Compare commits

..

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
72f62325f2 extract: 2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger
Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
2026-03-16 14:54:38 +00:00
5 changed files with 17 additions and 18 deletions

View file

@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Cloak raised only $1,455 against a $300,000 target (0.5% of target), entering re
### Additional Evidence (challenge) ### Additional Evidence (challenge)
*Source: 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Phonon Studio AI launch failed to reach its $88,888 target and entered refunding status, demonstrating that not all futarchy-governed raises succeed. The project had demonstrable traction (live product, 1000+ songs generated, functional token mechanics) but still failed to attract sufficient capital, suggesting futarchy capital formation success is not uniform across project types or market conditions. Phonon Studio AI launch failed to reach its $88,888 target and entered refunding status, demonstrating that not all futarchy-governed raises succeed. The project had demonstrable traction (live product, 1000+ songs generated, functional token mechanics) but still failed to attract sufficient capital, suggesting futarchy capital formation success is not uniform across project types or market conditions.
@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Phonon Studio AI launch failed to reach its $88,888 target and entered refunding
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger fundraise achieved 14.4x oversubscription ($86.4M committed against $6M target), demonstrating continued strong demand for futarchy-governed ICOs on the MetaDAO platform. Ranger raised $86.4M against $6M target (14.4x oversubscription), demonstrating continued extreme oversubscription in MetaDAO ICOs. This is the first MetaDAO raise with existing investors and pre-existing obligations, showing the model extends beyond greenfield projects.
--- ---

View file

@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ This structure is untested in practice. Key risks:
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
MycoRealms allocates 3M tokens (18.9% of supply) to team with zero circulating at launch, unlocking only at 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x ICO price via 3-month TWAP after 18-month cliff. Physical infrastructure project demonstrates mechanism applies beyond pure digital contexts. MycoRealms allocates 3M tokens (18.9% of supply) to team with zero circulating at launch, unlocking only at 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x ICO price via 3-month TWAP after 18-month cliff. Physical infrastructure project demonstrates mechanism applies beyond pure digital contexts.
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: 2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
XorraBet structured 4M team tokens (20% of supply) with five tranches unlocking at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, and 32x price multiples, with an 18-month cliff and 3-month TWAP evaluation. At launch, 0 team tokens circulate, and if the token never reaches 2x, the team receives nothing. XorraBet structured 4M team tokens (20% of supply) with five tranches unlocking at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, and 32x price multiples, with an 18-month cliff and 3-month TWAP evaluation. At launch, 0 team tokens circulate, and if the token never reaches 2x, the team receives nothing.
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ XorraBet structured 4M team tokens (20% of supply) with five tranches unlocking
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger implements 7.6M token performance package (29.7% of supply) with 18-month cliff and price-based unlocks at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, and 32x ICO price using 3-month TWAP, demonstrating adoption of this mechanism in production futarchy launches. Ranger team performance package uses 18-month cliff with price-based unlocks at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, and 32x ICO price using 3-month TWAP. This represents 7.6M tokens (29.7% of total supply), showing aggressive use of performance vesting in MetaDAO launches.
--- ---

View file

@ -30,15 +30,15 @@ The lower volatility in recent launches could reflect declining speculative inte
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: 2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Solomon's 51x oversubscription ($102.9M committed vs $8M accepted) required returning $94.9M to participants, demonstrating the capital inefficiency of oversubscribed raises even when the platform caps final acceptance. Solomon's 51x oversubscription ($102.9M committed vs $8M accepted) required returning $94.9M to participants, demonstrating the capital inefficiency of oversubscribed raises even when the platform caps final acceptance.
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger ICO required returning $80.4M of $86.4M committed (93% refund rate), with additional complexity from points-holder preference allocation creating two-tier pro-rata calculations. Ranger implemented points-based preference allocation where existing Ranger points holders get pro-rata priority, then excess filled by non-points commitments. This creates a hybrid allocation mechanism that attempts to reward early supporters while still accepting broad participation. The 14.4x oversubscription suggests this doesn't fully solve the capital efficiency problem.
--- ---

View file

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ The structure itself—20% immediate, 80% linear over 12 months—represents a d
### Additional Evidence (confirm) ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16* *Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger ambassadors/ecosystem allocation uses 25% immediate unlock with remaining 75% in 6-month linear vest, while existing investors receive 24-month linear vest, showing varied vesting structures within single launch. Ranger ambassadors and ecosystem partners receive 25% immediate unlock with remaining 25% in 6-month linear vest (768,750 tokens total). Existing investors get 24-month linear vest with no cliff (4,356,250 tokens).
--- ---

View file

@ -88,12 +88,11 @@ This ICO is to expand the team's capacity and increase velocity as we build towa
## Key Facts ## Key Facts
- Ranger ICO had $6M minimum raise target - Ranger ICO raised $86,398,012.12 against $6M minimum target
- Ranger ICO received $86.4M in commitments - Ranger ICO closed 2026-01-10
- Ranger ICO closed and completed 2026-01-10 - Ranger total token supply: 25,625,000 RNGR
- Ranger implements $250k monthly spending allowance - Ranger monthly spending allowance: $250k
- Ranger ICO included 90-day bid program for excess funds at ICO price minus spend - Ranger implements points-based preference allocation for ICO
- Ranger points holders received pro-rata preference in allocation - Ranger 90-day bid program accepts tokens at ICO price minus spend
- Ranger placed 20% of raised funds with 2M tokens in FutarchyAMM - ~$50B daily derivatives volume trades across Solana, Arbitrum, and Hyperliquid
- Ranger placed 900k tokens in single-sided Meteora liquidity - Ranger token mint: RNGRtJMbCveqCp7AC6U95KmrdKecFckaJZiWbPGmeta
- Approximately $50B in daily derivatives volume trades across Solana, Arbitrum, and Hyperliquid