auto-fix: strip 7 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4bdf49a8c6
commit
fb6b1249a7
5 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ CLAIM CANDIDATE 4: "Semaglutide patent expiration in India (March 20, 2026), Can
|
|||
- Domain: health
|
||||
- Confidence: likely (patent expiration is fact; price projection based on manufacturing cost analysis and Indian market competition)
|
||||
- Sources: STAT News March 17, 2026; MedDataX, Medical Dialogues India; University of Liverpool analysis; ZME Science
|
||||
- KB connections: Updates existing claim [[GLP-1 receptor agonists... inflationary through 2035]]
|
||||
- KB connections: Updates existing claim GLP-1 receptor agonists... inflationary through 2035
|
||||
|
||||
CLAIM CANDIDATE 5: "OpenEvidence's March 10, 2026 milestone of 1 million daily clinical consultations creates a scale-safety asymmetry: 30M+ monthly physician-AI interactions influence clinical decisions with zero prospective outcomes evidence and physicians deskilling simultaneously"
|
||||
- Domain: health (primary), ai-alignment (cross-domain)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Peer-reviewed study in Annals of Internal Medicine modeling the health consequen
|
|||
**What I expected but didn't find:** A stronger response from the VBC community about the enrollment instability problem. The Annals study focuses on coverage loss as a mortality mechanism, not on what it means for VBC business models. The VBC-specific analysis is missing from peer-reviewed literature — this is a gap.
|
||||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- Extends [[Americas declining life expectancy is driven by deaths of despair...]] — OBBBA adds policy-driven coverage loss as a second compounding mechanism
|
||||
- Extends Americas declining life expectancy is driven by deaths of despair... — OBBBA adds policy-driven coverage loss as a second compounding mechanism
|
||||
- New context for Belief 1 (healthspan as binding constraint): the compounding failure is accelerating, now with a new policy-driven vector
|
||||
- Cross-reference: the 100+ rural hospital closures will disproportionately affect regions where deaths of despair are concentrated — geographic overlap creates compounding effect
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ The House Republican Study Committee (RSC) unveiled a framework for a second bud
|
|||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- Extends the OBBBA coverage loss story — the second bill adds site-neutral FQHC threat on top of Medicaid enrollment loss
|
||||
- Directly threatens the CHW infrastructure that the March 18 session identified as most RCT-validated non-clinical intervention
|
||||
- Connects to [[healthcare is a complex adaptive system requiring simple enabling rules]] — the opposite of what these cuts are doing
|
||||
- Connects to healthcare is a complex adaptive system requiring simple enabling rules — the opposite of what these cuts are doing
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:** The site-neutral FQHC threat is the specific extractable claim. Something like: "Republican site-neutral payment proposals would eliminate FQHCs' enhanced per-visit payment differential, removing the funding mechanism that makes community health worker programs economically viable within the institution that hosts most of them."
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ The Congressional Budget Office's final score for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
|
|||
**What I expected but didn't find:** Direct OBBBA provisions targeting CHW or VBC programs specifically. The impact is indirect but structurally severe: coverage fragmentation → prevention economics fail; provider tax freeze → CHW infrastructure can't scale. No specific "CHW program" cut — just systematic erosion of every condition VBC and CHW need to function.
|
||||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- Directly challenges [[the healthcare attractor state is a prevention-first system...]] — the attractor requires enrollment stability that OBBBA breaks
|
||||
- Extends [[value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary]] — now adding a new stall mechanism: population stability
|
||||
- Directly challenges the healthcare attractor state is a prevention-first system... — the attractor requires enrollment stability that OBBBA breaks
|
||||
- Extends value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary — now adding a new stall mechanism: population stability
|
||||
- Contextualizes the March 18 finding on CHW reimbursement (20 states with SPAs) — provider tax freeze prevents the other 30 states from catching up
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:** Multiple claims possible — OBBBA coverage loss timeline (proven), VBC enrollment stability mechanism (structural analysis), provider tax freeze CHW impact (likely), rural health transformation offset (partial counterpoint).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ Coverage fragmentation creates "hidden costs" — hospitals and health systems w
|
|||
**What I expected but didn't find:** Any VBC plan announcement about adjusting their population health investment strategy in response to OBBBA. If VBC plans understood that work requirements would fragment their enrolled populations, they would be planning for it. Either they haven't grasped the implication, or they're not talking about it publicly.
|
||||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- Extends [[value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary...]] with a NEW stall mechanism: population stability (in addition to the existing payment boundary and full risk-bearing gap)
|
||||
- Challenges [[the healthcare attractor state is a prevention-first system...]] — the attractor requires conditions that OBBBA is degrading
|
||||
- Extends value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary... with a NEW stall mechanism: population stability (in addition to the existing payment boundary and full risk-bearing gap)
|
||||
- Challenges the healthcare attractor state is a prevention-first system... — the attractor requires conditions that OBBBA is degrading
|
||||
- Cross-domain: Rio should evaluate whether there are financial mechanisms (multi-year capitation contracts, reinsurance, risk corridors) that could protect VBC plans from OBBBA enrollment fragmentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:** The specific claim to extract: "OBBBA's work requirements and semi-annual redeterminations fragment the continuous enrollment that value-based care prevention economics require, because prevention investment payback periods (12-36 months) exceed the enrollment stability the law creates." This is a structural/mechanism claim that is distinct from the coverage loss count and mortality projections.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue