auto-fix: strip 4 broken wiki links
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4da8fb65c0
commit
f28af86055
4 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Academic research confirms the internet structurally opposes singular-vision nar
|
|||
- "Design Fiction" (singular authoritative vision) worked in the print era of simultaneity
|
||||
- "Design Futures" (collaborative, multiple plausible scenarios) is "participatory by necessity" in the internet era of differential context
|
||||
|
||||
This provides the structural explanation for why [[no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale]] — it's not that master narratives are badly designed, it's that the internet environment structurally prevents singular vision from achieving saturation. Only collaborative, participatory foresight can work at scale in differential context.
|
||||
This provides the structural explanation for why no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale — it's not that master narratives are badly designed, it's that the internet environment structurally prevents singular vision from achieving saturation. Only collaborative, participatory foresight can work at scale in differential context.
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-domain implication (flagged for Leo):** TeleoHumanity's narrative strategy may need to be Design Futures (collaborative foresight) rather than Design Fiction (singular master narrative). The Teleo collective IS already a collaborative foresight structure — this may be the structural reason it can work in the internet era.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ tags: [mrbeast, beast-industries, feastables, step, content-to-commerce, communi
|
|||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]] — this IS the attractor state at scale
|
||||
- [[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] — MrBeast's content spend IS the community building mechanism; Step is the commercial harvest
|
||||
- [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]] — MrBeast's scarce resource is community trust, not content production
|
||||
- value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework — MrBeast's scarce resource is community trust, not content production
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
- CLAIM CANDIDATE (from Session 10, now with more data): "The content-to-community-to-commerce stack generates ~6:1 revenue multiplier at mega-creator scale, with content as loss leader and community trust as the scarce asset that generates the commercial value"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The community-speculation distinction: communities anchored around genuine gamep
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] — this data shows "aligned" must mean engaged around the actual product, not around speculation
|
||||
- [[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs]] — gaming is proving this attractor earlier than other entertainment categories
|
||||
- the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs — gaming is proving this attractor earlier than other entertainment categories
|
||||
- [[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]] — the play-and-own model is exactly this engagement stack
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Fiction-to-reality pipeline fails (or is severely delayed) when:
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]] — this model SPECIFIES when the infrastructure function activates
|
||||
- [[no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale]] — consistent with the model: organic adoption = distributed adoption = slow/unreliable
|
||||
- no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale — consistent with the model: organic adoption = distributed adoption = slow/unreliable
|
||||
- [[ideological adoption is a complex contagion requiring multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted sources not simple viral spread through weak ties]] — complex contagion research is part of the distributed adoption barrier story
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue