leo: homepage rotation — JSON sidecar for runtime consumption

Adds homepage-rotation.json as the machine-readable artifact for livingip-web.
Markdown stays canonical for human review; JSON is what the frontend reads.

Schema per entry: order, act, pillar, slug, path, title, domain, sourcer,
api_fetchable, note. 25 entries, 11 fetchable via /api/claims/<slug>,
14 render-only until Argus FOUND-001 exposes foundations + core paths.

Frontend access pattern:
  https://git.livingip.xyz/teleo/teleo-codex/raw/branch/main/agents/leo/curation/homepage-rotation.json

Also fixes off-by-one in markdown footer (10→11 fetchable).

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <D35C9237-A739-432E-A3DB-20D52D1577A9>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-04-25 11:16:59 +01:00 committed by Teleo Agents
parent 7f07691b04
commit fab185e4db
2 changed files with 312 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
{
"version": 2,
"schema_version": 2,
"updated": "2026-04-25",
"source": "agents/leo/curation/homepage-rotation.md (canonical for human review; this JSON is the runtime artifact)",
"maintained_by": "leo",
"design_note": "Runtime consumers (livingip-web homepage) read this JSON. The markdown sibling is the human-reviewable source. When the markdown changes, regenerate the JSON. Both ship in the same PR.",
"rotation": [
{
"order": 1,
"act": "Opening — The problem",
"pillar": "P1: Coordination failure is structural",
"slug": "multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "Multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "Moloch / Schmachtenberger / algorithmic game theory",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Opens with the diagnosis. Structural, not moral."
},
{
"order": 2,
"act": "Opening — The problem",
"pillar": "P1: Coordination failure is structural",
"slug": "the metacrisis is a single generator function where all civilizational-scale crises share the structural cause of rivalrous dynamics on exponential technology on finite substrate",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "The metacrisis is a single generator function",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "Daniel Schmachtenberger",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "One generator function, many symptoms."
},
{
"order": 3,
"act": "Opening — The problem",
"pillar": "P1: Coordination failure is structural",
"slug": "the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "The alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (observed industry pattern — Anthropic RSP → 2yr erosion)",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Moloch applied to AI. Concrete, near-term, falsifiable."
},
{
"order": 4,
"act": "Why it's endogenous",
"pillar": "P2: Self-organized criticality",
"slug": "minsky's financial instability hypothesis shows that stability breeds instability as good times incentivize leverage and risk-taking that fragilize the system until shocks trigger cascades",
"path": "foundations/critical-systems/",
"title": "Minsky's financial instability hypothesis",
"domain": "critical-systems",
"sourcer": "Hyman Minsky (disaster-myopia framing)",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Instability is endogenous — no external actor needed. Crises as feature, not bug."
},
{
"order": 5,
"act": "Why it's endogenous",
"pillar": "P2: Self-organized criticality",
"slug": "power laws in financial returns indicate self-organized criticality not statistical anomalies because markets tune themselves to maximize information processing and adaptability",
"path": "foundations/critical-systems/",
"title": "Power laws in financial returns indicate self-organized criticality",
"domain": "critical-systems",
"sourcer": "Bak / Mandelbrot / Kauffman",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Reframes fat tails from pathology to feature."
},
{
"order": 6,
"act": "Why it's endogenous",
"pillar": "P2: Self-organized criticality",
"slug": "optimization for efficiency without regard for resilience creates systemic fragility because interconnected systems transmit and amplify local failures into cascading breakdowns",
"path": "foundations/critical-systems/",
"title": "Optimization for efficiency creates systemic fragility",
"domain": "critical-systems",
"sourcer": "Taleb / McChrystal / Abdalla manuscript",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Fragility from efficiency. Five-evidence-chain claim."
},
{
"order": 7,
"act": "The solution",
"pillar": "P4: Mechanism design without central authority",
"slug": "designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "Designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "Ostrom / Hayek / mechanism design lineage",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "The core pivot. Why we build mechanisms, not decide outcomes."
},
{
"order": 8,
"act": "The solution",
"pillar": "P4: Mechanism design without central authority",
"slug": "futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making",
"path": "core/mechanisms/",
"title": "Futarchy solves trustless joint ownership",
"domain": "mechanisms",
"sourcer": "Robin Hanson (originator) + MetaDAO implementation",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Futarchy thesis crystallized. Links to the specific mechanism we're betting on."
},
{
"order": 9,
"act": "The solution",
"pillar": "P4: Mechanism design without central authority",
"slug": "decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning because dispersed knowledge cannot be collected into a single mind but can be coordinated through price signals that encode local information into globally accessible indicators",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "Decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "Friedrich Hayek",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Hayek's knowledge problem. Solana-native resonance (price signals, decentralization)."
},
{
"order": 10,
"act": "The solution",
"pillar": "P4: Mechanism design without central authority",
"slug": "universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective",
"path": "domains/ai-alignment/",
"title": "Universal alignment is mathematically impossible",
"domain": "ai-alignment",
"sourcer": "Kenneth Arrow / synthesis applied to AI",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Arrow's theorem applied to alignment. Bridge to social choice theory."
},
{
"order": 11,
"act": "Collective intelligence is engineerable",
"pillar": "P5: CI is measurable",
"slug": "collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "Collective intelligence is a measurable property",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "Anita Woolley et al.",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Makes CI scientifically tractable. Grounding for the agent collective."
},
{
"order": 12,
"act": "Collective intelligence is engineerable",
"pillar": "P5: CI is measurable",
"slug": "adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution when wrong challenges have real cost evaluation is structurally separated from contribution and confirmation is rewarded alongside novelty",
"path": "foundations/collective-intelligence/",
"title": "Adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge",
"domain": "collective-intelligence",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (KB governance design)",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Why challengers weigh 0.35. Core attribution incentive."
},
{
"order": 13,
"act": "Knowledge theory of value",
"pillar": "P3+P7: Knowledge as value",
"slug": "products are crystallized imagination that augment human capacity beyond individual knowledge by embodying practical uses of knowhow in physical order",
"path": "foundations/teleological-economics/",
"title": "Products are crystallized imagination",
"domain": "teleological-economics",
"sourcer": "Cesar Hidalgo",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Information theory of value. Markets make us wiser, not richer."
},
{
"order": 14,
"act": "Knowledge theory of value",
"pillar": "P3+P7: Knowledge as value",
"slug": "the personbyte is a fundamental quantization limit on knowledge accumulation forcing all complex production into networked teams",
"path": "foundations/teleological-economics/",
"title": "The personbyte is a fundamental quantization limit",
"domain": "teleological-economics",
"sourcer": "Cesar Hidalgo",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "Why coordination matters for complexity."
},
{
"order": 15,
"act": "Knowledge theory of value",
"pillar": "P3+P7: Knowledge as value",
"slug": "value is doubly unstable because both market prices and underlying relevance shift with the knowledge landscape",
"path": "domains/internet-finance/",
"title": "Value is doubly unstable",
"domain": "internet-finance",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (Abdalla manuscript + Hidalgo)",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Two layers of instability. Investment theory foundation."
},
{
"order": 16,
"act": "Knowledge theory of value",
"pillar": "P3+P7: Knowledge as value",
"slug": "priority inheritance means nascent technologies inherit economic value from the future systems they will enable because dependency chains transmit importance backward through time",
"path": "domains/internet-finance/",
"title": "Priority inheritance in technology investment",
"domain": "internet-finance",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (original concept) + Hidalgo product space",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Bridges CS / investment theory. Sticky metaphor."
},
{
"order": 17,
"act": "AI inflection",
"pillar": "P8: AI inflection",
"slug": "agentic Taylorism means humanity feeds knowledge into AI through usage as a byproduct of labor and whether this concentrates or distributes depends entirely on engineering and evaluation",
"path": "domains/ai-alignment/",
"title": "Agentic Taylorism",
"domain": "ai-alignment",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (original concept)",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Core contribution to the AI-labor frame. Taylor parallel made live."
},
{
"order": 18,
"act": "AI inflection",
"pillar": "P8: AI inflection",
"slug": "voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints",
"path": "domains/ai-alignment/",
"title": "Voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure",
"domain": "ai-alignment",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (observed pattern — Anthropic RSP trajectory)",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Observed pattern, not theory."
},
{
"order": 19,
"act": "AI inflection",
"pillar": "P8: AI inflection",
"slug": "single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness",
"path": "domains/ai-alignment/",
"title": "Single-reward RLHF cannot align diverse preferences",
"domain": "ai-alignment",
"sourcer": "Alignment research literature",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Specific, testable. Connects AI alignment to Arrow's theorem (#10)."
},
{
"order": 20,
"act": "AI inflection",
"pillar": "P8: AI inflection",
"slug": "nested-scalable-oversight-achieves-at-most-52-percent-success-at-moderate-capability-gaps",
"path": "domains/ai-alignment/",
"title": "Nested scalable oversight achieves at most 52% success at moderate capability gaps",
"domain": "ai-alignment",
"sourcer": "Anthropic debate research",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Quantitative. Mainstream oversight has empirical limits."
},
{
"order": 21,
"act": "Attractor dynamics",
"pillar": "P1+P8: Attractor dynamics",
"slug": "attractor-molochian-exhaustion",
"path": "domains/grand-strategy/",
"title": "Attractor: Molochian exhaustion",
"domain": "grand-strategy",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (Moloch sprint synthesis)",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Civilizational attractor basin. Names the default bad outcome."
},
{
"order": 22,
"act": "Attractor dynamics",
"pillar": "P1+P8: Attractor dynamics",
"slug": "attractor-authoritarian-lock-in",
"path": "domains/grand-strategy/",
"title": "Attractor: Authoritarian lock-in",
"domain": "grand-strategy",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (Moloch sprint synthesis)",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "One-way door. AI removes 3 historical escape mechanisms. Urgency argument."
},
{
"order": 23,
"act": "Attractor dynamics",
"pillar": "P1+P8: Attractor dynamics",
"slug": "attractor-coordination-enabled-abundance",
"path": "domains/grand-strategy/",
"title": "Attractor: Coordination-enabled abundance",
"domain": "grand-strategy",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (Moloch sprint synthesis)",
"api_fetchable": true,
"note": "Gateway positive basin. What we're building toward."
},
{
"order": 24,
"act": "Coda — Strategic framing",
"pillar": "TeleoHumanity axiom",
"slug": "collective superintelligence is the alternative to monolithic AI controlled by a few",
"path": "core/teleohumanity/",
"title": "Collective superintelligence is the alternative",
"domain": "teleohumanity",
"sourcer": "TeleoHumanity axiom VI",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "The positive thesis. What we're building."
},
{
"order": 25,
"act": "Coda — Strategic framing",
"pillar": "P1+P8: Closing the loop",
"slug": "AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on creating a self-undermining loop that collective intelligence can break",
"path": "core/grand-strategy/",
"title": "AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on",
"domain": "grand-strategy",
"sourcer": "m3taversal (grand strategy framing)",
"api_fetchable": false,
"note": "AI's self-undermining tendency is exactly what collective intelligence addresses."
}
]
}

View file

@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ Schema per entry: `slug`, `path`, `title`, `domain`, `sourcer`, `api_fetchable`,
## Operational notes
**Slug verification — done.** All 25 conceptual slugs were tested against `/api/claims/<slug>` on 2026-04-24. Results:
- **10 of 25 resolve** via the current API (all `domains/` content)
- **15 of 25 404** because the API doesn't expose `foundations/` or `core/` content (except `core/mechanisms/`)
- **11 of 25 resolve** via the current API (all `domains/` content + `core/mechanisms/`)
- **14 of 25 404** because the API doesn't expose `foundations/` or non-mechanisms `core/` content
- **1 claim (#3 alignment tax) is not in the Qdrant search index** despite existing on disk — embedding pipeline gap
**Argus tickets filed:**