auto-fix: strip 1 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md

@@ -39,10 +39,16 @@ The contrast with Ranger is instructive. Ranger's liquidation shows futarchy han
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
+*Source: 2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc | Added: 2026-03-15*
 
 MetaDAO's rejection of ISC treasury diversification shows futarchy markets applying conservative risk assessment to treasury operations. Despite theoretical inflation hedge benefits, markets rejected a 6.8% allocation to an early-stage stablecoin, prioritizing capital preservation over yield optimization - a pattern consistent with traditional treasury management.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-03-19-futardio-proposal-engage-in-250000-otc-trade-with-colosseum]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+MetaDAO's $250k OTC trade with Colosseum uses a 5/7 multisig (FhJHnsCGm9JDAe2JuEvqN12vzateJhZ4bgDuxFWN9gMwraeQKByg) with defined execution steps including balance confirmation, price calculation, and Streamflow vesting setup. The proposal passed via futarchy but execution requires traditional multisig coordination with representatives from both parties.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md

@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ The risk is that cultural proposals introduce systematic bias: participants who
 
 The single data point is limited. One passed proposal doesn't establish a reliable pattern. Cultural proposals that fail futarchy governance (and thus go unobserved in public records) would provide the necessary counter-evidence to calibrate how often futarchy actually validates cultural versus financial spending.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-03-19-futardio-proposal-engage-in-250000-otc-trade-with-colosseum]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Colosseum's proposal includes non-monetary value proposition: sponsoring MetaDAO as the DAO track in the next Solana hackathon ($50k-$80k prize pool) at no additional cost. The futarchy market priced this strategic partnership including brand visibility and ecosystem access, not just the $250k capital infusion.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/vesting-with-immediate-partial-unlock-plus-linear-release-creates-alignment-while-enabling-liquidity-by-giving-investors-tradeable-tokens-upfront-and-time-locked-exposure.md

@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ The structure itself—20% immediate, 80% linear over 12 months—represents a d
 - Proposal failure suggests market rejected either the structure or the specific terms
 - No evidence this structure outperforms alternatives in practice
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-03-19-futardio-proposal-engage-in-250000-otc-trade-with-colosseum]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Colosseum's $250k META acquisition uses 20% immediate unlock with 80% vested over 12 months via Streamflow linear vest, demonstrating the pattern in a strategic partnership context where immediate liquidity enables early engagement while long-term vesting maintains alignment.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

inbox/archive/2024-03-19-futardio-proposal-engage-in-250000-otc-trade-with-colosseum.md

@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/5qEyKCVyJZMFZSb3yxh6rQjqDYxASiLW7vFuuUTCYnb
 date: 2024-03-19
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
 event_type: proposal
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md", "vesting-with-immediate-partial-unlock-plus-linear-release-creates-alignment-while-enabling-liquidity-by-giving-investors-tradeable-tokens-upfront-and-time-locked-exposure.md", "futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Proposal Details
@@ -90,3 +94,14 @@ We won’t speculate on what the exact ROI will be to META in the short to mediu
 - Autocrat version: 0.1
 - Completed: 2024-03-24
 - Ended: 2024-03-24
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- MetaDAO Proposal 13 passed on 2024-03-24
+- Colosseum committed $250,000 USDC for META tokens
+- Price per META set at pass market TWAP if below $850, capped at $850 if TWAP between $850-$1,200, void if TWAP exceeds $1,200
+- 20% of META transferred immediately, 80% vested over 12 months via Streamflow
+- Execution used 5/7 multisig with members from both Colosseum and MetaDAO
+- META spot price on 2024-03-18 was $468.09
+- META circulating supply on 2024-03-18 was 17,421 tokens
+- Colosseum promised to sponsor MetaDAO as DAO track in next Solana hackathon after Renaissance with $50k-$80k prize pool at no additional cost