Compare commits
1 commit
4a8f6a6eae
...
537103fd4b
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
537103fd4b |
5 changed files with 115 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market?"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Proph3t (metaproph3t)"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/GPT8dFcpHfssMuULYKT9qERPY3heMoxwZHxgKgPw3TYM"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2023-12-16
|
||||
resolution_date: 2023-12-22
|
||||
category: "strategy"
|
||||
summary: "Proposal to build a Saber vote market funded by $150k consortium, with MetaDAO owning majority and earning revenue from vote trading fees"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market?
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
Proposal to build a vote market for Saber's veSBR holders, funded by a $150k consortium of ecosystem teams (UXD, BlazeStake, LP Finance, Saber). MetaDAO would own the majority of the platform, with $62k allocated to development costs and $90k reserved for ongoing operations. The platform would enable veSBR holders to earn yield by selling their votes and allow projects to acquire liquidity more efficiently than through bespoke campaigns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** Proph3t (metaproph3t)
|
||||
- **Proposal Account:** GPT8dFcpHfssMuULYKT9qERPY3heMoxwZHxgKgPw3TYM
|
||||
- **Completed:** 2023-12-22
|
||||
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.1
|
||||
|
||||
## Financial Structure
|
||||
- **Total Funding:** $150,000 from consortium
|
||||
- **Development Budget:** $62,000
|
||||
- Smart contracts (Matt/fzzyyti): $24,000
|
||||
- UI/UX (Marie): $12,000
|
||||
- Platform design (Durden): $7,000
|
||||
- Program management (Proph3t): $7,000
|
||||
- Audits (r0bre, joe): $10,000 combined
|
||||
- Deployment/misc: $2,000
|
||||
- **Treasury Reserve:** $88,000 for operations and maintenance
|
||||
- **Revenue Model:** 5-15% take rate on vote trades
|
||||
|
||||
## Revenue Projections
|
||||
Based on Curve and Aura benchmarks, estimated $1 in yearly vote trade volume per $50 of Saber TVL. With Saber's $20M TVL at the time, projected $400k annual volume. At 15% take rate and 65% MetaDAO ownership, estimated $39k annual revenue to MetaDAO.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **Kickoff:** December 11-15, 2023
|
||||
- **Development:** December 18 - February 9, 2024 (with holiday break)
|
||||
- **Audit:** January 29 - February 2, 2024
|
||||
- **Launch:** February 19, 2024
|
||||
|
||||
## Team
|
||||
- Marie (swagy_marie): UI/UX
|
||||
- Matt (fzzyyti): Smart contracts
|
||||
- Durden (durdenwannabe): Platform design & tokenomics
|
||||
- Joe (joebuild) & r0bre: Contract audits
|
||||
- Proph3t (metaproph3t): Program manager
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This proposal demonstrates MetaDAO's pivot from building its own vote market (Marinade, proposal 0) to providing futarchy-governed infrastructure as a service for other protocols. It shows MetaDAO's legitimacy-building strategy through partnerships with established Solana projects and represents an early test of the "futarchy as a service" model. The multi-party funding consortium structure ($150k from 4+ teams) validates external demand for MetaDAO's governance technology.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - strategic direction toward infrastructure provider
|
||||
- [[futardio]] - platform hosting this proposal
|
||||
- [[proph3t]] - proposer and program manager
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window]] - governance mechanism used
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2023-12-16** — [[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]] proposed: Build Saber vote market funded by $150k consortium from UXD, BlazeStake, LP Finance, and Saber
|
||||
- **2023-12-22** — [[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]] passed: Approved development of Saber vote market with $62k development budget and $90k treasury reserve
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -44,3 +44,7 @@ Relevant Entities:
|
|||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- **2023-12-16** — Proposed [[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]]: $150k consortium-funded Saber vote market with MetaDAO as majority owner and service provider
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
27
entities/internet-finance/saber.md
Normal file
27
entities/internet-finance/saber.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: company
|
||||
name: "Saber"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
website: "https://saber.so"
|
||||
founded: null
|
||||
key_people:
|
||||
- "c2yptic"
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
tvl: "$20M (as of December 2023)"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Saber
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Saber is a Solana-based decentralized exchange focused on stablecoin and wrapped asset trading. The protocol uses a vote-escrowed token model (veSBR) where token holders lock SBR to gain governance rights over liquidity gauge emissions. As of December 2023, Saber had $20M in TVL and was planning to implement a vote market to enable veSBR holders to monetize their voting power.
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2023-12-16** — Partnered with MetaDAO to build vote market infrastructure, contributing to $150k funding consortium alongside UXD, BlazeStake, and LP Finance
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]] - governance infrastructure partnership
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - futarchy infrastructure provider
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,14 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/GPT8dFcpHfssMuULYKT9qERPY3heMoxwZHxgKgPw3TY
|
|||
date: 2023-12-16
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This is a decision_market entity extraction, not a claim extraction. The proposal itself contains no novel mechanism insights - it applies existing vote market concepts (Curve/Convex/Votium model) to Saber. The value is in the governance event and the strategic pivot it represents for MetaDAO (from building own products to providing infrastructure as a service). Enrichments focus on operational complexity, multi-party coordination, and MetaDAO's evolving positioning. Created new entity for Saber as it's a significant Solana protocol with $20M TVL and ongoing relationship with MetaDAO."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -201,3 +206,13 @@ For those who are more familiar with bribe terminology, which I prefer not to us
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.1
|
||||
- Completed: 2023-12-22
|
||||
- Ended: 2023-12-22
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Saber had $20M TVL as of December 2023
|
||||
- Curve had $2B TVL with $1.25M in biweekly vote incentives (December 2023)
|
||||
- Curve had $20B TVL with $15-20M biweekly vote incentives before Luna depeg
|
||||
- Aura had $600M TVL with $900k biweekly vote incentives (May 2023)
|
||||
- Convex charges 7-10% take rate on vote markets
|
||||
- Votium charges ~3% take rate
|
||||
- Hidden Hand charges ~10% take rate
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue