extract: 2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model

Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-16 12:46:16 +00:00
parent f4ceaec012
commit fb34c875ee
3 changed files with 27 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ Dean's List DAO fee structure proposal passed despite requiring traders to activ
Dean's List DAO proposal passed with TWAP threshold requiring only 3% MCAP increase ($307,855 vs $298,889 baseline), suggesting the market viewed the fee increase as marginally positive but not strongly so. The conservative 3% threshold indicates either low participation or weak conviction despite clear revenue projections showing 20x fee increase.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
The Dean's List proposal passed futarchy governance despite requiring complex multi-step economic modeling (FDV projections, TWAP calculations, sell pressure estimates) that most token holders would not independently verify. The 5.33% projected FDV increase exceeded the 3% TWAP requirement, suggesting the proposal's passage reflected trust in the model rather than independent market validation of the buyback mechanics.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ The model assumes consistent service demand (6 dApp reviews per month) and stabl
The proposal passed MetaDAO governance but represents a single implementation without long-term performance data. The 80% sell-off assumption is stated as "assumption" in the proposal itself, not empirically validated. No mechanism prevents citizens from selling more than 80% if they face liquidity pressure.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
The Dean's List DAO proposal demonstrates buyback mechanics with specific numbers: charging clients 2500 USDC per review, taking 20% DAO tax in USDC (500), using remaining 2000 USDC to purchase $DEAN tokens, then distributing purchased tokens to DAO citizens as payment. With 80% of recipients selling, the model claims net positive price action because buys exceed sells by 20%. Example shows 400 USDC daily purchases creating 80% increase in trading volume relative to baseline 500 USDC/day, with estimated 5.33% FDV increase from $337,074 to $355,028 monthly.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/5c2XSWQ9rVPge2Umoz1yenZcAwRaQS5bC4i4w87B1WU
date: 2024-07-18
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: unprocessed
status: enrichment
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-16
enrichments_applied: ["treasury-buyback-model-creates-constant-buy-pressure-by-converting-revenue-to-governance-token-purchases.md", "futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Proposal Details
@ -146,3 +150,13 @@ This way we create volume (3600 \$USDC volume) and the price action is always po
- Autocrat version: 0.3
- Completed: 2024-07-22
- Ended: 2024-07-22
## Key Facts
- The Dean's List DAO had FDV of $337,074 and daily trading volume of $500 as of July 2024
- The Dean's List DAO charges 2500 USDC per dApp review
- The Dean's List DAO proposal assumed 6 dApp reviews per month (15,000 USDC monthly revenue)
- The Dean's List DAO circulating supply: 100,000,000 $DEAN tokens
- The Dean's List DAO $DEAN price was $0.00337 at proposal time
- The Dean's List DAO proposal set 20% DAO tax rate with remainder used for token buybacks
- The Dean's List DAO proposal estimated 80% of paid DAO citizens would sell their $DEAN tokens