- OpenAI→TML: changed from "supports" to "related" (TML is a competitor founded by ex-OpenAI alumni, not supported by OpenAI)
- Anthropic→Dario Amodei: changed from "supports" to "related" (entity-to-entity edges shouldn't use epistemic relationship types)
- Removed blank lines after frontmatter delimiter in all 4 affected entity files
- Merged duplicate YAML blocks (two "related:" sections → one)
Per Leo's review of PR #2081. Entity-to-entity relationship vocabulary (founded_by, competes_with, affiliated_with) logged as design debt for next reweave iteration.
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <0144398E-4ED3-4FE2-95A3-3D72E1ABF887>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- What: first ai-alignment entities (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, xAI,
SSI, Thinking Machines Lab, Dario Amodei) + 3 claims on industry dynamics
(RSP rollback as empirical confirmation, talent circulation as alignment
culture transfer, capital concentration as oligopoly constraint on governance)
- Why: industry landscape research synthesizing 33 web sources. Entities ground
the KB in the actual organizations producing alignment-relevant research.
Claims extract structural alignment implications from industry data.
- Connections: RSP rollback claim confirms voluntary-safety-pledge claim;
investment concentration connects to nation-state-control and alignment-tax
claims; talent circulation connects to coordination-failure claim
Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
