Compare commits

...

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
aa1495ef44 auto-fix: strip 5 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
2026-03-16 11:49:41 +00:00
Teleo Agents
34534d1f2c extract: 2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger
Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
2026-03-16 11:48:22 +00:00
4 changed files with 39 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -32,16 +32,22 @@ The source presents no failure cases despite eight ICOs, which suggests either s
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2025-10-14-futardio-launch-avici]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
*Source: 2025-10-14-futardio-launch-avici | Added: 2026-03-15*
Avici achieved 17x oversubscription ($34.2M committed vs $2M target), exceeding the previously documented 15x benchmark and demonstrating continued strong market demand for futarchy-governed raises.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2025-10-18-futardio-launch-loyal]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
*Source: 2025-10-18-futardio-launch-loyal | Added: 2026-03-15*
Loyal's fundraise achieved 151x oversubscription ($75.9M committed vs $500K target), far exceeding the previously documented 15x pattern. The final raise settled at $2.5M, suggesting the platform's conditional market mechanisms successfully filtered commitment from actual capital deployment.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger fundraise achieved 14.4x oversubscription ($86.4M committed against $6M target), consistent with the pattern of massive oversubscription in MetaDAO ICOs. This is the first MetaDAO raise with existing investors and pre-existing obligations, testing whether futarchy-governed capital formation works for companies with legacy cap tables.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -41,11 +41,17 @@ This structure is untested in practice. Key risks:
- 18-month cliff may be too long for early-stage projects with high burn rates, creating team retention risk
- No precedent for whether TWAP-based triggers actually prevent manipulation in low-liquidity token markets
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger team performance package uses 7.6M tokens (29.7% of supply) with 18-month cliff and price-based unlocks at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, and 32x ICO price using 3-month TWAP. This demonstrates the pattern of TWAP-based performance vesting becoming standard in futarchy-governed launches.
---
Relevant Notes:
- [[time-based token vesting is hedgeable making standard lockups meaningless as alignment mechanisms because investors can short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure while appearing locked.md]]
- [[dynamic performance-based token minting replaces fixed emission schedules by tying new token creation to measurable outcomes creating algorithmic meritocracy in token distribution.md]]
- time-based token vesting is hedgeable making standard lockups meaningless as alignment mechanisms because investors can short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure while appearing locked.md
- dynamic performance-based token minting replaces fixed emission schedules by tying new token creation to measurable outcomes creating algorithmic meritocracy in token distribution.md
Topics:
- [[internet-finance/_map]]
- internet-finance/_map

View file

@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ The convergence toward lower volatility in recent launches (maximum 30% drawdown
## Limitations
The lower volatility in recent launches could reflect declining speculative interest rather than superior price discovery. The capital efficiency problem may be solvable through secondary markets for subscription rights or through hybrid mechanisms that combine pro-rata allocation with price discovery. This analysis is based on a single source and limited to 8 data points, warranting experimental confidence.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-01-06-futardio-launch-ranger]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Ranger implemented a preference system for 'points holders' (existing community members) who get pro-rata allocation first, with excess filled by non-points commitments. This creates a two-tier allocation system attempting to reward early supporters while still accepting broad participation. The 14.4x oversubscription suggests this hybrid approach still faces the capital efficiency problem.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/8Nmd13rpULJjY7h6oxCfuTWy8WkZxcuDrDWiSdnViVuo"
date: 2026-01-06
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: unprocessed
status: enrichment
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
event_type: launch
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-16
enrichments_applied: ["metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md", "pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-capital-inefficiency-through-massive-oversubscription-refunds.md", "performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Launch Details
@ -81,3 +85,14 @@ This ICO is to expand the team's capacity and increase velocity as we build towa
- Total approved: $8,000,000.00
- Closed: 2026-01-10
- Completed: 2026-01-10
## Key Facts
- Ranger ICO launched 2026-01-06 with $6M minimum target
- Total committed capital: $86,398,012.12 (14.4x oversubscription)
- ICO closed and completed 2026-01-10
- Approximately $50B in daily derivatives volume trades across Solana, Arbitrum, and Hyperliquid
- Ranger token supply: 25,625,000 RNGR
- Monthly spending allowance: $250k
- 90-day bid program for excess funds at ICO price minus spend
- 20% of funds raised placed in liquidity with 2M tokens in FutarchyAMM and 900k in Meteora