Compare commits
1 commit
3624c02f0c
...
51d2525389
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51d2525389 |
8 changed files with 58 additions and 153 deletions
|
|
@ -5,20 +5,17 @@ name: "Cloak: Futardio Fundraise"
|
|||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: failed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[cloak]]"
|
||||
platform: futardio
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/9MqyiXXJUAXQ1Uy5j2EV8hq21UeR3ruukWkZ1XGNhg3R"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2026-03-03
|
||||
resolution_date: 2026-03-04
|
||||
category: fundraise
|
||||
summary: "Cloak attempted to raise $300K for privacy DCA infrastructure on Solana but attracted only $1,455 in commitments before automatic refund"
|
||||
category: "fundraise"
|
||||
summary: "$300K fundraise for private DCA infrastructure on Solana via ZK-proof privacy pools"
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
raise_target: "$300,000"
|
||||
total_committed: "$1,455"
|
||||
success_rate: "0.49%"
|
||||
token_offered: "10,000,000 8RS (62.9% of supply)"
|
||||
ico_price: "$0.03"
|
||||
team_monthly_allowance: "$10,000"
|
||||
runway_target: "24 months"
|
||||
commitment_rate: "0.485%"
|
||||
outcome: "refunded"
|
||||
window: "24 hours"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,37 +23,52 @@ created: 2026-03-11
|
|||
# Cloak: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
Cloak launched a futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio seeking $300K to build privacy-focused DCA infrastructure on Solana. The protocol promised ZK-proof privacy pools, unlinkable session wallets, and integration with Jupiter for anonymous asset accumulation. Despite technical sophistication and first-mover positioning in private DCA, the raise attracted only $1,455 in 24 hours (0.49% of target), triggering automatic refund under Futardio's all-or-nothing mechanism.
|
||||
Cloak attempted to raise $300,000 through Futardio's unruggable ICO mechanism to fund development of private DCA infrastructure on Solana. The project proposed using ZK-proof privacy pools to break the on-chain link between user wallets and trading strategies, addressing MEV extraction and surveillance concerns. The fundraise failed to reach its target, collecting only $1,455 (0.485% of goal) before closing and issuing full refunds.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Failed (refunded)
|
||||
- **Raise Target:** $300,000
|
||||
- **Total Committed:** $1,455
|
||||
- **Success Rate:** 0.49%
|
||||
- **Duration:** 24 hours (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04)
|
||||
- **Token Economics:** 15.9M total supply, 10M offered at $0.03 (62.9% allocation), $477K FDV
|
||||
- **Team Structure:** 2 founders, $10K/month allowance, 3M performance-locked tokens (18.9%)
|
||||
- **Commitment Rate:** 0.485%
|
||||
- **Launch Date:** 2026-03-03
|
||||
- **Close Date:** 2026-03-04
|
||||
- **Window:** 24 hours
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Structure
|
||||
- **Total Supply:** 15.9M $CLOAK (12.9M circulating at launch)
|
||||
- **ICO Allocation:** 10M tokens (62.9%) at $0.03/token
|
||||
- **Liquidity:** 2.9M tokens (18.2%) split between Futarchy AMM (2M) and Meteora (900K)
|
||||
- **Team:** 3M tokens (18.9%) performance-locked with 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x price triggers, 18-month minimum cliff
|
||||
- **FDV at Launch:** ~$477,000
|
||||
|
||||
## Use of Funds Proposal
|
||||
- **Team:** 40% ($120K) — $5K/month per founder for 2-person team
|
||||
- **Security Audit:** 10% ($30K) — smart contract + ZK proof audit
|
||||
- **Infrastructure:** 6% ($18K) — RPC, hosting, keeper bot (~$1,500/month)
|
||||
- **Operations:** 4% ($12K) — legal, domain, marketing
|
||||
- **Treasury Reserve:** 40% ($120K) — held for scaling, additional hires, future audits
|
||||
|
||||
## Product Status at Launch
|
||||
- Private beta live on Solana mainnet
|
||||
- Privacy.cash ZK-proof pool integration complete
|
||||
- Session wallet architecture deployed
|
||||
- Jupiter integration for execution
|
||||
- Solana Blinks support shipped
|
||||
- Supported assets: SOL, cbBTC, ZEC
|
||||
- First RWA integration: Oro (tokenized gold)
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This represents one of the most severe fundraise failures on Futardio's platform — raising less than 0.5% of target despite:
|
||||
- Clear technical execution (live mainnet beta)
|
||||
- Legitimate privacy use case (MEV protection, surveillance resistance)
|
||||
- First-mover advantage in privacy DCA category
|
||||
- Credible team (repeat builders, Superteam contributors)
|
||||
- Reasonable valuation ($477K FDV)
|
||||
This fundraise represents one of the earliest attempts to build privacy infrastructure for DeFi execution on Solana, specifically targeting the MEV extraction and surveillance problems inherent in transparent DCA strategies. The extreme failure rate (0.485% of target) suggests either:
|
||||
1. Market skepticism about privacy product-market fit on Solana
|
||||
2. Insufficient traction/validation in private beta to justify $300K raise
|
||||
3. Team/execution risk concerns given early-stage product
|
||||
4. Timing issues (24-hour window may have been insufficient for discovery)
|
||||
|
||||
The failure suggests either:
|
||||
1. Privacy DCA market demand is far smaller than assumed
|
||||
2. Futardio's 24-hour window is insufficient for complex infrastructure raises
|
||||
3. The $300K target was misaligned with demonstrated traction ($1,455 suggests ~$50K realistic ceiling)
|
||||
4. Retail-focused privacy narrative doesn't resonate when institutional clients (the actual market) aren't visible
|
||||
|
||||
Notably, Cloak had shipped product, integrated multiple protocols (Privacy.cash, Jupiter, Oro), and achieved technical milestones that typically signal fundability. The disconnect between execution and capital attraction is significant for understanding futarchy-governed fundraising dynamics.
|
||||
The performance-locked team token structure (0 tokens circulating at launch, unlocks only at 2x+ price multiples) represented strong alignment, but was insufficient to overcome other concerns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[cloak]] — parent entity
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — fundraising platform
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO]] — futarchy infrastructure provider
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility]] — this failure tests Futardio's brand resilience
|
||||
- [[internet-capital-markets-compress-fundraising-timelines]] — 24-hour window may be too compressed for infrastructure raises
|
||||
- Demonstrates limits of [[ownership-coin-treasuries-should-be-actively-managed-through-buybacks-and-token-sales-as-continuous-capital-calibration-not-treated-as-static-war-chests]] when initial raise fails entirely
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO]] — futarchy governance infrastructure
|
||||
- [[jupiter]] — DEX integration for execution
|
||||
- Relates to [[futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility]] — this failure tests Futardio's brand resilience
|
||||
|
|
@ -23,17 +23,13 @@ created: 2026-03-11
|
|||
|
||||
# Cloak
|
||||
|
||||
Cloak is a privacy-focused DCA (dollar-cost averaging) protocol on Solana that enables traders to accumulate assets anonymously using ZK-proof privacy pools. The protocol routes trades through unlinkable session wallets to break the on-chain connection between user wallets and trading strategies. Cloak raised via Futardio's futarchy-governed ICO mechanism but failed to reach its $300K target, raising only $1,455 before refunding.
