Compare commits

..

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
c342dc6887 rio: extract from 2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 5)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 16:55:25 +00:00
4 changed files with 15 additions and 14 deletions

View file

@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless
- **2026-03-07** — Areal DAO launch: $50K target, raised $11,654 (23.3%), REFUNDING status by 2026-03-08 — first documented failed futarchy-governed fundraise on platform
- **2026-03-04** — [[seekervault]] fundraise launched targeting $75,000, closed next day with only $1,186 (1.6% of target) in refunding status
- **2024-11-08** — [[futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium]] passed: FutureDAO allocated 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium CLMM farm, demonstrating futarchy governing post-launch treasury operations
## Competitive Position
- **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
- **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."

View file

@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ entity_type: decision_market
name: "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium"
domain: internet-finance
status: passed
parent_entity: "[[futuredao]]"
parent_entity: "[[futardio]]"
platform: "futardio"
proposer: "proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2"
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm"
proposal_date: 2024-11-08
resolution_date: 2024-11-11
category: "treasury"
summary: "Allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to create Raydium CLMM farm for liquidity bootstrapping"
summary: "Allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium CLMM farm for liquidity bootstrapping"
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
---
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ created: 2026-03-11
# FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium
## Summary
Proposal to establish a Raydium liquidity farm for $FUTURE token, allocating 1% of total supply as rewards to incentivize liquidity providers. Uses standard Raydium CLMM architecture with $FUTURE-USDC pair, 7-90 day farming period, and ~0.1 SOL creation cost.
Proposal to establish a Raydium Concentrated Liquidity Market Maker (CLMM) farm for $FUTURE token, allocating 1% of total supply as rewards to incentivize liquidity providers. The proposal follows Raydium's standard farming template: CLMM pool paired with stablecoin (USDC), 7-90 day farming period, and approximately 0.1 SOL in operational costs.
## Market Data
- **Outcome:** Passed
@ -27,12 +27,16 @@ Proposal to establish a Raydium liquidity farm for $FUTURE token, allocating 1%
- **Proposal Account:** HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm
- **DAO Account:** ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.3
- **Duration:** 3 days (2024-11-08 to 2024-11-11)
- **Created:** 2024-11-08
- **Completed:** 2024-11-11
## Significance
Demonstrates futarchy governing routine post-launch treasury operations, not just existential decisions. FutureDAO uses conditional markets to decide standard DeFi infrastructure deployment (Raydium farms), showing futarchy DAOs adopt conventional operational scaffolding even when governance is market-based. The proposal follows Raydium's established template rather than inventing novel mechanisms.
This proposal demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations for post-launch liquidity management. FutureDAO used conditional markets to decide whether to deploy 1% of token supply to standard DeFi infrastructure (Raydium), showing futarchy applied to operational decisions beyond existential questions. The proposal's passage indicates the market believed liquidity farming would increase $FUTURE token price more than alternative uses of that 1% allocation.
The proposal also illustrates the complexity friction in futarchy adoption: a routine liquidity decision required ~1000 words of technical specification covering CLMM mechanics, fee tiers, emission rates, and implementation steps.
## Relationship to KB
- [[futuredao]] - parent entity, proposal #5
- [[raydium]] - infrastructure provider
- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] - confirms this claim
- [[futardio]] - governance platform
- [[raydium]] - liquidity infrastructure
- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] - confirms this pattern
- [[futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements]] - demonstrates proposal complexity

View file

@ -44,7 +44,3 @@ Relevant Entities:
Topics:
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
## Timeline
- **2024-11-08** — FutureDAO proposes creating CLMM farm on Raydium with 1% token allocation, demonstrating standard liquidity bootstrapping pattern for futarchy-launched projects

View file

@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal and updated parent FutureDAO entity. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal and new entity for Raydium as it's a significant infrastructure provider referenced across multiple sources. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions."
---
## Proposal Details