-enforcement-creates-natural-experiment-for-outcome-data-evaluation
|
||||||
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
||||||
|
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Colorado HB 25-1002 establishes the first state-level outcomes data testing authority for behavioral health parity enforcement, creating a potential natural experiment for access-metric enforcement
|
# Colorado HB 25-1002 establishes the first state-level outcomes data testing authority for behavioral health parity enforcement, creating a potential natural experiment for access-metric enforcement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Colorado HB 25-1002, effective January 1, 2026, grants the Insurance Commissioner explicit authority to promulgate rules establishing 'parity data testing using outcomes data' and 'documented access timelines for follow-up visits after an initial behavioral health encounter.' This is categorically different from MHPAEA's process-based requirements, which focus on coverage design (NQTLs, prior authorization procedures) rather than actual access outcomes. The law does not mandate specific metrics but creates the regulatory infrastructure to enforce parity based on whether patients can actually access care, not just whether coverage policies are facially equivalent. This addresses the two-level access problem: MHPAEA enforcement closes coverage gaps (level 1) but not reimbursement-driven access gaps (level 2). Colorado's approach attempts level 1.5 enforcement by requiring outcome-based demonstration of access parity. The law builds on Colorado's existing MHPAEA Parity Report infrastructure (conducted by HSAG), which already audits outcomes data including denial rates, prior authorization timelines, and access metrics across managed care entities. HB 25-1002 formalizes and extends this infrastructure with explicit enforcement authority. The natural experiment value depends on subsequent rulemaking defining specific outcomes metrics and enforcement thresholds, expected 2026-2027.
|
Colorado HB 25-1002, effective January 1, 2026, grants the Insurance Commissioner explicit authority to promulgate rules establishing 'parity data testing using outcomes data' and 'documented access timelines for follow-up visits after an initial behavioral health encounter.' This is categorically different from MHPAEA's process-based requirements, which focus on coverage design (NQTLs, prior authorization procedures) rather than actual access outcomes. The law does not mandate specific metrics but creates the regulatory infrastructure to enforce parity based on whether patients can actually access care, not just whether coverage policies are facially equivalent. This addresses the two-level access problem: MHPAEA enforcement closes coverage gaps (level 1) but not reimbursement-driven access gaps (level 2). Colorado's approach attempts level 1.5 enforcement by requiring outcome-based demonstration of access parity. The law builds on Colorado's existing MHPAEA Parity Report infrastructure (conducted by HSAG), which already audits outcomes data including denial rates, prior authorization timelines, and access metrics across managed care entities. HB 25-1002 formalizes and extends this infrastructure with explicit enforcement authority. The natural experiment value depends on subsequent rulemaking defining specific outcomes metrics and enforcement thresholds, expected 2026-2027.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -14,12 +14,23 @@ supports:
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
||||||
- the-mental-health-supply-gap-is-widening-not-closing-because-demand-outpaces-workforce-growth-and-technology-primarily-serves-the-already-served-rather-than-expanding-access
|
- the-mental-health-supply-gap-is-widening-not-closing-because-demand-outpaces-workforce-growth-and-technology-primarily-serves-the-already-served-rather-than-expanding-access
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002 establishes the first state-level outcomes data testing authority for behavioral health parity enforcement, creating a potential natural experiment for access-metric enforcement
|
||||||
|
- Mental Health Parity Index
|
||||||
|
- The Mental Health Parity Index documents that 43 states have structural access disparities in commercial insurance driven by below-Medicare reimbursement rates, not just coverage design failures
|
||||||
related:
|
related:
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
||||||
- the-mental-health-supply-gap-is-widening-not-closing-because-demand-outpaces-workforce-growth-and-technology-primarily-serves-the-already-served-rather-than-expanding-access
|
- the-mental-health-supply-gap-is-widening-not-closing-because-demand-outpaces-workforce-growth-and-technology-primarily-serves-the-already-served-rather-than-expanding-access
|
||||||
- mental-health-reimbursement-27pct-gap-structural-access-barrier
|
- mental-health-reimbursement-27pct-gap-structural-access-barrier
|
||||||
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002
|
||||||
|
- Reimbursement benchmarking tools are the necessary but missing infrastructure for outcome-based MHPAEA enforcement
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002 establishes the first state-level outcomes data testing authority for behavioral health parity enforcement, creating a potential natural experiment for access-metric enforcement|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- Mental Health Parity Index|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- The Mental Health Parity Index documents that 43 states have structural access disparities in commercial insurance driven by below-Medicare reimbursement rates, not just coverage design failures|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- Reimbursement benchmarking tools are the necessary but missing infrastructure for outcome-based MHPAEA enforcement|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Mental health providers are reimbursed 27.1% less than medical/surgical providers for comparable services creating a structural access barrier that MHPAEA enforcement cannot address because the law requires comparable processes not comparable rates
|
# Mental health providers are reimbursed 27.1% less than medical/surgical providers for comparable services creating a structural access barrier that MHPAEA enforcement cannot address because the law requires comparable processes not comparable rates
|
||||||
|
|
@ -38,4 +49,4 @@ Colorado HB 25-1002's outcomes data testing authority creates a potential enforc
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Source:** Mental Health Parity Index, April 2026
|
**Source:** Mental Health Parity Index, April 2026
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Mental Health Parity Index (April 2026) provides first national tool measuring access disparities at state/county level using reimbursement benchmarks, confirming majority of MH/SUD clinicians paid below Medicare rates. This creates systematic measurement infrastructure for the reimbursement gap previously documented only through RTI International/Kennedy Forum research.
|
Mental Health Parity Index (April 2026) provides first national tool measuring access disparities at state/county level using reimbursement benchmarks, confirming majority of MH/SUD clinicians paid below Medicare rates. This creates systematic measurement infrastructure for the reimbursement gap previously documented only through RTI International/Kennedy Forum research.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -17,10 +17,14 @@ related:
|
||||||
- mental-health-reimbursement-27pct-gap-structural-access-barrier
|
- mental-health-reimbursement-27pct-gap-structural-access-barrier
|
||||||
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
||||||
|
- ERIC (ERISA Industry Committee)
|
||||||
|
- Hospital price transparency rules produce measurable cost reductions only for self-pay patients seeking elective procedures while insured patients show no behavioral change because insurance insulates them from marginal cost
|
||||||
supports:
|
supports:
|
||||||
- State MHPAEA enforcement addresses procedural coverage parity but cannot solve reimbursement rate disparities that drive mental health access barriers
|
- State MHPAEA enforcement addresses procedural coverage parity but cannot solve reimbursement rate disparities that drive mental health access barriers
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- State MHPAEA enforcement addresses procedural coverage parity but cannot solve reimbursement rate disparities that drive mental health access barriers|supports|2026-05-01
|
- State MHPAEA enforcement addresses procedural coverage parity but cannot solve reimbursement rate disparities that drive mental health access barriers|supports|2026-05-01
|
||||||
|
- ERIC (ERISA Industry Committee)|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- Hospital price transparency rules produce measurable cost reductions only for self-pay patients seeking elective procedures while insured patients show no behavioral change because insurance insulates them from marginal cost|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# MHPAEA enforcement closes coverage gaps but not access gaps because payers differentially treat mental health versus medical reimbursement rates
|
# MHPAEA enforcement closes coverage gaps but not access gaps because payers differentially treat mental health versus medical reimbursement rates
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ scope: structural
|
||||||
sourcer: Georgia Office of Commissioner of Insurance and Safety Fire
|
sourcer: Georgia Office of Commissioner of Insurance and Safety Fire
|
||||||
supports:
|
supports:
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-closes-coverage-gaps-but-not-access-gaps-because-payers-differentially-treat-mental-health-versus-medical-reimbursement-rates
|
||||||
|
- The Mental Health Parity Index documents that 43 states have structural access disparities in commercial insurance driven by below-Medicare reimbursement rates, not just coverage design failures
|
||||||
related:
|
related:
|
||||||
- mental-health-reimbursement-27pct-gap-structural-access-barrier
|
- mental-health-reimbursement-27pct-gap-structural-access-barrier
|
||||||
- trump-mhpaea-2024-rule-pause-suspends-outcome-data-enforcement-preserves-procedural-compliance
|
- trump-mhpaea-2024-rule-pause-suspends-outcome-data-enforcement-preserves-procedural-compliance
|
||||||
|
|
@ -20,6 +21,12 @@ related:
|
||||||
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
||||||
- illinois-mhpaea-2024-rule-enforcement-creates-natural-experiment-for-outcome-data-evaluation
|
- illinois-mhpaea-2024-rule-enforcement-creates-natural-experiment-for-outcome-data-evaluation
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002
|
||||||
|
- ERIC (ERISA Industry Committee)
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- ERIC (ERISA Industry Committee)|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- The Mental Health Parity Index documents that 43 states have structural access disparities in commercial insurance driven by below-Medicare reimbursement rates, not just coverage design failures|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# State MHPAEA enforcement addresses procedural coverage parity but cannot solve reimbursement rate disparities that drive mental health access barriers
|
# State MHPAEA enforcement addresses procedural coverage parity but cannot solve reimbursement rate disparities that drive mental health access barriers
|
||||||
|
|
@ -59,4 +66,4 @@ Illinois piloted the Mental Health Parity Index after signing a mental health pa
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Source:** MultiState Aug 2025, Becker's Behavioral Health
|
**Source:** MultiState Aug 2025, Becker's Behavioral Health
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
State enforcement is bipartisan: Georgia's $25M enforcement (largest in US history) was conducted by a Republican commissioner, while Washington's enforcement was led by a Democrat commissioner. This bipartisan pattern suggests state enforcement compensation is driven by structural healthcare access failures rather than partisan ideology, increasing the durability of the trend.
|
State enforcement is bipartisan: Georgia's $25M enforcement (largest in US history) was conducted by a Republican commissioner, while Washington's enforcement was led by a Democrat commissioner. This bipartisan pattern suggests state enforcement compensation is driven by structural healthcare access failures rather than partisan ideology, increasing the durability of the trend.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ related:
|
||||||
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
- state-mhpaea-enforcement-addresses-procedural-parity-not-reimbursement-parity
|
||||||
- illinois-mhpaea-2024-rule-enforcement-creates-natural-experiment-for-outcome-data-evaluation
|
- illinois-mhpaea-2024-rule-enforcement-creates-natural-experiment-for-outcome-data-evaluation
|
||||||
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
- mhpaea-enforcement-evolved-three-levels-coverage-access-metrics-reimbursement
|
||||||
|
- ERIC (ERISA Industry Committee)
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- ERIC (ERISA Industry Committee)|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Trump administration's MHPAEA 2024 rule enforcement pause specifically suspended outcome-data evaluation requirements while preserving procedural comparative analysis requirements that payers already know how to satisfy
|
# Trump administration's MHPAEA 2024 rule enforcement pause specifically suspended outcome-data evaluation requirements while preserving procedural comparative analysis requirements that payers already know how to satisfy
|
||||||
|
|
@ -51,4 +54,4 @@ The Kaiser settlement creates a nuanced enforcement posture under Trump DOL: out
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Source:** Synthesis of 2024 Final Rule provisions
|
**Source:** Synthesis of 2024 Final Rule provisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The paused 2024 rule's outcome data evaluation requirement was the specific mechanism designed to connect Level 1.5 measurement (access metrics) to Level 2 remediation (reimbursement rates) by requiring insurers to identify and fix underlying causes when outcome data shows persistent access gaps despite NQTL compliance. The pause removes this connection mechanism.
|
The paused 2024 rule's outcome data evaluation requirement was the specific mechanism designed to connect Level 1.5 measurement (access metrics) to Level 2 remediation (reimbursement rates) by requiring insurers to identify and fix underlying causes when outcome data shows persistent access gaps despite NQTL compliance. The pause removes this connection mechanism.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,13 @@ related:
|
||||||
supports:
|
supports:
|
||||||
- DCM-registered prediction market platforms converging on perpetual futures marks structural repositioning as full-spectrum derivatives exchanges, creating a three-way category split distinguishing regulated event platforms, offshore decentralized venues, and on-chain governance markets
|
- DCM-registered prediction market platforms converging on perpetual futures marks structural repositioning as full-spectrum derivatives exchanges, creating a three-way category split distinguishing regulated event platforms, offshore decentralized venues, and on-chain governance markets
|
||||||
- Prediction market platform competition in 2026 is being decided by ownership alignment rather than product features or regulatory status, with token-value-accrual models constituting a competitive moat that non-ownership user models cannot easily replicate
|
- Prediction market platform competition in 2026 is being decided by ownership alignment rather than product features or regulatory status, with token-value-accrual models constituting a competitive moat that non-ownership user models cannot easily replicate
|
||||||
|
- John Wang
|
||||||
|
- Kalshi-Hyperliquid co-authorship creates regulatory arbitrage through market design licensing where DCM expertise is applied to offshore platforms that capture non-US markets
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- DCM-registered prediction market platforms converging on perpetual futures marks structural repositioning as full-spectrum derivatives exchanges, creating a three-way category split distinguishing regulated event platforms, offshore decentralized venues, and on-chain governance markets|supports|2026-04-30
|
- DCM-registered prediction market platforms converging on perpetual futures marks structural repositioning as full-spectrum derivatives exchanges, creating a three-way category split distinguishing regulated event platforms, offshore decentralized venues, and on-chain governance markets|supports|2026-04-30
|
||||||
- Prediction market platform competition in 2026 is being decided by ownership alignment rather than product features or regulatory status, with token-value-accrual models constituting a competitive moat that non-ownership user models cannot easily replicate|supports|2026-05-01
|
- Prediction market platform competition in 2026 is being decided by ownership alignment rather than product features or regulatory status, with token-value-accrual models constituting a competitive moat that non-ownership user models cannot easily replicate|supports|2026-05-01
|
||||||
|
- John Wang|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- Kalshi-Hyperliquid co-authorship creates regulatory arbitrage through market design licensing where DCM expertise is applied to offshore platforms that capture non-US markets|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Kalshi-Hyperliquid HIP-4 partnership creates offshore decentralized prediction market regulatory arbitrage model separating US access from execution infrastructure
|
# Kalshi-Hyperliquid HIP-4 partnership creates offshore decentralized prediction market regulatory arbitrage model separating US access from execution infrastructure
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -15,8 +15,11 @@ related:
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- institutional-holder-redemption-windows-signal-conviction-through-revealed-preference-not-lockup-duration|related|2026-04-19
|
- institutional-holder-redemption-windows-signal-conviction-through-revealed-preference-not-lockup-duration|related|2026-04-19
|
||||||
- Token vesting against volume milestones solves the country lead coordination problem by aligning incentives with the regulatory operational and execution risk of launching new markets|related|2026-04-20
|
- Token vesting against volume milestones solves the country lead coordination problem by aligning incentives with the regulatory operational and execution risk of launching new markets|related|2026-04-20
|
||||||
|
- Token unlock schedules create exit liquidity cycles that misalign speculative holders from long-term community building in tokenized IP|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
sourced_from:
|
sourced_from:
|
||||||
- inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-09-theiaresearch-x-archive.md
|
- inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-09-theiaresearch-x-archive.md
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- Token unlock schedules create exit liquidity cycles that misalign speculative holders from long-term community building in tokenized IP
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Time-based token vesting is hedgeable making standard lockups meaningless as alignment mechanisms because investors can short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure while appearing locked
|
# Time-based token vesting is hedgeable making standard lockups meaningless as alignment mechanisms because investors can short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure while appearing locked
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ depends_on:
|
||||||
related:
|
related:
|
||||||
- Planetary defense significantly reduces asteroid-specific extinction risk but does not address gamma-ray bursts, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe which remain primary rationale for multiplanetary expansion
|
- Planetary defense significantly reduces asteroid-specific extinction risk but does not address gamma-ray bursts, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe which remain primary rationale for multiplanetary expansion
|
||||||
- Planetary defense addresses asteroid/comet impacts but not GRBs, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe — the risks most clearly requiring multiplanetary distribution
|
- Planetary defense addresses asteroid/comet impacts but not GRBs, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe — the risks most clearly requiring multiplanetary distribution
|
||||||
|
- Increasing aluminum radiation shielding beyond 10 g/cm² is counterproductive for GCR protection because heavy ion spallation produces more biologically effective secondary radiation than the additional shielding blocks
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- Planetary defense significantly reduces asteroid-specific extinction risk but does not address gamma-ray bursts, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe which remain primary rationale for multiplanetary expansion|related|2026-04-24
|
- Planetary defense significantly reduces asteroid-specific extinction risk but does not address gamma-ray bursts, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe which remain primary rationale for multiplanetary expansion|related|2026-04-24
|
||||||
- Planetary defense addresses asteroid/comet impacts but not GRBs, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe — the risks most clearly requiring multiplanetary distribution|related|2026-04-24
|
- Planetary defense addresses asteroid/comet impacts but not GRBs, supervolcanism, or anthropogenic catastrophe — the risks most clearly requiring multiplanetary distribution|related|2026-04-24
|
||||||
|
- Increasing aluminum radiation shielding beyond 10 g/cm² is counterproductive for GCR protection because heavy ion spallation produces more biologically effective secondary radiation than the additional shielding blocks|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Radiation protection for space habitation converges on a multi-layered strategy because no single approach provides adequate shielding against both galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events
|
# Radiation protection for space habitation converges on a multi-layered strategy because no single approach provides adequate shielding against both galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ type: entity
|
||||||
entity_type: organization
|
entity_type: organization
|
||||||
domain: health
|
domain: health
|
||||||
status: active
|
status: active
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002 establishes the first state-level outcomes data testing authority for behavioral health parity enforcement, creating a potential natural experiment for access-metric enforcement
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- Colorado HB 25-1002 establishes the first state-level outcomes data testing authority for behavioral health parity enforcement, creating a potential natural experiment for access-metric enforcement|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Colorado HB 25-1002
|
# Colorado HB 25-1002
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ sponsors:
|
||||||
- Ballmer Group
|
- Ballmer Group
|
||||||
website: https://www.thekennedyforum.org/focus-areas/coverage-parity/parity-index/
|
website: https://www.thekennedyforum.org/focus-areas/coverage-parity/parity-index/
|
||||||
tags: [mental-health-parity, MHPAEA, reimbursement-rates, network-adequacy, monitoring-infrastructure]
|
tags: [mental-health-parity, MHPAEA, reimbursement-rates, network-adequacy, monitoring-infrastructure]
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- The Mental Health Parity Index documents that 43 states have structural access disparities in commercial insurance driven by below-Medicare reimbursement rates, not just coverage design failures
|
||||||
|
- Reimbursement benchmarking tools are the necessary but missing infrastructure for outcome-based MHPAEA enforcement
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- The Mental Health Parity Index documents that 43 states have structural access disparities in commercial insurance driven by below-Medicare reimbursement rates, not just coverage design failures|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
- Reimbursement benchmarking tools are the necessary but missing infrastructure for outcome-based MHPAEA enforcement|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Mental Health Parity Index
|
# Mental Health Parity Index
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ name: John Wang
|
||||||
role: Head of Crypto, Kalshi
|
role: Head of Crypto, Kalshi
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
status: active
|
status: active
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- Kalshi-Hyperliquid co-authorship creates regulatory arbitrage through market design licensing where DCM expertise is applied to offshore platforms that capture non-US markets
|
||||||
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
|
- Kalshi-Hyperliquid co-authorship creates regulatory arbitrage through market design licensing where DCM expertise is applied to offshore platforms that capture non-US markets|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# John Wang
|
# John Wang
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ related:
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|related|2026-04-17
|
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|related|2026-04-17
|
||||||
- Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms|related|2026-04-17
|
- Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms|related|2026-04-17
|
||||||
|
- Narrative can function as counter-infrastructure to dominant cultural narratives when quality and timing align, as demonstrated by cross-spectrum critical consensus|supports|2026-05-02
|
||||||
|
supports:
|
||||||
|
- Narrative can function as counter-infrastructure to dominant cultural narratives when quality and timing align, as demonstrated by cross-spectrum critical consensus
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale
|
# narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ supports:
|
||||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation
|
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation
|
||||||
related:
|
related:
|
||||||
- Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms
|
- Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms
|
||||||
|
- Narrative can function as counter-infrastructure to dominant cultural narratives when quality and timing align, as demonstrated by cross-spectrum critical consensus
|
||||||
reweave_edges:
|
reweave_edges:
|
||||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|supports|2026-04-17
|
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||||
- Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms|related|2026-04-17
|
- Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms|related|2026-04-17
|
||||||
|
- Narrative can function as counter-infrastructure to dominant cultural narratives when quality and timing align, as demonstrated by cross-spectrum critical consensus|related|2026-05-02
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale suggesting coordination narratives must emerge from shared crisis not deliberate construction
|
# no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale suggesting coordination narratives must emerge from shared crisis not deliberate construction
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue