|
|
|
|
@ -1,14 +1,87 @@
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
processed_by: model_v1
|
|
|
|
|
type: source
|
|
|
|
|
title: "Futardio: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?"
|
|
|
|
|
author: "futard.io"
|
|
|
|
|
url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX"
|
|
|
|
|
date: 2025-08-20
|
|
|
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
|
|
|
format: data
|
|
|
|
|
status: processed
|
|
|
|
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
|
|
|
|
event_type: proposal
|
|
|
|
|
processed_by: rio
|
|
|
|
|
processed_date: 2025-08-20
|
|
|
|
|
enrichments_applied: ["link_extraction", "sentiment_analysis"]
|
|
|
|
|
extraction_model: model_v1
|
|
|
|
|
extraction_notes: Initial extraction
|
|
|
|
|
enrichments_applied: ["time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
|
|
|
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
|
|
|
extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of vesting modification mechanism (forfeit-for-liquidity vs hedging) and additional futarchy implementation data point. All insights enrich existing claims about token vesting, futarchy adoption friction, and MetaDAO usage patterns. The failed proposal itself is a factual event, not an arguable claim."
|
|
|
|
|
processed_by: rio
|
|
|
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
|
|
|
|
enrichments_applied: ["time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
|
|
|
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
|
|
|
extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of forfeit-for-liquidity as alternative to hedgeable vesting, additional futarchy implementation data point showing limited volume in substantive but uncontested decisions, and demonstrates proposal complexity friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal itself and updated Sanctum parent entity timeline. All substantive insights enrich existing claims about token vesting mechanisms, futarchy adoption patterns, and MetaDAO usage."
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanctum's proposal to offer investors early unlocks of their cloud holdings was ultimately unsuccessful. The decision market indicated a lack of confidence in the proposal's viability.
|
|
|
|
|
## Proposal Details
|
|
|
|
|
- Project: Sanctum
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?
|
|
|
|
|
- Status: Failed
|
|
|
|
|
- Created: 2025-08-20
|
|
|
|
|
- URL: https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX
|
|
|
|
|
- Description: This proposal would empower the Sanctum Team to offer investors immediate unlocks of their vesting CLOUD, forfeiting 35% of their CLOUD to the Team Reserve.
|
|
|
|
|
- Discussion: https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud-under-deliberation/1793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Financial Details:
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal Date: 2025-08-20
|
|
|
|
|
- Resolution Date: 2025-08-23
|
|
|
|
|
- Status: Failed
|
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 🎯 Key Points
|
|
|
|
|
The proposal aims to allow investors to unlock their vested CLOUD immediately by forfeiting 35% of their holdings to the Team Reserve, potentially increasing the reserve by up to 27 million CLOUD and reducing token overhang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 📊 Impact Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
|
|
|
|
|
Investors will gain immediate access to a portion of their CLOUD tokens, while the Sanctum Team will strengthen their reserve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### 📈 Upside Potential
|
|
|
|
|
This move could enhance liquidity and investor satisfaction by providing early access to funds while bolstering the Team Reserve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### 📉 Risk Factors
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiting 35% of their tokens may deter some investors and could lead to negative sentiment regarding the token's long-term value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9% of token supply from investors is currently unlocking monthly for next 24 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proposal would empower the Sanctum Team to offer investors immediate unlocks of their vesting CLOUD, forfeiting 35% of their CLOUD to the Team Reserve (which the team undertakes not to redistribute for at least the next 24 months).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net result would be an increase of up to 27 million additional CLOUD to the Team Reserve & a decreased token overhang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read the full proposal here https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud-under-deliberation/1793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Raw Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal account: `C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX`
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal number: 2
|
|
|
|
|
- DAO account: `GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov`
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2`
|
|
|
|
|
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
|
|
|
|
- Completed: 2025-08-23
|
|
|
|
|
- Ended: 2025-08-23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Key Facts
|
|
|
|
|
- Sanctum proposal C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX failed (2025-08-23)
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal would have allowed 35% forfeit for immediate unlock of vested CLOUD
|
|
|
|
|
- 9% of CLOUD token supply was unlocking monthly over 24 months from investors
|
|
|
|
|
- Potential increase of up to 27 million CLOUD to Team Reserve if all investors opted in
|
|
|
|
|
- Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Key Facts
|
|
|
|
|
- Sanctum proposal C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX failed (2025-08-23)
|
|
|
|
|
- 9% of CLOUD token supply was unlocking monthly over 24 months from investors
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal would have allowed 35% forfeit for immediate unlock
|
|
|
|
|
- Potential increase of up to 27 million CLOUD to Team Reserve if all investors opted in
|
|
|
|
|
- Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposal account: C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX
|
|
|
|
|
- DAO account: GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposer: proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
|
|
|
|
|
|
