diff --git a/inbox/archive/general/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-statement-on-p2p-polymarket-betting-contro.md b/inbox/archive/general/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-statement-on-p2p-polymarket-betting-contro.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..80590464
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/general/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-statement-on-p2p-polymarket-betting-contro.md
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+type: source
+source_type: telegram-contribution
+title: "Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder add"
+author: "@m3taversal"
+date: 2026-03-30
+domain: internet-finance
+format: contribution
+status: processed
+proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
+contribution_type: source-submission
+tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'governance']
+---
+
+# Source: Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder b
+
+Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
+Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
+
+## Verbatim User Message
+
+@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze
+
+## Rio's Context
+
+Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder betting on own ICO outcome on Polymarket, states they would have pushed against it if known earlier, describes intervention approach. https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 — attributed to @m3taversal