Compare commits
1 commit
7b7fdd9aa2
...
d1eb96ea8d
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d1eb96ea8d |
5 changed files with 23 additions and 32 deletions
|
|
@ -82,12 +82,6 @@ Futardio cult launch (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04) demonstrates MetaDAO's platform
|
|||
|
||||
(challenge) Areal's failed Futardio launch ($11,654 raised of $50K target, REFUNDING status) demonstrates that futarchy-governed fundraising does not guarantee capital formation success. The mechanism provides credible exit guarantees through market-governed liquidation and governance quality through conditional markets, but market participants still evaluate project fundamentals and team credibility. Futarchy reduces rug risk but does not eliminate market skepticism of unproven business models or early-stage teams.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-01-12-futardio-proposal-create-spot-market-for-meta]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO's third proposal (2024-01-12) initiated creation of a spot market for $META tokens through a public token sale priced at the TWAP of the passing proposal. The sale had a $75,000 hard cap with approximately $35,000 allocated to liquidity pool creation. The proposal explicitly stated that if it failed, Meta-DAO would be unable to raise funds until March 12, 2024, demonstrating the operational dependency on futarchy-governed capital formation. The proposal passed and completed on 2024-01-18.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ Autocrat is MetaDAO's core governance program on Solana -- the on-chain implemen
|
|||
|
||||
**Limitations.** [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] -- when proposals are clearly good or clearly bad, few traders participate because the expected profit from trading in a consensus market is near zero. This is a structural feature, not a bug: contested decisions get more participation precisely because they're uncertain, which is when you most need information aggregation. But it does mean uncontested proposals can pass or fail with very thin markets, making the TWAP potentially noisy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-01-12-futardio-proposal-create-spot-market-for-meta]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
The META spot market proposal demonstrates TWAP-based pricing in production: the token sale price was set at 'the TWAP of the last passing proposal' and the spot market opening price was 'to be determined, potentially higher than the initial public sale price.' This confirms TWAP settlement is used not just for proposal resolution but also for derivative pricing mechanisms like token sales.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/9ABv3Phb44BNF4VFteSi9qcWEyABdnRqko
|
|||
proposal_date: 2024-01-12
|
||||
resolution_date: 2024-01-18
|
||||
category: "fundraise"
|
||||
summary: "Proposal to create a spot market for $META tokens through public sale and liquidity pool creation"
|
||||
summary: "Proposal to create public spot market for META tokens through structured token sale and liquidity pool creation"
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
hard_cap: "$75,000"
|
||||
lp_allocation: "$35,000"
|
||||
pricing_mechanism: "TWAP of passing proposal"
|
||||
autocrat_version: "0.1"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -23,27 +24,28 @@ created: 2026-03-11
|
|||
# MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
This proposal initiated the creation of a spot market for $META tokens by conducting a public token sale priced at the TWAP of the passing proposal, with a $75,000 hard cap and $35,000 allocated to liquidity pool creation. The proposal explicitly tied MetaDAO's ability to raise capital to its passage, stating that failure would prevent fundraising until March 12, 2024.
|
||||
Proposal to initiate creation of a spot market for $META tokens through a public token sale with $75,000 hard cap, using TWAP pricing from the passing proposal, and allocating $35,000 to establish a liquidity pool. The proposal aimed to provide broader public access to META tokens and establish market liquidity, with failure meaning MetaDAO could not raise from public markets until March 12, 2024.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** HfFi634cyurmVVDr9frwu4MjGLJzz9XbAJz981HdVaNz
|
||||
- **Proposal Number:** 3
|
||||
- **DAO Account:** 7J5yieabpMoiN3LrdfJnRjQiXHgi7f47UuMnyMyR78yy
|
||||
- **Duration:** 6 days (2024-01-12 to 2024-01-18)
|
||||
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.1
|
||||
- **Created:** 2024-01-12
|
||||
- **Completed:** 2024-01-18
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Sale Structure
|
||||
- Hard cap: $75,000
|
||||
- Sale price: TWAP of the passing proposal
|
||||
- Sale quantity: Hard cap / Sale Price
|
||||
- LP allocation: ~$35,000 in $META paired with $35,000 USD
|
||||
- Additional funds reserved in $SOL for operational funding
|
||||
## Mechanism Design
|
||||
- **Sale Price:** TWAP of the passing proposal
|
||||
- **Sale Quantity:** Hard cap / Sale price
|
||||
- **Hard Cap:** $75,000
|
||||
- **LP Allocation:** ~$35,000 in META tokens paired with USD
|
||||
- **Operational Funding:** Excess funds reserved in $SOL tokens
|
||||
- **Failure Consequence:** No public market fundraising until 2024-03-12
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This proposal demonstrates futarchy-governed capital formation in practice, using conditional market pricing (TWAP) to determine token sale terms. The explicit dependency on proposal passage for fundraising capability shows how futarchy mechanisms directly control treasury operations and capital access. The proposal also reveals operational constraints: MetaDAO structured its governance calendar such that proposal failure would create a two-month fundraising blackout period.
|
||||
This proposal represents MetaDAO's transition from governance-only token to publicly tradeable asset with structured liquidity. The use of TWAP pricing from the futarchy decision itself as the sale price mechanism demonstrates recursive application of futarchy principles—the market that decides whether to create the spot market also determines the initial sale price. The explicit failure consequence (3-month fundraising lockout) created meaningful downside risk for the futarchy decision.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - third governance proposal, first fundraising proposal
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] - demonstrates TWAP-based token sale pricing
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] - confirms TWAP settlement mechanism in production use
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - third governance proposal, established public market access
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] - demonstrates MetaDAO's own capital formation using futarchy
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] - confirms TWAP settlement mechanism in practice
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-01-12** — [[metadao-create-spot-market-for-meta]] passed: Initiated $META spot market creation through $75K token sale with TWAP-based pricing
|
||||
- **2024-01-12** — [[metadao-create-spot-market-for-meta]] passed: Approved creation of public spot market for META tokens with $75K hard cap and TWAP-based pricing
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ processed_by: rio
|
|||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Proposal data extracted as decision_market entity. No new claims warranted - the proposal demonstrates existing futarchy mechanisms (TWAP pricing, conditional markets) rather than introducing novel insights. Enriched two existing claims with production evidence of TWAP-based pricing and capital formation mechanics."
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted decision_market entity for MetaDAO's third proposal establishing public spot market for META tokens. No new claims warranted—the proposal demonstrates existing futarchy mechanisms in practice rather than introducing novel mechanism insights. Enriched two existing claims with concrete evidence of TWAP pricing and MetaDAO's capital formation progression. The recursive use of futarchy to price its own token sale is notable but already covered by existing claims about MetaDAO's implementation."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ The proposal invites futards to actively participate in shaping the future of th
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO proposal 3 had hard cap of $75,000 with $35,000 allocated to LP creation (2024-01-12)
|
||||
- Proposal used TWAP of passing proposal to determine token sale price
|
||||
- Proposal failure would have prevented MetaDAO fundraising until March 12, 2024
|
||||
- Proposal passed and completed on 2024-01-18
|
||||
- MetaDAO proposal 3 had hard cap of $75,000 for META token sale (2024-01-12)
|
||||
- MetaDAO allocated $35,000 to liquidity pool creation from token sale proceeds
|
||||
- Proposal failure would have prevented MetaDAO from raising funds until 2024-03-12
|
||||
- MetaDAO Autocrat version 0.1 was used for this proposal
|
||||
- Proposal completed in 6 days (2024-01-12 to 2024-01-18)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue