Compare commits

..

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
72e6941d4c rio: extract from 2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 5)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 15:55:19 +00:00
4 changed files with 12 additions and 18 deletions

View file

@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless
- **2026-03-07** — Areal DAO launch: $50K target, raised $11,654 (23.3%), REFUNDING status by 2026-03-08 — first documented failed futarchy-governed fundraise on platform
- **2026-03-04** — [[seekervault]] fundraise launched targeting $75,000, closed next day with only $1,186 (1.6% of target) in refunding status
- **2024-11-08** — [[futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium]] proposed: FutureDAO seeks to allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium liquidity farming
- **2024-11-11** — [[futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium]] passed: FutureDAO approved Raydium farm allocation, demonstrating futarchy governing routine treasury operations
## Competitive Position
- **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
- **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."

View file

@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ entity_type: decision_market
name: "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium"
domain: internet-finance
status: passed
parent_entity: "[[futardio]]"
parent_entity: "[[futuredao]]"
platform: "futardio"
proposer: "proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2"
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm"
proposal_date: 2024-11-08
resolution_date: 2024-11-11
category: "treasury"
summary: "Allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium liquidity farming rewards to bootstrap token liquidity"
summary: "Allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to create Raydium CLMM farm for liquidity bootstrapping"
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
---
@ -19,23 +19,20 @@ created: 2026-03-11
# FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium
## Summary
FutureDAO's fifth governance proposal allocated 1% of total $FUTURE token supply as rewards for a Raydium liquidity farm. The proposal established a CLMM pool paired with a stable asset (USDC) to enhance token liquidity and reduce slippage. Pool creation cost approximately 0.1 SOL, with farming duration set between 7-90 days per Raydium's platform requirements.
Proposal to establish a Raydium liquidity farm for $FUTURE token, allocating 1% of total supply as rewards to incentivize liquidity providers. Uses standard Raydium CLMM architecture with $FUTURE-USDC pair, 7-90 day farming period, and ~0.1 SOL creation cost.
## Market Data
- **Outcome:** Passed
- **Proposer:** proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
- **Proposal Number:** 5
- **Proposal Account:** HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm
- **DAO Account:** ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.3
- **Completed:** 2024-11-11
- **Duration:** 3 days (2024-11-08 to 2024-11-11)
## Significance
This proposal demonstrates futarchy-governed DAOs using conditional markets for routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions. FutureDAO adopted Raydium's standard liquidity farming template (1% allocation, CLMM architecture, stable pair) despite using experimental governance mechanisms. The decision shows how futarchy organizations converge on traditional DeFi operational patterns even when governance itself is market-based.
The proposal also reveals complexity friction in futarchy adoption: participants needed to understand CLMM mechanics, fee tier selection, emission rate calculations, and pool creation costs on top of the conditional market mechanism itself.
Demonstrates futarchy governing routine post-launch treasury operations, not just existential decisions. FutureDAO uses conditional markets to decide standard DeFi infrastructure deployment (Raydium farms), showing futarchy DAOs adopt conventional operational scaffolding even when governance is market-based. The proposal follows Raydium's established template rather than inventing novel mechanisms.
## Relationship to KB
- [[futardio]] - governance platform
- [[raydium]] - liquidity infrastructure
- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] - confirms claim
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] - demonstrates complexity friction
- [[futuredao]] - parent entity, proposal #5
- [[raydium]] - infrastructure provider
- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] - confirms this claim

View file

@ -47,5 +47,4 @@ Topics:
## Timeline
- **2024-11-08** — FutureDAO proposes liquidity farming allocation using Raydium's CLMM architecture (1% token supply, 7-90 day duration, ~0.1 SOL pool creation cost)
- **2024-11-11** — FutureDAO's Raydium farm proposal passes, demonstrating futarchy-governed projects adopting standard DeFi liquidity infrastructure
- **2024-11-08** — FutureDAO proposes creating CLMM farm on Raydium with 1% token allocation, demonstrating standard liquidity bootstrapping pattern for futarchy-launched projects

View file

@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md", "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal and updated parent entities (Futardio, Raydium). Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal and updated parent FutureDAO entity. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
---
## Proposal Details