|
||||
Cloak is a privacy infrastructure protocol on Solana that enables private DCA (dollar-cost averaging) execution through ZK-proof privacy pools. The protocol routes trades through unlinkable session wallets to break the on-chain link between user wallets and trading strategies. Launched via Futardio fundraise on 2026-03-03, the project failed to reach its $300K target and refunded all commitments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — [[cloak-futardio-fundraise]] launched on Futardio with $300K target, offering private DCA into SOL, cbBTC, and ZEC with Privacy.cash ZK-proof integration
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — Fundraise closed with $1,455 committed (0.49% of target), triggering automatic refund; first RWA integration with Oro (tokenized gold) announced during raise
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — Futardio fundraise launched with $300K target for private DCA infrastructure on Solana
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — Fundraise closed with only $1,455 committed (0.5% of target), full refund issued
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — fundraising platform
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO]] — futarchy governance infrastructure
|
||||
- [[privacy-cash]] — ZK-proof privacy pool provider
|
||||
- [[Jupiter]] — DEX aggregator for trade execution
|
||||
- [[Oro]] — first RWA integration partner (tokenized gold)
|
||||
- Product demonstrates [[futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale]] failure mode when value proposition unclear
|
||||
- Architecture relevant to privacy DeFi and institutional on-chain trading use cases
|
||||
- Product positioned as privacy layer for DeFi execution, addressing MEV extraction and surveillance concerns
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless
|
|||
|
||||
- **2026-03-07** — Areal DAO launch: $50K target, raised $11,654 (23.3%), REFUNDING status by 2026-03-08 — first documented failed futarchy-governed fundraise on platform
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — [[seekervault]] fundraise launched targeting $75,000, closed next day with only $1,186 (1.6% of target) in refunding status
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — [[cloak-futardio-fundraise]] launched seeking $300K for privacy DCA infrastructure; failed with $1,455 raised (0.49% of target), triggering automatic refund
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — [[cloak-futardio-fundraise]] failed: Cloak raised only $1,455 of $300K target (0.485%), full refund issued
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
|
||||
- **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: company
|
||||
name: Oro
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
platform: solana
|
||||
product_type: rwa_tokenization
|
||||
asset_class: gold
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Oro
|
||||
|
||||
Oro is a tokenized gold protocol on Solana, representing the first real-world asset (RWA) integration for privacy-focused DCA infrastructure. The protocol enables on-chain gold accumulation with automated DCA from leftover trade change.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — Announced as first RWA integration partner for [[cloak]], positioning as private distribution layer for tokenized gold on Solana
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[cloak]] — first privacy DCA integration
|
||||
- Demonstrates [[areal-targets-smb-rwa-tokenization-as-underserved-market-versus-equity-and-large-financial-instruments]] expansion into precious metals
|
||||
- RWA tokenization relevant to institutional on-chain asset accumulation use cases
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: person
|
||||
name: Prasad
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
roles:
|
||||
- founder
|
||||
- engineer
|
||||
affiliations:
|
||||
- Stealth
|
||||
- PermaSign
|
||||
- Superteam
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Prasad
|
||||
|
||||
Prasad is co-founder of [[cloak]], a privacy DCA protocol on Solana. Founding Engineer at Stealth, previously co-founded PermaSign, and contributed to Superteam. Led Cloak's Blinks integration, institutional API routes, and backend infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — Co-founded [[cloak]], launched [[cloak-futardio-fundraise]] on Futardio (failed with $1,455 raised vs $300K target)
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[cloak]] — co-founder focused on API and backend
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — used platform for fundraising attempt
|
||||
- Solana ecosystem builder with institutional infrastructure focus
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: company
|
||||
name: Privacy.cash
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
platform: solana
|
||||
product_type: privacy_infrastructure
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Privacy.cash
|
||||
|
||||
