Compare commits
6 commits
cfac177129
...
a885402bda
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
a885402bda | ||
| 238cbeb924 | |||
| b5e24aef7c | |||
|
|
98ac9cd2a4 | ||
| fad3e0be7b | |||
|
|
0aa97f9574 |
10 changed files with 180 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ Sora standalone app achieved 12 million downloads but retention below 8% at day
|
|||
|
||||
EU AI Act Article 50 (effective August 2026) creates a creative content exemption that means entertainment's authenticity premium will be market-driven rather than regulation-driven. While AI-generated news/marketing must be labeled, 'evidently artistic, creative, satirical, or fictional' content requires only minimal disclosure. This regulatory asymmetry confirms that consumer preference, not regulatory mandate, remains the binding constraint for AI adoption in entertainment.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-18-arxiv-fanfiction-age-of-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Academic survey of fanfiction communities shows 66% would decrease interest in reading AI-generated stories, 43% actively oppose AI integration, and 72% report negative reaction to discovering undisclosed AI usage. 84.7% believe AI cannot replicate emotional nuances. These are overwhelming rejection rates that persist despite AI quality improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ This advantage compounds with the scarcity economics documented in the media att
|
|||
- **Human-made premium unquantified**: The underlying premium itself is still emerging and not yet measured
|
||||
- **Selection bias risk**: Communities may form preferentially around human-created content for reasons other than provenance (quality, cultural resonance), confounding causality
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-18-arxiv-fanfiction-age-of-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Fanfiction communities demonstrate that provenance verification is not just about authenticity but about community participation: members evaluate through 'evidence of author engagement with source material' and value the craft-development journey. 68.6% expressed ethical concerns about unauthorized scraping of fan works for AI training, viewing it as appropriation of unpaid creative labor within gift-economy communities. This extends the provenance advantage: community-owned IP has both inherent provenance AND community investment in protecting that provenance.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ The 2026 emergence of 'human-made' as a premium market label provides concrete e
|
|||
|
||||
The 2026 benchmark shows AI video quality (hand anatomy, lip-sync) has crossed the threshold where technical tells are no longer visible, yet consumer adoption remains low (Sora <8% D30 retention). This suggests that once quality becomes indistinguishable, the preference signal shifts to factors other than production value — likely authenticity, provenance, or use case fit rather than visual fidelity.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-18-arxiv-fanfiction-age-of-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Fanfiction communities reveal that quality is not just fluid but RELATIONAL: embedded in community values and social context. Members evaluate through emotional depth, character consistency, and evidence of author engagement—criteria that are inherently social. A technically competent AI story may be deemed 'low quality' if it lacks authentic voice. This means quality definitions can be structurally incompatible with AI-generated content regardless of technical capability.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ The data is specific to creator content and may not generalize to all entertainm
|
|||
|
||||
Deloitte 2024 Connected Consumer Survey found nearly 70% of respondents are concerned AI-generated content will be used to deceive them. Approximately half of consumers now believe they can recognize AI-written content, with many disengaging when brands appear to rely heavily on it in emotionally meaningful contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-18-arxiv-fanfiction-age-of-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
Fanfiction community data shows rejection is VALUES-based not quality-based: 92% agree 'fanfiction is a space for human creativity' and 86% insist on AI disclosure. 58% feel 'deceived' by undisclosed AI usage. The authenticity signal (human authorship) is the primary quality criterion, making technical improvements irrelevant to acceptance.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "quality-assessment-in-community-fiction-is-relational-not-absolute-creating-structural-advantage-for-human-content.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "creator-stakeholding-intensifies-ai-resistance-because-craft-development-journey-is-the-value-not-output-efficiency.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 3,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"quality-assessment-in-community-fiction-is-relational-not-absolute-creating-structural-advantage-for-human-content.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"creator-stakeholding-intensifies-ai-resistance-because-craft-development-journey-is-the-value-not-output-efficiency.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"creator-stakeholding-intensifies-ai-resistance-because-craft-development-journey-is-the-value-not-output-efficiency.md:stripped_wiki_link:the-fanchise-engagement-ladder-from-content-to-co-ownership-"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"quality-assessment-in-community-fiction-is-relational-not-absolute-creating-structural-advantage-for-human-content.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"creator-stakeholding-intensifies-ai-resistance-because-craft-development-journey-is-the-value-not-output-efficiency.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "experienced-developers-slower-with-ai-tools-while-believing-faster-revealing-systematic-perception-gap.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "practitioner-self-reports-systematically-overestimate-ai-productivity-creating-adoption-signal-distortion.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 7,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"experienced-developers-slower-with-ai-tools-while-believing-faster-revealing-systematic-perception-gap.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"experienced-developers-slower-with-ai-tools-while-believing-faster-revealing-systematic-perception-gap.md:stripped_wiki_link:deep-technical-expertise-is-a-greater-force-multiplier-when-",
|
||||
"experienced-developers-slower-with-ai-tools-while-believing-faster-revealing-systematic-perception-gap.md:stripped_wiki_link:agent-generated-code-creates-cognitive-debt",
|
||||
"experienced-developers-slower-with-ai-tools-while-believing-faster-revealing-systematic-perception-gap.md:stripped_wiki_link:AI-capability-and-reliability-are-independent-dimensions",
|
||||
"practitioner-self-reports-systematically-overestimate-ai-productivity-creating-adoption-signal-distortion.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"practitioner-self-reports-systematically-overestimate-ai-productivity-creating-adoption-signal-distortion.md:stripped_wiki_link:AI-optimization-of-industry-subsystems-induces-demand-for-mo",
|
||||
"practitioner-self-reports-systematically-overestimate-ai-productivity-creating-adoption-signal-distortion.md:stripped_wiki_link:economic-forces-push-humans-out-of-every-cognitive-loop-wher"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"experienced-developers-slower-with-ai-tools-while-believing-faster-revealing-systematic-perception-gap.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"practitioner-self-reports-systematically-overestimate-ai-productivity-creating-adoption-signal-distortion.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "protocol-based-quality-filtering-enables-coherent-collaborative-worldbuilding-at-scale-without-centralized-editorial-authority.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "found-fiction-grounding-in-reality-makes-collaborative-horror-feel-distinctly-real-by-mimicking-archival-discovery-patterns.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 5,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"protocol-based-quality-filtering-enables-coherent-collaborative-worldbuilding-at-scale-without-centralized-editorial-authority.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"protocol-based-quality-filtering-enables-coherent-collaborative-worldbuilding-at-scale-without-centralized-editorial-authority.md:stripped_wiki_link:fanchise-management-is-a-stack-of-increasing-fan-engagement-",
|
||||
"protocol-based-quality-filtering-enables-coherent-collaborative-worldbuilding-at-scale-without-centralized-editorial-authority.md:stripped_wiki_link:entertainment-IP-should-be-treated-as-a-multi-sided-platform",
|
||||
"found-fiction-grounding-in-reality-makes-collaborative-horror-feel-distinctly-real-by-mimicking-archival-discovery-patterns.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"found-fiction-grounding-in-reality-makes-collaborative-horror-feel-distinctly-real-by-mimicking-archival-discovery-patterns.md:stripped_wiki_link:worldbuilding-as-narrative-infrastructure-creates-communal-m"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"protocol-based-quality-filtering-enables-coherent-collaborative-worldbuilding-at-scale-without-centralized-editorial-authority.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"found-fiction-grounding-in-reality-makes-collaborative-horror-feel-distinctly-real-by-mimicking-archival-discovery-patterns.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,11 +7,15 @@ date: 2025-06-18
|
|||
domain: entertainment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, cultural-dynamics]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
triage_tag: claim
|
||||
flagged_for_theseus: ["Community norms around AI authorship parallel alignment concerns — communities independently developing governance for AI content"]
|
||||
tags: [fanfiction, ai-content, authenticity, community-governance, human-creativity, consumer-acceptance]
|
||||
processed_by: clay
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md", "consumer-acceptance-of-ai-creative-content-declining-despite-quality-improvements-because-authenticity-signal-becomes-more-valuable.md", "community-owned-IP-has-structural-advantage-in-human-made-premium-because-provenance-is-inherent-and-legible.md", "consumer definition of quality is fluid and revealed through preference not fixed by production value.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -65,3 +69,17 @@ Academic study on fanfiction communities' perspectives on AI-generated content.
|
|||
## Curator Notes
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Academic evidence with quantitative data that directly strengthens Session 1 epistemic rejection findings and extends them to community fiction contexts specifically. The "relational quality" concept is novel to the KB.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- 84.7% of fanfiction community members believe AI cannot replicate emotional nuances of human-authored stories
|
||||
- 77.5% doubt AI can maintain narrative authenticity while offering innovation
|
||||
- 66% said knowing a story was AI-generated would decrease interest in reading it
|
||||
- 43% actively oppose AI integration (vs 26% cautiously accepting, 24% context-dependent)
|
||||
- 92% agree 'fanfiction is a space for human creativity'
|
||||
- 86% insist authors disclose AI involvement
|
||||
- 72% report negative reaction to discovering undisclosed AI usage; 58% feel 'deceived'
|
||||
- 83.6% of those opposing AI are themselves writers
|
||||
- 68.6% expressed ethical concerns about unauthorized scraping of fan works for AI training
|
||||
- 73.7% worried about platforms being 'inundated' with low-quality AI content
|
||||
- Older, experienced writers (10+ years) resist AI most strongly
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-07-10
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
triage_tag: claim
|
||||
tags: [developer-productivity, rct, ai-tools, over-reliance, perception-gap, automation-overshoot]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -47,3 +51,15 @@ Randomized controlled trial: 16 experienced open-source developers, 246 tasks, m
|
|||
## Curator Notes
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: deep technical expertise is a greater force multiplier when combined with AI agents
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: RCT evidence that challenges the expertise-multiplier claim for expert-on-familiar-codebase context. The 39-point perception gap is a novel finding that explains HOW automation overshoot occurs — practitioners' self-reports systematically mislead adoption decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- METR conducted RCT with 16 experienced open-source developers on 246 tasks
|
||||
- Codebases averaged 22k+ GitHub stars, 1M+ lines of code, 5+ years developer experience
|
||||
- Primary tool was Cursor Pro with Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet
|
||||
- Developers had ~50 hours of AI coding tool experience
|
||||
- Measured productivity: 19% slower with AI tools
|
||||
- Predicted productivity (before): 24% faster
|
||||
- Estimated productivity (after): 20% faster
|
||||
- AI suggestion acceptance rate: less than 44%
|
||||
- Study published 2025-07-10 by METR (@METR_Evals)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-10-17
|
|||
domain: entertainment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [cultural-dynamics, collective-intelligence]
|
||||
format: essay
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
triage_tag: claim
|
||||
tags: [scp-foundation, collaborative-fiction, quality-control, community-governance, narrative-coherence, worldbuilding]
|
||||
processed_by: clay
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,3 +50,13 @@ Analysis of the SCP Foundation as the largest collaborative writing project in h
|
|||
## Curator Notes
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: community governance over IP production quality (Session 5 research theme)
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: SCP Foundation provides the longest-running, largest-scale case study of community-governed narrative production. Directly challenges or extends the four-tier governance spectrum from Session 5 by adding a "protocol + voting" model.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- SCP Foundation has ~9,800 SCP objects as of 2025
|
||||
- SCP Foundation has 6,300+ Foundation Tales
|
||||
- SCP Foundation operates across 16 language branches
|
||||
- SCP Foundation has operated for 18 years (2007-2025)
|
||||
- American Journalism article in 2022 suggested SCP may be the largest collaborative writing project in history
|
||||
- SCP submissions below -10 community votes are deleted
|
||||
- SCP formalized rigorous editing process by 2009
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue