auto-fix: strip 3 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md

@@ -69,22 +69,28 @@ Dean's List DAO proposal passed with TWAP threshold requiring only 3% MCAP incre
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+*Source: 2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
 The Dean's List proposal passed futarchy governance despite requiring complex multi-step economic modeling (FDV projections, TWAP calculations, sell pressure estimates) that most token holders would not independently verify. The 5.33% projected FDV increase exceeded the 3% TWAP requirement, suggesting the proposal's passage reflected trust in the model rather than independent market validation of the buyback mechanics.
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (extend)
-*Source: [[2026-03-06-futardio-launch-lobsterfutarchy]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+*Source: 2026-03-06-futardio-launch-lobsterfutarchy | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
 LobsterFutarchy's failure ($1,183 of $500,000 target) occurred despite proposing infrastructure for a stated market need (agent financial sandboxing) and reasonable economics ($45k/month burn for 12 months). The 99.8% funding shortfall suggests participation friction or credibility gaps rather than market rejection of the concept itself.
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (extend)
-*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+*Source: 2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
 Dean's List treasury proposal required TWAP > 3% to pass and projected 5-20% FDV increase, well above the threshold. The proposal passed, suggesting that when economic benefits substantially exceed participation thresholds, friction becomes less determinative of outcomes.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Salmon Wallet presented strong alignment with futarchy principles (transparency, anti-rug, community ownership) and had established product-market fit (building since 2022, real users), yet the launch went to refunding status. This suggests participation friction rather than fundamental market rejection of the project's value proposition.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

inbox/archive/2026-02-22-futardio-launch-salmon-wallet.md

@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/4WnHCy8swMZ67B1DBDdx9WUag5RP4EYUvsvqi68VoyQR"
 date: 2026-02-22
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
 event_type: launch
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Launch Details
@@ -77,3 +81,12 @@ This ICO is the ownership layer. Token holders become co-governors of Salmon's t
 - Token mint: `2LR1NTuTT4X9EX5sEQ34QfnBBxdFzsgQomL1FZXumeta`
 - Version: v0.7
 - Closed: 2026-02-23
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Salmon Wallet has been building in public since 2022
+- Salmon Wallet attempted to raise $350,000 through futard.io on 2026-02-22
+- The Salmon Wallet launch closed on 2026-02-23 with 'Refunding' status
+- Launch address: 4WnHCy8swMZ67B1DBDdx9WUag5RP4EYUvsvqi68VoyQR
+- Token symbol: 2LR
+- Platform version: v0.7