auto-fix: strip 5 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

domains/entertainment/ai-filmmaking-enables-solo-production-but-practitioners-retain-collaboration-voluntarily-revealing-community-value-exceeds-efficiency-gains.md

@@ -10,17 +10,8 @@ agent: clay
 scope: causal
 sourcer: TechCrunch
 related_claims: ["[[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]]", "[[non-ATL production costs will converge with the cost of compute as AI replaces labor across the production chain]]", "[[human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant]]"]
-related:
-- AI filmmaking is developing institutional community validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach
-- AI narrative filmmaking breakthrough will be a filmmaker using AI tools not pure AI automation
-- Community building is more valuable than individual film brands in AI-enabled filmmaking because audience is the sustainable asset
-- AI Director multi-shot generation removes manual assembly as the primary workflow barrier for AI narrative filmmaking
-- ai-filmmaking-enables-solo-production-but-practitioners-retain-collaboration-voluntarily-revealing-community-value-exceeds-efficiency-gains
-reweave_edges:
-- AI filmmaking is developing institutional community validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach|related|2026-04-17
-- AI narrative filmmaking breakthrough will be a filmmaker using AI tools not pure AI automation|related|2026-04-17
-- Community building is more valuable than individual film brands in AI-enabled filmmaking because audience is the sustainable asset|related|2026-04-17
-- AI Director multi-shot generation removes manual assembly as the primary workflow barrier for AI narrative filmmaking|related|2026-04-29
+related: ["AI filmmaking is developing institutional community validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach", "AI narrative filmmaking breakthrough will be a filmmaker using AI tools not pure AI automation", "Community building is more valuable than individual film brands in AI-enabled filmmaking because audience is the sustainable asset", "AI Director multi-shot generation removes manual assembly as the primary workflow barrier for AI narrative filmmaking", "ai-filmmaking-enables-solo-production-but-practitioners-retain-collaboration-voluntarily-revealing-community-value-exceeds-efficiency-gains"]
+reweave_edges: ["AI filmmaking is developing institutional community validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach|related|2026-04-17", "AI narrative filmmaking breakthrough will be a filmmaker using AI tools not pure AI automation|related|2026-04-17", "Community building is more valuable than individual film brands in AI-enabled filmmaking because audience is the sustainable asset|related|2026-04-17", "AI Director multi-shot generation removes manual assembly as the primary workflow barrier for AI narrative filmmaking|related|2026-04-29"]
 ---
 
 # AI filmmaking enables solo production but practitioners retain collaboration voluntarily, revealing community value exceeds efficiency gains
@@ -31,4 +22,4 @@ Multiple independent filmmakers interviewed after using generative AI tools to r
 
 **Source:** PSKY 'Three Pillars' strategy, 2026
 
-PSKY uses AI for 'script development, casting, VFX, real-time rendering and data-driven creative decisions' as efficiency mechanism within traditional studio structure, not as enabler of distributed community production. This represents the corporate AI adoption path (efficiency/cost reduction) versus the community AI adoption path (enabling distributed creation).
+PSKY uses AI for 'script development, casting, VFX, real-time rendering and data-driven creative decisions' as efficiency mechanism within traditional studio structure, not as enabler of distributed community production. This represents the corporate AI adoption path (efficiency/cost reduction) versus the community AI adoption path (enabling distributed creation).

domains/entertainment/millennial-franchise-ip-has-structural-demographic-ceiling-among-gen-z-because-formative-community-experiences-did-not-occur.md

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: entertainment
-description: Harry Potter, Marvel, and similar franchises achieved Millennial dominance through culturally formative events (midnight releases, collective theatrical premieres) that Gen Z never experienced, creating a qualitative relationship gap beyond marketing reach
-confidence: experimental
-source: YPulse March 2026, Morning Consult demographic data
-created: 2026-04-29
-title: Millennial-era franchise IP has a structural demographic ceiling among Gen Z because the formative community experiences that created Millennial franchise fandom did not occur for Gen Z
-agent: clay
-sourced_from: entertainment/2026-04-29-ypulse-gen-z-franchise-care-harry-potter-marvel-demographic.md
-scope: structural
-sourcer: YPulse
-supports: ["ideological-adoption-is-a-complex-contagion-requiring-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-sources-not-simple-viral-spread-through-weak-ties"]
-related: ["ideological-adoption-is-a-complex-contagion-requiring-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-sources-not-simple-viral-spread-through-weak-ties", "information-cascades-create-power-law-distributions-in-culture-because-consumers-use-popularity-as-quality-signal-when-choice-is-overwhelming"]
----
-
-# Millennial-era franchise IP has a structural demographic ceiling among Gen Z because the formative community experiences that created Millennial franchise fandom did not occur for Gen Z
-
-YPulse's March 2026 analysis frames the generational franchise gap as 'does Gen Z even care' rather than 'does Gen Z love it less,' suggesting a qualitative difference in relationship rather than quantitative affinity decline. Morning Consult data shows Gen Z adults at 15% avid Harry Potter fans versus Millennials far above all other generations (Gen X 19%, Boomers 14%). The mechanism is timing-based: Millennials experienced Harry Potter's 1998-2011 cultural arc as formative events—midnight book releases, packed movie premieres, years of culturally built hype—while Gen Z encountered the same IP as established legacy content without the collective community-building moments. YPulse notes 'interest in franchise products has steadily declined over the years' and applies the same pattern across Marvel and Jurassic Park. This is not a marketing problem but a structural timing gap: the multiple reinforcing exposures that form complex contagion-based fandom never occurred for Gen Z in their formative years. The upcoming Harry Potter TV show on MAX represents a natural test case—if it successfully reactivates Gen Z community formation, it would challenge this structural ceiling thesis.

domains/internet-finance/cftc-dcm-preemption-scope-excludes-unregistered-platforms.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ sourced_from: internet-finance/2026-04-24-cftc-9219-26-massachusetts-sjc-amicus-
 scope: structural
 sourcer: CFTC
 supports: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets", "futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse"]
-related: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets", "futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse", "dcm-field-preemption-protects-all-contracts-on-registered-platforms-regardless-of-type", "cftc-dcm-preemption-scope-excludes-unregistered-platforms", "cftc-state-supreme-court-amicus-signals-multi-jurisdictional-defense-strategy", "38-state-ag-coalition-signals-prediction-market-federalism-not-partisanship", "cftc-arizona-tro-formalizes-dcm-preemption-two-tier-structure"]
+related: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets", "futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse", "dcm-field-preemption-protects-all-contracts-on-registered-platforms-regardless-of-type", "cftc-dcm-preemption-scope-excludes-unregistered-platforms", "cftc-state-supreme-court-amicus-signals-multi-jurisdictional-defense-strategy", "38-state-ag-coalition-signals-prediction-market-federalism-not-partisanship"]
 ---
 
 # CFTC preemption defense explicitly excludes unregistered prediction market platforms from federal protection
@@ -24,10 +24,3 @@ The CFTC's Massachusetts SJC amicus brief exclusively addresses 'CFTC-regulated
 **Source:** Arizona District Court TRO, April 10, 2026
 
 Arizona TRO explicitly limited to 'CFTC-regulated DCMs' with court reasoning premised on CEA exclusive jurisdiction over 'federally registered' derivatives platforms. No extension to non-registered on-chain protocols. Court's reasoning makes the two-tier structure MORE explicit by predicating preemption on federal registration status.
-
-
-## Supporting Evidence
-
-**Source:** CFTC Wisconsin filing April 28, 2026
-
-CFTC's Wisconsin lawsuit (April 28, 2026) defends Kalshi and Polymarket—both DCM-registered platforms. The federal preemption argument explicitly relies on Congress giving CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over derivatives traded on registered exchanges. Unregistered platforms remain outside the preemption scope.

domains/internet-finance/cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets.md

@@ -377,10 +377,3 @@ CFTC Massachusetts SJC amicus brief explicitly scopes preemption argument to 'fe
 **Source:** CFTC-9211-26, Arizona TRO order, April 10, 2026
 
 U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona granted TRO on April 10, 2026, finding CFTC 'likely to succeed on the merits' of CEA preemption against Arizona gambling laws. Court explicitly limited scope to 'CFTC-regulated DCMs' and premised reasoning on 'federally registered' platform status. This is the first federal district court merits assessment confirming DCM preemption likely succeeds.
-
-
-## Supporting Evidence
-
-**Source:** U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, CFTC-9211-26
-
-Arizona TRO (April 10, 2026) provides first federal district court finding that CEA preemption is 'likely to succeed on the merits' against state gambling enforcement, explicitly limited to CFTC-registered DCMs. Court reasoning is predicated on platforms being 'federally regulated markets,' creating formal judicial confirmation of the two-tier structure.

domains/internet-finance/cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ agent: rio
 scope: functional
 sourcer: CNBC
 supports: ["executive-branch-offensive-litigation-creates-preemption-through-simultaneous-multi-state-suits-not-defensive-case-law"]
-related: ["Democratic demand for CFTC enforcement of existing war-bet rules creates a regulatory dilemma where enforcing expands offshore jurisdiction while refusing creates political ammunition", "cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense", "executive-branch-offensive-litigation-creates-preemption-through-simultaneous-multi-state-suits-not-defensive-case-law", "bipartisan-prediction-market-legislation-threatens-cftc-preemption-through-congressional-redefinition", "state-prediction-market-enforcement-extends-to-federally-licensed-exchanges-creating-institutional-exposure-beyond-specialized-platforms", "cftc-state-supreme-court-amicus-signals-multi-jurisdictional-defense-strategy", "bipartisan-state-ag-coalition-signals-near-consensus-opposition-to-cftc-prediction-market-preemption", "cftc-arizona-tro-formalizes-dcm-preemption-two-tier-structure"]
+related: ["Democratic demand for CFTC enforcement of existing war-bet rules creates a regulatory dilemma where enforcing expands offshore jurisdiction while refusing creates political ammunition", "cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense", "executive-branch-offensive-litigation-creates-preemption-through-simultaneous-multi-state-suits-not-defensive-case-law", "bipartisan-prediction-market-legislation-threatens-cftc-preemption-through-congressional-redefinition", "state-prediction-market-enforcement-extends-to-federally-licensed-exchanges-creating-institutional-exposure-beyond-specialized-platforms", "cftc-state-supreme-court-amicus-signals-multi-jurisdictional-defense-strategy", "bipartisan-state-ag-coalition-signals-near-consensus-opposition-to-cftc-prediction-market-preemption"]
 reweave_edges: ["Democratic demand for CFTC enforcement of existing war-bet rules creates a regulatory dilemma where enforcing expands offshore jurisdiction while refusing creates political ammunition|related|2026-04-18", "Executive branch offensive litigation creates preemption through simultaneous multi-state suits not defensive case-law|supports|2026-04-18"]
 ---
 
@@ -135,10 +135,3 @@ CFTC filing in state supreme court (Massachusetts SJC) extends the pattern of ac
 **Source:** CFTC-9208-26 (filing), CFTC-9211-26 (TRO grant)
 
 Arizona TRO is the first affirmative CFTC federal court win blocking a state criminal case specifically. Filed April 2, granted April 10 — 8-day turnaround from filing to TRO grant. This is the fastest judicial confirmation in the 5-state litigation campaign (AZ, CT, IL, NY, WI).
-
-
-## Supporting Evidence
-
-**Source:** CFTC Press Release 9211-26, April 10, 2026
-
-Arizona TRO granted 8 days after CFTC filed suit (April 2), demonstrating rapid federal court intervention to block state criminal proceedings. This is the first TRO win in the 5-state litigation campaign, showing federal courts willing to issue emergency relief to protect DCM-registered platforms from state enforcement.

domains/internet-finance/cftc-same-day-counter-filing-signals-institutionalized-enforcement-machinery.md

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: internet-finance
-description: The acceleration from days-to-weeks response time (April 2) to same-day response (April 28) indicates CFTC has standing legal templates and real-time state filing monitoring
-confidence: likely
-source: CoinDesk Policy / The Hill / Courthouse News, CFTC filing timeline April 2-28, 2026
-created: 2026-04-29
-title: CFTC same-day counter-filing signals institutionalized enforcement machinery where any state action triggers immediate federal response
-agent: rio
-sourced_from: internet-finance/2026-04-28-cftc-sues-wisconsin-fifth-state-prediction-markets.md
-scope: structural
-sourcer: CoinDesk Policy / The Hill / Courthouse News
-supports: ["prediction-market-scotus-cert-likely-by-early-2027-because-three-circuit-litigation-pattern-creates-formal-split-by-summer-2026-and-34-state-amicus-participation-signals-federalism-stakes-justify-review"]
-related: ["cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense", "preemptive-federal-litigation-creates-jurisdictional-shield-against-state-prediction-market-enforcement"]
----
-
-# CFTC same-day counter-filing signals institutionalized enforcement machinery where any state action triggers immediate federal response
-
-The CFTC filed its Wisconsin lawsuit on April 28, 2026, the same day as the first news cycle coverage of Wisconsin AG Josh Kaul's April 23-24 enforcement actions. This represents a dramatic acceleration from the April 2 filings, which responded to state actions from October-March with a multi-week lag. The same-day response time suggests three institutional developments: (1) CFTC has standing legal response templates ready for immediate deployment, (2) CFTC or regulated platforms (Kalshi/Polymarket) are monitoring state court filings in real time, and (3) the federal counter-filing process has been streamlined to the point of automation. This creates a ratchet effect where every state enforcement action simultaneously amplifies both the federal preemption campaign and state resistance, accelerating the conflict toward SCOTUS resolution. The response timing itself is evidence that the CFTC views this as a systematic jurisdictional defense campaign, not case-by-case litigation.

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control.md

@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
 ---
+description: The legal argument for why futarchic capital vehicles differ from traditional securities -- emergent ownership, market-driven decisions, and raise-then-propose structure create layers of separation between the fundraise and the investment target
 type: claim
 domain: internet-finance
-description: The legal argument for why futarchic capital vehicles differ from traditional securities -- emergent ownership, market-driven decisions, and raise-then-propose structure create layers of separation between the fundraise and the investment target
-confidence: experimental
-source: LivingIP Master Plan
 created: 2026-02-28
-related: ["governance-first-capital-second-sequencing-prevents-token-capture-of-protocol-development-because-early-capital-injection-selects-for-financialized-governance-participants", "futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control", "futarchy enables trustless joint ownership by forcing dissenters to be bought out through pass markets", "Living Capital vehicles likely fail the Howey test for securities classification because the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision eliminates the efforts of others prong"]
-reweave_edges: ["governance-first-capital-second-sequencing-prevents-token-capture-of-protocol-development-because-early-capital-injection-selects-for-financialized-governance-participants|related|2026-04-18"]
+confidence: experimental
+source: "LivingIP Master Plan"
+related:
+- governance-first-capital-second-sequencing-prevents-token-capture-of-protocol-development-because-early-capital-injection-selects-for-financialized-governance-participants
+reweave_edges:
+- governance-first-capital-second-sequencing-prevents-token-capture-of-protocol-development-because-early-capital-injection-selects-for-financialized-governance-participants|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control
@@ -44,10 +46,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 
 Topics:
 - [[maps/internet finance and decision markets]]
-- [[maps/LivingIP architecture]]
-
-## Supporting Evidence
-
-**Source:** CFTC 5-state litigation campaign April 2-28, 2026
-
-5-state CFTC campaign (April 2-28, 2026) confirms enforcement scope is precisely bounded to centralized commercial platforms with sports/election event contracts. No state enforcement action across 7+ state lawsuits has named decentralized governance protocols or on-chain futarchy markets, confirming MetaDAO's structural irrelevance to enforcement targets.
+- [[maps/LivingIP architecture]]

domains/internet-finance/state-prediction-market-enforcement-exclusively-targets-sports-centralized-platforms-seven-state-pattern.md

@@ -12,16 +12,9 @@ scope: structural
 sourcer: Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul
 supports: ["metadao-twap-settlement-excludes-event-contract-definition-through-endogenous-price-mechanism"]
 challenges: ["futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse"]
-related: ["metadao-twap-settlement-excludes-event-contract-definition-through-endogenous-price-mechanism", "futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse", "prediction-market-concentrated-user-base-creates-political-vulnerability-through-volume-familiarity-gap", "state-prediction-market-enforcement-extends-to-federally-licensed-exchanges-creating-institutional-exposure-beyond-specialized-platforms", "state-prediction-market-enforcement-exclusively-targets-sports-centralized-platforms-seven-state-pattern"]
+related: ["metadao-twap-settlement-excludes-event-contract-definition-through-endogenous-price-mechanism", "futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse", "prediction-market-concentrated-user-base-creates-political-vulnerability-through-volume-familiarity-gap", "state-prediction-market-enforcement-extends-to-federally-licensed-exchanges-creating-institutional-exposure-beyond-specialized-platforms"]
 ---
 
 # State prediction market enforcement exclusively targets sports event contracts on centralized platforms across seven-state pattern
 
 Wisconsin's April 25, 2026 complaint targets sports event contracts and political election contracts on five centralized platforms (Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Coinbase, Crypto.com). The complaint contains zero reference to on-chain protocols, futarchy governance markets, decentralized governance mechanisms, MetaDAO, or endogenous-price-settled conditional markets. This maintains a perfect seven-state pattern where every state enforcement action (Wisconsin is the 7th) has exclusively targeted the same subset: sports event contracts on centralized commercial platforms. The pattern holds across different legal theories—Wisconsin adds IGRA tribal gaming exclusivity, but still only applies it to sports contracts. MetaDAO's TWAP governance markets fall entirely outside Wisconsin's complaint definition of regulated activity. The consistency suggests state enforcement is driven by competition with regulated gambling (tribal and commercial) rather than principled opposition to prediction market mechanisms generally. The five-defendant simultaneous targeting (versus the typical 'lead with Kalshi' approach) indicates Wisconsin treats this as market-structure competition with tribal gaming, not platform-specific compliance failure. The pattern's durability across seven states with different political compositions and legal theories suggests structural rather than contingent targeting.
-
-
-## Supporting Evidence
-
-**Source:** Wisconsin AG enforcement April 23-24, 2026
-
-Wisconsin enforcement (April 23-24, 2026) targets Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Coinbase, and Crypto.com—all centralized commercial platforms. No mention of decentralized governance protocols, on-chain futarchy markets, or unregistered protocols. This extends the pattern to 7+ state actions with zero decentralized protocol citations.

domains/internet-finance/third-circuit-ruling-creates-first-federal-appellate-precedent-for-cftc-preemption-of-state-gambling-laws.md

@@ -59,10 +59,3 @@ The 3rd Circuit precedent is now one side of an emerging circuit split with the
 **Source:** Arizona District Court TRO, CFTC-9211-26
 
 Arizona TRO (April 10, 2026) provides district court confirmation at preliminary merits standard, complementing the 3rd Circuit preliminary injunction (April 7). CFTC now has two levels of federal judicial support for DCM preemption — appellate and district — both explicitly scoped to registered platforms.
-
-
-## Extending Evidence
-
-**Source:** U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, CFTC-9211-26
-
-Arizona TRO (April 10, 2026) adds district court TRO-level confirmation to the 3rd Circuit preliminary injunction (April 7), creating two-level federal judicial support for DCM preemption. Both rulings explicitly scope protection to registered platforms, formalizing the two-tier regulatory structure.

domains/internet-finance/tribal-gaming-igra-creates-independent-enforcement-motivation-beyond-gambling-prohibition.md

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: internet-finance
-description: Wisconsin's enforcement timing (weeks after legalizing tribal sports betting) reveals economic protection motive distinct from moral gambling opposition
-confidence: experimental
-source: Wisconsin AG enforcement April 23-24, 2026; Oneida Nation statement; Gov. Evers tribal compact law
-created: 2026-04-29
-title: Tribal gaming IGRA exclusivity creates independent enforcement motivation beyond gambling prohibition where prediction markets threaten newly legalized tribal sports betting compacts
-agent: rio
-sourced_from: internet-finance/2026-04-28-cftc-sues-wisconsin-fifth-state-prediction-markets.md
-scope: causal
-sourcer: CoinDesk Policy / The Hill / Courthouse News
-challenges: ["38-state-ag-coalition-signals-prediction-market-federalism-not-partisanship"]
-related: ["tribal-gaming-igra-creates-federal-prediction-market-enforcement-independent-of-dodd-frank", "cftc-prediction-market-preemption-eliminates-tribal-gaming-exclusivity-by-removing-state-compact-authority", "tribal-sovereignty-creates-third-dimension-legal-challenge-to-prediction-markets", "prediction-market-concentrated-user-base-creates-political-vulnerability-through-volume-familiarity-gap", "state-prediction-market-enforcement-exclusively-targets-sports-centralized-platforms-seven-state-pattern"]
----
-
-# Tribal gaming IGRA exclusivity creates independent enforcement motivation beyond gambling prohibition where prediction markets threaten newly legalized tribal sports betting compacts
-
-Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers signed a law legalizing online sports betting through tribal compacts just weeks before AG Josh Kaul filed enforcement actions against Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Coinbase, and Crypto.com. The Oneida Nation issued a statement supporting the AG lawsuit, citing IGRA-protected tribal gaming exclusivity concerns. This creates a distinct enforcement motivation: prediction markets offering sports contracts undercut BOTH the newly legalized tribal sports betting market AND the state's newly passed regulatory framework. The tribal gaming economic stake is independent of traditional anti-gambling moral arguments—it's about protecting a specific economic arrangement (tribal exclusivity) that was just codified in state law. This suggests state enforcement actions may be driven by economic protection of specific constituencies (tribal gaming operators) rather than generalized gambling prohibition, which has implications for the federal preemption argument. If states are enforcing to protect specific economic arrangements rather than public morals, the Dodd-Frank preemption argument becomes stronger because Congress explicitly intended to prevent state-by-state economic protectionism in derivatives markets.

entities/internet-finance/oneida-nation.md

@@ -1,28 +1,21 @@
-# Oneida Nation
+# Oneida Nation of Wisconsin
 
-**Type:** Tribal Gaming Operator  
-**Jurisdiction:** Wisconsin  
-**Domain:** internet-finance  
-**Status:** Active
+**Type:** Federally recognized tribe  
+**Gaming:** Class III gaming compact with Wisconsin  
+**Legal Status:** Sovereign nation with IGRA-protected gaming exclusivity  
 
 ## Overview
 
-The Oneida Nation is a federally recognized Native American tribe operating gaming facilities in Wisconsin under IGRA (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) protections. The tribe holds exclusive gaming rights through state-tribal compacts.
+The Oneida Nation of Wisconsin is a federally recognized tribe with Class III gaming compact granting exclusivity over specific gaming activities in Wisconsin under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).
+
+## Prediction Market Litigation
+
+On April 25, 2026, the Oneida Nation became the first tribal gaming entity to join as co-plaintiff (not just amicus) in state prediction market enforcement action. Joined Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul in lawsuit against Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Coinbase, and Crypto.com.
+
+### Legal Theory
+
+Prediction markets offering sports event contracts allegedly infringe on Class III gaming compact exclusivity protected under IGRA. This creates federal law enforcement pathway independent of state gambling classification arguments.
 
 ## Timeline
 
-- **2026-04-24** — Issued statement supporting Wisconsin AG lawsuit against prediction market platforms, citing IGRA-protected tribal gaming exclusivity concerns threatened by sports betting contracts on Kalshi, Polymarket, and other platforms
-
-## Regulatory Position
-
-The Oneida Nation views prediction market platforms offering sports contracts as undermining tribal gaming exclusivity established through state compacts. This creates economic motivation for state enforcement independent of traditional anti-gambling arguments.
-
-## Related Entities
-
-- Wisconsin AG (enforcement partner)
-- Kalshi (enforcement target)
-- Polymarket (enforcement target)
-
-## Tags
-
-#tribal-gaming #igra #wisconsin #prediction-markets #enforcement
+- **2026-04-25** — Joined as co-plaintiff in Wisconsin AG prediction market enforcement action

inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-04-10-cftc-arizona-tro-prediction-markets-dcm-preemption.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ secondary_domains: []
 format: regulatory-filing
 status: processed
 processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2026-04-29
+processed_date: 2026-04-28
 priority: high
 tags: [prediction-markets, cftc, preemption, arizona, tro, dcm, regulatory]
 intake_tier: research-task

inbox/queue/2026-04-28-cftc-sues-wisconsin-fifth-state-prediction-markets.md

@@ -7,13 +7,10 @@ date: 2026-04-28
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news-article
-status: processed
-processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2026-04-29
+status: unprocessed
 priority: high
 tags: [prediction-markets, cftc, wisconsin, preemption, tribal-gaming, kalshi, regulatory-campaign]
 intake_tier: research-task
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-04-29-ypulse-gen-z-franchise-care-harry-potter-marvel-demographic.md

@@ -7,13 +7,10 @@ date: 2026-03-16
 domain: entertainment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: processed
-processed_by: clay
-processed_date: 2026-04-29
+status: unprocessed
 priority: high
 tags: [Gen-Z, Harry-Potter, Marvel, franchise-IP, demographics, fandom, audience-data]
 intake_tier: research-task
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content