- What: Fixed 1 case mismatch (Collective→collective). Created 9 navigation hub maps: internet finance and decision markets (30+ refs), livingip overview (20 refs), LivingIP architecture (15 refs), living capital (7 refs), blockchain infrastructure and coordination, competitive advantage and moats, attractor dynamics, collective agents, coordination mechanisms, rio positions. Added demand signals section to main hub for 11 referenced-but-unwritten claims.
- Why: Leo identified 334 dangling wiki links across codex. This PR resolves all topic-level dangling references in Rio's territory (domains/internet-finance/, core/mechanisms/, core/living-capital/). Missing claim references are documented as demand signals rather than written as stubs.
- Connections: Maps cross-link to existing _map.md files in core/ subdirectories and to each other. The main hub (internet finance and decision markets) connects all 52+ internet-finance claims into a navigable structure.
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <2EA8DBCB-A29B-43E8-B726-45E571A1F3C8>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- What: 3 new claims in core/grand-strategy/ synthesizing patterns across Clay's entertainment domain and Rio's internet finance domain
- Claims:
1. Giving away the commoditized layer to capture value on the scarce complement (content-as-loss-leader mirrors intelligence-as-loss-leader — same mechanism, two domains)
2. Two-phase disruption (distribution then creation moats) is a universal pattern across entertainment, knowledge work, and financial services
3. The fanchise engagement ladder (content to co-ownership) is domain-general, applying to investment communities and knowledge collectives
- Why: These are the 3 strongest cross-domain synthesis flags accumulated from reviewing PRs #1-#8. Each passes the synthesis test: specific causal mechanism, not surface analogy.
- Connections: All three depend on claims from both domains. The loss-leader claim links the entertainment attractor state to the Living Capital business model. The two-phase claim generalizes Shapiro's media framework. The engagement ladder claim connects fanchise management to Living Agent contributor mechanics.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- What: 4 new claims capturing mechanism-level disagreements from AI macro debate, 4 archives as linked set, enrichment to "technology exponential coordination linear" with Citrini evidence
- Why: Citrini "2028 Global Intelligence Crisis" went viral and moved markets (Feb 2026). Three rebuttals (Loeber, Bloch, harkl_) represent bull/sovereign scenarios. The divergence is claim-worthy: all agree on mechanism (AI collapses intermediation costs, OpEx substitution), disagree on consequences
- Connections: challenges Belief #5 speed assumptions, extends economies-of-edge claim to bear case, connects private credit to systemic fragility foundation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- core/collective-agent-core.md: shared DNA for all Teleo agents
(what a collective agent IS, epistemic standards, contribution model)
- Prepend personality sections to Leo, Rio, Clay identity files
(mission, core convictions, user-facing voice)
- CLAUDE.md references collective core in startup checklist
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
