Compare commits
20 commits
4e43e94773
...
a2deb64425
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a2deb64425 | |||
|
|
25a2bcf36e | ||
|
|
d6cac49b81 | ||
|
|
6459163781 | ||
| eb34307fd8 | |||
|
|
6b12e31aa2 | ||
| e1d0de13d6 | |||
|
|
ab01a67e5a | ||
|
|
6ce30dd429 | ||
| 32ec339877 | |||
| b55dafe191 | |||
|
|
53daf2dad3 | ||
|
|
6bcf7df0b3 | ||
|
|
35b3abd1c3 | ||
|
|
862ae0e947 | ||
| 881f9243bf | |||
|
|
ef18f973e9 | ||
| a7a8794466 | |||
|
|
f3ed471ac8 | ||
|
|
249bc206c1 |
554 changed files with 375 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -1,10 +1,20 @@
|
|||
# MetaDAO VC Discount Rejection
|
||||
---
|
||||
type: decision
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "MetaDAO: VC Discount Rejection"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: rejected
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
||||
platform: metadao
|
||||
proposal_date: 2026-03
|
||||
resolution_date: 2026-03
|
||||
category: treasury
|
||||
summary: "$6M OTC deal offering VCs 30% META discount rejected via futarchy; 16% price surge followed"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** March 2026
|
||||
**Type:** Treasury/Fundraising Decision
|
||||
**Mechanism:** Futarchy vote
|
||||
**Status:** Rejected
|
||||
**Parent:** [[metadao]]
|
||||
# MetaDAO VC Discount Rejection
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
A $6M OTC deal that would have offered VC firms a 30% discount on META tokens.
|
||||
|
|
@ -21,6 +31,8 @@ This decision provides strong empirical evidence for futarchy's ability to preve
|
|||
2. The conditional market mechanism made the extractive deal unprofitable to pursue
|
||||
3. The community recognized and rejected value extraction through the futarchy process
|
||||
|
||||
This was also a CONTESTED decision with meaningful engagement, providing counter-evidence to the pattern documented in [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — when stakes are high enough, participation follows.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
- MetaDAO empirical results show smaller participants gaining influence through futarchy
|
||||
- [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]]
|
||||
- [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]]
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — the VC discount rejection occurred on the curated MetaDAO platform, not futard.io
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -35,16 +35,22 @@ No data yet on whether community involvement actually changes creative decisions
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-01-variety-mediawan-claynosaurz-animated-series]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
*Source: 2025-06-01-variety-mediawan-claynosaurz-animated-series | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
Claynosaurz describes community as 'co-conspirators who have a real impact on Claynosaurz's future' and states community input helps shape narrative and content direction. However, the source does not specify the mechanisms (storyboard sharing, script collaboration, etc.) — only that community influence exists. This extends the claim by adding another case but doesn't confirm the specific mechanisms.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-07-21-thenftbuzz-doodles-dreamnet-protocol]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2025-07-21-thenftbuzz-doodles-dreamnet-protocol | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
DreamNet adds a fourth mechanism: AI-mediated distributed authorship where community members produce narrative content (characters, lore, locations) that AI synthesizes, with audience reception determining what becomes canon. This is structurally different from storyboard sharing or script collaboration because it removes editorial gatekeeping entirely — the 'market' for story elements determines narrative direction through the WorldState ledger.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-11-01-claynosaurz-mipjunior-community-governance-model]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Claynosaurz adds three specific mechanisms to the co-creation toolkit: (1) IP bible updated weekly with community input, making canonical world rules responsive to community discussion, (2) social media engagement signals as continuous feedback loop replacing discrete collaboration events, and (3) fan artist employment pipeline where exceptional community creators are absorbed into the professional production team. These mechanisms operate without formal voting or governance authority.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ The academic framing is significant: top-tier musicology journals treating conce
|
|||
- "Society is craving communal experiences amid increasing isolation"
|
||||
- Tour as "cultural touchstone" where "audiences see themselves reflected in Swift's evolution"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-18-synthesis-collaborative-fiction-governance-spectrum]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
