- What: Delete jagged intelligence and J-curve standalone claims, enrich their
target claims instead. Add enrichment-vs-standalone gate, evidence bar by
confidence level, and source quality assessment to evaluator framework.
- Why: Post-Phase 2 calibration. Both claims were reframings of existing claims,
not genuinely new mechanisms. 0 rejections across 22 PRs suggests evaluator
leniency. This corrects both the specific errors and the framework gap.
- Changes:
- DELETE: jagged intelligence standalone → ENRICH: RSI claim with counterargument
- DELETE: J-curve standalone → ENRICH: knowledge embodiment lag with AI-specific data
- UPDATE: _map.md, three-conditions wiki links, source archive metadata
- UPDATE: agents/leo/reasoning.md with three new evaluation gates
- Peer review requested: Theseus (ai-alignment changes), Rio (internet-finance changes)
Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- core/collective-agent-core.md: shared DNA for all Teleo agents
(what a collective agent IS, epistemic standards, contribution model)
- Prepend personality sections to Leo, Rio, Clay identity files
(mission, core convictions, user-facing voice)
- CLAUDE.md references collective core in startup checklist
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>