auto-fix: strip 1 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

domains/internet-finance/consumer-crypto-adoption-requires-apps-optimized-for-earning-and-belonging-not-speculation.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ related_claims:
   - futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-over-time
   - optimal-governance-requires-mixing-mechanisms-for-different-decision-types
 sources:
-  - "[[2025-03-28-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-build-a-sanctum-mobile-app-wonder]]"
+  - "2025-03-28-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-build-a-sanctum-mobile-app-wonder"
 created: 2025-03-28
 ---
 
@@ -48,4 +48,10 @@ This claim emerged from Sanctum's futarchy proposal to MetaDAO for building Wond
 
 ## Interpretation
 
-This represents a hypothesis about consumer crypto product-market fit rather than established evidence. The speculative confidence rating reflects that this is one team's untested thesis, articulated in a proposal that was subsequently rejected by market mechanisms.
+This represents a hypothesis about consumer crypto product-market fit rather than established evidence. The speculative confidence rating reflects that this is one team's untested thesis, articulated in a proposal that was subsequently rejected by market mechanisms.
+
+### Additional Evidence (challenge)
+*Source: [[2026-03-25-tg-shared-knimkar-2036423976281382950]] | Added: 2026-03-25*
+
+P2P.me's growth stalled in non-volume metrics since mid-2025 despite strong product-market fit on the core on/off-ramp function. Investor thesis acknowledges 'customers don't acquire themselves' and questions whether decentralized approach works, suggesting that even with utility-first products, centralized growth tactics (like Uber/DoorDash geographic expansion) may be necessary. This challenges the assumption that utility alone drives adoption.
+

domains/internet-finance/social-login-and-embedded-fiat-on-ramps-target-the-two-structural-barriers-to-mainstream-crypto-adoption.md

@@ -21,4 +21,10 @@ While these solutions are promising, they are speculative and untested on a larg
 The `claims_extracted` in the archive lists `social-login-and-embedded-fiat-on-ramps-eliminate-the-two-structural-barriers...` but the actual filename uses `...target-the-two-structural-barriers...`.
 
 ## Recommendation
-Drop claim 3 from this PR entirely and resubmit it separately once it's properly extracted from the source material.
+Drop claim 3 from this PR entirely and resubmit it separately once it's properly extracted from the source material.
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-03-25-tg-shared-knimkar-2036423976281382950]] | Added: 2026-03-25*
+
+P2P.me demonstrates this pattern in emerging markets specifically, positioning as 'Cash App or Phantom for emerging markets users with the on/offramp product as the hook.' The team explicitly frames regulatory arbitrage as a feature (e.g., users in India avoiding 1% TDS tax), showing how on-ramps serve as distribution wedges for broader crypto adoption in markets where traditional finance has higher friction.
+

inbox/queue/2026-03-25-tg-shared-knimkar-2036423976281382950.md

@@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ url: "https://x.com/knimkar/status/2036423976281382950"
 date: 2026-03-25
 domain: internet-finance
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
 contribution_type: source-submission
 tags: [telegram-shared, x-article, p2p-me]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-25
+enrichments_applied: ["social-login-and-embedded-fiat-on-ramps-target-the-two-structural-barriers-to-mainstream-crypto-adoption.md", "consumer-crypto-adoption-requires-apps-optimized-for-earning-and-belonging-not-speculation.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 # @knimkar — P2P.me Investment Thesis
@@ -47,4 +51,11 @@ Cons
 --- Product today does not really support large ticket on/offramping (due to how the reputation system works)
 --- Defi businesses all make money from whales and/or price-insensitive retail traders. Can P2P win either of these segments? The userbase today is largely young people, so there’s some line of sight to winning the retail trader group
 
-- Regulatory risk: you need to ascribe some real % chance to negative tail risk outcomes here (see recent situation with DCX founders in India)
+- Regulatory risk: you need to ascribe some real % chance to negative tail risk outcomes here (see recent situation with DCX founders in India)
+
+## Key Facts
+- P2P.me is launching a token ($P2P) as of March 2026
+- P2P.me is a MetaDAO launch
+- P2P.me growth in non-volume metrics stalled since mid-2025
+- India has a 1% TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) on crypto transactions
+- P2P.me's reputation system currently limits large-ticket on/off-ramping