SCP Foundation with 9,800+ objects and 6,300+ tales demonstrates that protocol-distributed authorship (standardized format + peer review + voting) produces coherent worldbuilding at massive scale without centralized editorial authority. The emergent canonical clusters form organically through community consensus rather than top-down coordination. This confirms that worldbuilding can scale through structural constraints rather than editorial control, though it does NOT produce linear narrative (which requires concentrated authority per the tradeoff claim).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -79,10 +79,16 @@ Danish cohort achieved same weight loss outcomes (16.7% at 64 weeks) using HALF
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-02-01-cms-balance-model-details-rfa-design]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-02-01-cms-balance-model-details-rfa-design | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
BALANCE Model's dual payment mechanism (capitation adjustment + reinsurance) plus manufacturer-funded lifestyle support represents the first major policy attempt to address the chronic-use cost structure. The Medicare GLP-1 Bridge (July 2026) provides immediate price relief while full model architecture is built, indicating urgency around cost containment.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-12-01-who-glp1-guidelines-behavioral-therapy-combination]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
WHO's conditional recommendation structure and behavioral therapy requirement suggest the 'chronic use model' framing may be incomplete. The guideline establishes medication-plus-behavioral-therapy as the standard, not medication alone, which may have different economics than the pure pharmaceutical model. WHO also announced it will develop 'an evidence-based prioritization framework to identify which adults with obesity should be prioritized for GLP-1 treatment'—implying targeted use rather than universal chronic treatment.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -67,10 +67,16 @@ Digital behavioral support may partially solve the persistence problem: UK study
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-02-01-cms-balance-model-details-rfa-design]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-02-01-cms-balance-model-details-rfa-design | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
BALANCE Model's manufacturer-funded lifestyle support requirement directly addresses the persistence problem by mandating evidence-based programs for GI side effects, nutrition, and physical activity—the factors most associated with discontinuation. This shifts the cost of adherence support from payers to manufacturers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-12-01-who-glp1-guidelines-behavioral-therapy-combination]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
WHO's conditional recommendation requiring behavioral therapy combination provides international regulatory support for adherence interventions. The guideline explicitly states GLP-1s should be 'combined with intensive behavioral therapy to maximize and sustain benefits'—directly addressing the persistence problem by making behavioral support the standard of care rather than an optional add-on.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ Futardio extends MetaDAO's infrastructure to permissionless launches, demonstrat
|
|||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-17-metadao-q1-2026-update]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
First MetaDAO ICO failure occurred February 7, 2026 when Hurupay (onchain neobank) failed to reach $3M minimum target despite strong metrics ($7.2M monthly volume, $500K+ revenue). This demonstrates the platform's quality filter works - not all projects pass, which strengthens rather than weakens the ownership coin thesis. All previous 8 ICOs since April 2025 had succeeded before this.
|
||||
First MetaDAO ICO failure occurred February 7, 2026 when Hurupay (onchain neobank) failed to reach $3M minimum target despite strong metrics ($7.2M monthly volume, $500K+ revenue). All previous 8 ICOs since April 2025 had succeeded before this. Two competing interpretations: (1) the platform's quality filter works — not all projects pass, which strengthens rather than weakens the ownership coin thesis; (2) the investor base was thinning during the post-December 2025 revenue decline, and the failure reflects demand contraction rather than project-specific filtering. The evidence supports both readings — Hurupay's fundamentals were stronger than several projects that did raise successfully, which favors the demand-thinning interpretation, but the timing also coincided with broader emerging-market sentiment weakness.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-17-metadao-q1-2026-update]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025, with the ICO cadence problem persisting due to the curated model limiting throughput. Platform has generated ~$2.4M revenue since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025) - 60% from AMM, 40% from Meteora LP. Total raised across 8+ ICOs: $25.6M with $390M committed (15x oversubscription). Futarchy AMM processed $300M+ volume, $1.5M fees.
|
||||
Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025, with the ICO cadence problem persisting due to the curated model limiting throughput. This is the key new signal — the platform's revenue trajectory has inverted despite strong cumulative metrics, suggesting the curated model's throughput ceiling may be binding.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -76,6 +76,12 @@ The securities law question may be superseded by state gaming law enforcement. E
|
|||
|
||||
Arizona's criminal charges against Kalshi demonstrate that being 'not a security' does not protect prediction market operators from criminal gambling prosecution. The structural separation that defeats Howey test classification is irrelevant to state gaming laws and election betting prohibitions. Criminal charges create personal liability for executives that persists regardless of securities law analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-12-cftc-advisory-anprm-prediction-markets]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
The CFTC's March 2026 ANPRM creates a parallel regulatory vector through the Commodity Exchange Act that could affect futarchy governance markets independently of securities law. If 'gaming' under CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C) is defined broadly, futarchy markets could face prohibition or restriction not because they're securities, but because they're classified as gaming contracts. This means proving futarchy entities aren't securities under Howey may be necessary but not sufficient for regulatory defensibility—they must also avoid the 'gaming' classification under the CEA.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,28 +30,34 @@ The federal-state jurisdictional conflict is unresolved. If states successfully
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-01-00-nevada-polymarket-lawsuit-prediction-markets]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-01-00-nevada-polymarket-lawsuit-prediction-markets | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
Nevada Gaming Control Board's January 2026 lawsuit against Polymarket directly challenges the CFTC regulatory legitimacy established through QCX acquisition. Nevada court found NGCB 'reasonably likely to prevail on the merits' and rejected Polymarket's exclusive federal jurisdiction argument, indicating state courts do not accept CFTC authority as dispositive. Massachusetts issued similar preliminary injunction against Kalshi. This represents coordinated state pushback against federal preemption.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
CFTC's imminent rulemaking signal in February 2026 represents the agency moving from case-by-case enforcement to comprehensive regulatory framework, attempting to establish federal primacy before courts resolve jurisdiction questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-01-30-npr-kalshi-19-federal-lawsuits]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-01-30-npr-kalshi-19-federal-lawsuits | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Consumer class action lawsuits alleging prediction markets worsen gambling addiction create political risk independent of legal outcomes. Four class-action suits seeking certification demonstrate that even if prediction markets win federal preemption arguments, the gambling addiction narrative generates political pressure that could constrain operations or invite Congressional intervention. Daniel Wallach (gaming attorney): 'They're engaging in gambling, no matter what they're trying to call it.'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-02-26-hklaw-prediction-market-jurisdictional-battle]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-02-26-hklaw-prediction-market-jurisdictional-battle | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Polymarket's CFTC regulatory status is now under direct challenge in 50+ state enforcement actions. Nevada, Massachusetts, Maryland, Ohio, Connecticut, and New York have all brought enforcement actions arguing that sports prediction markets are state-regulated gaming, not CFTC-regulated derivatives. The Ninth Circuit denied Kalshi's stay in February 2026, and 36+ states filed amicus briefs in the Fourth Circuit opposing federal preemption. This suggests Polymarket's regulatory legitimacy through CFTC compliance may not protect it from state-level gaming enforcement.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-00-ebg-kalshi-litigation-preemption-analysis]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
The Kalshi litigation reveals that CFTC regulation alone does not resolve state gambling law conflicts. Despite operating as CFTC-regulated DCMs, Kalshi faces state enforcement actions in Maryland, Tennessee, California, and New York. Maryland courts found that federal DCM status does not preempt state gambling authority because the CEA lacks express preemption language. This means Polymarket's QCX acquisition, while establishing CFTC legitimacy, may not shield it from state-level gambling enforcement.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ The investment implication is that ISRU businesses should be evaluated not again
|
|||
|
||||
Helium-3 extraction avoids the launch cost competition problem that threatens water-for-propellant economics because helium-3's terrestrial scarcity and quantum computing demand create a market where lunar extraction competes against constrained Earth supply rather than against launch services. This suggests resources with high Earth-side value and limited terrestrial supply may be more economically viable than resources primarily valuable for in-space use.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-18-spacenews-lunar-economy-resources-reactors]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
The helium-3 quantum computing demand creates a case where lunar resources have Earth-side markets that launch cost reductions cannot compete with, because the resource literally doesn't exist on Earth in sufficient quantities. This represents a boundary condition where the paradox doesn't apply: when the resource is unavailable terrestrially, launch costs only affect the extraction economics, not the market viability.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ The UNCOPUOS Working Group on Space Resource Activities produced draft Recommend
|
|||
|
||||
This pattern — national legislation creating de facto international norms through accumulation of consistent domestic practice — is a governance design insight with implications beyond space. It demonstrates that when multilateral treaty-making stalls, coordinated unilateral action by like-minded states can establish operative legal frameworks. This parallels the Artemis Accords approach: [[the Artemis Accords replace multilateral treaty-making with bilateral norm-setting to create governance through coalition practice rather than universal consensus]]. Both represent governance emergence through practice rather than negotiation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-18-spacenews-lunar-economy-resources-reactors]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
SpaceNews reports that India has now adopted 'first to explore, first to own' principle alongside US, Luxembourg, UAE, and Japan. The article notes Congress enacted laws establishing this principle and it has been 'adopted by India, Luxembourg, UAE, Japan' creating 'de facto international law through national legislation without international agreement.' This extends the coalition beyond the original Artemis Accords signatories and shows the framework spreading to major emerging space powers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-02-07** — [[metadao-hurupay-ico-failure]] Failed: First ICO failure, Hurupay did not reach $3M minimum despite $7.2M monthly volume
|
||||
- **2026-03-18** — [[metadao-ban-hawkins-proposals]] Failed: Community rejected Ban Hawkins' governance proposals through futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2026-03-18** — [[metadao-first-launchpad-proposal]] Failed: Initial launchpad proposal rejected through futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2026-02-07** — [[metadao-hurupay-ico]] Failed: First MetaDAO ICO failure - Hurupay failed to reach $3M minimum, full refunds issued
|
||||
- **2026-03** — [[metadao-vc-discount-rejection]] Passed: Community rejected $6M OTC deal offering 30% VC discount via futarchy vote, triggering 16% META price surge
|
||||
- **2026-03-17** — Revenue decline continues since mid-December 2025; platform generated ~$2.4M total revenue since Futarchy AMM launch (60% AMM, 40% Meteora LP)
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "community-ip-governance-operates-on-spectrum-from-informal-engagement-signals-to-formal-onchain-voting-to-distributed-authorship.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 4,
|
||||
"rejected": 1,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"community-ip-governance-operates-on-spectrum-from-informal-engagement-signals-to-formal-onchain-voting-to-distributed-authorship.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"community-ip-governance-operates-on-spectrum-from-informal-engagement-signals-to-formal-onchain-voting-to-distributed-authorship.md:stripped_wiki_link:progressive-validation-through-community-building-reduces-de",
|
||||
"community-ip-governance-operates-on-spectrum-from-informal-engagement-signals-to-formal-onchain-voting-to-distributed-authorship.md:stripped_wiki_link:fanchise-management-is-a-stack-of-increasing-fan-engagement-",
|
||||
"community-ip-governance-operates-on-spectrum-from-informal-engagement-signals-to-formal-onchain-voting-to-distributed-authorship.md:stripped_wiki_link:traditional-media-buyers-now-seek-content-with-pre-existing-"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"community-ip-governance-operates-on-spectrum-from-informal-engagement-signals-to-formal-onchain-voting-to-distributed-authorship.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "who-glp-1-conditional-recommendation-requires-behavioral-therapy-combination.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 3,
|
||||
"rejected": 1,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"who-glp-1-conditional-recommendation-requires-behavioral-therapy-combination.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"who-glp-1-conditional-recommendation-requires-behavioral-therapy-combination.md:stripped_wiki_link:glp-1-persistence-drops-to-15-percent-at-two-years-for-non-d",
|
||||
"who-glp-1-conditional-recommendation-requires-behavioral-therapy-combination.md:stripped_wiki_link:GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"who-glp-1-conditional-recommendation-requires-behavioral-therapy-combination.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "cea-absence-of-express-preemption-creates-structural-legal-uncertainty-for-prediction-markets.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "dual-compliance-preemption-test-disadvantages-decentralized-prediction-markets.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 5,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"cea-absence-of-express-preemption-creates-structural-legal-uncertainty-for-prediction-markets.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"cea-absence-of-express-preemption-creates-structural-legal-uncertainty-for-prediction-markets.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed-entities-are-structurally-not-securities-b",
|
||||
"dual-compliance-preemption-test-disadvantages-decentralized-prediction-markets.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"dual-compliance-preemption-test-disadvantages-decentralized-prediction-markets.md:stripped_wiki_link:Ooki-DAO-proved-that-DAOs-without-legal-wrappers-face-genera",
|
||||
"dual-compliance-preemption-test-disadvantages-decentralized-prediction-markets.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed-entities-are-structurally-not-securities-b"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"cea-absence-of-express-preemption-creates-structural-legal-uncertainty-for-prediction-markets.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"dual-compliance-preemption-test-disadvantages-decentralized-prediction-markets.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "cftc-gaming-definition-ambiguity-creates-classification-risk-for-governance-markets.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "cftc-flags-single-actor-decision-contracts-for-manipulation-risk-affecting-futarchy-governance.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 3,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"cftc-gaming-definition-ambiguity-creates-classification-risk-for-governance-markets.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"cftc-gaming-definition-ambiguity-creates-classification-risk-for-governance-markets.md:stripped_wiki_link:Polymarket achieved us regulatory legitimacy through qcx acq",
|
||||
"cftc-flags-single-actor-decision-contracts-for-manipulation-risk-affecting-futarchy-governance.md:set_created:2026-03-18"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"cftc-gaming-definition-ambiguity-creates-classification-risk-for-governance-markets.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"cftc-flags-single-actor-decision-contracts-for-manipulation-risk-affecting-futarchy-governance.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "helium-3-quantum-computing-demand-creates-lunar-extraction-incentive.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "terrestrial-industrial-companies-entering-lunar-mining-signals-engineering-phase-transition.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 3,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"helium-3-quantum-computing-demand-creates-lunar-extraction-incentive.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"helium-3-quantum-computing-demand-creates-lunar-extraction-incentive.md:stripped_wiki_link:the 30 year space economy attractor state is a cislunar indu",
|
||||
"terrestrial-industrial-companies-entering-lunar-mining-signals-engineering-phase-transition.md:set_created:2026-03-18"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"helium-3-quantum-computing-demand-creates-lunar-extraction-incentive.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"terrestrial-industrial-companies-entering-lunar-mining-signals-engineering-phase-transition.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "distributed-authorship-produces-scalable-worldbuilding-while-coherent-linear-narrative-requires-concentrated-editorial-authority.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "scp-foundations-narrative-protocol-model-uses-structural-constraints-to-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "ttrpg-actual-play-dm-player-dynamic-is-structurally-isomorphic-to-founding-team-community-dynamic-in-tier-2-community-owned-ip.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 3,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 9,
|
||||
"rejected": 3,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"distributed-authorship-produces-scalable-worldbuilding-while-coherent-linear-narrative-requires-concentrated-editorial-authority.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"distributed-authorship-produces-scalable-worldbuilding-while-coherent-linear-narrative-requires-concentrated-editorial-authority.md:stripped_wiki_link:fanchise-management-is-a-stack-of-increasing-fan-engagement-",
|
||||
"distributed-authorship-produces-scalable-worldbuilding-while-coherent-linear-narrative-requires-concentrated-editorial-authority.md:stripped_wiki_link:entertainment-IP-should-be-treated-as-a-multi-sided-platform",
|
||||
"scp-foundations-narrative-protocol-model-uses-structural-constraints-to-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"scp-foundations-narrative-protocol-model-uses-structural-constraints-to-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding.md:stripped_wiki_link:fanchise-management-is-a-stack-of-increasing-fan-engagement-",
|
||||
"scp-foundations-narrative-protocol-model-uses-structural-constraints-to-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding.md:stripped_wiki_link:protocol-design-enables-emergent-coordination-of-arbitrary-c",
|
||||
"ttrpg-actual-play-dm-player-dynamic-is-structurally-isomorphic-to-founding-team-community-dynamic-in-tier-2-community-owned-ip.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"ttrpg-actual-play-dm-player-dynamic-is-structurally-isomorphic-to-founding-team-community-dynamic-in-tier-2-community-owned-ip.md:stripped_wiki_link:distributed-authorship-produces-scalable-worldbuilding-while",
|
||||
"ttrpg-actual-play-dm-player-dynamic-is-structurally-isomorphic-to-founding-team-community-dynamic-in-tier-2-community-owned-ip.md:stripped_wiki_link:fanchise-management-is-a-stack-of-increasing-fan-engagement-"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"distributed-authorship-produces-scalable-worldbuilding-while-coherent-linear-narrative-requires-concentrated-editorial-authority.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"scp-foundations-narrative-protocol-model-uses-structural-constraints-to-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"ttrpg-actual-play-dm-player-dynamic-is-structurally-isomorphic-to-founding-team-community-dynamic-in-tier-2-community-owned-ip.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-11-01
|
|||
domain: entertainment
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: article
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [claynosaurz, community-governance, co-creation, mipjunior, nicholas-cabana, informal-governance, ip-bible, uGC]
|
||||
processed_by: clay
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["community-co-creation-in-animation-production-includes-storyboard-sharing-script-collaboration-and-collectible-integration-as-specific-mechanisms.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -73,3 +77,13 @@ PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[progressive validation through community building reduces
|
|||
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides the most specific description of Claynosaurz's informal co-creation model, establishing it as "Tier 2" on the governance spectrum. Critical for the governance spectrum claim that synthesizes this session's main finding.
|
||||
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The key claim to extract is about the GOVERNANCE TIERS, not just Claynosaurz specifically. Use Claynosaurz as the evidence anchor but extract the broader pattern. Also flag the founder-dependency sustainability question — informal governance works only while founders are listening. What happens when the founding team changes?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Claynosaurz achieved 450M+ views and 200M+ impressions by late 2025
|
||||
- Claynosaurz community has 530K+ online subscribers across platforms
|
||||
- Claynosaurz reported nearly 1B social views at Annecy 2025 in June
|
||||
- Claynosaurz has 39-episode animated series in co-production with Mediawan Kids & Family
|
||||
- Gameloft is co-developing a Claynosaurz mobile game
|
||||
- Jesse Cleverly from Wildseed Studios (Mediawan) serves as showrunner for Claynosaurz series
|
||||
- Nicholas Cabana presented Claynosaurz model at MIPJunior 2025 in Cannes
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-03-18
|
|||
domain: entertainment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence, cultural-dynamics]
|
||||
format: essay
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
triage_tag: claim
|
||||
tags: [collaborative-fiction, governance-spectrum, editorial-authority, narrative-coherence, scp-foundation, ao3, ttrpg, community-owned-ip, worldbuilding]
|
||||
processed_by: clay
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["worldbuilding-as-narrative-infrastructure-creates-communal-meaning-through-transmedia-coordination-of-audience-experience.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -92,3 +96,17 @@ CC-BY-SA 3.0 prevents major studio consolidation but enables ecosystem-scale gra
|
|||
## Curator Notes
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: community governance and narrative quality (Sessions 5-6 research thread)
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: This is the synthesis source for Session 6. It resolves the central gap from Session 5 ("no community-owned IP has demonstrated qualitatively different stories") by identifying the structural tradeoff that explains WHY. It also extends the four-tier governance model to a six-point spectrum with historical cases.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- AO3 has 17M+ works, 94M daily hits, 700 volunteers
|
||||
- SCP Foundation has 9,800+ SCP objects, 6,300+ tales, 16 language branches, 18 years of operation
|
||||
- SCP uses CC-BY-SA 3.0 licensing
|
||||
- SCP deletion threshold is -10 votes
|
||||
- SCP requires greenlight by 2 experienced reviewers pre-publication
|
||||
- Critical Role is #1 Twitch channel and has spawned animated series, novels, comics
|
||||
- Dropout/Dimension 20 generates $80-90M revenue at 40-45% EBITDA
|
||||
- Pudgy Penguins (Tier 1) delegates to production partner with no community narrative input
|
||||
- Claynosaurz (Tier 2) uses informal co-creation with team retaining editorial authority
|
||||
- Azuki/Bobu (Tier 3) uses formal on-chain voting bounded to secondary character
|
||||
- Doodles/DreamNet (Tier 4) uses protocol-level distributed authorship, pre-launch
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show more
Loading…
Reference in a new issue