auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #295

- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>

domains/internet-finance/defi-agent-strategy-immutability-prevents-post-trust-manipulation-by-locking-logic-after-track-record-establishment.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+type: claim
+claim_title: DeFi agent strategy immutability prevents post-trust manipulation by locking logic after track record establishment
+confidence: speculative
+domains: [internet-finance]
+secondary_domains: [living-agents]
+created: 2026-03-05
+processed_date: 2026-03-05
+---
+
+# DeFi agent strategy immutability prevents post-trust manipulation by locking logic after track record establishment
+
+Runbook.ai proposes that DeFi agent strategies should become immutable after establishing a track record, preventing creators from modifying logic after users have committed capital based on historical performance. This addresses the principal-agent problem where strategy creators could exploit trust by changing behavior after attracting deposits.
+
+While smart contract immutability is standard in DeFi protocols (e.g., Uniswap pools, Compound markets), applying this to agent *strategies* (which typically remain under creator control) represents a different trust model. The novelty is not immutability itself, but its application to strategy logic that users rent based on past performance.
+
+The mechanism combines:
+- Immutable strategy logic (no post-deployment changes)
+- TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) execution for verifiable computation
+- Performance-based discovery (users select strategies by track record)
+- Revenue sharing between strategy creators and users
+
+## Critical implementation gaps
+
+The proposal doesn't address:
+- How strategies handle protocol upgrades or security patches
+- Whether immutability applies to parameter tuning or only core logic
+- Sybil resistance (creators launching many strategies, hiding failures)
+- Migration paths when underlying DeFi protocols change
+
+## Evidence and context
+
+Runbook.ai attempted to raise $350,000 through a futarchy mechanism but achieved only $3,600 in commitments, suggesting limited market validation of the model.
+
+The immutability constraint trades adaptability for credibility—strategies cannot evolve with market conditions, but users gain certainty about what they're renting.
+
+## Related concepts
+
+- [[core/mechanisms/_map|Mechanism design patterns]]
+- [[core/living-agents/_map|Living agents overview]]
+- [[core/internet-finance/_map|Internet finance systems]]
+
+## Source
+
+Extracted from [[2026-03-05-futardio-launch-runbookai|Futardio launch announcement]] (2026-03-05)

domains/internet-finance/runbookai-creates-marketplace-for-rentable-defi-agent-strategies-with-immutable-logic-and-tee-execution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+---
+type: claim
+claim_title: Runbook.ai creates marketplace for rentable DeFi agent strategies with immutable logic and TEE execution
+confidence: speculative
+domains: [internet-finance]
+secondary_domains: [living-agents]
+created: 2026-03-05
+processed_date: 2026-03-05
+---
+
+# Runbook.ai creates marketplace for rentable DeFi agent strategies with immutable logic and TEE execution
+
+Runbook.ai proposes a marketplace where users can rent DeFi agent strategies from creators, with strategy logic locked as immutable and executed in Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). Users maintain custody of their funds while paying creators a percentage of returns.
+
+The model attempts to solve the DeFi strategy trust problem: users want to benefit from sophisticated trading strategies without surrendering custody or trusting creators to maintain advertised behavior.
+
+## Key architectural claims
+
+1. **Immutable strategies**: Once deployed, strategy logic cannot be modified by creators
+2. **TEE execution**: Strategies run in hardware-isolated environments for verifiable computation
+3. **Non-custodial**: Users retain control of funds while strategies execute trades
+4. **Performance-based selection**: Users choose strategies based on historical track records
+5. **Revenue sharing**: Creators earn percentage of profits rather than fixed fees
+
+## Market validation concerns
+
+Runbook.ai attempted to raise $350,000 through a futarchy mechanism (conditional prediction markets) but achieved only $3,600 in commitments—a 99% shortfall. This suggests either:
+- Limited confidence in the marketplace model
+- Skepticism about futarchy as a fundraising mechanism
+- Insufficient market demand for rentable DeFi strategies
+- Poor execution of the raise itself
+
+The failed raise is a significant negative signal about market appetite for this approach.
+
+## Unresolved questions
+
+- How do immutable strategies handle protocol upgrades or security patches?
+- What prevents creators from launching many strategies and hiding failures (Sybil problem)?
+- How does TEE execution interact with blockchain state verification?
+- What happens when underlying DeFi protocols change their interfaces?
+
+## Related concepts
+
+- [[core/mechanisms/_map|Mechanism design patterns]]
+- [[core/living-agents/_map|Living agents overview]]
+- [[core/internet-finance/_map|Internet finance systems]]
+
+## Source
+
+Extracted from [[2026-03-05-futardio-launch-runbookai|Futardio launch announcement]] (2026-03-05)

inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-runbookai.md

@@ -6,9 +6,15 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/9DfNVpcDm6x1GXUa8wik8YVZhiw7dTmmhefVBWVZuAg8"
 date: 2026-03-05
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
 event_type: launch
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+claims_extracted: ["runbookai-creates-marketplace-for-rentable-defi-agent-strategies-with-immutable-logic-and-tee-execution.md", "defi-agent-strategy-immutability-prevents-post-trust-manipulation-by-locking-logic-after-track-record-establishment.md"]
+enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md", "living-agents-that-earn-revenue-share-across-their-portfolio-can-become-more-valuable-than-any-single-portfolio-company-because-the-agent-aggregates-returns-while-companies-capture-only-their-own.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims about RunBookAI's marketplace architecture and immutability mechanism, both rated experimental/speculative due to failed raise and lack of product evidence. Applied three enrichments: MetaDAO platform usage (concrete failure case), futarchy adoption friction (confirms complexity barrier), and portfolio aggregation value (extends revenue model pattern). The dramatic funding failure ($3,600 of $350,000) is the most significant signal—suggests either poor market fit or ineffective value communication to futarchy-native investors."
 ---
 
 ## Launch Details
@@ -107,3 +113,12 @@ Remote On-device agents,  creator SDK, institutional tier.
 - Token mint: `pMFWrTS9E6btgjLyxNc3AGi74QqvG88GV2vVrLJmeta`
 - Version: v0.7
 - Closed: 2026-03-06
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- RunBookAI launched on futard.io 2026-03-05 seeking $350,000
+- Raise reached only $3,600 in commitments before refunding
+- Launch address: 9DfNVpcDm6x1GXUa8wik8YVZhiw7dTmmhefVBWVZuAg8
+- Token: pMF, mint: pMFWrTS9E6btgjLyxNc3AGi74QqvG88GV2vVrLJmeta
+- Roadmap: Q2 2026 creator tools, Q3 2026 backtesting, Q4 2026 marketplace launch, Q1 2027+ scale
+- Revenue model: agent setup fees (creators), performance splits (renters), platform fees (both)