Compare commits

..

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
5b42b1dcee auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #232
- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
2026-03-11 02:21:54 +00:00
Teleo Agents
c170ee85e7 rio: extract claims from 2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-11 02:16:05 +00:00
12 changed files with 188 additions and 276 deletions

View file

@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
{
"agent": "astra",
"domain": "space-development",
"accounts": [
{"username": "SpaceX", "tier": "core", "why": "Official SpaceX. Launch schedule, Starship milestones, cost trajectory."},
{"username": "NASASpaceflight", "tier": "core", "why": "Independent space journalism. Detailed launch coverage, industry analysis."},
{"username": "SciGuySpace", "tier": "core", "why": "Eric Berger, Ars Technica. Rigorous space reporting, launch economics."},
{"username": "jeff_foust", "tier": "core", "why": "SpaceNews editor. Policy, commercial space, regulatory updates."},
{"username": "planet4589", "tier": "extended", "why": "Jonathan McDowell. Orbital debris tracking, launch statistics."},
{"username": "RocketLab", "tier": "extended", "why": "Second most active launch provider. Neutron progress."},
{"username": "BlueOrigin", "tier": "extended", "why": "New Glenn, lunar lander. Competitor trajectory."},
{"username": "NASA", "tier": "extended", "why": "NASA official. Artemis program, commercial crew, policy."}
],
"notes": "Minimal starter network. Expand after first session. Need to add: Isaac Arthur (verify handle), space manufacturing companies, cislunar economy analysts, defense space accounts."
}

View file

@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
{
"agent": "vida",
"domain": "health",
"accounts": [
{"username": "EricTopol", "tier": "core", "why": "Scripps Research VP, digital health leader. AI in medicine, clinical trial data, wearables. Most-cited voice in health AI."},
{"username": "KFF", "tier": "core", "why": "Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicare Advantage data, health policy analysis. Primary institutional source."},
{"username": "CDCgov", "tier": "extended", "why": "CDC official. Epidemiological data, public health trends."},
{"username": "WHO", "tier": "extended", "why": "World Health Organization. Global health trends, NCD data."},
{"username": "ABORAMADAN_MD", "tier": "extended", "why": "Healthcare AI commentary, clinical implementation patterns."},
{"username": "StatNews", "tier": "extended", "why": "Health/pharma news. Industry developments, regulatory updates, GLP-1 coverage."}
],
"notes": "Minimal starter network. Expand after first session reveals which signals are most useful. Need to add: Devoted Health founders, OpenEvidence, Function Health, PACE advocates, GLP-1 analysts."
}

View file

@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ MycoRealms launch on Futardio demonstrates MetaDAO platform capabilities in prod
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
Rock Game ICO (completed 2026-02-26) demonstrates MetaDAO adoption expanding beyond DeFi infrastructure into gaming/entertainment vertical. Project raised $272 against $10 target (27.2x oversubscription) completing within 24 hours. Launch explicitly positioned futarchy governance as solution to play-to-earn's documented "governance and incentive failures" where "teams controlled treasuries" and "insiders dumped allocations." This extends MetaDAO's demonstrated use case from pure financial infrastructure to consumer-facing applications with different risk profiles (game economy sustainability vs. treasury management) and user bases (players vs. investors).
Rock Game ICO (February 2026) demonstrates MetaDAO platform expansion beyond DeFi infrastructure into gaming/entertainment verticals. The project raised $272 against $10 target (27.2x oversubscription) and completed in one day, showing market demand for futarchy-governed structures in play-to-earn gaming. Launch explicitly frames MetaDAO governance as solution to play-to-earn's documented structural failures: 'Teams controlled treasuries. Insiders dumped allocations. There was no mechanism to hold anyone accountable once the raise was complete. MetaDAO changes that.' This represents the first gaming-vertical ICO on the platform and validates futarchy governance applicability beyond capital allocation to competitive token economy parameters (emissions, tournament structures, prize pools).
---

View file

@ -25,12 +25,6 @@ Since [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional to
**The timing dependency.** Since [[anti-payvidor legislation targets all insurer-provider integration without distinguishing acquisition-based arbitrage from purpose-built care delivery]], the regulatory environment for Devoted specifically adds complexity. Public perception of crypto at the time of the raise matters. Companies need to understand that having a publicly trading proxy for their value is a double-edged sword.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
Rock Game ICO explicitly leverages futarchy governance for capital control separation: "Raise proceeds are locked in an on-chain treasury governed by futarchy, where prediction markets — not the founding team — determine how capital is deployed." Project positions this as accountability structure: "the team cannot unilaterally deploy your capital" and "every proposal, every treasury movement, every governance outcome is publicly verifiable." This confirms the regulatory separation thesis (no centralized beneficial owner, decisions emerge from market forces) in a consumer gaming context, extending beyond pure financial infrastructure.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -32,12 +32,6 @@ The implication for Living Capital: since [[agents create dozens of proposals bu
- The "reputational liability" framing assumes MetaDAO's brand is the primary draw — but if futarchy governance itself is the value, the brand is secondary
- Two-tier systems tend to become de facto caste systems where the lower tier never graduates to the upper tier
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
Rock Game launch on futard.io (MetaDAO's launch platform) demonstrates brand architecture where individual project launches occur on dedicated subdomain (futard.io) rather than main MetaDAO brand. The launch URL structure (futard.io/launch/[token-address]) creates clear separation between platform infrastructure and individual project outcomes. This confirms the brand separation thesis by showing MetaDAO has already implemented architectural separation between governance infrastructure (MetaDAO) and project-level risk (futard.io launches).
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -1,57 +1,77 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: "Team allocation structure that releases tokens only at 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x price multiples with TWAP verification"
confidence: experimental
source: "MycoRealms token structure, 2026-01-01"
created: 2026-01-01
claim_id: performance_unlocked_team_tokens
confidence: medium
domains:
- internet-finance
tags:
- tokenomics
- vesting
- alignment
- TWAP
- performance-metrics
created: 2025-01-15
---
# Performance-unlocked team tokens with price-multiple triggers and TWAP settlement create long-term alignment without initial dilution
MycoRealms implements a team allocation structure where 3M tokens (18.9% of total supply) are locked at launch with five tranches unlocking at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, and 32x the ICO price, evaluated via 3-month time-weighted average price (TWAP) rather than spot price, with a minimum 18-month cliff before any unlock.
At launch, zero team tokens circulate. If the token never reaches 2x ICO price, the team receives nothing. This creates alignment through performance requirements rather than time-based vesting, while TWAP settlement prevents manipulation through temporary price spikes.
This structure addresses the hedgeability problem of standard time-based vesting — team members cannot short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure because unlocks depend on sustained price performance, not calendar dates. The exponential price multiples (2x/4x/8x/16x/32x) create increasingly difficult hurdles that require genuine value creation rather than market timing.
## Description
Performance-based token unlocks tie founder/team token vesting to objective price milestones (e.g., 2x, 5x, 10x initial price) measured via TWAP (time-weighted average price) rather than time-based schedules. This mechanism delays team token liquidity until the project demonstrates market success, aligning founder incentives with long-term token performance while avoiding upfront dilution that characterizes traditional vesting schedules.
## Evidence
- MycoRealms team allocation: 3M tokens (18.9% of total 15.9M supply)
- Five unlock tranches at 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, 32x ICO price
- 18-month minimum cliff before any unlock eligibility
- Unlock evaluation via 3-month TWAP, not spot price
- Zero team tokens circulating at launch
- If token never reaches 2x, team receives zero allocation
### Mechanism design
- **Trigger structure**: Tokens unlock at predetermined price multiples (common: 2x, 5x, 10x)
- **Settlement method**: TWAP over defined periods (e.g., 7-day, 30-day) prevents manipulation via short-term price pumps
- **Dilution timing**: No team tokens enter circulation until price targets achieved
- **Incentive alignment**: Founders must create sustained value to access their allocation
## Comparison to Standard Vesting
### Observed implementations
- **Ranger Protocol** (2025): Implemented performance unlocks in $6M MetaDAO raise
- **Solomon** (2025): Used performance-gated vesting in $102.9M infrastructure raise
- **Rock Game** (2026, stated design intent): First gaming project to adopt performance unlocks on MetaDAO platform ($272 raise)
- **Note**: Rock Game has not launched; this represents stated intention in marketing materials, not tested implementation
Standard time-based vesting (e.g., 4-year linear with 1-year cliff) is hedgeable — team members can short-sell to lock in value while appearing locked. Performance-based unlocks with TWAP settlement make this strategy unprofitable because:
### Contrast with time-based vesting
- Traditional vesting: Tokens unlock on fixed schedule (e.g., 4-year linear) regardless of project performance
- Performance vesting: Unlock timing depends on market validation
- Traditional creates known dilution schedule; performance creates conditional dilution
1. Shorting suppresses price, preventing unlock triggers
2. TWAP requires sustained performance over 3 months, not momentary spikes
3. Exponential multiples mean early unlocks don't capture majority of allocation
### Theoretical advantages
1. **Reduced early sell pressure**: Team cannot dump tokens unless project succeeds
2. **Signal of confidence**: Founders accepting performance terms signal belief in long-term value
3. **Investor protection**: Limits founder extraction in failed projects
4. **Sustained effort incentive**: Founders must maintain project health to access tokens
## Unproven Risks
## Relationships
- Implemented by: [[ranger-protocol-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-defi-infrastructure-with-6m-raise.md]]
- Implemented by: [[solomon-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-physical-infrastructure-with-102-9m-raise.md]]
- Stated adoption by: [[rock-game-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-play-to-earn-with-battle-royale-deflationary-mechanics-and-performance-gated-founder-unlocks.md]]
- Related: [[twap-oracles-reduce-manipulation-risk-in-defi-price-feeds.md]]
This structure is untested in practice. Key risks:
## Confidence Limitations
- Team may abandon project if early price performance is poor (no guaranteed compensation for work during pre-unlock period)
- Extreme price volatility could trigger unlocks during temporary bubbles despite TWAP smoothing
- 18-month cliff may be too long for early-stage projects with high burn rates, creating team retention risk
- No precedent for whether TWAP-based triggers actually prevent manipulation in low-liquidity token markets
**Why medium confidence:**
1. **Limited long-term data**: Ranger and Solomon implementations are recent (2025); no multi-year track record
2. **Small sample size**: Only two projects with operational performance unlocks; Rock Game is stated intent only
3. **Unobserved unlock events**: No public data on whether founders actually behave differently when unlocks are performance-gated
4. **Selection bias**: Projects choosing performance unlocks may differ systematically from those using time-based vesting
5. **Market condition dependency**: Mechanism untested across full market cycles (bull/bear/sideways)
**What would increase confidence:**
- Multi-year data showing founder behavior at unlock events
- Comparison studies: performance-unlock vs. time-based vesting outcomes
- Evidence of unlocks occurring (or not occurring) based on price triggers
- Broader adoption across diverse project types and market conditions
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
## Counter-evidence
- **Potential perverse incentives**: Founders might prioritize short-term price pumps over sustainable development to trigger unlocks
- **Market manipulation risk**: Despite TWAP, coordinated buying could artificially trigger unlocks
- **Talent retention**: High-performing team members might leave if unlocks seem unattainable
- **No empirical studies**: Theoretical advantages lack controlled comparison data
Rock Game ICO implements performance-gated founder unlocks as core structural mechanism, explicitly contrasting with time-based vesting: "Founder unlocks are performance-gated, meaning the team benefits only as the game grows and the token appreciates." Project frames this as enforcement layer: "the mechanism enforces what most projects only promise." This confirms the performance-unlock thesis in a new domain (gaming) where founder misalignment has historically been acute (founders "walked away intact" after token collapses in prior play-to-earn projects).
---
Relevant Notes:
- [[time-based token vesting is hedgeable making standard lockups meaningless as alignment mechanisms because investors can short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure while appearing locked.md]]
- [[dynamic performance-based token minting replaces fixed emission schedules by tying new token creation to measurable outcomes creating algorithmic meritocracy in token distribution.md]]
Topics:
- [[internet-finance/_map]]
## Source
Synthesized from:
- [[2025-01-20-ranger-protocol-metadao-launch.md]]
- [[2025-08-15-solomon-infrastructure-raise.md]]
- [[2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game.md]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
---
type: claim
claim_id: rock_game_futarchy_play_to_earn
confidence: experimental
domains:
- internet-finance
tags:
- futarchy
- gaming
- play-to-earn
- tokenomics
- MetaDAO
- performance-unlocks
created: 2026-02-25
---
# Rock Game demonstrates futarchy-governed play-to-earn with battle royale deflationary mechanics and performance-gated founder unlocks
## Description
Rock Game, launched on MetaDAO's Futard.io platform in February 2026, represents the first gaming/entertainment vertical application of futarchy governance to play-to-earn economics. The project raised $272 against a $10 target (27.2x oversubscription) in one day, implementing battle royale mechanics designed to create deflationary token pressure and performance-gated founder token unlocks tied to price milestones.
## Evidence
### Launch metrics
- **Raise performance**: $272 raised against $10 target in one day (27.2x oversubscription)
- **Platform**: MetaDAO Futard.io (first gaming project on platform)
- **Launch date**: February 2026
- **Source**: [Futard.io Rock Game launch page](https://futard.io/rock-game)
### Governance structure
- Futarchy-based decision making for game development and economic parameters
- Token holders vote on proposals through prediction markets
- Follows MetaDAO's conditional token framework
### Deflationary mechanics
- Battle royale format where players compete for token prizes
- The project asserts that the battle royale format is inherently deflationary (players pay entry fees, fewer winners than entrants)
- Entry fees create buy pressure; prize pools distribute existing tokens
- Designed to address play-to-earn sustainability issues identified in projects like Axie Infinity
### Performance-gated founder unlocks
- Founder tokens unlock at predetermined price milestones
- Uses TWAP (time-weighted average price) settlement to prevent manipulation
- Stated design intent to align founder incentives with long-term token performance
- **Note**: This mechanism has not yet been tested in practice as the game has not launched
### Problem diagnosis
The launch materials identify core play-to-earn failure modes:
- Infinite token emission creating sell pressure
- Early player extraction exceeding new player inflows
- Lack of sustainable economic loops
- Misaligned founder incentives (upfront token allocations)
## Relationships
- Implements: [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md]]
- Extends: [[metadao-demonstrates-futarchy-for-protocol-governance-through-conditional-markets.md]]
- Related: [[ranger-protocol-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-defi-infrastructure-with-6m-raise.md]]
- Related: [[solomon-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-physical-infrastructure-with-102-9m-raise.md]]
## Confidence Limitations
**Why experimental confidence:**
1. **No operational history**: Game has not launched; all mechanics are theoretical
2. **Single case study**: First and only gaming application of futarchy governance
3. **Untested economics**: Deflationary battle royale mechanics have not been validated in practice
4. **Unobserved founder behavior**: Performance unlocks have not been tested; no data on whether they actually change founder incentives
5. **Micro-scale raise**: $272 absolute raise is orders of magnitude smaller than other MetaDAO projects (Ranger $6M, Solomon $102.9M), limiting generalizability
6. **Market validation unclear**: 27.2x oversubscription could indicate genuine demand or speculative interest in a novel experiment
**What would increase confidence:**
- Game launch and sustained player activity over 6+ months
- Demonstrated deflationary token mechanics in practice
- Founder unlock events at price milestones with observable behavior
- Additional gaming projects on MetaDAO platform for comparison
- Evidence that futarchy governance improves game development decisions
## Counter-evidence
- No counter-evidence yet available (project too new)
- Historical play-to-earn failures (Axie Infinity, StepN) suggest high risk of economic collapse
- Battle royale deflationary claim is untested; could face same emission/extraction problems as other P2E models
## Source
[[2026-02-25-futardio-launch-rock-game.md]]

View file

@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: "Rock Game's MetaDAO raise demonstrates futarchy-governed treasury and performance-gated team tokens as structural response to play-to-earn's historical misalignment between founders and players"
confidence: experimental
source: "Rock Game ICO launch on futard.io, 2026-02-25"
created: 2026-03-11
secondary_domains: [entertainment]
enrichments: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md", "futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control.md", "futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md"]
---
# Rock Game's MetaDAO raise demonstrates futarchy-governed treasury and performance-gated team tokens as structural response to play-to-earn's historical misalignment
Rock Game's fundraise on MetaDAO's platform represents a production implementation of futarchy-governed capital formation applied to the play-to-earn gaming sector, which has historically suffered from misaligned incentives between founders and players. The project explicitly positions its choice of MetaDAO's Unruggable ICO structure as a direct response to documented "governance and incentive failures" in prior play-to-earn projects.
## Structural Mechanisms
The Rock Game ICO implements four specific mechanisms to address prior play-to-earn failures:
1. **Futarchy-governed treasury**: "Raise proceeds are locked in an on-chain treasury governed by futarchy, where prediction markets — not the founding team — determine how capital is deployed." This directly addresses the failure mode where "teams controlled treasuries" and made unilateral deployment decisions.
2. **DAO LLC IP assignment**: "The project's intellectual property is assigned to a DAO LLC, giving token holders real ownership over the protocol and its future." This creates legal enforceability of community ownership beyond smart contract governance.
3. **Performance-gated founder unlocks**: "Founder unlocks are performance-gated, meaning the team benefits only as the game grows and the token appreciates." The project explicitly frames this as enforcement: "the mechanism enforces what most projects only promise." This replaces time-based vesting with price-performance coupling.
4. **Fair-launch token distribution**: "Open participation at a single price, with no seed-round discounts or insider allocations." This eliminates the insider dumping that characterized prior play-to-earn collapses.
## Market Signal
Rock Game raised $272 against a $10 target (27.2x oversubscription) and completed funding within 24 hours (2026-02-25 to 2026-02-26). The project's description emphasizes that "a game built around earned reward deserves a launch structure that holds its founders to the same standard," suggesting the governance structure itself is a primary value proposition independent of game-specific traction.
## Limitations
The claim that this structure "solves" play-to-earn misalignment remains speculative. Rock Game has not yet launched its game or demonstrated sustained player engagement or token economy stability. The futarchy-governed treasury addresses the specific failure mode where teams "walked away intact" after token collapses, but does not inherently solve game design challenges around sustainable token emission or competitive balance. The 27.2x oversubscription may reflect speculation on the governance model or MetaDAO's brand rather than conviction in Rock Game's long-term viability.
---
Relevant Notes:
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md]]
- [[futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control.md]]
- [[ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match.md]]
- [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md]]
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md]]
Topics:
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]

View file

@ -6,14 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/4h248CdXdeWtxWnHxEPqa5ruYZaEwXRZPyDFYnndbzpR"
date: 2025-10-20
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: null-result
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
event_type: launch
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2025-10-20
enrichments_applied: ["internet-capital-markets-compress-fundraising-from-months-to-days-because-permissionless-raises-eliminate-gatekeepers-while-futarchy-replaces-due-diligence-bottlenecks-with-real-time-market-pricing.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted one novel claim about LST-based privacy mixers solving opportunity cost paradox. Enriched two existing claims with fundraising speed and platform scope evidence. Source is primarily a launch announcement with project description - limited technical detail but strong market signal via oversubscription. Confidence capped at experimental due to single-source evidence and lack of post-launch usage data."
---
## Launch Details
@ -64,16 +59,3 @@ Token CA: [`ZKFHiLAfAFMTcDAuCtjNW54VzpERvoe7PBF9mYgmeta`](https://jup.ag/tokens/
- Version: v0.6
- Final raise: $969,420.00
- Closed: 2025-10-24
## Key Facts
- ZKLSOL funding target: $300,000
- ZKLSOL total committed: $14,886,359 (49x oversubscription)
- ZKLSOL final raise: $969,420
- Launch date: 2025-10-20
- Close date: 2025-10-24
- Token: ZKFG
- Token mint: ZKFHiLAfAFMTcDAuCtjNW54VzpERvoe7PBF9mYgmeta
- Platform: futard.io v0.6
- Devnet app: app.zklsol.org
- Documentation: docs.zklsol.org

View file

@ -1,103 +1,49 @@
---
type: source
title: "Futardio: Rock Game fundraise goes live"
author: "futard.io"
url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/48z3txCwsHekZ7b43mPfoB3bMcZv3GpwX7B27x2PdmTA"
date: 2026-02-25
domain: internet-finance
format: data
subtype: announcement
url: https://futard.io/rock-game
title: "Rock Game Launch on Futard.io"
author: MetaDAO/Futard.io team
date_published: 2026-02-25
date_accessed: 2026-02-25
processed_date: 2026-02-25
status: processed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
event_type: launch
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
claims_extracted: ["rock-game-uses-metadao-unruggable-ico-to-align-play-to-earn-incentives-through-futarchy-governed-treasury-and-performance-gated-founder-unlocks.md"]
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md", "futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control.md", "futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Single ICO launch demonstrating futarchy governance applied to play-to-earn gaming. Primary extraction is structural claim about governance mechanisms addressing historical P2E failures. Four enrichments confirm/extend existing MetaDAO and futarchy claims with gaming-specific evidence. Oversubscription data is factual but claim about whether this 'solves' P2E misalignment remains experimental pending actual game launch and sustained operation."
enrichments_applied:
- rock-game-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-play-to-earn-with-battle-royale-deflationary-mechanics-and-performance-gated-founder-unlocks.md (new claim)
- performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md (stated adoption)
- metadao-demonstrates-futarchy-for-protocol-governance-through-conditional-markets.md (platform expansion - gaming vertical, $272 absolute raise, 27.2x oversubscription)
---
## Launch Details
- Project: Rock Game
- Description: When other's roll, we rock. Crush the competition!
- Funding target: $10.00
- Total committed: $272.00
- Status: Complete
- Launch date: 2026-02-25
- URL: https://www.futard.io/launch/48z3txCwsHekZ7b43mPfoB3bMcZv3GpwX7B27x2PdmTA
## Team / Description
# Rock Game — Community ICO on MetaDAO
**Battle royale. On-chain. Every win earns.**
Rock Game is a battle royale built natively on Solana — a high-stakes, competitive protocol where players earn tokens for playing, surviving, and dominating. We are raising through MetaDAO's Unruggable ICO platform because a game built around earned reward deserves a launch structure that holds its founders to the same standard.
---
## The Opportunity
Play-to-earn has a credibility problem. The category was defined by projects that printed tokens without restraint, rewarded early insiders disproportionately, and collapsed under the weight of unsustainable emission schedules and misaligned teams. Players were left holding worthless assets. Founders walked away intact.
Rock Game is built on a different foundation. The battle royale format is inherently deflationary in its competitive logic — not everyone wins, and token rewards are tied directly to performance. This creates a sustainable earn dynamic: tokens flow to skilled, active players, not to those who simply arrived early. The result is an economy that rewards genuine engagement and filters out mercenary capital over time.
---
## Why MetaDAO?
We chose MetaDAO's Unruggable ICO model because the structural failures of play-to-earn were not primarily game design failures — they were governance and incentive failures. Teams controlled treasuries. Insiders dumped allocations. There was no mechanism to hold anyone accountable once the raise was complete.
MetaDAO changes that. Raise proceeds are locked in an on-chain treasury governed by futarchy, where prediction markets — not the founding team — determine how capital is deployed. The project's intellectual property is assigned to a DAO LLC, giving token holders real ownership over the protocol and its future. Founder unlocks are performance-gated, meaning the team benefits only as the game grows and the token appreciates. The mechanism enforces what most projects only promise.
---
## What Token Holders Own
- **Governance over the treasury** — all major capital allocation decisions are subject to futarchy-based approval, not unilateral founder discretion.
- **A stake in the competitive economy** — token emissions, tournament structures, and prize pool mechanics are core protocol functions whose parameters are governed by the community.
- **Real IP ownership** — the DAO LLC structure ensures the game's code, assets, and infrastructure cannot be extracted or redirected by a private entity.
- **Aligned long-term incentives** — no seed-round discounts, no hidden allocations. Every participant enters at the same price.
---
## The Deal
- **High-float, fair-launch** — open participation at a single price, with no privileged early tranches or insider allocations.
- **Treasury controlled by governance from day one** — the team cannot unilaterally deploy your capital.
- **Performance-gated founder unlocks** — team rewards scale with token performance, ensuring full alignment from launch through maturity.
- **Full on-chain transparency** — every proposal, every treasury movement, every governance outcome is publicly verifiable.
---
> **In a battle royale, only the strongest survive. The same should be true of the teams building them.**
>
> Rock Game's token economy rewards players who earn it. This ICO is structured to ensure the founding team is held to the same standard — earning their upside only as the game and its community grow. Token holders are not spectators. They are co-owners of the protocol and every token that flows through it.
---
*Participate in the Rock Game ICO on MetaDAO →*
## Links
- Website: https://joe.com
## Raw Data
- Launch address: `48z3txCwsHekZ7b43mPfoB3bMcZv3GpwX7B27x2PdmTA`
- Token: 3n6 (3n6)
- Token mint: `3n6X4XRJHrkckqX21a5yJdSiGXXZo4MtEvVVsgSAmeta`
- Version: v0.7
- Total approved: $10.00
- Closed: 2026-02-26
- Completed: 2026-02-26
# Rock Game Launch on Futard.io
## Key Facts
- Rock Game raised $272 against $10 target (27.2x oversubscription)
- Launch completed within 24 hours (2026-02-25 to 2026-02-26)
- Token: 3n6, mint address: 3n6X4XRJHrkckqX21a5yJdSiGXXZo4MtEvVVsgSAmeta
- Launch address: 48z3txCwsHekZ7b43mPfoB3bMcZv3GpwX7B27x2PdmTA
- Platform: MetaDAO Unruggable ICO (futard.io)
- Game genre: Battle royale on Solana
- Website: https://joe.com
- **Launch date**: February 2026
- **Platform**: MetaDAO Futard.io
- **Raise amount**: $272 against $10 target (27.2x oversubscription)
- **Completion time**: One day
- **Project type**: Futarchy-governed play-to-earn battle royale game
- **Governance**: Futarchy-based decision making via conditional tokens
- **Tokenomics**: Performance-gated founder unlocks, deflationary battle royale mechanics
- **Vertical**: First gaming/entertainment project on MetaDAO platform
## Summary
Rock Game launched on MetaDAO's Futard.io platform as the first gaming application of futarchy governance. The project raised $272 in one day (27.2x oversubscription of $10 target), implementing battle royale mechanics designed to create deflationary token pressure. Founder tokens are designed to unlock at price milestones using TWAP settlement.
The launch page identifies play-to-earn failure modes (infinite emission, extraction exceeding inflows, misaligned incentives) and positions Rock Game's battle royale format and performance unlocks as solutions. The game has not yet launched; all mechanics are design intentions.
## Content
[Launch page describes futarchy governance structure, battle royale deflationary mechanics, performance-gated founder token unlocks, and diagnosis of play-to-earn economic failures. Includes raise metrics: $272 raised against $10 target in one day.]
## Relevance
- First gaming/entertainment vertical on MetaDAO platform
- Demonstrates futarchy application beyond DeFi and physical infrastructure
- Implements performance-unlocked tokenomics in gaming context
- Provides case study of micro-scale MetaDAO raise ($272 vs. Ranger $6M, Solomon $102.9M)
- Tests whether futarchy governance can address play-to-earn sustainability issues
## Extraction Notes
- Raise scale ($272) is orders of magnitude smaller than other MetaDAO projects
- 27.2x oversubscription indicates interest but absolute dollar amount limits generalizability
- All mechanics (deflationary battle royale, performance unlocks, futarchy governance) are untested design intentions
- No operational data available; game has not launched
- Launch materials contain project assertions about deflationary mechanics that are theoretical, not empirically validated

View file

@ -6,14 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/Aakx1gdDoNQYqiv5uoqdXx56mGr6AbZh73SWpxHrk2qF"
date: 2026-03-03
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: null-result
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
event_type: launch
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "First observed futarchy-governed wallet infrastructure project on MetaDAO platform. Failed raise provides empirical data on futarchy adoption friction for operational software vs pure capital allocation vehicles. Enriches existing claims about MetaDAO scope expansion, adoption barriers, and operational governance challenges."
---
## Launch Details
@ -204,14 +199,3 @@ Secondary:
- Token mint: `DDPW4sZT9GsSb2mSfY9Yi9EBZGnBQ2LvvJTXCpnLmeta`
- Version: v0.7
- Closed: 2026-03-04
## Key Facts
- Salmon Wallet launched on futard.io 2026-03-03 seeking $375,000
- Raised $97,535 before refunding (status: Refunding, closed 2026-03-04)
- Project active since 2022 with $122.5K prior funding (80K bootstrap, 42.5K grants)
- Planned $25,000 monthly burn rate for 12-month runway
- Token: SAL (Salmon Token)
- Launch address: Aakx1gdDoNQYqiv5uoqdXx56mGr6AbZh73SWpxHrk2qF
- Operates own Solana validator for transparent revenue
- Listed on Solana wallet adapter since 2022

View file

@ -6,14 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/GmNzSXzQ3q6UCVRpBf8PkvEqoo454Qr6twWc9zuzJzBa"
date: 2026-03-04
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: null-result
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
event_type: launch
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility.md", "myco-realms-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-physical-infrastructure-through-125k-mushroom-farm-raise-with-market-controlled-capex-deployment.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "First documented consumer food business futarchy raise. Failed within one day, providing critical data point on futarchy applicability to traditional physical businesses. Enriches existing claims on MetaDAO platform usage, reputational risk of permissionless launches, and comparison to Myco Realms physical infrastructure raise. Founder explicitly rejected crypto-native framing, positioning futarchy purely as capital formation alternative to traditional fundraising."
---
## Launch Details
@ -119,14 +114,3 @@ If that's you, welcome. Let's make crêpes.
- Token mint: `8XqLC3q6ju8Mxd33Zj92pEZsVwbbvqFd7JUbPLXSmeta`
- Version: v0.7
- Closed: 2026-03-05
## Key Facts
- Pli Crêperie Ambulante launched on futard.io 2026-03-04 targeting $350,000
- Launch reached Refunding status and closed 2026-03-05 (one day duration)
- Budget breakdown: 60k CHF truck, 8k equipment, 6k/year permits, 24k/year ingredients, 90k/year founder living, 15k buffer = ~219k CHF Phase 1
- Three-phase roadmap: food truck (months 1-12), restaurant (year 2), franchise (year 3+)
- Founder: Solutions Architect in tech, based in Zürich, not trained chef
- Market context: Zürich 430k+ residents, no dedicated crêperie food truck currently operating
- Token: 8Xq, mint address 8XqLC3q6ju8Mxd33Zj92pEZsVwbbvqFd7JUbPLXSmeta
- Launch address: GmNzSXzQ3q6UCVRpBf8PkvEqoo454Qr6twWc9zuzJzBa