Compare commits
3 commits
54eef535d3
...
b8fcdfb86f
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
b8fcdfb86f | ||
|
|
857c28c9b0 | ||
|
|
c520b7a403 |
34 changed files with 23 additions and 491 deletions
|
|
@ -27,12 +27,6 @@ This is not an American problem alone. The American diet and lifestyle are sprea
|
|||
|
||||
The four major risk factors behind the highest burden of noncommunicable disease -- tobacco use, harmful use of alcohol, unhealthy diets, and physical inactivity -- are all lifestyle factors that simple interventions could address. The gap between what science knows works (lifestyle modification) and what the system delivers (pharmaceutical symptom management) represents one of the largest misalignments in the modern economy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-01-cell-med-glp1-societal-implications-obesity]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
GLP-1s may function as a pharmacological counter to engineered food addiction. The population-level obesity decline (39.9% to 37.0%) coinciding with 12.4% adult GLP-1 adoption suggests pharmaceutical intervention can partially offset the metabolic consequences of engineered hyperpalatable foods, though this addresses symptoms rather than root causes of the food environment.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,12 +23,6 @@ The competitive dynamics (Lilly vs. Novo vs. generics post-2031) will drive pric
|
|||
|
||||
Real-world persistence data from 125,474 commercially insured patients shows the chronic use model fails not because patients choose indefinite use, but because most cannot sustain it: only 32.3% of non-diabetic obesity patients remain on GLP-1s at one year, dropping to approximately 15% at two years. This creates a paradox for payer economics—the "inflationary chronic use" concern assumes sustained adherence, but the actual problem is insufficient persistence. Under capitation, payers pay for 12 months of therapy ($2,940 at $245/month) for patients who discontinue and regain weight, capturing net cost with no downstream savings from avoided complications. The economics only work if adherence is sustained AND the payer captures downstream benefits—with 85% discontinuing by two years, the downstream cardiovascular and metabolic savings that justify the cost never materialize for most patients.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-01-cell-med-glp1-societal-implications-obesity]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
The Cell Press review characterizes GLP-1s as marking a 'system-level redefinition' of cardiometabolic management with 'ripple effects across healthcare costs, insurance models, food systems, long-term population health.' Obesity costs the US $400B+ annually, providing context for the scale of potential cost impact. The WHO issued conditional recommendations within 2 years of widespread adoption (December 2025), unusually fast for a major therapeutic category.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -31,12 +31,6 @@ Since specialization and value form an autocatalytic feedback loop where each am
|
|||
|
||||
The Commonwealth Fund's 2024 international comparison demonstrates this transition empirically across 10 developed nations. All countries compared (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, US) have eliminated material scarcity in healthcare — all possess advanced clinical capabilities and universal or near-universal access infrastructure. Yet health outcomes vary dramatically. The US spends >16% of GDP (highest by far) with worst outcomes, while top performers (Australia, Netherlands) spend the lowest percentage of GDP. The differentiator is not clinical capability (US ranks 2nd in care process quality) but access structures and equity — social determinants. This proves that among developed nations with sufficient material resources, social disadvantage (who gets care, discrimination, equity barriers) drives outcomes more powerfully than clinical quality or spending volume.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-01-cell-med-glp1-societal-implications-obesity]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
GLP-1 access inequality demonstrates the epidemiological transition in action: the intervention addresses metabolic disease (post-transition health problem) but access stratifies by wealth and insurance status (social disadvantage), potentially widening health inequalities even as population-level outcomes improve. The WHO's emphasis on 'multisectoral action' and 'healthier environments' acknowledges that pharmaceutical solutions alone cannot address socially-determined health outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -91,12 +91,6 @@ FutureDAO's token migrator extends the unruggable ICO concept to community takeo
|
|||
|
||||
MetaDAO ICO platform processed 8 projects from April 2025 to January 2026, raising $25.6M against $390M in committed demand (15x oversubscription). Platform generated $57.3M in Assets Under Futarchy and $1.5M in fees from $300M trading volume. Individual project performance: Avici 21x peak/7x current, Omnipair 16x peak/5x current, Umbra 8x peak/3x current with $154M committed for $3M raise (51x oversubscription). Recent launches (Ranger, Solomon, Paystream, ZKLSOL, Loyal) show convergence toward lower volatility with maximum 30% drawdown from launch.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO Q3 2024 roadmap prioritized launching a market-based grants product as the primary objective, with specific targets to launch 5 organizations and process 8 proposals through the product. This represents an expansion from pure ICO functionality to grants decision-making, demonstrating futarchy's application to capital allocation beyond fundraising.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -77,12 +77,6 @@ Autocrat v0.1 made the three-day window configurable rather than hardcoded, with
|
|||
|
||||
Proposal #3 on MetaDAO (account EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs) ran on Autocrat version 0.3, created 2024-07-04, and completed/ended 2024-07-08 - confirming the four-day operational window (proposal creation plus three-day settlement period) specified in the mechanism design.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
Production deployment data from futard.io shows Proposal #1 on DAO account De8YzDKudqgeJXqq6i7q82AgxxrQ1JXXfMgouQuPyhY using Autocrat version 0.3, with proposal created, ended, and completed all on 2025-03-05. This confirms operational use of the Autocrat v0.3 implementation in live governance.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -41,12 +41,6 @@ Dean's List ThailandDAO proposal (DgXa6gy7nAFFWe8VDkiReQYhqe1JSYQCJWUBV8Mm6aM) f
|
|||
|
||||
Proposal #3 failed with no indication of trading activity or market participation in the on-chain data, consistent with the pattern of minimal engagement in proposals without controversy or competitive dynamics.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
The ISC treasury swap proposal (Gp3ANMRTdGLPNeMGFUrzVFaodouwJSEXHbg5rFUi9roJ) was a contested decision that failed, showing futarchy markets can reject proposals with clear economic rationale when risk factors dominate. The proposal offered inflation hedge benefits but markets priced early-stage counterparty risk higher, demonstrating active price discovery in treasury decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -46,12 +46,6 @@ Sanctum's Wonder proposal failure reveals a new friction: team conviction vs. ma
|
|||
|
||||
Dean's List ThailandDAO proposal included complex mechanics (token lockup multipliers, governance power calculations, leaderboard dynamics, multi-phase rollout with feedback sessions, payment-in-DEAN options at 10% discount) that increased evaluation friction. Despite favorable economics (16x projected FDV increase, $15K cost, 3% threshold), the proposal failed to attract trading volume. The proposal's own analysis noted the 3% requirement was 'small compared to the projected FDV increase' and 'achievable,' yet market participants did not engage, confirming that proposal complexity creates adoption barriers even when valuations are attractive.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO's Q3 roadmap explicitly prioritized UI performance improvements, targeting reduction of page load times from 14.6 seconds to 1 second. This 93% reduction target indicates that user experience friction was severe enough to warrant top-level roadmap inclusion alongside product launches and team building.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -41,12 +41,6 @@ This pattern is general. Since [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token pri
|
|||
|
||||
MetaDAO's Autocrat v0.1 simplified by making proposal slots configurable and reducing default duration to 3 days. The proposer explicitly framed this as enabling 'quicker feedback loops,' suggesting the original implementation's fixed duration was a practical barrier to adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO's roadmap included 'cardboard cutout' design phase for grants product, explicitly gathering requirements from both prospective DAO users and decision market traders before implementation. This user-centered design approach demonstrates practical adaptation of futarchy theory to real user needs.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -37,12 +37,6 @@ The contrast with Ranger is instructive. Ranger's liquidation shows futarchy han
|
|||
- The subcommittee model introduces trusted roles that could recentralize power over time, undermining the trustless property that makes futarchy valuable
|
||||
- Since [[Ooki DAO proved that DAOs without legal wrappers face general partnership liability making entity structure a prerequisite for any futarchy-governed vehicle]], some of this scaffolding is legally required rather than a failure of market mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO's rejection of ISC treasury diversification shows futarchy markets applying conservative risk assessment to treasury operations. Despite theoretical inflation hedge benefits, markets rejected a 6.8% allocation to an early-stage stablecoin, prioritizing capital preservation over yield optimization - a pattern consistent with traditional treasury management.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ However, this case provides concrete evidence that [[futarchy adoption faces fri
|
|||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-08-27-futardio-proposal-fund-the-drift-superteam-earn-creator-competition]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
Drift's $8,250 creator competition proposal failed despite having clear upside potential (community engagement, content generation, B.E.T awareness) and minimal downside risk. The proposal offered a structured prize pool across multiple tracks (video, Twitter threads, trade ideas) with established evaluation criteria, yet still failed to generate sufficient market participation. This is a canonical example of participation friction killing an economically sensible proposal.
|
||||
The Drift Creator Competition proposal offered a structured marketing campaign with defined deliverables (video content, Twitter threads, trade ideas) and measurable outcomes (community engagement, B.E.T awareness) for $8,250. The proposal included clear evaluation criteria and distribution through established platform (Superteam Earn). Despite these favorable characteristics, it failed to pass, suggesting the failure mechanism was insufficient trader participation rather than negative market assessment of the proposal's value.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,5 @@ FutureDAO is a market-governed decentralized organization building the Future Pr
|
|||
- **2024-06-05** — futuredao-token-migrator proposal passed: Approved $12,000 USDC development budget for token migration tool with 60% presale success threshold and tiered fee structure (2% for <$1M FDMC, 1.5% for <$5M, 1% for <$20M) distributed to Champions NFT stakers
|
||||
- **2024-06-08** — Token Migrator proposal completed and ended
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-08-30** — Proposed $25,000 budget for Pre-Governance Mandates tool development and entry into Solana Radar Hackathon (September 1 - October 8, 2024). Tool combines multi-criteria decision-making engine with customizable surveys and Web3 integration to facilitate pre-governance community engagement. Proposal passed 2024-09-02.
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
FutureDAO extends [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] by applying conditional market logic to community takeovers of existing projects rather than just initial launches. The token migrator uses [[SPL-404-enables-fungible-NFT-swap-revenue-for-DAOs-by-bridging-governance-tokens-and-NFT-liquidity-on-Solana]] to distribute migration fees to staked NFT holders.
|
||||
|
|
@ -58,13 +58,13 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2024-03-02** — [[metadao-increase-meta-liquidity-dutch-auction]] passed: completed Dutch auction and liquidity provision, moving all protocol-owned liquidity to Meteora 1% fee pool
|
||||
- **2025-01-27** — [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-2]] proposed: Theia offers $500K for 370.370 META at 14% premium with 12-month vesting
|
||||
- **2025-01-30** — [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-2]] passed: Theia acquires 370.370 META tokens for $500,000 USDC
|
||||
- **2023-11-18** — [[metadao-develop-lst-vote-market]] proposed: first product development proposal requesting 3,000 META to build Votium-style validator bribe platform for MNDE/mSOL holders
|
||||
- **2023-11-29** — [[metadao-develop-lst-vote-market]] passed: approved LST Vote Market development with projected $10.5M enterprise value addition
|
||||
- **2023-11-18** — metadao-develop-lst-vote-market proposed: first product development proposal requesting 3,000 META to build Votium-style validator bribe platform for MNDE/mSOL holders
|
||||
- **2023-11-29** — metadao-develop-lst-vote-market passed: approved LST Vote Market development with projected $10.5M enterprise value addition
|
||||
- **2023-12-03** — Proposed Autocrat v0.1 migration with configurable proposal slots and 3-day default duration
|
||||
- **2023-12-13** — Completed Autocrat v0.1 migration, moving 990,000 META, 10,025 USDC, and 5.5 SOL to new program despite unverifiable build
|
||||
- **2024-01-24** — Proposed AMM program to replace CLOB markets, addressing liquidity fragmentation and state rent costs (Proposal CF9QUBS251FnNGZHLJ4WbB2CVRi5BtqJbCqMi47NX1PG)
|
||||
- **2024-01-29** — AMM proposal passed with 400 META on approval and 800 META on completion budget
|
||||
- **2024-08-31** — Passed proposal to enter services agreement with Organization Technology LLC, creating US entity vehicle for paying contributors with $1.378M annualized burn rate. Entity owns no IP (all owned by MetaDAO LLC) and cannot encumber MetaDAO LLC. Agreement cancellable with 30-day notice or immediately for material breach.
|
||||
- **2024-08-14** — Proposed futardio memecoin launchpad with futarchy-governed token allocation; proposal failed after market vote, demonstrating reputational risk concerns outweighed adoption benefits
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "isc-stablecoin-uses-multi-asset-basket-collateralization-to-resist-dollar-inflation.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "metadao-treasury-diversification-proposal-failed-due-to-isc-risk-profile.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 4,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"isc-stablecoin-uses-multi-asset-basket-collateralization-to-resist-dollar-inflation.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"metadao-treasury-diversification-proposal-failed-due-to-isc-risk-profile.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"metadao-treasury-diversification-proposal-failed-due-to-isc-risk-profile.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate gov",
|
||||
"metadao-treasury-diversification-proposal-failed-due-to-isc-risk-profile.md:stripped_wiki_link:MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volum"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"isc-stablecoin-uses-multi-asset-basket-collateralization-to-resist-dollar-inflation.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"metadao-treasury-diversification-proposal-failed-due-to-isc-risk-profile.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 2,
|
||||
"rejected": 1,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-gov"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "futarchy-information-advantage-scales-with-information-asymmetry-converging-to-voting-in-aligned-expert-communities.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "kpi-conditional-futarchy-is-more-appropriate-than-asset-price-futarchy-for-thinly-traded-organizations-coupled-to-external-market-sentiment.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "governance-cadence-below-one-proposal-per-month-is-incompatible-with-continuous-futarchy-because-infrequent-decisions-reduce-market-learning-and-liquidity-accumulation.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 3,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 7,
|
||||
"rejected": 3,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"futarchy-information-advantage-scales-with-information-asymmetry-converging-to-voting-in-aligned-expert-communities.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"futarchy-information-advantage-scales-with-information-asymmetry-converging-to-voting-in-aligned-expert-communities.md:stripped_wiki_link:speculative-markets-aggregate-information-through-incentive-",
|
||||
"futarchy-information-advantage-scales-with-information-asymmetry-converging-to-voting-in-aligned-expert-communities.md:stripped_wiki_link:MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volum",
|
||||
"kpi-conditional-futarchy-is-more-appropriate-than-asset-price-futarchy-for-thinly-traded-organizations-coupled-to-external-market-sentiment.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"kpi-conditional-futarchy-is-more-appropriate-than-asset-price-futarchy-for-thinly-traded-organizations-coupled-to-external-market-sentiment.md:stripped_wiki_link:coin-price-is-the-fairest-objective-function-for-asset-futar",
|
||||
"governance-cadence-below-one-proposal-per-month-is-incompatible-with-continuous-futarchy-because-infrequent-decisions-reduce-market-learning-and-liquidity-accumulation.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"governance-cadence-below-one-proposal-per-month-is-incompatible-with-continuous-futarchy-because-infrequent-decisions-reduce-market-learning-and-liquidity-accumulation.md:stripped_wiki_link:MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volum"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"futarchy-information-advantage-scales-with-information-asymmetry-converging-to-voting-in-aligned-expert-communities.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"kpi-conditional-futarchy-is-more-appropriate-than-asset-price-futarchy-for-thinly-traded-organizations-coupled-to-external-market-sentiment.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"governance-cadence-below-one-proposal-per-month-is-incompatible-with-continuous-futarchy-because-infrequent-decisions-reduce-market-learning-and-liquidity-accumulation.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 3,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 9,
|
||||
"rejected": 3,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
|
||||
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-",
|
||||
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:emergent-misalignment-arises-naturally-from-reward-hacking-a",
|
||||
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:the-specification-trap-means-any-values-encoded-at-training-",
|
||||
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
|
||||
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:community-centred-norm-elicitation-surfaces-alignment-target"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "marinade-sam-bid-routing-to-mnde-stakers-creates-performance-fee-alignment-between-validator-selection-and-governance-token-holders.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 1,
|
||||
"rejected": 1,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"marinade-sam-bid-routing-to-mnde-stakers-creates-performance-fee-alignment-between-validator-selection-and-governance-token-holders.md:set_created:2026-03-15"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"marinade-sam-bid-routing-to-mnde-stakers-creates-performance-fee-alignment-between-validator-selection-and-governance-token-holders.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "working-group-model-creates-self-sustaining-community-engagement-through-independent-operation-with-initial-core-team-collaboration.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "futarchy-governed-community-working-groups-use-trial-periods-with-performance-metrics-to-validate-experimental-initiatives.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 5,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"working-group-model-creates-self-sustaining-community-engagement-through-independent-operation-with-initial-core-team-collaboration.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"working-group-model-creates-self-sustaining-community-engagement-through-independent-operation-with-initial-core-team-collaboration.md:stripped_wiki_link:dao-event-perks-as-governance-incentives-create-plutocratic-",
|
||||
"futarchy-governed-community-working-groups-use-trial-periods-with-performance-metrics-to-validate-experimental-initiatives.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"futarchy-governed-community-working-groups-use-trial-periods-with-performance-metrics-to-validate-experimental-initiatives.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-",
|
||||
"futarchy-governed-community-working-groups-use-trial-periods-with-performance-metrics-to-validate-experimental-initiatives.md:stripped_wiki_link:metadao-autocrat-v01-reduces-proposal-duration-to-three-days"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"working-group-model-creates-self-sustaining-community-engagement-through-independent-operation-with-initial-core-team-collaboration.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"futarchy-governed-community-working-groups-use-trial-periods-with-performance-metrics-to-validate-experimental-initiatives.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "glp-1-adoption-produced-first-measurable-population-level-obesity-decline-demonstrating-pharmaceutical-intervention-can-shift-population-health-outcomes.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "glp-1-access-inequality-risks-creating-two-tier-metabolic-health-system-where-pharmacological-prevention-stratifies-by-wealth-while-root-causes-remain-unaddressed.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 2,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"glp-1-adoption-produced-first-measurable-population-level-obesity-decline-demonstrating-pharmaceutical-intervention-can-shift-population-health-outcomes.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"glp-1-access-inequality-risks-creating-two-tier-metabolic-health-system-where-pharmacological-prevention-stratifies-by-wealth-while-root-causes-remain-unaddressed.md:set_created:2026-03-15"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"glp-1-adoption-produced-first-measurable-population-level-obesity-decline-demonstrating-pharmaceutical-intervention-can-shift-population-health-outcomes.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"glp-1-access-inequality-risks-creating-two-tier-metabolic-health-system-where-pharmacological-prevention-stratifies-by-wealth-while-root-causes-remain-unaddressed.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,13 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/7AbivixQZTrgnqpmyxW2j1dd4Jyy15K3T2T7MEgfg8D
|
|||
date: 2024-08-03
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "futarchy implementations must simplify theoretical mechanisms for production adoption because original designs include impractical elements that academics tolerate but users reject.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -68,13 +64,3 @@ Subject to the DAO’s approval, this is what we’ll be working on for the rema
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-08-07
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-08-07
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO Q3 2024 roadmap proposal was created on 2024-08-03 and passed on 2024-08-07
|
||||
- MetaDAO proposal account: 7AbivixQZTrgnqpmyxW2j1dd4Jyy15K3T2T7MEgfg8DZ
|
||||
- MetaDAO planned to interview 40 candidates for engineering roles in Q3 2024
|
||||
- MetaDAO planned to secure San Francisco office space in Q3 2024
|
||||
- MetaDAO planned to hire a Twitter intern in Q3 2024
|
||||
- MetaDAO UI page load times were 14.6 seconds before optimization efforts
|
||||
- MetaDAO used Autocrat version 0.3 for this proposal
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/yTiRuoXWQVdVgbUJBU6J3FF1Sxnzy7FW7osqkkfMK6G
|
|||
date: 2024-08-20
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ processed_date: 2024-08-20
|
|||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Single failed proposal data point. No new claims warranted - this is operational evidence confirming existing claims about MetaDAO's Autocrat implementation mechanics and engagement patterns. The three-day window (2024-08-20 to 2024-08-24) and failed status provide concrete confirmation of the futarchy mechanism in production."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,11 +40,3 @@ extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
|
|||
- DAO account: GWywkp2mY2vzAaLydR2MBXRCqk2vBTyvtVRioujxi5Ce
|
||||
- Proposer: HwBL75xHHKcXSMNcctq3UqWaEJPDWVQz6NazZJNjWaQc
|
||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Proposal #4 on futard.io created 2024-08-20, completed 2024-08-24, status: Failed
|
||||
- Proposal account: yTiRuoXWQVdVgbUJBU6J3FF1Sxnzy7FW7osqkkfMK6G
|
||||
- DAO account: GWywkp2mY2vzAaLydR2MBXRCqk2vBTyvtVRioujxi5Ce
|
||||
- Proposer: HwBL75xHHKcXSMNcctq3UqWaEJPDWVQz6NazZJNjWaQc
|
||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -82,11 +82,9 @@ Link to campaign details and evaluation criteria: [Link](https://docs.google.com
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Drift Protocol is the largest open-sourced perpetual futures exchange built on Solana
|
||||
- Drift is the largest open-sourced perpetual futures exchange built on Solana
|
||||
- Drift launched B.E.T, described as Solana's first capital efficient prediction market
|
||||
- The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition proposal (AKMnVnSC8DzoZJktErtzR2QNt1ESoN8i2DdHPYuQTMGY) was proposal #4 on MetaDAO
|
||||
- The proposal requested $8,250 total prize pool split across: Grand prize ($3,000), Video track ($1,750), Twitter thread track ($1,750), Trade ideas track ($1,750)
|
||||
- Each individual contest had prize structure: 1st place $1,000, 2nd place $500, 3rd place $250
|
||||
- Funding would have come from Drift Foundation Grants Program in DRIFT tokens
|
||||
- Competition would have been run through Superteam Earn platform
|
||||
- Proposal was created 2024-08-27, completed and ended 2024-08-31, status: Failed
|
||||
- The Drift Creator Competition proposal included three bounty tracks plus grand prize: Grand prize ($3,000), Video content ($1,750), Twitter threads ($1,750), Trade ideas ($1,750)
|
||||
- Prize structure for each track: 1st place $1,000, 2nd place $500, 3rd place $250
|
||||
- Proposal was to be executed through Superteam Earn platform
|
||||
- Funding would come from Drift Foundation Grants Program in DRIFT tokens
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/53EDms4zPkp4khbwBT3eXWhMALiMwssg7f5zckq22tH
|
|||
date: 2024-08-31
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -81,13 +78,3 @@ If any significant material expense is to be assessed or significant changes to
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-09-03
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-09-03
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO Proposal 6 passed on 2024-09-03
|
||||
- Organization Technology LLC expected annualized burn is $1.378M
|
||||
- Services agreement can be canceled with 30-day notice or immediately for material breach
|
||||
- First disbursement from MetaDAO LLC to Organization Technology LLC occurred September 1, 2024 or when passed, whichever later
|
||||
- Proposal created 2024-08-31 by Nallok and Proph3t
|
||||
- Proposal account: 53EDms4zPkp4khbwBT3eXWhMALiMwssg7f5zckq22tH5
|
||||
- MetaDAO completed strategic partnership via Proposal 19 four weeks prior
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,13 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/Gp3ANMRTdGLPNeMGFUrzVFaodouwJSEXHbg5rFUi9ro
|
|||
date: 2024-10-30
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md", "futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -96,12 +92,3 @@ Potential pitfalls:
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-11-03
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-11-03
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO treasury held approximately $2.2M USDC as of 2024-10-30
|
||||
- ISC launched at $1.545 on 2023-03-17 and traded at $1.81 on 2024-10-30
|
||||
- USD lost 17.8% of value since 2020 according to proposal
|
||||
- Proposal parameters: 150,000 USDC DCA over 10 orders, 1 hour intervals, price range $1.70-$1.90
|
||||
- Proposal account: Gp3ANMRTdGLPNeMGFUrzVFaodouwJSEXHbg5rFUi9roJ
|
||||
- Proposal status: Failed, completed 2024-11-03
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1V
|
|||
date: 2024-11-08
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ processed_date: 2024-11-08
|
|||
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,12 +105,3 @@ Establishing a Raydium farm for \$FUTURE with 1% of the total supply as rewards
|
|||
- Raydium offers fee tiers of 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, and 1%
|
||||
- FutureDAO is proposal #5 on DAO account ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm
|
||||
- Proposal used Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- FutureDAO proposal HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm passed on 2024-11-11
|
||||
- Raydium CLMM pool creation costs approximately 0.1 SOL
|
||||
- Raydium offers fee tiers of 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, and 1%
|
||||
- FutureDAO Raydium proposal was #5 on DAO account ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm
|
||||
- Proposal used Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
- Raydium farming periods range from 7 to 90 days per platform guidelines
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,14 +7,10 @@ date: 2025-00-00
|
|||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence, ai-alignment]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [futarchy, DeSci, DAOs, empirical-evidence, VitaDAO, simulation, governance-cadence]
|
||||
flagged_for_theseus: ["DeSci governance patterns relevant to AI alignment coordination mechanisms"]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 3 claims, 3 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -47,10 +43,3 @@ Academic paper examining futarchy adoption in DeSci (Decentralized Science) DAOs
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[speculative markets aggregate information through incentive and selection effects not wisdom of crowds]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Peer-reviewed evidence that futarchy converges with voting in low-information-asymmetry environments — defines the boundary condition where markets DON'T beat votes
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the boundary condition claim — when does futarchy add value vs when does it converge with voting? The information asymmetry dimension is the key variable
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- VitaDAO retrospective simulation covered proposals up to April 2025
|
||||
- 13 DeSci DAOs analyzed: AthenaDAO, BiohackerDAO, CerebrumDAO, CryoDAO, GenomesDAO, HairDAO, HippocratDAO, MoonDAO, PsyDAO, VitaDAO, and others
|
||||
- Most DeSci DAOs operate below 1 proposal/month governance frequency
|
||||
- Paper published in Frontiers in Blockchain, peer-reviewed academic journal
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11U
|
|||
date: 2025-01-13
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,13 +53,3 @@ If approved, this proposal would sanction the addition of a JTO Vault to the Tip
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2025-01-18
|
||||
- Ended: 2025-01-18
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Jito DAO proposal CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11UA was proposal number 1 for the DAO
|
||||
- The proposal used Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
- DAO account: B3PDBD7NCsJyxSdSDFEK38oNKZMBrgkg46TuqqkgAwPp
|
||||
- Proposer account: proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
|
||||
- Proposal created 2025-01-13, completed and ended 2025-01-18
|
||||
- Discussion occurred on Discord at discord.gg/QtGpxC52Kw
|
||||
- JIP-10 forum discussion: https://forum.jito.network/t/jip-10-decision-market-on-whether-to-adopt-jto-in-the-tiprouter-ncn-protocol-development/463
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,13 +7,9 @@ date: 2025-02-01
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [impossibility-result, agreement-complexity, reward-hacking, multi-objective, safety-critical-slices]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 3 claims, 3 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,9 +48,3 @@ Formalizes AI alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem where N agents
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Third independent impossibility result from multi-objective optimization — convergent evidence from three mathematical traditions strengthens our core impossibility claim
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The convergence of three impossibility traditions AND the "consensus-driven reduction" pathway are both extractable
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Paper presented as oral presentation at AAAI 2026 Special Track on AI Alignment
|
||||
- Formalizes AI alignment as multi-objective optimization problem with N agents and M objectives
|
||||
- Paper identifies 'No-Free-Lunch principle' for alignment: irreducible computational costs regardless of method sophistication
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/DnDiyjAcmS3BNmNEJa2ydEbd6DgnddpkyVXJfngdRTz
|
|||
date: 2025-02-04
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,12 +53,3 @@ If approved, this proposal would sanction the development and implementation of
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2025-02-07
|
||||
- Ended: 2025-02-07
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Marinade MIP.5 proposal account: DnDiyjAcmS3BNmNEJa2ydEbd6DgnddpkyVXJfngdRTzF
|
||||
- Marinade DAO account: 9RNQx6cnheD4tzvRCW5Mo1sTo72Vm6PbPj6SFC5aK4fy
|
||||
- Proposal used Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
- Proposal completed and ended on 2025-02-07
|
||||
- Proposal discussion hosted on Discord: https://discord.gg/Bkc2EMEF6n
|
||||
- Forum discussion at: https://forum.marinade.finance/t/mip-5-sam-bid-routing-to-mnde-stakers/1700
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/6TkkCy26HCqxWGt1QgfhFHc6ASikRjk74Gkk4Wfyd7w
|
|||
date: 2025-02-13
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -97,13 +94,3 @@ The DWG will be led by Socrates, bringing 3+ years of crypto marketing expertise
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2025-02-16
|
||||
- Ended: 2025-02-16
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Drift Working Group proposal account: 6TkkCy26HCqxWGt1QgfhFHc6ASikRjk74Gkk4Wfyd7wR
|
||||
- Drift Working Group proposal number: 2 on futard.io
|
||||
- Drift Working Group budget: 50,000 DRIFT total (15,400 per month for 3 months, 3,800 for initiatives)
|
||||
- Drift Working Group team structure: 1 lead (5,000 DRIFT/month) + 4 members (2,600 DRIFT/month each)
|
||||
- Drift Working Group lead: Socrates, 3+ years crypto marketing experience
|
||||
- Drift Working Group fund management: 2/3 multisig (lead + two Drift team members)
|
||||
- Drift Working Group proposal completed: 2025-02-16
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/EksJ2GhxbmhVAdDKP4kThHiuzKwjhq5HSb1kgFj6x2Q
|
|||
date: 2025-03-05
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ processed_date: 2025-03-11
|
|||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This is raw proposal data from futard.io showing a passed proposal. No project name or proposal details provided beyond metadata. The data confirms operational use of Autocrat v0.3 but contains no arguable claims or novel insights—only verifiable transaction facts. Enriches existing claim about MetaDAO's Autocrat implementation with concrete production evidence."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,10 +41,3 @@ extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Status: Passed
|
||||
- Created, ended, and completed: 2025-03-05
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Proposal #1 on futard.io (account EksJ2GhxbmhVAdDKP4kThHiuzKwjhq5HSb1kgFj6x2Qu) passed on 2025-03-05
|
||||
- DAO account De8YzDKudqgeJXqq6i7q82AgxxrQ1JXXfMgouQuPyhY is using Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
- Proposer account: 89VB5UmvopuCFmp5Mf8YPX28fGvvqn79afCgouQuPyhY
|
||||
- Proposal lifecycle (created, ended, completed) all occurred on same day: 2025-03-05
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HCHkdhiPh2q9LTyvUpfyfuybPHW7qg1T2vGtiJzGPrs
|
|||
date: 2025-03-05
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,11 +27,3 @@ extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2025-03-08
|
||||
- Ended: 2025-03-08
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Futard.io Proposal #3 (HCHkdhiPh2q9LTyvUpfyfuybPHW7qg1T2vGtiJzGPrsG) was created on 2025-03-05
|
||||
- Proposal #3 used Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
- Proposal #3 completed and passed on 2025-03-08
|
||||
- Proposal #3 ran on DAO account 5n61x4BeVvvRMcYBMaorhu1MaZDViYw6HghE8gwLCvPR
|
||||
- Proposal #3 was submitted by proposer 89VB5UmvopuCFmp5Mf8YPX28fGvvqn79afCgouQuPyhY
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/2dvNKyxKzVuUMcd89wzfuYjX2RKbJps2Srqu4mJ7LEg
|
|||
date: 2025-04-22
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -51,14 +48,3 @@ This would be the test example for transferring the MetaDAO treasury of USDC to
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2025-04-22
|
||||
- Ended: 2025-04-22
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Test DAO proposal 'Testing v0.3 Transfer' passed on 2025-04-22
|
||||
- Proposal aimed to transfer MetaDAO treasury USDC to v0.4 DAO
|
||||
- Proposal account: 2dvNKyxKzVuUMcd89wzfuYjX2RKbJps2Srqu4mJ7LEgC
|
||||
- Proposal number: 1
|
||||
- DAO account: GCSGFCRfCRQDbqtPLa6bV7DCJz26NkejR182or8PNqRw
|
||||
- Proposer: 8Cwx4yR2sFAC5Pdx2NgGHxCk1gJrtSTxJoyqVonqndhq
|
||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Proposal completed and ended: 2025-04-22
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,13 +7,9 @@ date: 2025-06-01
|
|||
domain: health
|
||||
secondary_domains: [entertainment, internet-finance]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [glp-1, obesity, societal-impact, equity, food-systems, population-health, sustainability]
|
||||
processed_by: vida
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch in pharmaceutical history but their chronic use model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035.md", "Big Food companies engineer addictive products by hacking evolutionary reward pathways creating a noncommunicable disease epidemic more deadly than the famines specialization eliminated.md", "the epidemiological transition marks the shift from material scarcity to social disadvantage as the primary driver of health outcomes in developed nations.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,11 +52,3 @@ EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on both the population-level effect AND the equity concer
|
|||
|
||||
flagged_for_clay: ["GLP-1 adoption is reshaping cultural narratives around obesity, body image, and pharmaceutical solutions to behavioral problems — connects to health narrative infrastructure"]
|
||||
flagged_for_rio: ["GLP-1 equity gap creates investment opportunity in access-focused models that serve underserved populations — potential Living Capital thesis"]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- October 2025 Gallup poll: 12.4% of US adults taking GLP-1 for weight loss (30M+ people)
|
||||
- US obesity prevalence: 39.9% (2022) → 37.0% (2025), representing 7.6M fewer obese Americans
|
||||
- WHO issued conditional recommendations for GLP-1s in December 2025
|
||||
- Obesity costs US $400B+ annually
|
||||
- WHO three-pillar approach: healthier environments (population policy), protect high-risk individuals, person-centered care
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue