Compare commits

..

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
3b1537b799 extract: 2021-02-00-mckinsey-facility-to-home-265-billion-shift 2026-03-15 17:48:13 +00:00
18 changed files with 14 additions and 241 deletions

View file

@ -27,12 +27,6 @@ The facility closures in 43 states indicate the crisis has moved beyond "shortag
None identified. This is a descriptive claim about measured workforce conditions across all 50 states.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2021-02-00-mckinsey-facility-to-home-265-billion-shift]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
The 3-4x expansion in home-based care required to reach $265B by 2025 will intensify caregiver workforce shortages. Home health is already the fastest-growing RPM segment (25.3% CAGR), but workforce availability is the binding constraint on facility-to-home migration speed. Technology can enable remote monitoring but cannot fully replace in-person caregiving for activities of daily living.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ This facility-to-home migration is the physical infrastructure layer of [[the he
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2021-02-00-mckinsey-facility-to-home-265-billion-shift]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
The $265B projection represents a 3-4x increase from current ~$65B baseline, requiring massive expansion of home health workforce and technology infrastructure. Services that can shift include: already feasible (primary care, outpatient specialist consults, hospice, behavioral health) and stitchable capabilities requiring technology enablement (dialysis, post-acute care, long-term care, infusions). The gap between current and projected capacity is as large as the entire VBC payment transition.
Johns Hopkins hospital-at-home demonstrates 19-30% cost savings vs. in-hospital care, while home care for heart failure patients shows 52% lower costs. The shift requires 3-4x increase in home care capacity from current $65B baseline to $265B by 2025. Key enabling services include dialysis, post-acute care, long-term care, and infusions—all now technically feasible for home delivery.
---

View file

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The atoms-to-bits conversion happens at the patient's home ([[healthcares defens
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2021-02-00-mckinsey-facility-to-home-265-billion-shift]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
RPM market projected to grow from $29B to $138B (2024-2033) at 19% CAGR, with AI in RPM growing $2B to $8.4B (2024-2030) at 27.5% CAGR. Home healthcare is the fastest-growing RPM end-use segment at 25.3% CAGR. 71M Americans expected to use RPM by 2025. This technology stack growth directly enables the $265B facility-to-home care migration.
RPM market projected to grow from $29B to $138B (2024-2033) at 19% CAGR, with AI in RPM growing $2B to $8.4B (2024-2030) at 27.5% CAGR. Home healthcare is the fastest-growing RPM end-use segment at 25.3% CAGR. 71M Americans expected to use RPM by 2025. This technology stack directly enables the $265B facility-to-home care migration.
---

