From fa0b79bfb0aa98d5e6d0812508d34ef5cc9efd00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:07:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] auto-fix: strip 3 broken wiki links Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base. --- ... gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md | 4 ++-- ...ous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/domains/entertainment/GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md b/domains/entertainment/GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md index 4cb3eb12..5e3b449b 100644 --- a/domains/entertainment/GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md +++ b/domains/entertainment/GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md @@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ The 60%→26% collapse in consumer enthusiasm for AI-generated creator content b ### Additional Evidence (extend) -*Source: [[2026-01-01-koinsights-authenticity-premium-ai-rejection]] | Added: 2026-03-16* +*Source: 2026-01-01-koinsights-authenticity-premium-ai-rejection | Added: 2026-03-16* The binding constraint is specifically a moral disgust response in emotionally meaningful contexts, not just general acceptance issues. Journal of Business Research found that AI authorship triggers moral disgust even when content is identical to human-written versions. This suggests the gate is values-based rejection, not quality assessment. ### Additional Evidence (confirm) -*Source: [[2026-02-01-seedance-2-ai-video-benchmark]] | Added: 2026-03-16* +*Source: 2026-02-01-seedance-2-ai-video-benchmark | Added: 2026-03-16* Sora standalone app achieved 12 million downloads but retention below 8% at day 30 (vs 30%+ benchmark for successful apps), demonstrating that even among early adopters who actively sought AI video tools, usage hasn't created a compelling habit. This empirically confirms that capability has outpaced demand-side acceptance. diff --git a/domains/entertainment/human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md b/domains/entertainment/human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md index 78a6f8d9..4465a982 100644 --- a/domains/entertainment/human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md +++ b/domains/entertainment/human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The 60%→26% enthusiasm collapse for AI-generated creator content (2023-2025) w ### Additional Evidence (confirm) -*Source: [[2026-01-01-koinsights-authenticity-premium-ai-rejection]] | Added: 2026-03-16* +*Source: 2026-01-01-koinsights-authenticity-premium-ai-rejection | Added: 2026-03-16* The 'authenticity premium' is now measurable across multiple studies. Nuremberg Institute (2025) found that simply labeling an ad as AI-generated lowers ad attitudes and willingness to purchase, creating a quantifiable trust penalty for AI authorship.