Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
d0998a23bd theseus: AI coordination governance evidence — 3 claims + 1 entity
- What: 3 claims on coordination governance empirics (binding regulation as
  only mechanism that works, transparency declining, compute export controls
  as misaligned governance) + UK AISI entity + comprehensive source archive
- Why: targeted research on weakest grounding of B2 ("alignment is coordination
  problem"). Found that voluntary coordination has empirically failed across
  every mechanism tested (2023-2026). Only binding regulation with enforcement
  changes behavior. This challenges the optimistic version of B2 and
  strengthens the case for enforcement-backed coordination.
- Connections: confirms voluntary-safety-pledge claim with extensive new
  evidence, strengthens nation-state-control claim, challenges alignment-tax
  claim by showing the tax is being cut not paid

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
2026-03-16 19:35:00 +00:00
03aa9c9a7c theseus: AI industry landscape — 7 entities + 3 claims from web research
- What: first ai-alignment entities (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, xAI,
  SSI, Thinking Machines Lab, Dario Amodei) + 3 claims on industry dynamics
  (RSP rollback as empirical confirmation, talent circulation as alignment
  culture transfer, capital concentration as oligopoly constraint on governance)
- Why: industry landscape research synthesizing 33 web sources. Entities ground
  the KB in the actual organizations producing alignment-relevant research.
  Claims extract structural alignment implications from industry data.
- Connections: RSP rollback claim confirms voluntary-safety-pledge claim;
  investment concentration connects to nation-state-control and alignment-tax
  claims; talent circulation connects to coordination-failure claim

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
2026-03-16 17:56:38 +00:00