|
|
|
|
@ -1,41 +1,44 @@
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
type: entity
|
|
|
|
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
|
|
|
|
name: "Sanctum: Use up to 2.5M CLOUD to incentivise INF-SOL liquidity via Kamino Vaults"
|
|
|
|
|
name: "Sanctum: Should Sanctum use up to 2.5M CLOUD to incentivise INF-SOL liquidity via Kamino Vaults?"
|
|
|
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
|
|
|
status: passed
|
|
|
|
|
parent_entity: "[[sanctum]]"
|
|
|
|
|
platform: "futardio"
|
|
|
|
|
proposer: "proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2"
|
|
|
|
|
proposer: "Sanctum team"
|
|
|
|
|
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/6mc1Fp6ds8XKA2jMzBDDhVwvY6ZCGg6SNqvHy4E6LS7Q"
|
|
|
|
|
proposal_date: 2025-03-05
|
|
|
|
|
resolution_date: 2025-03-08
|
|
|
|
|
category: "treasury"
|
|
|
|
|
summary: "Treasury allocation to deepen INF-SOL liquidity through yield incentives on Kamino managed vaults"
|
|
|
|
|
summary: "Allocate up to 2.5M CLOUD tokens to incentivize INF-SOL liquidity via Kamino Vaults with 20% initial APY dropping to 15%"
|
|
|
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
|
|
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Sanctum: Use up to 2.5M CLOUD to incentivise INF-SOL liquidity via Kamino Vaults
|
|
|
|
|
# Sanctum: Should Sanctum use up to 2.5M CLOUD to incentivise INF-SOL liquidity via Kamino Vaults?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
|
Sanctum proposed allocating up to 2.5M CLOUD tokens to incentivize INF-SOL liquidity through Kamino Vaults, offering LPs 20% initial yield for the first month, then 15% thereafter. The proposal aimed to address insufficient SOL native liquidity depth for INF, which despite strong performance (outperforming mSOL and jitoSOL), lacked the liquidity needed for large depositors and to serve as Solana's LST liquidity nexus.
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal to allocate up to 2.5M CLOUD tokens to incentivize INF-SOL liquidity through Kamino managed vaults, offering liquidity providers 20% APY for the first month, then 15% thereafter. The goal is to deepen SOL native liquidity for INF, which has strong performance metrics but insufficient liquidity depth for large depositors. Kamino was selected because 95%+ of existing xSOL-SOL liquidity comes from their managed vaults.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Market Data
|
|
|
|
|
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
|
|
|
|
- **Proposer:** proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
|
|
|
|
|
- **Proposal Account:** 6mc1Fp6ds8XKA2jMzBDDhVwvY6ZCGg6SNqvHy4E6LS7Q
|
|
|
|
|
- **DAO Account:** 5n61x4BeVvvRMcYBMaorhu1MaZDViYw6HghE8gwLCvPR
|
|
|
|
|
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.3
|
|
|
|
|
- **Proposer:** Sanctum team
|
|
|
|
|
- **Resolution:** 2025-03-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Rationale
|
|
|
|
|
INF demonstrated strong performance relative to major Solana LSTs but lacked sufficient liquidity depth. The proposal noted that >95% of existing xSOL-SOL liquidity on AMMs comes from Kamino managed vaults, indicating user preference for third-party managed positions. The INF-SOL Kamino vault had already outperformed 100% INF HODL strategy due to high capital velocity (trading volume relative to TVL). Industry standard LP yield is 15% combined (fees + incentives), with 20% offered initially to bootstrap liquidity.
|
|
|
|
|
- **Treasury Allocation:** Up to 2.5M CLOUD tokens
|
|
|
|
|
- **Target TVL:** $2.5M
|
|
|
|
|
- **Expected Duration:** 6+ months at target TVL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Significance
|
|
|
|
|
This proposal demonstrates futarchy governance applied to treasury-funded liquidity incentives, a common DeFi governance decision type. The structured approach (time-limited higher yield transitioning to standard rate, capped TVL, managed by Kamino) shows how futarchy markets can price complex treasury allocation decisions with multiple parameters. The proposal passed without significant market contestation, reinforcing the pattern that futarchy markets show limited trading volume on uncontested decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrates futarchy pricing infrastructure spending where markets evaluate whether liquidity incentives will increase token value. The proposal treats liquidity depth as a strategic asset for positioning INF as "the liquidity nexus of Solana for all LSTs." Shows standard DeFi incentive economics (15% APY industry norm) being evaluated through conditional token markets. The uncontested passage with minimal trading volume exemplifies the pattern where stakeholder consensus reduces market activity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Performance Context
|
|
|
|
|
- INF outperforms mSOL and jitoSOL historically
|
|
|
|
|
- INF-SOL Kamino vault has outperformed 100% INF HODL strategy
|
|
|
|
|
- High capital velocity (trading volume relative to TVL) in existing vault
|
|
|
|
|
- Current liquidity insufficient for large depositor exits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
|
|
|
- [[sanctum]] - parent entity governance decision
|
|
|
|
|
- [[MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions]] - confirms pattern of low volume on uncontested proposals
|
|
|
|
|
- [[futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs]] - related mechanism for pricing non-financial proposals
|
|
|
|
|
- [[MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions]] - exemplifies low-volume uncontested pattern
|
|
|
|
|
- [[futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs]] - infrastructure spending as token price input
|
|
|
|
|
|