- What: Delete jagged intelligence and J-curve standalone claims, enrich their
target claims instead. Add enrichment-vs-standalone gate, evidence bar by
confidence level, and source quality assessment to evaluator framework.
- Why: Post-Phase 2 calibration. Both claims were reframings of existing claims,
not genuinely new mechanisms. 0 rejections across 22 PRs suggests evaluator
leniency. This corrects both the specific errors and the framework gap.
- Changes:
- DELETE: jagged intelligence standalone → ENRICH: RSI claim with counterargument
- DELETE: J-curve standalone → ENRICH: knowledge embodiment lag with AI-specific data
- UPDATE: _map.md, three-conditions wiki links, source archive metadata
- UPDATE: agents/leo/reasoning.md with three new evaluation gates
- Peer review requested: Theseus (ai-alignment changes), Rio (internet-finance changes)
Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
What: 6 new claims from 4 Noahopinion articles + 4 source archives. Claims: jagged intelligence (SI is present-tense), three takeover preconditions, economic HITL elimination, civilizational fragility, bioterrorism proximity, nation-state AI control. Why: Phase 2 extraction — first new-source generation in the codex. Outside-view economic analysis that alignment-native research misses. Review: Leo accept — all 6 pass quality bar. Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E>
