rio: extract claims from 2026-01-xx-rasmont-futarchy-is-parasitic-lesswrong

- Source: inbox/queue/2026-01-xx-rasmont-futarchy-is-parasitic-lesswrong.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Claims: 2, Entities: 1
- Enrichments: 2
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <PIPELINE>

domains/internet-finance/advisory-futarchy-avoids-selection-distortion-by-decoupling-prediction-from-execution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: When prediction markets inform but don't determine outcomes, traders cannot exploit the causal feedback loop where approval itself affects the measured outcome
+confidence: experimental
+source: GnosisDAO GIP-145, Futarchy Labs proposal
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: Advisory futarchy avoids selection distortion by decoupling prediction from execution because non-binding markets cannot create the approval-signals-prosperity correlation that Rasmont identifies
+agent: rio
+scope: causal
+sourcer: GnosisDAO, Futarchy Labs
+related_claims: ["futarchy-is-manipulation-resistant-because-attack-attempts-create-profitable-opportunities-for-defenders", "[[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]]"]
+---
+
+# Advisory futarchy avoids selection distortion by decoupling prediction from execution because non-binding markets cannot create the approval-signals-prosperity correlation that Rasmont identifies
+
+GnosisDAO's GIP-145 implements 'Advisory Futarchy' where prediction market signals display alongside Snapshot votes but don't determine outcomes. This structure is theoretically significant because it addresses Rasmont's critique of binding futarchy: that traders can profit by signaling approval regardless of causal merit, because approval itself creates the prosperity signal. In advisory futarchy, approval doesn't determine execution, so there's no feedback loop to exploit. The market estimates 'if this passes, what happens to token price' but passing doesn't guarantee execution, breaking the selection effect. The 9-month pilot (Feb-Sep 2026) with $100k liquidity will test whether advisory signals provide better calibrated predictions than binding ones would. If advisory futarchy produces more accurate forecasts, it suggests the binding mechanism itself creates the distortion Rasmont identifies.

domains/internet-finance/conditional-decision-markets-are-structurally-biased-toward-selection-correlations-rather-than-causal-policy-effects.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: Traders must price contracts based on what happens if a policy is approved (selection), not what is caused by approval, creating systematic bias toward fundamentals rather than policy effects
+confidence: experimental
+source: Nicolas Rasmont (LessWrong), bronze bull and bailout examples
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: Conditional decision markets are structurally biased toward selection correlations rather than causal policy effects, making futarchy approval signals evidential rather than causal
+agent: rio
+scope: structural
+sourcer: Nicolas Rasmont
+related_claims: ["[[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy]]", "[[futarchy enables trustless joint ownership by forcing dissenters to be bought out through pass markets]]", "[[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]]", "[[called-off bets enable conditional estimates without requiring counterfactual verification]]"]
+---
+
+# Conditional decision markets are structurally biased toward selection correlations rather than causal policy effects, making futarchy approval signals evidential rather than causal
+
+Rasmont argues that futarchy contains a structural impossibility: conditional decision markets cannot estimate causal policy effects once their outputs are acted upon. The mechanism is that traders must price contracts based on welfare-conditional-on-approval, not welfare-caused-by-approval. In the bronze bull example, a wasteful monument gets approved because approval signals economic confidence ('only prosperous societies build monuments'), making the conditional-on-approval price higher than the causal effect warrants. The bailout inversion shows the reverse: a beneficial stimulus package gets rejected because approval signals crisis, making welfare-conditional-on-approval low even though welfare-caused-by-approval is high. This creates what Rasmont calls 'market superstitions' - self-fulfilling coordination equilibria where traders profit by correctly reading organizational fundamentals rather than policy effects. The organization bears the costs of bad policies while traders capture gains from gambling on fundamentals. Proposed fixes fail: post-hoc randomization requires implausibly high rates (50%+) to overcome selection bias, while random settlement eliminates information aggregation entirely. The core claim is that 'there is no payout structure that simultaneously incentivizes decision market participants to price in causal knowledge and allows that knowledge to be acted upon.' This is distinct from manipulation or illiquidity critiques - it claims even perfectly implemented futarchy with rational traders systematically fails at causal inference.

domains/internet-finance/congressional-insider-trading-legislation-for-prediction-markets-treats-them-as-financial-instruments-not-gambling-strengthening-dcm-regulatory-legitimacy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: The Torres Act applies securities-style insider trading rules to prediction markets signaling Congressional acceptance of the financial market framework rather than gambling regulation
+confidence: experimental
+source: Rep. Ritchie Torres, Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: Congressional insider trading legislation for prediction markets treats them as financial instruments not gambling strengthening DCM regulatory legitimacy
+agent: rio
+scope: structural
+sourcer: Rep. Ritchie Torres
+related_claims: ["[[futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires]]"]
+---
+
+# Congressional insider trading legislation for prediction markets treats them as financial instruments not gambling strengthening DCM regulatory legitimacy
+
+Rep. Ritchie Torres introduced the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 to bar federal employees and elected officials from trading on political outcomes they might influence. The bill explicitly applies to DCM-designated platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. The legislative framing is critical: Torres applies insider trading concepts from securities markets (analogous to the STOCK Act for Congressional stock trading) rather than gambling restrictions. This represents Congressional legitimization of prediction markets as financial instruments. The bill emerged as platforms gained DCM designation and federal legitimacy, suggesting Congress views regulation-and-legitimization as the appropriate response rather than prohibition. The bipartisan framing around 'public integrity' makes this politically durable despite broader partisan divides on prediction markets. The STOCK Act precedent is instructive: that legislation didn't kill Congressional stock trading, it clarified rules and legitimized the activity under a regulatory framework. The Torres bill follows the same pattern for prediction markets.

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governance-markets-create-insider-trading-paradox-because-informed-governance-participants-are-simultaneously-the-most-valuable-traders-and-the-most-restricted-under-insider-trading-frameworks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: Applying insider trading rules to governance prediction markets would exclude the participant class most likely to improve decision quality creating a structural tension between information efficiency and regulatory compliance
+confidence: speculative
+source: Torres Act implications for futarchy, agent analysis
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: Futarchy governance markets create insider trading paradox because informed governance participants are simultaneously the most valuable traders and the most restricted under insider trading frameworks
+agent: rio
+scope: structural
+sourcer: Agent analysis of Torres Act implications
+related_claims: ["[[futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires]]", "[[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles]]"]
+---
+
+# Futarchy governance markets create insider trading paradox because informed governance participants are simultaneously the most valuable traders and the most restricted under insider trading frameworks
+
+The Torres Act's insider trading logic creates a structural problem when applied to futarchy governance markets. In corporate prediction markets about external events, insider trading rules make sense: federal officials with non-public information about policy decisions shouldn't trade on those outcomes. But in futarchy, the token holders who vote on proposals are by definition 'insiders' — they can influence the outcomes that prediction markets are forecasting. If Torres-style insider trading logic were extended to governance markets, it would require governance participants to not trade on governance outcomes. This creates a paradox: the people with the most information and influence (active governance participants) would be excluded from the markets designed to aggregate their information. This is likely NOT the legislative intent of the Torres bill, which targets federal officials with unique non-public information about government decisions, not DAO token holders whose influence is public and on-chain. However, the conceptual tension reveals a boundary condition for futarchy adoption: as governance prediction markets gain regulatory legitimacy, they may face pressure to restrict trading by 'insiders' (governance token holders), which would undermine the core mechanism. The resolution likely requires distinguishing between non-public information asymmetry (which insider trading rules target) and public governance influence (which futarchy requires).

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-requires-quantifiable-exogenous-kpis-as-deployment-constraint-because-most-dao-proposals-lack-measurable-objectives.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: Empirical analysis of 13 DeSci DAOs found absent KPIs in the majority of proposals, making futarchy narrowly applicable at current governance maturity levels
+confidence: experimental
+source: Frontiers in Blockchain 2025, empirical analysis of 13 DeSci DAOs including VitaDAO
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives
+agent: rio
+scope: structural
+sourcer: Anonymous authors, Frontiers in Blockchain
+related_claims: ["[[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]]", "[[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy]]"]
+---
+
+# Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives
+
+The paper's empirical analysis of governance data from 13 DeSci DAOs (January 2024-April 2025) identified 'absent KPIs in most proposals' as a primary barrier to futarchy implementation. This finding reveals a structural constraint: futarchy mechanisms require clearly defined, measurable success metrics to function, but real-world DAO proposals are predominantly qualitative. The paper argues DeSci contexts are 'particularly suited' for futarchy specifically because research proposals can generate quantifiable metrics (publication outcomes, hypothesis confirmation, milestone achievement) — unlike ambiguous political decisions. This implies futarchy's applicability is limited to domains where objective functions can be externalized and measured. The constraint is not theoretical but empirical: the governance infrastructure that would make futarchy viable (proposal-level KPIs) does not currently exist in most DAO contexts. The paper lists 'clearly defined, measurable KPIs for each proposal' as the first implementation requirement, suggesting this is the binding constraint on adoption.

domains/internet-finance/post-hoc-randomization-requires-implausibly-high-implementation-rates-to-overcome-selection-bias-in-futarchy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: Randomly implementing only some approved policies to create counterfactuals fails at realistic randomization rates because selection signal dominates causal signal
+confidence: experimental
+source: Nicolas Rasmont (LessWrong), analysis of randomization fix
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: "Post-hoc randomization requires implausibly high implementation rates (50%+) to overcome selection bias in futarchy"
+agent: rio
+scope: functional
+sourcer: Nicolas Rasmont
+related_claims: ["[[conditional-decision-markets-are-structurally-biased-toward-selection-correlations-rather-than-causal-policy-effects]]"]
+---
+
+# Post-hoc randomization requires implausibly high implementation rates (50%+) to overcome selection bias in futarchy
+
+Rasmont analyzes the proposed fix of randomly implementing approved policies to create counterfactual data for causal inference. The mechanism is that if only X% of approved policies are actually implemented, the market can compare outcomes between implemented and non-implemented policies to isolate causal effects. However, Rasmont argues this requires 'implausibly high randomization rates - perhaps 50%+' before the causal signal overwhelms the selection signal. At realistic randomization rates (5-10%), the selection bias still dominates because the correlation between approval and fundamentals is stronger than the causal effect of most policies. This means the fix would require organizations to randomly not implement half of their approved policies, which defeats the purpose of having a decision mechanism. The alternative fix - random settlement regardless of outcome - eliminates the information aggregation purpose entirely by transforming markets into influence-buying mechanisms where capital rather than information determines outcomes.

domains/internet-finance/third-circuit-ruling-creates-first-federal-appellate-precedent-for-cftc-preemption-of-state-gambling-laws.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: The 2-1 Third Circuit decision directly contradicts the Ninth Circuit's Nevada ruling, creating an explicit circuit split that typically triggers SCOTUS review
+confidence: likely
+source: Third Circuit Court of Appeals, April 7, 2026 ruling
+created: 2026-04-10
+title: Third Circuit ruling creates first federal appellate precedent for CFTC preemption of state gambling laws making Supreme Court review near-certain
+agent: rio
+scope: structural
+sourcer: Third Circuit Court of Appeals
+related_claims: ["[[cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets]]", "[[futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires]]"]
+---
+
+# Third Circuit ruling creates first federal appellate precedent for CFTC preemption of state gambling laws making Supreme Court review near-certain
+
+The Third Circuit ruled that the Commodity Exchange Act preempts state gambling regulation of products on CFTC-licensed designated contract markets (DCMs), directly contradicting the Ninth Circuit's recent decision allowing Nevada to maintain its ban on Kalshi. This explicit circuit split—where two federal appellate courts reach opposite conclusions on the same legal question—makes Supreme Court review extremely likely according to multiple legal commentators quoted in Sportico. The ruling represents the first federal appellate court to affirm CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets. Circuit splits are one of the most common triggers for SCOTUS certiorari because they create legal uncertainty across jurisdictions. The dissent by Judge Jane Richards Roth, arguing Kalshi's offerings were 'virtually indistinguishable' from sportsbook products, provides the strongest counter-argument and suggests the outcome at SCOTUS is not predetermined—a 4-justice minority could be swayed by this framing.

entities/internet-finance/futarchy-labs.md

@@ -1,13 +1,37 @@
+---
+type: entity
+entity_type: company
+name: Futarchy Labs
+status: active
+domain: internet-finance
+---
+
 # Futarchy Labs
 
-**Type:** company  
-**Status:** active  
-**Domain:** internet-finance
+**Type:** Company  
+**Status:** Active  
+**Domain:** Internet Finance  
 
 ## Overview
 
-Futarchy Labs proposed and is implementing the GnosisDAO Advisory Futarchy pilot.
+Futarchy Labs builds futarchy tooling and infrastructure for DAOs, distinct from MetaDAO. The company focuses on making futarchy mechanisms accessible to existing governance platforms through integrations with tools like Snapshot and the Gnosis Conditional Token Framework.
+
+## Products & Services
+
+- Advisory futarchy widgets for governance platforms
+- Conditional token market infrastructure
+- Futarchy-as-a-Service (FaaS) tooling
+
+## Key Relationships
+
+- **GnosisDAO**: Primary partner for advisory futarchy pilot
+- **Gnosis Conditional Token Framework**: Core infrastructure dependency
+- **Snapshot**: Integration platform for governance proposals
 
 ## Timeline
 
-- **2026-02-01** — Proposed 9-month Advisory Futarchy pilot to GnosisDAO, integrating prediction market widgets into Snapshot governance
+- **2026-02-07** — gnosisdao-gip145-advisory-futarchy-pilot Partnership announced: 9-month advisory futarchy pilot with GnosisDAO, $100k liquidity allocation
+
+## Strategic Position
+
+Futarchy Labs represents futarchy as ecosystem infrastructure rather than a single DAO implementation. Unlike MetaDAO (which is a futarchy-governed entity), Futarchy Labs builds tools for other organizations to adopt futarchy mechanisms.

entities/internet-finance/gnosisdao.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+---
+type: entity
+entity_type: organization
+name: GnosisDAO
+status: active
+founded: 2020
+domain: internet-finance
+---
+
+# GnosisDAO
+
+**Type:** Decentralized Autonomous Organization  
+**Status:** Active  
+**Domain:** Internet Finance  
+
+## Overview
+
+GnosisDAO governs the Gnosis ecosystem, including the Gnosis Chain and Conditional Token Framework. The DAO is notable for implementing advisory futarchy as a governance experiment alongside traditional token voting.
+
+## Key Infrastructure
+
+- **Conditional Token Framework**: Native prediction market infrastructure used for futarchy implementation
+- **Snapshot**: Governance voting platform
+- **GNO Token**: Governance and value accrual token
+
+## Timeline
+
+- **2020** — GnosisDAO established to govern Gnosis ecosystem
+- **2026-02-07** — gnosisdao-gip145-advisory-futarchy-pilot Passed: 9-month advisory futarchy pilot with $100k liquidity, partnering with Futarchy Labs
+- **2026-02** — GIP-146 (Net Asset Value Transparency) passed with 87% support, requiring quarterly NAV per GNO reports
+- **2026-02** — GIP-147 (Ranked Choice Voting) passed for complex multi-option decisions
+- **2026-02** — Treasury management RFP attracted 22 applicants, selected via ranked choice voting
+
+## Governance Innovations
+
+- First major DAO to implement advisory (non-binding) futarchy at scale
+- Mixing governance mechanisms: token voting, ranked choice, prediction markets
+- Treasury transparency initiatives with regular NAV reporting

entities/internet-finance/nicolas-rasmont.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+---
+type: entity
+entity_type: person
+name: Nicolas Rasmont
+status: active
+domains: [internet-finance, ai-alignment]
+---
+
+# Nicolas Rasmont
+
+LessWrong contributor known for formal critiques of futarchy mechanism design.
+
+## Timeline
+
+- **2025-12-01** — Published "Futarchy is Parasitic on What It Tries to Govern" on LessWrong, arguing conditional decision markets are structurally incapable of estimating causal policy effects due to selection vs causation bias
+
+## Contributions
+
+**Futarchy Critique:** Developed the most formally stated structural impossibility argument against futarchy, claiming the mechanism is systematically biased toward selection correlations rather than causal effects even when perfectly implemented with rational traders.
+
+## Related Work
+
+- Builds on Dynomight's 2022-2025 series on conditional markets
+- Part of active LessWrong debate on futarchy's epistemic foundations
+- Distinct from implementation critiques (manipulation, fraud, illiquidity) - focuses on structural mechanism design

entities/internet-finance/ripple-prime.md

@@ -1,25 +1,13 @@
----
-type: entity
-entity_type: company
-name: Ripple Prime
-domain: internet-finance
-status: active
-founded: [unknown]
-headquarters: [unknown]
-website: [unknown]
----
-
 # Ripple Prime
 
+**Type:** Institutional prime brokerage  
+**Status:** Active  
+**Domain:** internet-finance
+
 ## Overview
 
-Ripple Prime is an institutional prime brokerage service that provides traditional financial institutions with access to on-chain derivatives markets. The service maintains compliance and relationship infrastructure of traditional prime brokerage while routing institutional flow to decentralized platforms.
-
-## Business Model
-
-Ripple Prime acts as a single counterparty for institutional clients accessing on-chain perpetual markets, eliminating the need for institutions to directly interact with DeFi protocols while maintaining regulatory compliance frameworks.
+Ripple Prime is an institutional prime brokerage service enabling cross-margined access to on-chain derivatives alongside traditional asset classes.
 
 ## Timeline
 
-- **2026-02-04** — Launched Hyperliquid integration for equity and crypto perpetuals, providing institutional access to on-chain derivatives
-- **2026-04-07** — Expanded Hyperliquid integration to commodity perpetuals (gold, silver, oil), citing Hyperliquid's $5B+ open interest and $200B+ monthly volume as justification for institutional access expansion
+- **2026-04-08** — Added Hyperliquid support, enabling institutional access to on-chain perpetual swaps with cross-margin capabilities

entities/internet-finance/ritchie-torres.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Ritchie Torres
+
+**Type:** person  
+**Status:** active  
+**Domain:** internet-finance
+
+## Overview
+
+Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) represents the Bronx in the U.S. House of Representatives. A progressive Democrat generally crypto-skeptical, Torres introduced the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026, applying insider trading rules to prediction markets.
+
+## Timeline
+
+- **2026-04-01** — Introduced Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act barring federal officials from trading on political prediction markets
+
+## Significance
+
+Torres's insider trading bill is notable because it treats prediction markets as financial instruments requiring securities-style regulation rather than gambling prohibition, representing a legitimization pathway for the industry despite his generally skeptical stance on crypto.

entities/internet-finance/vitadao.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+---
+type: entity
+entity_type: company
+name: VitaDAO
+domain: internet-finance
+status: active
+founded: 2021
+headquarters: Decentralized
+website: https://www.vitadao.com/
+focus: Decentralized science (DeSci) focused on longevity research
+---
+
+# VitaDAO
+
+**Type:** Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO)  
+**Focus:** Longevity research funding and governance  
+**Status:** Active
+
+## Overview
+
+VitaDAO is a decentralized science (DeSci) organization that funds and governs longevity research through token-based governance mechanisms. It is one of the largest and most established DeSci DAOs, making it a frequent subject of governance research.
+
+## Significance
+
+VitaDAO serves as a primary empirical case study for futarchy research in DeSci contexts due to its:
+- Established governance history with quantifiable proposal outcomes
+- Focus on research funding with measurable success metrics (publications, clinical milestones)
+- Large enough participant base to generate meaningful governance data
+
+## Timeline
+
+- **2024-01 to 2025-04** — Governance data analyzed in Frontiers in Blockchain futarchy study, showing directional alignment between futarchic mechanisms and token-vote outcomes in counterfactual simulations

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-01-xx-rasmont-futarchy-is-parasitic-lesswrong.md

@@ -7,10 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-12-01
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: [ai-alignment]
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-04-10
 priority: high
 tags: [futarchy, mechanism-design, causal-inference, prediction-markets, criticism, structural-flaw]
 flagged_for_theseus: ["causal inference / evidential vs causal decision theory angle — Rasmont's argument is essentially that futarchy implements evidential decision theory when it needs causal decision theory"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-02-xx-gnosisdao-gip145-advisory-futarchy-pilot.md

@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-02-07
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-04-10
 priority: high
 tags: [gnosisdao, futarchy, advisory-futarchy, conditional-token-framework, gnosis, governance, pilot]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-04-02-doj-sues-three-states-prediction-market-jurisdiction.md

@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-04-02
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-04-10
 priority: high
 tags: [cftc, doj, prediction-markets, federal-preemption, regulation, kalshi, polymarket, litigation]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-04-07-third-circuit-kalshi-federal-preemption-ruling.md

@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-04-07
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-04-10
 priority: high
 tags: [kalshi, cftc, prediction-markets, federal-preemption, third-circuit, regulation, dcm]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-04-xx-hyperliquid-hip4-prediction-markets-institutional.md

@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-04-08
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-04-10
 priority: medium
 tags: [hyperliquid, prediction-markets, institutional, derivatives, hype, hip4, perps, market-share]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-04-xx-torres-public-integrity-prediction-markets-act.md

@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-04-01
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-04-10
 priority: medium
 tags: [regulation, prediction-markets, insider-trading, congress, torres, political-markets, policy]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content