extract: 2026-03-20-stelling-gpai-cop-industry-mapping

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-20 00:49:18 +00:00
parent dfd21f428a
commit f43dcda5e2

View file

@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-04-01
domain: ai-alignment domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [] secondary_domains: []
format: paper format: paper
status: unprocessed status: null-result
priority: high priority: high
tags: [GPAI, Code-of-Practice, industry-practices, EU-AI-Act, safety-measures, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google-DeepMind, compliance, voluntary] tags: [GPAI, Code-of-Practice, industry-practices, EU-AI-Act, safety-measures, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google-DeepMind, compliance, voluntary]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-20
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
--- ---
## Content ## Content
@ -42,3 +46,12 @@ tags: [GPAI, Code-of-Practice, industry-practices, EU-AI-Act, safety-measures, O
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Shows that Code of Practice may be formalizing existing practices rather than creating new obligations — relevant to whether mandatory framework actually changes behavior WHY ARCHIVED: Shows that Code of Practice may be formalizing existing practices rather than creating new obligations — relevant to whether mandatory framework actually changes behavior
EXTRACTION HINT: Be careful about the author caveat — this is evidence about stated policies not compliance evidence; extractor should note this distinction clearly EXTRACTION HINT: Be careful about the author caveat — this is evidence about stated policies not compliance evidence; extractor should note this distinction clearly
## Key Facts
- EU AI Act GPAI Code of Practice Third Draft finalized April 2025
- Code of Practice received by Commission July 10, 2025
- Code of Practice became applicable August 2, 2025
- Analysis examined documents from over a dozen companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon
- Paper is 166 pages analyzing safety and security measures
- Authors found relevant quotes from at least 5 companies for majority of measures in Commitments II.1-II.16