pipeline: clean 2 stale queue duplicates
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
469e4c028d
commit
f61e557eb1
2 changed files with 0 additions and 73 deletions
|
|
@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: source
|
|
||||||
source_type: telegram-contribution
|
|
||||||
title: "Source from @m3taversal — 01Resolved (@01resolved) analysis on Superclaw liquidation proposal and post-ICO"
|
|
||||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
||||||
date: 2026-03-27
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
format: contribution
|
|
||||||
status: enrichment
|
|
||||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
||||||
contribution_type: source-submission
|
|
||||||
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'futarchy', 'ownership-coins', 'defi', 'governance', 'market-analysis']
|
|
||||||
processed_by: rio
|
|
||||||
processed_date: 2026-03-28
|
|
||||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Source: 01Resolved (@01resolved) analysis on Superclaw liquidation proposal and post-ICO governance guardrai
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
|
|
||||||
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Verbatim User Message
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Hey @FutAIrdBot here’s some interesting info for you https://x.com/01resolved/status/2037550464188006477?s=46 and https://x.com/01resolved/status/2037550467316847015?s=46
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Rio's Context
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
01Resolved (@01resolved) analysis on Superclaw liquidation proposal and post-ICO governance guardrails. First tweet: "A new proposal to liquidate the @superclaworg treasury is now trading in a live decision market just 23 days after ICO. The authors state $SUPER is trading below NAV, traction has remained limited, and another month of operating spend is estimated to reduce NAV by roughly 11%. Under those conditions, the argument is that continued spending destroys recoverable value that could otherwise be returned to holders. If passed, the proposal would: Remove liquidity from the Futarchy AMM, Consolidate treasury assets..." Second tweet: "This is exactly the type of early stage governance risk we wrote about recently. Our view is that sensitive treasury proposals should be subject to project specific guardrails and post-ICO timing windows, rather than becoming immediately eligible. The @P2Pdotme ICO currently live on @MetaDAOProject appears to already reflect some of this thinking. In the ICO details, community governance proposals are only enabled 7-9 months after funding. Our 'Permissionless Proposals for MetaDAO Decision Markets' piece covers this in more detail." Attribution: shared by @m3taversal
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Facts
|
|
||||||
- Superclaw liquidation proposal estimates another month of operating spend would reduce NAV by approximately 11%
|
|
||||||
- P2P.me ICO implements 7-9 month delay on community governance proposals post-funding
|
|
||||||
- 01Resolved published analysis on early-stage governance risk and post-ICO timing windows
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: source
|
|
||||||
source_type: telegram-contribution
|
|
||||||
title: "Source from @m3taversal — Jussy_world thread on P2P.me ICO concentration — 10 wallets filled 93% of $5.3M "
|
|
||||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
||||||
date: 2026-03-27
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
format: contribution
|
|
||||||
status: enrichment
|
|
||||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
||||||
contribution_type: source-submission
|
|
||||||
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'crypto-infra']
|
|
||||||
processed_by: rio
|
|
||||||
processed_date: 2026-03-28
|
|
||||||
enrichments_applied: ["access-friction-functions-as-a-natural-conviction-filter-in-token-launches-because-process-difficulty-selects-for-genuine-believers-while-price-friction-selects-for-wealthy-speculators.md"]
|
|
||||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Source: Jussy_world thread on P2P.me ICO concentration — 10 wallets filled 93% of $5.3M raise, 336 contribut
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
|
|
||||||
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Verbatim User Message
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@FutAIrdBot https://x.com/jussy_world/status/2037542331075944739?s=46
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Rio's Context
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Jussy_world thread on P2P.me ICO concentration — 10 wallets filled 93% of $5.3M raise, 336 contributors, Polymarket betting on ICO outcome, team response calling it "early conviction." User @m3taversal flagged. https://x.com/jussy_world/status/2037542331075944739
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Facts
|
|
||||||
- P2P.me ICO raised $5.3M total
|
|
||||||
- P2P.me ICO had 336 total contributors
|
|
||||||
- 10 wallets provided 93% of the $5.3M raise (~$4.93M)
|
|
||||||
- Polymarket created betting markets on P2P.me ICO outcome
|
|
||||||
- P2P.me team publicly responded to concentration criticism by calling it 'early conviction'
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue