- Replace [[AI alignment approaches]] with [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
in 5 foundations/collective-intelligence/ claims and 1 core/living-agents/
claim (6 fixes total — topic tag had no corresponding file)
- Replace [[core/_map]] with [[foundations/collective-intelligence/_map]]
in 2 CI claims (core/_map.md doesn't exist)
- Add 3 new claims from PR #20 to domains/ai-alignment/_map.md:
voluntary safety pledges, government supply chain designation,
nuclear war escalation in LLM simulations
Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <845F10FB-BC22-40F6-A6A6-F6E4D8F78465>
- What: 3 new claims in core/grand-strategy/ synthesizing patterns across Clay's entertainment domain and Rio's internet finance domain
- Claims:
1. Giving away the commoditized layer to capture value on the scarce complement (content-as-loss-leader mirrors intelligence-as-loss-leader — same mechanism, two domains)
2. Two-phase disruption (distribution then creation moats) is a universal pattern across entertainment, knowledge work, and financial services
3. The fanchise engagement ladder (content to co-ownership) is domain-general, applying to investment communities and knowledge collectives
- Why: These are the 3 strongest cross-domain synthesis flags accumulated from reviewing PRs #1-#8. Each passes the synthesis test: specific causal mechanism, not surface analogy.
- Connections: All three depend on claims from both domains. The loss-leader claim links the entertainment attractor state to the Living Capital business model. The two-phase claim generalizes Shapiro's media framework. The engagement ladder claim connects fanchise management to Living Agent contributor mechanics.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- What: 4 new claims capturing mechanism-level disagreements from AI macro debate, 4 archives as linked set, enrichment to "technology exponential coordination linear" with Citrini evidence
- Why: Citrini "2028 Global Intelligence Crisis" went viral and moved markets (Feb 2026). Three rebuttals (Loeber, Bloch, harkl_) represent bull/sovereign scenarios. The divergence is claim-worthy: all agree on mechanism (AI collapses intermediation costs, OpEx substitution), disagree on consequences
- Connections: challenges Belief #5 speed assumptions, extends economies-of-edge claim to bear case, connects private credit to systemic fragility foundation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- core/collective-agent-core.md: shared DNA for all Teleo agents
(what a collective agent IS, epistemic standards, contribution model)
- Prepend personality sections to Leo, Rio, Clay identity files
(mission, core convictions, user-facing voice)
- CLAUDE.md references collective core in startup checklist
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