View file

@ -65,18 +65,6 @@ Sanctum's Wonder proposal (2frDGSg1frwBeh3bc6R7XKR2wckyMTt6pGXLGLPgoota, created
Dean's List DAO proposal (DgXa6gy7nAFFWe8VDkiReQYhqe1JSYQCJWUBV8Mm6aM) used Autocrat v0.3 with 3-day trading period and 3% TWAP threshold. Proposal completed 2024-06-25 with failed status. This provides concrete implementation data: small DAOs (FDV $123K) can deploy Autocrat with custom TWAP thresholds (3% vs. typical higher thresholds), but low absolute dollar amounts may be insufficient to attract trader participation even when percentage returns are favorable.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2023-12-03-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v01]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
Autocrat v0.1 made the three-day window configurable rather than hardcoded, with the proposer stating it was 'most importantly' designed to 'allow for quicker feedback loops.' The proposal passed with 990K META migrated, demonstrating community acceptance of parameterized proposal duration.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2024-07-04-futardio-proposal-proposal-3]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
Proposal #3 on MetaDAO (account EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs) ran on Autocrat version 0.3, created 2024-07-04, and completed/ended 2024-07-08 - confirming the four-day operational window (proposal creation plus three-day settlement period) specified in the mechanism design.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -35,12 +35,6 @@ FitByte ICO attracted only $23 in total commitments against a $500,000 target be
Dean's List ThailandDAO proposal (DgXa6gy7nAFFWe8VDkiReQYhqe1JSYQCJWUBV8Mm6aM) failed on 2024-06-25 despite projecting 16x FDV increase with only 3% TWAP threshold required. The proposal explicitly calculated that $73.95 per-participant value creation across 50 participants would meet the threshold, yet failed to attract sufficient trading volume. This extends the 'limited trading volume' pattern from uncontested decisions to contested-but-favorable proposals, suggesting the participation problem is broader than initial observations indicated.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2024-07-04-futardio-proposal-proposal-3]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
Proposal #3 failed with no indication of trading activity or market participation in the on-chain data, consistent with the pattern of minimal engagement in proposals without controversy or competitive dynamics.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -35,12 +35,6 @@ This pattern is general. Since [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token pri
- MetaDAO's current scale ($219M total futarchy marketcap) may be too small to attract sophisticated attacks that the removed mechanisms were designed to prevent
- Hanson might argue that MetaDAO's version isn't really futarchy at all — just conditional prediction markets used for governance, which is a narrower claim
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2023-12-03-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v01]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
MetaDAO's Autocrat v0.1 simplified by making proposal slots configurable and reducing default duration to 3 days. The proposer explicitly framed this as enabling 'quicker feedback loops,' suggesting the original implementation's fixed duration was a practical barrier to adoption.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: Human judgment layer resolves ambiguity in automated reward systems while maintaining credible commitment
confidence: experimental
source: Drift Futarchy proposal execution structure
created: 2026-03-15
---
# Futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override because pure algorithmic distribution cannot handle edge cases or gaming attempts
The Drift proposal establishes a 2/3 multisig execution group (metaprophet, Sumatt, Lmvdzande) to distribute the 50,000 DRIFT budget according to the outlined rules. Critically, the proposal grants this group discretion in two areas: (1) determining 'exact criteria' for the activity pool to filter non-organic participation, and (2) deciding which proposals qualify if successful proposals exceed the budget. The group also receives 3,000 DRIFT for their work and has authority to return excess funds to the treasury. This structure acknowledges that pure algorithmic distribution fails when faced with gaming, ambiguous cases, or unforeseen circumstances. The multisig provides a credible commitment mechanism - the proposal passes based on general principles, but execution requires human judgment. The group composition (known futarchy advocates) provides reputational accountability.
---
Relevant Notes:
- futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md
Topics:
- [[_map]]

View file

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: Three-month clawback period filters for proposals that create lasting value versus short-term manipulation
confidence: experimental
source: Drift Futarchy proposal structure
created: 2026-03-15
---
# Futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming because immediate rewards enable proposal spam for token extraction rather than quality governance
The Drift proposal structures proposer rewards with a three-month delay between proposal passage and token claim. Passing proposals earn up to 5,000 DRIFT each, but tokens are only claimable after three months. This delay creates a quality filter: proposers must believe their proposals will create sustained value that survives the vesting period. Without this delay, rational actors could spam low-quality proposals to extract rewards, knowing they can exit before negative effects manifest. The proposal also includes an executor group discretion clause - if successful proposals exceed expectations, the group can decide which top N proposals split the allocation. This combines time-based filtering with human judgment to prevent gaming. The 20,000 DRIFT activity pool uses the same three-month delay, with criteria finalized by the execution group to 'filter for non organic activity.'
---
Relevant Notes:
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md
- performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md
Topics:
- [[_map]]

View file

@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: Token distributions to historical participants leverage behavioral economics to seed active markets
confidence: experimental
source: Drift Futarchy proposal, endowment effect literature
created: 2026-03-15
---
# Futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect by converting past engagement into token holdings that create psychological ownership
The Drift Futarchy incentive program explicitly uses retroactive token distribution to MetaDAO participants as a mechanism to bootstrap engagement. The proposal cites the endowment effect - the behavioral economics finding that people value things more highly once they own them - as the theoretical basis. By distributing 9,600 DRIFT to 32 MetaDAO participants based on historical activity (5+ interactions over 30+ days), plus 2,400 DRIFT to AMM swappers, the proposal creates a cohort of token holders who have psychological ownership before the futarchy system launches. This differs from standard airdrops by explicitly targeting demonstrated forecasters rather than broad distribution. The tiered structure (100-400 DRIFT based on META holdings) further segments by engagement level. The proposal pairs this with forward incentives (5,000 DRIFT per passing proposal, 20,000 DRIFT activity pool) to convert initial ownership into sustained participation.
---
Relevant Notes:
- MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md
Topics:
- [[_map]]

View file

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: Community approved treasury migration despite inability to verify program builds, revealing governance tradeoffs
confidence: experimental
source: MetaDAO Autocrat v0.1 proposal risk disclosure, December 2023
created: 2026-03-15
---
# MetaDAO Autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
The proposal explicitly disclosed that the new Autocrat program "was unable to build with solana-verifiable-build" and required "placing trust in me that I didn't introduce a backdoor." Despite this counterparty risk affecting 990,000 META, 10,025 USDC, and 5.5 SOL, the proposal passed. The proposer acknowledged this as a temporary compromise, stating "for future versions, I should always be able to use verifiable builds." This reveals a critical governance tradeoff: the MetaDAO community valued faster iteration and improved functionality (configurable proposal slots, 3-day default) over the security guarantee of verifiable builds. The decision suggests early-stage futarchy DAOs prioritize mechanism refinement over security hardening, accepting elevated trust assumptions to compress development cycles. This pattern may not generalize to mature DAOs or larger treasuries, but demonstrates that governance communities will accept temporary centralization when the alternative is slower evolution of the governance mechanism itself.
---
Relevant Notes:
- futarchy implementations must simplify theoretical mechanisms for production adoption because original designs include impractical elements that academics tolerate but users reject.md
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md
Topics:
- [[_map]]

View file

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: Configurable proposal slots with three-day default compress feedback loops in futarchy governance
confidence: experimental
source: MetaDAO Autocrat v0.1 proposal, December 2023
created: 2026-03-15
---
# MetaDAO Autocrat v0.1 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
The Autocrat v0.1 upgrade introduces configurable slots per proposal with a default of 3 days, explicitly designed to "allow for quicker feedback loops." This represents a significant reduction from previous implementations and addresses a key friction point in futarchy adoption: the time cost of decision-making. The proposal passed and migrated 990,000 META, 10,025 USDC, and 5.5 SOL to the new program, demonstrating community acceptance of faster iteration cycles. The architectural change makes proposal duration a parameter rather than a constant, allowing MetaDAO to tune the speed-quality tradeoff based on empirical results. This matters because governance mechanism adoption depends on matching decision velocity to organizational needs—too slow and participants route around the system, too fast and markets cannot aggregate information effectively.
---
Relevant Notes:
- MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md
Topics:
- [[_map]]

View file

@ -60,10 +60,6 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
- **2025-01-30** — [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-2]] passed: Theia acquires 370.370 META tokens for $500,000 USDC
- **2023-11-18** — [[metadao-develop-lst-vote-market]] proposed: first product development proposal requesting 3,000 META to build Votium-style validator bribe platform for MNDE/mSOL holders
- **2023-11-29** — [[metadao-develop-lst-vote-market]] passed: approved LST Vote Market development with projected $10.5M enterprise value addition
- **2023-12-03** — Proposed Autocrat v0.1 migration with configurable proposal slots and 3-day default duration
- **2023-12-13** — Completed Autocrat v0.1 migration, moving 990,000 META, 10,025 USDC, and 5.5 SOL to new program despite unverifiable build
- **2024-01-24** — Proposed AMM program to replace CLOB markets, addressing liquidity fragmentation and state rent costs (Proposal CF9QUBS251FnNGZHLJ4WbB2CVRi5BtqJbCqMi47NX1PG)
- **2024-01-29** — AMM proposal passed with 400 META on approval and 800 META on completion budget
## Key Decisions
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|

View file

@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
{
"rejected_claims": [
{
"filename": "hospital-at-home-achieves-19-30-percent-cost-savings-versus-facility-care-through-reduced-overhead-and-shorter-length-of-stay.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
{
"filename": "home-care-for-heart-failure-reduces-costs-52-percent-through-avoided-hospitalizations-and-emergency-visits.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
{
"filename": "94-percent-of-medicare-beneficiaries-prefer-home-based-post-acute-care-creating-demand-pull-for-facility-to-home-transition.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
}
],
"validation_stats": {
"total": 3,
"kept": 0,
"fixed": 3,
"rejected": 3,
"fixes_applied": [
"hospital-at-home-achieves-19-30-percent-cost-savings-versus-facility-care-through-reduced-overhead-and-shorter-length-of-stay.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
"home-care-for-heart-failure-reduces-costs-52-percent-through-avoided-hospitalizations-and-emergency-visits.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
"94-percent-of-medicare-beneficiaries-prefer-home-based-post-acute-care-creating-demand-pull-for-facility-to-home-transition.md:set_created:2026-03-15"
],
"rejections": [
"hospital-at-home-achieves-19-30-percent-cost-savings-versus-facility-care-through-reduced-overhead-and-shorter-length-of-stay.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
"home-care-for-heart-failure-reduces-costs-52-percent-through-avoided-hospitalizations-and-emergency-visits.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
"94-percent-of-medicare-beneficiaries-prefer-home-based-post-acute-care-creating-demand-pull-for-facility-to-home-transition.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
"date": "2026-03-15"
}

View file

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ priority: medium
tags: [home-health, hospital-at-home, care-delivery, facility-shift, mckinsey, senior-care]
processed_by: vida
processed_date: 2026-03-15
enrichments_applied: ["home-based-care-could-capture-265-billion-in-medicare-spending-by-2025-through-hospital-at-home-remote-monitoring-and-post-acute-shift.md", "rpm-technology-stack-enables-facility-to-home-care-migration-through-ai-middleware-that-converts-continuous-data-into-clinical-utility.md", "caregiver-workforce-crisis-shows-all-50-states-experiencing-shortages-with-43-states-reporting-facility-closures-signaling-care-infrastructure-collapse.md"]
enrichments_applied: ["home-based-care-could-capture-265-billion-in-medicare-spending-by-2025-through-hospital-at-home-remote-monitoring-and-post-acute-shift.md", "rpm-technology-stack-enables-facility-to-home-care-migration-through-ai-middleware-that-converts-continuous-data-into-clinical-utility.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
@ -61,9 +61,13 @@ EXTRACTION HINT: The technology-enabling-care-site-shift narrative is more extra
## Key Facts
- Up to $265 billion in Medicare care services (25% of total cost) could shift from facilities to home by 2025
- Current home-based care serves ~$65B, requiring 3-4x capacity increase to reach $265B
- Johns Hopkins hospital-at-home shows 19-30% cost savings vs. in-hospital care
- Home care for heart failure patients shows 52% lower costs per systematic review
- 94% of Medicare beneficiaries prefer home-based post-acute care
- 16% of 65+ respondents more likely to receive home health post-pandemic (McKinsey Consumer Health Insights, June 2021)
- COVID catalyzed permanent shift in telehealth adoption and care delivery expectations
- Remote patient monitoring market: $29B → $138B (2024-2033), 19% CAGR
- RPM market: $29B → $138B (2024-2033), 19% CAGR
- AI in RPM: $2B → $8.4B (2024-2030), 27.5% CAGR
- Home healthcare: fastest-growing RPM end-use segment (25.3% CAGR)
- Home healthcare is fastest-growing RPM segment at 25.3% CAGR
- 71M Americans expected to use RPM by 2025

View file

@ -6,14 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/AkLsnieYpCU2UsSqUNrbMrQNi9bvdnjxx75mZbJns9z
date: 2023-12-03
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: processed
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-15
claims_extracted: ["metadao-autocrat-v01-reduces-proposal-duration-to-three-days-enabling-faster-governance-iteration.md", "metadao-autocrat-migration-accepted-counterparty-risk-from-unverifiable-builds-prioritizing-iteration-speed-over-security-guarantees.md"]
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy implementations must simplify theoretical mechanisms for production adoption because original designs include impractical elements that academics tolerate but users reject.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Proposal Details
@ -68,12 +63,3 @@ For future versions, I should always be able to use verifiable builds.
- Autocrat version: 0
- Completed: 2023-12-13
- Ended: 2023-12-13
## Key Facts
- MetaDAO Autocrat v0.1 proposal created 2023-12-03, completed 2023-12-13
- Proposal migrated 990,000 META, 10,025 USDC, and 5.5 SOL from first to second Autocrat program
- Autocrat v0.1 default proposal duration is 3 days
- Proposal account: AkLsnieYpCU2UsSqUNrbMrQNi9bvdnjxx75mZbJns9zi
- DAO account: 3wDJ5g73ABaDsL1qofF5jJqEJU4RnRQrvzRLkSnFc5di
- Autocrat v0.1 could not use solana-verifiable-build for undisclosed reasons

View file

@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HyA2h16uPQBFjezKf77wThNGsEoesUjeQf9rFvfAy4t
date: 2024-02-05
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: enrichment
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-15
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Proposal Details
@ -64,12 +61,3 @@ Obviously, there is no algorithmic guarantee that the multisig members will actu
- Autocrat version: 0.1
- Completed: 2024-02-10
- Ended: 2024-02-10
## Key Facts
- MetaDAO Proposal 5 passed on 2024-02-05 and completed on 2024-02-10
- The proposal transferred 4,130 META to a 4/6 multisig: 3,100 META for sale participants, 1,000 META for liquidity pool, 30 META for multisig compensation (5 META each)
- Initial META spot price was set at 35 USDC/META through the liquidity pool pairing
- Multisig members were Proph3t, Dean, Nallok, Durden, Rar3, and BlockchainFixesThis
- Participants had a 2-day window (Feb 5-7) to transfer USDC for their allocations
- The liquidity pool was likely created on Meteora

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/E1FJAp8saDU6Da2ccayjLBfA53qbjKRNYvu7QiMAnjQ
date: 2024-02-18
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: enrichment
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ processed_date: 2024-02-18
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md", "MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md", "time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Failed MetaDAO proposal for $100k OTC trade. Extracted two claims: (1) the vesting mechanism design for managing large token sales, (2) the market rejection despite acknowledged liquidity need. Four enrichments confirm existing claims about futarchy scaffolding, TWAP usage, adoption friction, and vesting limitations. The proposal's failure is particularly interesting as evidence of futarchy rejecting a solution to a stated problem, suggesting the mechanism can distinguish between 'we have a problem' and 'this solution is net positive.'"
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-15
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Proposal Details
@ -160,15 +157,3 @@ Here are some post-money valuations at different prices as well total increase i
- Multisig: 6 members, 4/6 threshold (Proph3t, Dean, 0xNallok, Durden, Blockchainfixesthis, Rar3)
- Projected circulating supply increase: 2-7%
- Projected META value increase: ~15%
## Key Facts
- MetaDAO Proposal 8 created 2024-02-18, failed 2024-02-24
- Proposal sought $100k USDC for up to 500 META tokens at max(twapPass, $200)
- META spot price was $695.92 on 2024-02-18 20:20 UTC
- META circulating supply was 14,530 tokens at proposal time
- Proposal structure: 20% immediate transfer, 80% linear vest over 12 months via Streamflow
- Multisig: 6 members (Proph3t, Dean, 0xNallok, Durden, Blockchainfixesthis, Rar3) with 4/6 threshold
- Projected circulating supply increase: 2-7% depending on final price
- Projected META value increase: ~15% from liquidity injection
- Proposal included $2,000 USDC compensation for multisig members

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8X
date: 2024-07-04
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: enrichment
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ processed_date: 2024-12-10
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Structured data from a failed MetaDAO proposal. No new claims warranted - this is factual evidence of the futarchy mechanism in operation. Enriches existing claims about MetaDAO's Autocrat implementation with concrete on-chain data and timeline. The source contains only verifiable facts about proposal metadata, not arguable propositions."
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-15
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Proposal Details
@ -46,12 +42,3 @@ extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
- Proposal created: 2024-07-04
- Proposal completed and ended: 2024-07-08
- Proposal status: Failed
## Key Facts
- MetaDAO Proposal #3 account: EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs
- MetaDAO DAO account: GWywkp2mY2vzAaLydR2MBXRCqk2vBTyvtVRioujxi5Ce
- Proposal #3 proposer: HwBL75xHHKcXSMNcctq3UqWaEJPDWVQz6NazZJNjWaQc
- Proposal #3 used Autocrat version 0.3
- Proposal #3 status: Failed
- Proposal #3 timeline: Created 2024-07-04, Completed and Ended 2024-07-08