Privacy.cash provides ZK-proof privacy pool infrastructure on Solana, enabling protocols to offer cryptographically unlinkable deposits and withdrawals. The protocol uses commitment-based deposits where ownership is provably hidden, allowing downstream applications to build privacy-preserving financial products.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — Integrated by [[cloak]] for privacy DCA infrastructure, providing the ZK-proof layer for unlinkable session wallet architecture
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[cloak]] — first known integration for privacy DCA
|
||||
- Provides infrastructure relevant to [[futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation]] through privacy-preserving capital flows
|
||||
- ZK-proof privacy pools address surveillance concerns from Arkham Intelligence and Nansen tracking
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: person
|
||||
name: Vaibhav
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
roles:
|
||||
- founder
|
||||
- engineer
|
||||
affiliations:
|
||||
- CoinDCX
|
||||
- PermaSign
|
||||
- Superteam
|
||||
- Instadapp
|
||||
- Push Chain
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Vaibhav
|
||||
|
||||
Vaibhav is co-founder of [[cloak]], a privacy DCA protocol on Solana. Engineer at CoinDCX, previously co-founded PermaSign, and contributed to Superteam. Early engineer at Instadapp and Push Chain. Built Cloak's ZK privacy pool integration, keeper execution engine, session wallet architecture, frontend, and API layer.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2026-03-03** — Co-founded [[cloak]], launched [[cloak-futardio-fundraise]] on Futardio (failed with $1,455 raised vs $300K target)
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[cloak]] — co-founder and primary engineer
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — used platform for fundraising attempt
|
||||
- Solana ecosystem builder with privacy infrastructure focus
|
||||
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ event_type: launch
|
|||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Cloak fundraise is a significant failure case for Futardio — sophisticated technical execution, legitimate use case, credible team, but catastrophic capital attraction (0.49% of target). No novel claims extracted because the failure itself is the data point. Entity structure captures the fundraise mechanics, team composition, and technical integrations. Privacy.cash and Oro added as new entities due to first-known integrations. Vaibhav and Prasad added as founders with relevant background. This is primarily an entity data extraction with high significance for understanding futarchy-governed fundraising limits."
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Futardio launch that failed dramatically (0.485% of target). Pure entity extraction — no novel claims about futarchy mechanisms or privacy infrastructure beyond what's already in KB. The extreme failure rate is a data point but doesn't generate a claim without comparative context or mechanism insight. Team token structure (performance-locked with price triggers) is interesting but not novel enough for standalone claim given existing KB coverage of performance-based vesting."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -224,10 +224,10 @@ Worst case: the first and only private DCA product on Solana, used by whales who
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Cloak raised $1,455 of $300K target (0.49% success rate) on Futardio before automatic refund (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04)
|
||||
- Cloak offered 10M tokens at $0.03 ICO price with $477K FDV and 15.9M total supply
|
||||
- Cloak team structure: 2 founders, $10K/month allowance, 3M performance-locked tokens (18.9% of supply)
|
||||
- Cloak integrated Privacy.cash for ZK-proof privacy pools, Jupiter for DEX execution, and Oro for tokenized gold DCA
|
||||
- Cloak team allocation unlocks at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, 32x ICO price ($0.06, $0.12, $0.24, $0.48, $0.96) with 18-month cliff and 3-month TWAP settlement
|
||||
- MEV extraction on Solana estimated at $370M-$500M over 16 months (mid-2025) with DCA orders as primary target
|
||||
- Cloak estimated whale DCA information leakage cost at $10K-$40K/month on $500K/month volume vs $1,250 Cloak fee (0.25%)
|
||||
- Cloak raised $1,455 of $300,000 target (0.485% commitment rate) on Futardio (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04)
|
||||
- Cloak proposed $0.03/token ICO price with 15.9M total supply (12.9M circulating)
|
||||
- Cloak team allocation: 3M tokens (18.9%) performance-locked with 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x price triggers and 18-month minimum cliff
|
||||
- Cloak integrated Privacy.cash ZK-proof pools, Jupiter DEX, and Oro (tokenized gold) as first RWA
|
||||
- Cloak proposed $10K/month team allowance ($5K per founder) with 24-month runway from $300K raise
|
||||
- MEV extraction on Solana estimated at $370M-$500M over 16 months (mid-2025 data cited by Cloak)
|
||||
- Cloak supported SOL, cbBTC, ZEC in private beta on mainnet
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue