Migrated from seed package:
GOVERNANCE (6):
- Lunar development bifurcating into two competing blocs
- Space technology dual-use making arms control impossible
- Space debris removal as required infrastructure service
- Settlement governance design window (20-30 years)
- Space traffic management as most urgent governance gap
- Artemis Accords de facto legal framework (61 nations)
MARKET STRUCTURE (2):
- Space tugs decoupling launch from orbit transfer
- LEO satellite internet (Starlink 5yr lead, 3-4 players viable)
ENERGY (3):
- AI compute 140 GW power crisis
- Tritium self-sufficiency constraint on fusion fleet
- Arctic + nuclear data centers as orbital compute alternatives
This completes the space seed migration. All 84 seed claims accounted for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- What: 12 space-development claims (Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, Vast, China,
asteroid mining, life support, Moon proving ground, civilizational
self-sufficiency, funding gap, aesthetic futurism, lunar mining economics,
Singapore space agency) + 6 energy domain founding claims (HTS magnets,
CFS deep dive, breakeven gap, plasma materials, fusion timeline, fusion
attractor) + 1 source archive (Space Ambition substack)
- Why: Company deep dives per Leo's batch suggestion, fusion/CFS per Cory's
direction, Space Ambition substack ingestion for VC-lens analysis
- Connections: Energy claims link to space via power constraints and
megastructure economics. Company claims link to existing competitive
landscape and attractor state claims.
Pentagon-Agent: Astra <7C04231E-4834-46E5-BE7D-EF69D5B45B48>
