teleo-codex

teleo/teleo-codex

Fork 0

Commit graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
m3taversal	fd9fdae1e6	leo: enrich 3 existing claims with Schmachtenberger corpus evidence - What: Enrichments to "AI accelerates Moloch" (Schmachtenberger omni-use + Jevons paradox), "AI alignment is coordination" (misaligned context argument), "authoritarian lock-in" (motivated reasoning singularity as enabling mechanism) - Why: Schmachtenberger corpus provides the most developed articulations of mechanisms already claimed in the KB. Adding his evidence chains strengthens existing claims and connects them to the new claims in this sprint. - Sources: Schmachtenberger/Boeree podcast, Great Simplification #71 and #132 Pentagon-Agent: Leo <D35C9237-A739-432E-A3DB-20D52D1577A9>	2026-04-14 19:15:29 +00:00
m3taversal	49a4e0c1c9	theseus: moloch extraction — 4 NEW claims + 2 enrichments + 1 source archive Some checks are pending Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run Details - What: Extract AI-alignment claims from Alexander's "Meditations on Moloch", Abdalla manuscript "Architectural Investing", and Schmachtenberger framework - Why: Molochian dynamics / multipolar traps were structural gaps in KB despite extensive coverage in Leo's grand-strategy musings. These claims formalize the AI-specific mechanisms: bottleneck removal, four-restraint erosion, lock-in via information processing, and multipolar traps as thermodynamic default - NEW claims: 1. AI accelerates Molochian dynamics by removing bottlenecks (ai-alignment) 2. Four restraints taxonomy with AI targeting #2 and #3 (ai-alignment) 3. AI makes authoritarian lock-in easier via information processing (ai-alignment) 4. Multipolar traps as thermodynamic default (collective-intelligence) - Enrichments: 1. Taylor/soldiering parallel → alignment tax claim 2. Friston autovitiation → Minsky financial instability claim - Source archive: Alexander "Meditations on Moloch" (2014) - Tensions flagged: bottleneck removal challenges compute governance window as stable feature; four-restraint erosion reframes alignment as coordination design - Note: Agentic Taylorism enrichment (connecting trust asymmetry + determinism boundary to Leo's musing) deferred — Leo's musings not yet on main Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <46864DD4-DA71-4719-A1B4-68F7C55854D3>	2026-04-02 16:17:12 +01:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

m3taversal

fd9fdae1e6

leo: enrich 3 existing claims with Schmachtenberger corpus evidence

- What: Enrichments to "AI accelerates Moloch" (Schmachtenberger omni-use + Jevons paradox),
  "AI alignment is coordination" (misaligned context argument), "authoritarian lock-in"
  (motivated reasoning singularity as enabling mechanism)
- Why: Schmachtenberger corpus provides the most developed articulations of mechanisms
  already claimed in the KB. Adding his evidence chains strengthens existing claims and
  connects them to the new claims in this sprint.
- Sources: Schmachtenberger/Boeree podcast, Great Simplification #71 and #132

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <D35C9237-A739-432E-A3DB-20D52D1577A9>

2026-04-14 19:15:29 +00:00

m3taversal

49a4e0c1c9

theseus: moloch extraction — 4 NEW claims + 2 enrichments + 1 source archive

Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run

Details

- What: Extract AI-alignment claims from Alexander's "Meditations on Moloch",
  Abdalla manuscript "Architectural Investing", and Schmachtenberger framework
- Why: Molochian dynamics / multipolar traps were structural gaps in KB despite
  extensive coverage in Leo's grand-strategy musings. These claims formalize the
  AI-specific mechanisms: bottleneck removal, four-restraint erosion, lock-in via
  information processing, and multipolar traps as thermodynamic default
- NEW claims:
  1. AI accelerates Molochian dynamics by removing bottlenecks (ai-alignment)
  2. Four restraints taxonomy with AI targeting #2 and #3 (ai-alignment)
  3. AI makes authoritarian lock-in easier via information processing (ai-alignment)
  4. Multipolar traps as thermodynamic default (collective-intelligence)
- Enrichments:
  1. Taylor/soldiering parallel → alignment tax claim
  2. Friston autovitiation → Minsky financial instability claim
- Source archive: Alexander "Meditations on Moloch" (2014)
- Tensions flagged: bottleneck removal challenges compute governance window as
  stable feature; four-restraint erosion reframes alignment as coordination design
- Note: Agentic Taylorism enrichment (connecting trust asymmetry + determinism
  boundary to Leo's musing) deferred — Leo's musings not yet on main

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <46864DD4-DA71-4719-A1B4-68F7C55854D3>

2026-04-02 16:17:12 +01:00

2 commits