extract: 2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content

Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>

domains/ai-alignment/rlhf-is-implicit-social-choice-without-normative-scrutiny.md

@@ -29,10 +29,16 @@ The paper's proposed solution—RLCHF with explicit social welfare functions—c
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (extend)
-*Source: [[2025-06-00-li-scaling-human-judgment-community-notes-llms]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
+*Source: 2025-06-00-li-scaling-human-judgment-community-notes-llms | Added: 2026-03-15*
 
 RLCF makes the social choice mechanism explicit through the bridging algorithm (matrix factorization with intercept scores). Unlike standard RLHF which aggregates preferences opaquely through reward model training, RLCF's use of intercepts as the training signal is a deliberate choice to optimize for cross-partisan agreement—a specific social welfare function.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-an-differentiable-social-choice]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Comprehensive February 2026 survey by An & Du documents that contemporary ML systems implement social choice mechanisms implicitly across RLHF, participatory budgeting, and liquid democracy applications, with 18 identified open problems spanning incentive guarantees and pluralistic preference aggregation.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/ai-alignment/single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness.md

@@ -29,10 +29,16 @@ Chakraborty, Qiu, Yuan, Koppel, Manocha, Huang, Bedi, Wang. "MaxMin-RLHF: Alignm
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
+*Source: 2025-11-00-operationalizing-pluralistic-values-llm-alignment | Added: 2026-03-15*
 
 Study demonstrates that models trained on different demographic populations show measurable behavioral divergence (3-5 percentage points), providing empirical evidence that single-reward functions trained on one population systematically misalign with others.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-an-differentiable-social-choice]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+An & Du's survey reveals the mechanism behind single-reward failure: RLHF is doing social choice (preference aggregation) but treating it as an engineering detail rather than a normative design choice, which means the aggregation function is chosen implicitly and without examination of which fairness criteria it satisfies.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/health/glp-1-multi-organ-protection-creates-compounding-value-across-kidney-cardiovascular-and-metabolic-endpoints.md

@@ -42,6 +42,12 @@ SELECT trial exploratory analysis (N=17,604, median 41.8 months) shows semagluti
 
 Phase 3 trial shows semaglutide 2.4mg achieves 62.9% resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening fibrosis vs 34.3% placebo. Meta-analysis confirms GLP-1 RAs significantly increase histologic resolution of MASH, decrease liver fat deposition, improve hepatocellular ballooning, and reduce lobular inflammation. Some hepatoprotective benefits appear at least partly independent of weight loss, suggesting direct liver effects beyond metabolic improvement. This adds hepatic protection as a third major organ system (alongside cardiovascular and renal) where GLP-1s demonstrate protective effects.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-05-29-nejm-flow-trial-semaglutide-kidney-outcomes]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+FLOW trial demonstrated 29% reduction in cardiovascular death (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89) and 18% lower risk of major cardiovascular events in a kidney-focused trial. The cardiovascular benefits emerged as secondary endpoints in a study designed for kidney outcomes, supporting the multi-organ protection thesis. Separate analysis in Nature Medicine showed additive benefits when combined with SGLT2 inhibitors.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/health/semaglutide-reduces-kidney-disease-progression-24-percent-and-delays-dialysis-creating-largest-per-patient-cost-savings.md

@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ This is the first dedicated kidney outcomes trial with a GLP-1 receptor agonist,
 - FDA indication expansion to T2D patients with CKD (2024)
 - Dialysis cost benchmark: $90K+/year per patient
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-05-29-nejm-flow-trial-semaglutide-kidney-outcomes]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+FLOW trial (N=3,533, median 3.4 years follow-up) showed 24% reduction in major kidney disease events (HR 0.76, P=0.0003), with annual eGFR decline slowed by 1.16 mL/min/1.73m2 (P<0.001). Trial stopped early at prespecified interim analysis due to efficacy. FDA subsequently expanded semaglutide indications to include T2D patients with CKD. This is the first dedicated kidney outcomes trial with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, published in NEJM.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md

@@ -28,10 +28,16 @@ From the MetaDAO proposal:
 This claim extends futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility by showing the reputational concern operates at the mechanism level, not just the platform level. The market's rejection of Futardio suggests futarchy stakeholders prioritize mechanism credibility over short-term adoption metrics.
 
 
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Phonon Studio AI raised $88,888 target but ended in 'Refunding' status within one day (launched 2026-03-05, closed 2026-03-06). The project had live product traction (1000+ songs generated in first week, functional tokenized AI artist logic) but still failed to attract capital, suggesting futarchy-governed launches face quality perception issues even when projects demonstrate real product-market validation.
+
+
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
 *Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
-MetaDAO's internal debate on futardio explicitly weighs 'makes futarchy look less serious' and 'may make it harder to sell DeFi DAOs / non-crypto organizations' against adoption benefits, demonstrating the reputational risk tradeoff is recognized by practitioners before launch.
+Futardio proposal explicitly lists 'Makes futarchy look less serious' and 'May make it harder to sell DeFi DAOs / non-crypto organizations' as potential pitfalls, demonstrating MetaDAO's awareness of the reputational tradeoff. The proposal was ultimately rejected (status: Failed), suggesting the market agreed the credibility risk outweighed adoption benefits.
 
 ---
 

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md

@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ The Drift proposal establishes a 2/3 multisig execution group (metaprophet, Suma
 
 The Drift proposal explicitly states 'All grant decisions are at the discretion of the decision council and any such decisions made by the decision council are final.' This creates a hybrid structure where futarchy approves the program budget but a committee controls individual allocations, demonstrating the pattern of discretionary override for operational decisions.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Drift proposal uses 2/3 multisig execution group (metaprophet, Sumatt, Lmvdzande) with explicit discretion: 'exact criteria for this shall be finalized by the execution group' for activity filtering, and 'if successful proposals exceed two, executor group can decide top N proposals to split.' Multisig receives 3,000 DRIFT allocation and has authority to 'distribute their allocation as they see fit' or return excess funds.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md

@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ Dean's List DAO's fee increase proposal included switching quote token from mSOL
 
 The HNT-ORE boost proposal frames strategic partnership value through liquidity network effects and brand positioning ('flagship DePIN project', 'competitive unit of account for real world assets'). Markets must price whether Helium association increases ORE's perceived legitimacy and network depth, demonstrating futarchy's ability to evaluate partnership proposals with significant intangible components.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Dean's List DAO treasury de-risking proposal passed with market pricing showing 5-20% FDV increase ($500k to $525k-$600k) based on financial stability perception. The proposal explicitly modeled how converting volatile assets to stablecoins would impact market confidence and token valuation, demonstrating futarchy markets can price operational stability as a token price input.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md

@@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ The Dean's List proposal passed futarchy governance despite requiring complex mu
 
 LobsterFutarchy's failure ($1,183 of $500,000 target) occurred despite proposing infrastructure for a stated market need (agent financial sandboxing) and reasonable economics ($45k/month burn for 12 months). The 99.8% funding shortfall suggests participation friction or credibility gaps rather than market rejection of the concept itself.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Dean's List treasury proposal required TWAP > 3% to pass and projected 5-20% FDV increase, well above the threshold. The proposal passed, suggesting that when economic benefits substantially exceed participation thresholds, friction becomes less determinative of outcomes.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposer-incentives-require-delayed-vesting-to-prevent-gaming.md

@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ created: 2026-03-15
 
 The Drift proposal structures proposer rewards with a three-month delay between proposal passage and token claim. Passing proposals earn up to 5,000 DRIFT each, but tokens are only claimable after three months. This delay creates a quality filter: proposers must believe their proposals will create sustained value that survives the vesting period. Without this delay, rational actors could spam low-quality proposals to extract rewards, knowing they can exit before negative effects manifest. The proposal also includes an executor group discretion clause - if successful proposals exceed expectations, the group can decide which top N proposals split the allocation. This combines time-based filtering with human judgment to prevent gaming. The 20,000 DRIFT activity pool uses the same three-month delay, with criteria finalized by the execution group to 'filter for non organic activity.'
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Drift proposal implements 3-month vesting for proposer rewards (up to 5,000 DRIFT per passing proposal) and activity pool rewards (20,000 DRIFT split), explicitly stating rewards are 'claimable after 3 months.' This prevents immediate extraction and forces alignment with longer-term outcomes.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-retroactive-rewards-bootstrap-participation-through-endowment-effect.md

@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ created: 2026-03-15
 
 The Drift Futarchy incentive program explicitly uses retroactive token distribution to MetaDAO participants as a mechanism to bootstrap engagement. The proposal cites the endowment effect - the behavioral economics finding that people value things more highly once they own them - as the theoretical basis. By distributing 9,600 DRIFT to 32 MetaDAO participants based on historical activity (5+ interactions over 30+ days), plus 2,400 DRIFT to AMM swappers, the proposal creates a cohort of token holders who have psychological ownership before the futarchy system launches. This differs from standard airdrops by explicitly targeting demonstrated forecasters rather than broad distribution. The tiered structure (100-400 DRIFT based on META holdings) further segments by engagement level. The proposal pairs this with forward incentives (5,000 DRIFT per passing proposal, 20,000 DRIFT activity pool) to convert initial ownership into sustained participation.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Drift Futarchy proposal explicitly cites endowment effect as mechanism for retroactive rewards to 32 MetaDAO participants (9,600 DRIFT) based on activity thresholds. Proposal states rewards are 'meant to signal rewards for strong forecasters in futarchic markets' by 'rewarding early and active participants of MetaDAO with tokens to participate in Drift Futarchy (via the endowment effect).'
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ MetaDAO's Futardio proposal explicitly states: 'One of the ideal use-cases for f
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
 *Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
-MetaDAO proposal explicitly identifies memecoin governance as ideal futarchy use-case: 'memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.' This confirms the single-objective-function thesis with direct practitioner reasoning.
+MetaDAO proposal explicitly identifies memecoin governance as 'ideal use-case for futarchy' because 'memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.' This confirms the single-objective-function thesis with direct reasoning from practitioners.
 
 ---
 

domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md

@@ -56,10 +56,16 @@ Hurupay raised $2,003,593 against a $3,000,000 target (67% of goal) and entered
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (challenge)
-*Source: [[2026-03-03-futardio-launch-cloak]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+*Source: 2026-03-03-futardio-launch-cloak | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
 Cloak raised only $1,455 against a $300,000 target (0.5% of target), entering refunding status. This represents a near-total failure of market validation, contrasting sharply with the 15x oversubscription pattern. The project had shipped product (live mainnet beta with Oro integration), had credible team (repeat builders, Superteam contributors), and addressed a real problem (MEV extraction on DCA orders). Despite these fundamentals, the futarchy-governed raise failed to attract capital, suggesting that product-market fit and team credibility are insufficient without pre-existing community or distribution.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (challenge)
+*Source: [[2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Phonon Studio AI launch failed to reach its $88,888 target and entered refunding status, demonstrating that not all futarchy-governed raises succeed. The project had demonstrable traction (live product, 1000+ songs generated, functional token mechanics) but still failed to attract sufficient capital, suggesting futarchy capital formation success is not uniform across project types or market conditions.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

entities/internet-finance/colosseum.md

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Colosseum operates Solana's hackathon infrastructure, runs an accelerator progra
 - **2024-03-19** — [[metadao-otc-trade-colosseum]] proposed: $250,000 USDC acquisition of META tokens with 20% immediate unlock and 80% vested over 12 months
 - **2024-03-24** — [[metadao-otc-trade-colosseum]] passed: Colosseum completed OTC acquisition of META tokens from MetaDAO treasury
 
+- **2024-03-19** — Proposed $250,000 OTC acquisition of META tokens from MetaDAO treasury at market price up to $850 per token, with 20% immediate unlock and 80% vesting over 12 months. Proposal passed 2024-03-24. Committed to sponsor DAO track in next Solana hackathon ($50-80k prize pool) as part of strategic partnership.
 ## Relationship to KB
 - [[metadao]] — strategic investor and ecosystem partner
 - Demonstrates institutional adoption of futarchy-governed token sales as fundraising mechanism

entities/internet-finance/futardio.md

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless
 - **2026-02-03** — Hurupay fundraise launched targeting $3M, closed Feb 7 at $2M (67% of target) in refunding status
 - **2026-03-05** — Seyf AI-native wallet launch: raised $200 against $300,000 target, refunded (99.93% shortfall)
 - **2026-03-06** — LobsterFutarchy launch raised $1,183 against $500,000 target, closed in refunding status after one day
-- **2024-08-28** — MetaDAO futarchy proposal to build futardio (memecoin launchpad with futarchy governance) failed. Proposal included $100k grant over 6 months, Q3 launch target, and plan for immutable hyperstructure with revenue flowing to $FUTA token holders. Proposal acknowledged reputational risk tradeoff between driving futarchy adoption through memecoins versus maintaining credibility with serious DeFi/non-crypto organizations.
+- **2024-08-28** — MetaDAO futarchy proposal to build futardio memecoin launchpad created, offering $100k grant over 6 months with Q3 launch target. Proposal failed, project cancelled.
 ## Competitive Position
 - **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
 - **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."

entities/internet-finance/metadao.md

@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
 - **2024-01-24** — Proposed AMM program to replace CLOB markets, addressing liquidity fragmentation and state rent costs (Proposal CF9QUBS251FnNGZHLJ4WbB2CVRi5BtqJbCqMi47NX1PG)
 - **2024-01-29** — AMM proposal passed with 400 META on approval and 800 META on completion budget
 - **2024-08-31** — Passed proposal to enter services agreement with Organization Technology LLC, creating US entity vehicle for paying contributors with $1.378M annualized burn rate. Entity owns no IP (all owned by MetaDAO LLC) and cannot encumber MetaDAO LLC. Agreement cancellable with 30-day notice or immediately for material breach.
-- **2024-05-30** — Drift allocated 50,000 DRIFT to incentivize MetaDAO participant migration to Drift Futarchy, with 12,000 DRIFT in retroactive rewards to 32+ active MetaDAO users based on conditional vault interactions and META holdings
+- **2024-03-19** — Colosseum proposes $250,000 OTC acquisition of META with TWAP-based pricing (market price up to $850, voided above $1,200), 20% immediate unlock and 80% 12-month linear vest. Proposal passed 2024-03-24. Includes commitment to sponsor DAO track ($50-80K prize pool) in next Solana hackathon after Renaissance at no cost to MetaDAO.
+- **2024-03-19** — Proposal #13: Colosseum OTC acquisition of up to $250,000 worth of META tokens passed. Price mechanism: TWAP of pass market if below $850, capped at $850 if TWAP between $850-$1,200, void if above $1,200. Executed via 5/7 multisig with members from both organizations. Proposal completed 2024-03-24.
 ## Key Decisions
 | Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
 |------|----------|----------|----------|---------|

inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2026-02-00-an-differentiable-social-choice.json

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "rlhf-implements-implicit-social-choice-without-normative-scrutiny.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "impossibility-results-become-optimization-tradeoffs-in-learned-mechanisms.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "inverse-mechanism-learning-can-detect-implicit-social-choice-functions.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 3,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 5,
+    "rejected": 3,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "rlhf-implements-implicit-social-choice-without-normative-scrutiny.md:set_created:2026-03-16",
+      "rlhf-implements-implicit-social-choice-without-normative-scrutiny.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-Arr",
+      "impossibility-results-become-optimization-tradeoffs-in-learned-mechanisms.md:set_created:2026-03-16",
+      "impossibility-results-become-optimization-tradeoffs-in-learned-mechanisms.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-Arr",
+      "inverse-mechanism-learning-can-detect-implicit-social-choice-functions.md:set_created:2026-03-16"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "rlhf-implements-implicit-social-choice-without-normative-scrutiny.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "impossibility-results-become-optimization-tradeoffs-in-learned-mechanisms.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "inverse-mechanism-learning-can-detect-implicit-social-choice-functions.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-16"
+}

inbox/archive/2024-05-29-nejm-flow-trial-semaglutide-kidney-outcomes.md

@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2024-05-29
 domain: health
 secondary_domains: []
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 tags: [glp-1, semaglutide, CKD, kidney-disease, FLOW-trial, organ-protection]
+processed_by: vida
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["semaglutide-reduces-kidney-disease-progression-24-percent-and-delays-dialysis-creating-largest-per-patient-cost-savings.md", "glp-1-multi-organ-protection-creates-compounding-value-across-kidney-cardiovascular-and-metabolic-endpoints.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -38,3 +42,11 @@ Additive benefits when used with SGLT2 inhibitors (separate analysis in Nature M
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch in pharmaceutical history but their chronic use model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Kidney protection is where GLP-1 downstream savings are largest per-patient — dialysis prevention is the economic mechanism most favorable to the VBC cost-saving thesis
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the economic implications of slowed kidney decline for capitated payers, not just the clinical endpoint
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- FLOW trial had N=3,533 patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease
+- Median follow-up was 3.4 years before early stopping
+- Trial was stopped at prespecified interim analysis due to efficacy
+- Dialysis costs approximately $90K+/year per patient in the US
+- Separate analysis in Nature Medicine showed additive benefits with SGLT2 inhibitors

inbox/archive/2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs.md

@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/9jAnAupCdPQCFvuAMr5ZkmxDdEKqsneurgvUnx7Az9z
 date: 2024-05-30
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
 event_type: proposal
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-retroactive-rewards-bootstrap-participation-through-endowment-effect.md", "futarchy-proposer-incentives-require-delayed-vesting-to-prevent-gaming.md", "futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Proposal Details
@@ -107,3 +111,11 @@ In the event of uncertainty or excess budget, funds shall be returned to origina
 - Autocrat version: 0.3
 - Completed: 2024-06-02
 - Ended: 2024-06-02
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Drift Futarchy proposal 9jAnAupCdPQCFvuAMr5ZkmxDdEKqsneurgvUnx7Az9zS passed on 2024-06-02
+- 32 MetaDAO participants qualified for retroactive rewards based on 5+ interactions over 30+ days before May 19, 2024
+- Retroactive reward tiers: <1 META = 100 DRIFT, >=1 META = 200 DRIFT, >=10 META = 400 DRIFT
+- Total budget: 50,000 DRIFT split as 9,600 retroactive to qualified participants, 2,400 to AMM swappers, 10,000 for future proposers, 25,000 activity pool, 3,000 execution group
+- Execution group: metaprophet, Sumatt, Lmvdzande operating as 2/3 multisig

inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md

@@ -359,8 +359,10 @@ This would all be left to the discretion of the team building it, but they would
 
 
 ## Key Facts
-- MetaDAO futardio proposal was created 2024-08-28 and failed 2024-09-01
-- Futardio proposed $100k grant paid over 6 months for development team
-- Futardio planned Q3 launch timeline
-- Proposal identified pump.fun with a token as market opening
-- Nallok and Proph3t would support team but not be core team
+- Futardio proposal on MetaDAO created 2024-08-28, failed 2024-09-01
+- Proposal included $100k grant paid over 6 months to development team
+- Platform would have allocated percentage of each memecoin supply to futarchy DAO
+- Points system would convert to $FUTA token within 180 days
+- Revenue would flow to vault claimable by FUTA holders
+- Target launch was Q3 2024
+- Nallok and Proph3t would support but not be core team

inbox/archive/2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management.md

@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/4gaJ8bi1gpNEx6xSSsepjVBM6GXqTDfLbiUbzXbARHW
 date: 2024-12-02
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
 event_type: proposal
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md", "futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Proposal Details
@@ -122,3 +126,11 @@ This strategy ensures financial stability while signaling prudence to investors,
 - Autocrat version: 0.3
 - Completed: 2024-12-05
 - Ended: 2024-12-05
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Dean's List DAO treasury valued at $75,000-$87,000 at $350 SOL (excluding DEAN token)
+- Proposal required TWAP > 3% for passage, with conservative FDV baseline of $500,000
+- De-risking projected to increase survival probability from 50% to 90%
+- Market modeled 5% confidence boost scenario ($525k FDV) and 20% confidence boost scenario ($600k FDV)
+- Proposal created 2024-12-02, completed 2024-12-05

inbox/archive/2026-02-00-an-differentiable-social-choice.md

@@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-02-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: [mechanisms, collective-intelligence]
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: medium
 tags: [differentiable-social-choice, learned-mechanisms, voting-rules, rlhf-as-voting, impossibility-as-tradeoff, open-problems]
 flagged_for_rio: ["Differentiable auctions and economic mechanisms — direct overlap with mechanism design territory"]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["rlhf-is-implicit-social-choice-without-normative-scrutiny.md", "single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -40,8 +44,8 @@ Published February 2026. Comprehensive survey of differentiable social choice
 **What I expected but didn't find:** No specific engagement with RLCF or bridging-based approaches. The paper is a survey, not a solution proposal.
 
 **KB connections:**
-- [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes]] — differentiable social choice designs rules that learn outcomes
-- [[universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies]] — impossibility results become optimization constraints
+- designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes — differentiable social choice designs rules that learn outcomes
+- universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies — impossibility results become optimization constraints
 
 **Extraction hints:** Claims about (1) RLHF as implicit social choice without normative scrutiny, (2) impossibility results as optimization trade-offs not brick walls, (3) differentiable mechanisms as learnable alternatives to designed ones.
 
@@ -51,3 +55,10 @@ Published February 2026. Comprehensive survey of differentiable social choice
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: RLHF-as-social-choice framing + impossibility-as-optimization-tradeoff = new lens on our coordination thesis
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on "RLHF is implicit social choice" and "impossibility as optimization trade-off" — these are the novel framing claims
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- An & Du published comprehensive survey of differentiable social choice in February 2026
+- Survey identifies 18 open problems in the field
+- Six interconnected domains surveyed: differentiable economics, neural social choice, AI alignment as social choice, participatory budgeting, liquid democracy, inverse mechanism learning
+- Field of differentiable social choice emerged within last 5 years

inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai.md

@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/x1yqPH8mutuiqkrz66DPwFw1ykQqT4v5KyUUtUzBgPA"
 date: 2026-03-05
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
 event_type: launch
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md", "metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Launch Details
@@ -173,3 +177,13 @@ Phonon is already live which means there is real product market validation, meas
 - Token mint: `J697wnGGP8yWhYSrrMNsfH7cpKqp8up4uteigCHZmeta`
 - Version: v0.7
 - Closed: 2026-03-06
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Phonon Studio AI launched on Futardio 2026-03-05 with $88,888 USDC target
+- Phonon Studio AI fundraise entered refunding status by 2026-03-06
+- Phonon generated 1000+ AI songs in first week of operation
+- Phonon uses Meteora Dynamic Bonding Pool protocol for artist token trading
+- Phonon proposed $11,777 monthly operational allowance
+- Phonon token: J69, mint address J697wnGGP8yWhYSrrMNsfH7cpKqp8up4uteigCHZmeta
+- Phonon launch address: x1yqPH8mutuiqkrz66DPwFw1ykQqT4v5KyUUtUzBgPA