Compare commits
16 commits
contrib/ca
...
main
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3434410d83 | ||
|
|
8130f61355 | ||
|
|
da933cad73 | ||
|
|
deb9658a07 | ||
|
|
954e1cd089 | ||
|
|
1f9a872724 | ||
|
|
157e82b265 | ||
| 988c376865 | |||
| b5c6180dba | |||
| 018ee566e2 | |||
| 3c2faabb84 | |||
|
|
302d7c79f2 | ||
| dff7b29965 | |||
|
|
da64f805e6 | ||
|
|
dba00a7960 | ||
| 13c7dc0c0b |
678 changed files with 5886 additions and 1328 deletions
|
|
@ -20,20 +20,30 @@ You think something in the knowledge base is wrong or missing nuance. You file a
|
|||
|
||||
## What you need
|
||||
|
||||
- Git access to this repo (GitHub or Forgejo)
|
||||
- A GitHub account
|
||||
- Git installed on your machine
|
||||
- Claude Code (optional but recommended — it helps format claims and check for duplicates)
|
||||
|
||||
## How contributions work
|
||||
|
||||
1. You fork the repo, push changes to your fork, and open a PR on GitHub
|
||||
2. A mirror syncs your PR to the internal eval pipeline (~2 minutes)
|
||||
3. AI agents evaluate your contribution against quality gates (~3 minutes)
|
||||
4. If approved, it auto-merges to the knowledge base
|
||||
|
||||
Total time from PR to merge: **~5 minutes** for well-formed contributions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Path 1: Submit source material
|
||||
|
||||
This is the simplest contribution. You provide content; the agents do the extraction.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Clone and branch
|
||||
### 1. Fork and clone
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git clone https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
|
||||
# Fork on GitHub first (click "Fork" at https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex)
|
||||
git clone https://github.com/YOUR-USERNAME/teleo-codex.git
|
||||
cd teleo-codex
|
||||
git checkout main && git pull
|
||||
git remote add upstream https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
|
||||
git checkout -b contrib/your-name/brief-description
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ Source: [what this is and why it matters]"
|
|||
git push -u origin contrib/your-name/brief-description
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then open a PR. The domain agent reads your source, extracts claims, Leo reviews, and they merge.
|
||||
Then open a PR **against `living-ip/teleo-codex` main** on GitHub. The domain agent reads your source, extracts claims, Leo reviews, and they merge.
|
||||
|
||||
## Path 2: Propose a claim directly
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,7 +97,7 @@ You have domain expertise and want to state a thesis yourself — not just drop
|
|||
|
||||
### 1. Clone and branch
|
||||
|
||||
Same as Path 1.
|
||||
Same as Path 1 (fork, clone, branch).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Check for duplicates
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "Architecture paper defining the five contribution roles, their wei
|
|||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "Leo, original architecture with Cory-approved weight calibration"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-26
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- contributor guide
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- contributor guide|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Contribution Scoring & Attribution Architecture
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ confidence: experimental
|
|||
source: "Synthesis by Leo from: Aldasoro et al (BIS) via Rio PR #26; Noah Smith HITL elimination via Theseus PR #25; knowledge embodiment lag (Imas, David, Brynjolfsson) via foundations"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-07
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "early AI adoption increases firm productivity without reducing employment suggesting capital deepening not labor replacement as the dominant mechanism"
|
||||
- "economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate"
|
||||
- "knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox"
|
||||
- early AI adoption increases firm productivity without reducing employment suggesting capital deepening not labor replacement as the dominant mechanism
|
||||
- economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate
|
||||
- knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AI labor displacement follows knowledge embodiment lag phases where capital deepening precedes labor substitution and the transition timing depends on organizational restructuring not technology capability
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ confidence: experimental
|
|||
source: "Synthesis by Leo from: centaur team claim (Kasparov); HITL degradation claim (Wachter/Patil, Stanford-Harvard study); AI scribe adoption (Bessemer 2026); alignment scalable oversight claims"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-07
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination"
|
||||
- "human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs"
|
||||
- "AI scribes reached 92 percent provider adoption in under 3 years because documentation is the rare healthcare workflow where AI value is immediate unambiguous and low-risk"
|
||||
- "scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps"
|
||||
- centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination
|
||||
- human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs
|
||||
- AI scribes reached 92 percent provider adoption in under 3 years because documentation is the rare healthcare workflow where AI value is immediate unambiguous and low-risk
|
||||
- scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Does human oversight improve or degrade AI clinical decision-making?
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Does human oversight improve or degrade AI clinical decision-making?|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# centaur teams succeed only when role boundaries prevent humans from overriding AI in domains where AI is the stronger partner
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-03-05
|
|||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "John Lewis Gaddis 'On Grand Strategy' 2018"
|
||||
tradition: "Grand strategy, organizational theory"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- fitness landscape ruggedness determines whether adaptive systems find good solutions because smooth landscapes reward hill climbing while rugged landscapes trap agents in local optima and require exploration or recombination to escape
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- fitness landscape ruggedness determines whether adaptive systems find good solutions because smooth landscapes reward hill climbing while rugged landscapes trap agents in local optima and require exploration or recombination to escape|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# common sense is like oxygen it thins at altitude because power insulates leaders from the feedback loops that maintain good judgment
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ depends_on:
|
|||
- community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- access friction functions as a natural conviction filter in token launches because process difficulty selects for genuine believers while price friction selects for wealthy speculators
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- access friction functions as a natural conviction filter in token launches because process difficulty selects for genuine believers while price friction selects for wealthy speculators|supports|2026-04-04
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# early-conviction pricing is an unsolved mechanism design problem because systems that reward early believers attract extractive speculators while systems that prevent speculation penalize genuine supporters
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ related:
|
|||
- agent mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- agent mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- cryptographic agent trust ratings enable meta monitoring of AI feedback systems because persistent auditable reputation scores detect degrading review quality before it causes knowledge base corruption|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- cryptographic agent trust ratings enable meta monitoring of AI feedback systems because persistent auditable reputation scores detect degrading review quality before it causes knowledge base corruption
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Adversarial PR review produces higher quality knowledge than self-review because separated proposer and evaluator roles catch errors that the originating agent cannot see
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "An agent's health should be measured by cross-domain engagement (r
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Vida agent directory design (March 2026), Woolley et al 2010 (c-factor correlates with interaction not individual ability)"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-08
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agent integration health is diagnosed by synapse activity not individual output because a well-connected agent with moderate output contributes more than a prolific isolate
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
|
|||
created: 2026-03-03
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
source: "Strategy session journal, March 2026"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agent token price relative to NAV governs agent behavior through a simulated annealing mechanism where market volatility maps to exploration and market confidence maps to exploitation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "Compares Teleo's architecture against Wikipedia, Community Notes,
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Theseus, original analysis grounded in CI literature and operational comparison of existing knowledge aggregation systems"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- conversational memory and organizational knowledge are fundamentally different problems sharing some infrastructure because identical formats mask divergent governance lifecycle and quality requirements
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- conversational memory and organizational knowledge are fundamentally different problems sharing some infrastructure because identical formats mask divergent governance lifecycle and quality requirements|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Agent-mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi-agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
|
|||
created: 2026-03-05
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "Living Capital thesis development, March 2026"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Ownership coins with target markets create intelligence accelerant through capital deployment feedback because real investment outcomes generate learning loops that pure information-processing agents cannot access
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Ownership coins with target markets create intelligence accelerant through capital deployment feedback because real investment outcomes generate learning loops that pure information-processing agents cannot access|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agents that raise capital via futarchy accelerate their own development because real investment outcomes create feedback loops that information-only agents lack
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ related:
|
|||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- agent mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- evaluation and optimization have opposite model diversity optima because evaluation benefits from cross family diversity while optimization benefits from same family reasoning pattern alignment|related|2026-04-06
|
||||
- human contributors structurally correct for correlated AI blind spots because external evaluators provide orthogonal error distributions that no same family model can replicate|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- human contributors structurally correct for correlated AI blind spots because external evaluators provide orthogonal error distributions that no same family model can replicate
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# All agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposer's training biases
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "MetaDAO Launchpad"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "mechanism design, network effects, token economics"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
- Ownership coins with target markets create intelligence accelerant through capital deployment feedback because real investment outcomes generate learning loops that pure information-processing agents cannot access|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Ownership coins with target markets create intelligence accelerant through capital deployment feedback because real investment outcomes generate learning loops that pure information-processing agents cannot access
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Broad community ownership creates competitive advantage through aligned evangelism, not just capital raising. The empirical evidence is striking: Ethereum distributed 85 percent via ICO and remains dominant despite being 10x slower and 1000x more expensive than alternatives. Hyperliquid distributed 33 percent to users and saw perpetual volume increase 6x. Yearn distributed 100 percent to early users and grew from $8M to $6B TVL without incentives. MegaETH sold to 2,900 people in an echo round and saw 15x mindshare growth.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "LivingIP Evolution of Collective Knowledge"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# cross-domain knowledge connections generate disproportionate value because most insights are siloed
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ supports:
|
|||
- approval fatigue drives agent architecture toward structural safety because humans cannot meaningfully evaluate 100 permission requests per hour
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- approval fatigue drives agent architecture toward structural safety because humans cannot meaningfully evaluate 100 permission requests per hour|supports|2026-04-03
|
||||
- structurally separating proposer and reviewer agents across independent accounts with branch protection enforcement implements architectural separation that prompt level rules cannot achieve|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- structurally separating proposer and reviewer agents across independent accounts with branch protection enforcement implements architectural separation that prompt level rules cannot achieve
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Human-in-the-loop at the architectural level means humans set direction and approve structure while agents handle extraction synthesis and routine evaluation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,13 @@ created: 2026-03-07
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- graph traversal through curated wiki links replicates spreading activation from cognitive science because progressive disclosure implements decay based context loading and queries evolve during search through the berrypicking effect
|
||||
- undiscovered public knowledge exists as implicit connections across disconnected research domains and systematic graph traversal can surface hypotheses that no individual researcher has formulated
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
|
||||
- contributor guide
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- graph traversal through curated wiki links replicates spreading activation from cognitive science because progressive disclosure implements decay based context loading and queries evolve during search through the berrypicking effect|related|2026-04-03
|
||||
- undiscovered public knowledge exists as implicit connections across disconnected research domains and systematic graph traversal can surface hypotheses that no individual researcher has formulated|related|2026-04-07
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- contributor guide|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-28
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Numerai, Augur, UMA, EigenLayer, a16z cryptoeconomics, STAKESURE, Feb 2026"
|
||||
tradition: "Mechanism design"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Protocol-specific first-loss staking creates stronger DeFi insurance underwriting incentives than socialized coverage pools because stakers bear concentrated losses on protocols they select
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Protocol-specific first-loss staking creates stronger DeFi insurance underwriting incentives than socialized coverage pools because stakers bear concentrated losses on protocols they select|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# expert staking in Living Capital uses Numerai-style bounded burns for performance and escalating dispute bonds for fraud creating accountability without deterring participation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-capital
|
|||
created: 2026-03-05
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "SEC Report on The DAO (2017), Howey test framework, MetaDAO ecosystem analysis, Seedplex regulatory analysis, March 2026"
|
||||
challenges:
|
||||
- Permissioned futarchy ICOs are securities at launch regardless of governance mechanism because team effort dominates early value creation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Permissioned futarchy ICOs are securities at launch regardless of governance mechanism because team effort dominates early value creation|challenges|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-capital
|
|||
created: 2026-03-05
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "SEC Report of Investigation Release No. 34-81207 (July 2017), CFTC v. Ooki DAO (N.D. Cal. 2023), Living Capital regulatory analysis March 2026"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- the SECs treatment of staking rewards as service payments establishes that mechanical participation in network consensus is not an investment contract
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- the SECs treatment of staking rewards as service payments establishes that mechanical participation in network consensus is not an investment contract|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# the DAO Reports rejection of voting as active management is the central legal hurdle for futarchy because prediction market trading must prove fundamentally more meaningful than token voting
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-capital
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Living Capital"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- governance first capital second sequencing prevents token capture of protocol development because early capital injection selects for financialized governance participants
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- governance first capital second sequencing prevents token capture of protocol development because early capital injection selects for financialized governance participants|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,12 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-03-04
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "MetaDAO Terms of Service, Founder/Operator Legal Pack, inbox research files, web research"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Futarchy Labs
|
||||
- Delphi Digital
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Futarchy Labs|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- Delphi Digital|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-03-04
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "MetaDAO Founder/Operator Legal Pack, Solomon Labs governance docs, MetaDAO Terms of Service, inbox research files"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
source: "Governance - Meritocratic Voting + Futarchy"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Futarchy governance quality degrades on low-salience operational decisions because thin markets lack trader participation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Futarchy governance quality degrades on low-salience operational decisions because thin markets lack trader participation|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Galaxy Research, State of Onchain Futarchy (2025)"
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, prediction markets"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Augur
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Augur|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The 2024 US election provided empirical vindication for prediction markets versus traditional polling. Polymarket's markets proved more accurate, more responsive to new information, and more democratically accessible than centralized polling operations. This success directly catalyzed renewed interest in applying futarchy to DAO governance—if markets outperform polls for election prediction, the same logic suggests they should outperform token voting for organizational decisions.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-03-03
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Strategy session journal, March 2026"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Formal coordination mechanisms require shared narrative as prerequisite for valid objective function specification because the choice of what to optimize for is a narrative commitment the mechanism cannot make autonomously
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- MetaDAO's coin-price objective function partially resolves the Rasmont selection-correlation critique by making the welfare metric endogenous to the market mechanism, while retaining macro-tailwind selection bias
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Formal coordination mechanisms require shared narrative as prerequisite for valid objective function specification because the choice of what to optimize for is a narrative commitment the mechanism cannot make autonomously|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- MetaDAO's coin-price objective function partially resolves the Rasmont selection-correlation critique by making the welfare metric endogenous to the market mechanism, while retaining macro-tailwind selection bias|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Vitalik Buterin once noted that "pure futarchy has proven difficult to introduce, because in practice objective functions are very difficult to define (it's not just coin price that people want!)." For asset futarchy governing valuable holdings, this objection misses the point. Coin price is not merely acceptable—it is the fairest and most elegant objective function, and probably the only acceptable one for DAOs holding valuable assets.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Conditional decision market selection bias is mitigatable through decision-maker market participation, timing transparency, and low-rate random rejection without requiring structural redesign
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Conditional decision market selection bias is mitigatable through decision-maker market participation, timing transparency, and low-rate random rejection without requiring structural redesign|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Decision markets create a mechanism where attempting to steal from minority holders becomes a losing trade. The four conditional tokens (fABC, pABC, pUSD, fUSD) establish a constraint: for a treasury-raiding proposal to pass, pABC/pUSD must trade higher than fABC/fUSD. But from any rational perspective, 1 fABC is worth 1 ABC (DAO continues normally) while 1 pABC is worth 0 (DAO becomes empty after raid).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,16 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Rio Futarchy Experiment"
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, behavioral economics, market microstructure"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Is futarchy's low participation in uncontested decisions efficient disuse or a sign of structural adoption barriers?
|
||||
- Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives
|
||||
- Futarchy governance overhead increases decision friction because every significant action requires conditional market consensus preventing fast pivots
|
||||
- Futarchy governance quality degrades on low-salience operational decisions because thin markets lack trader participation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Is futarchy's low participation in uncontested decisions efficient disuse or a sign of structural adoption barriers?|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- Futarchy governance overhead increases decision friction because every significant action requires conditional market consensus preventing fast pivots|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- Futarchy governance quality degrades on low-salience operational decisions because thin markets lack trader participation|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Futarchy faces three concrete adoption barriers that compound to limit participation: token price psychology, proposal creation difficulty, and liquidity requirements. These aren't theoretical concerns but observed friction in MetaDAO's implementation.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "MetaDAO Launchpad"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, DAO governance, mechanism design"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Futarchy conditional markets aggregate information through financial stake not voting participation
|
||||
- Futarchy network effects emerge from governance lock-in not brand because conditional market treasury governance creates switching costs
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Futarchy conditional markets aggregate information through financial stake not voting participation|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- Futarchy network effects emerge from governance lock-in not brand because conditional market treasury governance creates switching costs|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Futarchy creates fundamentally different ownership dynamics than token-voting by requiring proposal supporters to buy out dissenters through conditional markets. When a proposal emerges that token holders oppose, they can sell in the Pass market, forcing supporters to purchase those tokens at market prices to achieve passage. This mechanism transforms governance from majority rule to continuous price discovery.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,12 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "Governance - Meritocratic Voting + Futarchy"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- AI agent futarchy governance eliminates organizational overhead through mechanism substitution because market-governed decision-making replaces committee structures that require human coordination costs
|
||||
- Futarchy conditional markets aggregate information through financial stake not voting participation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- AI agent futarchy governance eliminates organizational overhead through mechanism substitution because market-governed decision-making replaces committee structures that require human coordination costs|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- Futarchy conditional markets aggregate information through financial stake not voting participation|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for arbitrageurs
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The fundamental defect of token voting DAOs is that governance tokens are only useful if you command voting majority, and unlike equity shares they entitle minority holders to nothing. There is no internal mechanism preventing majorities from raiding treasuries and distributing assets only among themselves. Wholesale looting is not uncommon—Serum had multiple incidents, the CKS Mango raid remains unresolved, and the Uniswap DeFi Education Fund granted $20M based on a short forum post with no argument for token value accretion.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: teleohumanity
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "TeleoHumanity Manifesto, Chapter 8"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- rights expand as capabilities grow because capability creates moral obligation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- rights expand as capabilities grow because capability creates moral obligation|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# collective superintelligence is the alternative to monolithic AI controlled by a few
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-21
|
|||
source: "Tamim Ansary, The Invention of Yesterday (2019); McLennan College Distinguished Lecture Series"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "cultural history, narrative theory"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,8 +8,13 @@ confidence: experimental
|
|||
source: "TeleoHumanity Manifesto, Chapter 8"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- transparent algorithmic governance where AI response rules are public and challengeable through the same epistemic process as the knowledge base is a structurally novel alignment approach
|
||||
- rights expand as capabilities grow because capability creates moral obligation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- transparent algorithmic governance where AI response rules are public and challengeable through the same epistemic process as the knowledge base is a structurally novel alignment approach|related|2026-03-28
|
||||
- Alignment through continuous coordination outperforms upfront specification because deployment contexts inevitably diverge from training conditions making frozen values brittle|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
- rights expand as capabilities grow because capability creates moral obligation|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Alignment through continuous coordination outperforms upfront specification because deployment contexts inevitably diverge from training conditions making frozen values brittle
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# the alignment problem dissolves when human values are continuously woven into the system rather than specified in advance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,14 @@ source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-areal-finance.md"
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- areal proposes unified rwa liquidity through index token aggregating yield across project tokens
|
||||
- areal targets smb rwa tokenization as underserved market versus equity and large financial instruments
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "Cloak: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- areal proposes unified rwa liquidity through index token aggregating yield across project tokens|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- areal targets smb rwa tokenization as underserved market versus equity and large financial instruments|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Cloak: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Areal: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Proposal to allocate 4.2% of mining emissions to a development fund fo
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-05-futardio-proposal-establish-development-fund.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "Coal: Cut emissions by 50%?"
|
||||
- "coal: Let's get Futarded"
|
||||
- "COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "Coal: Cut emissions by 50%?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "coal: Let's get Futarded|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# COAL: Establish Development Fund?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
coal_staked: "10,000"
|
||||
proposal_length: "3 days"
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-15-futardio-proposal-lets-get-futarded.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "Coal: Cut emissions by 50%?"
|
||||
- "COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "Coal: Cut emissions by 50%?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# coal: Let's get Futarded
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Introduces Meta-PoW economic model moving mining power into pickaxes a
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-meta-pow-the-ore-treasury-protocol.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'coal': \"Let's get Futarded\"}"
|
||||
- "coal: Let's get Futarded"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'coal': \"Let's get Futarded|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "coal: Let's get Futarded|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ summary: "Convert DAO treasury from volatile SOL/SPL assets to stablecoins to re
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|supports|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,27 @@ summary: "Transition from USDC payments to $DEAN token distributions funded by s
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,28 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-30-futardio-proposal-fund-deans-list-dao-website-redesign.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model\"}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ summary: "Allocate 1M $DEAN tokens ($1,300 USDC equivalent) to University of Wat
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-08-futardio-proposal-reward-the-university-of-waterloo-blockchain-club-with-1-mil.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,19 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-22-futardio-proposal-thailanddao-event-promotion-to-boost-deans-list-dao-engageme.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ summary: "Increase swap liquidity fee from 0.25% to 5% DLMM base fee, switch quo
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-01-14-futardio-proposal-should-deans-list-dao-update-the-liquidity-fee-structure.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,17 @@ tags:
|
|||
- solana
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,19 @@ tags:
|
|||
- solana
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- Saber|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Saber
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,16 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
completion_rate: "3.3%"
|
||||
duration: "1 day"
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-digifrens.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent
|
||||
- "Git3: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "RunBookAI: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "Git3: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "RunBookAI: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# DigiFrens: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,20 @@ summary: "Drift DAO approved 50,000 DRIFT allocation for AI Agents Grants progra
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-19-futardio-proposal-allocate-50000-drift-to-fund-the-drift-ai-agent-request-for.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?"
|
||||
- "Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,24 @@ summary: "Proposal to establish community-run Drift Working Group with 50,000 DR
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-13-futardio-proposal-fund-the-drift-working-group.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition"
|
||||
- "Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,29 @@ summary: "50,000 DRIFT incentive program to reward early MetaDAO participants an
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override
|
||||
- futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
|
||||
- futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming
|
||||
- "Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Futarchy Proposal - Welcome the Futarchs
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,20 @@ summary: "Drift DAO approved 100,000 DRIFT to launch a two-month pilot grants pr
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-07-09-futardio-proposal-initialize-the-drift-foundation-grant-program.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ summary: "Futarchy Arena raised $934 of $50,000 target (1.9% fill rate) for the
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-futarchy-arena.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- "{'NFA.space': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "Hurupay: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "NFA.space: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "Send Arcade: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'NFA.space': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Hurupay: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "NFA.space: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Send Arcade: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Approved $25,000 budget for developing Pre-Governance Mandates tool an
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-30-futardio-proposal-approve-budget-for-pre-governance-hackathon-development.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Fund the Rug Bounty Program'}"
|
||||
- FutureDAO
|
||||
- "FutureDAO: Fund the Rug Bounty Program"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Fund the Rug Bounty Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- FutureDAO|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "FutureDAO: Fund the Rug Bounty Program|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,27 @@ summary: "Futardio cult raised via MetaDAO ICO — funds for fan merch, token li
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'MycoRealms': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "Avici: Futardio Launch"
|
||||
- "Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "MycoRealms: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- seyf futardio fundraise raised 200 against 300000 target signaling near zero market traction for ai native wallet concept
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MycoRealms': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Avici: Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MycoRealms: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- seyf futardio fundraise raised 200 against 300000 target signaling near zero market traction for ai native wallet concept|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio Cult: Futardio Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ summary: "Allocate $10K from treasury to create FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM pool:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal"
|
||||
- "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Reduce team spending to $50/mo (X Premium only), burn 4.5M of 5M perfo
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,19 @@ summary: "Proposal to fund RugBounty.xyz platform development with $5,000 USDC t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-14-futardio-proposal-fund-the-rug-bounty-program.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- FutureDAO
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development"
|
||||
- "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- FutureDAO|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FutureDAO: Fund the Rug Bounty Program
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "First proposal on Futardio platform testing Autocrat v0.3 implementati
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-27-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "Test DAO: Testing indexer changes"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "Test DAO: Testing indexer changes|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio: Proposal #1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium liquidity farm to bootstrap t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- raydium liquidity farming follows standard pattern of 1 percent token allocation 7 to 90 day duration and clmm pool architecture
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- raydium liquidity farming follows standard pattern of 1 percent token allocation 7 to 90 day duration and clmm pool architecture|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,14 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
monthly_burn: 4000
|
||||
runway_months: 10
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-insert-coin-labs.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Quantum Waffle
|
||||
- "RunBookAI: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "Send Arcade: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Quantum Waffle|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- "RunBookAI: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Send Arcade: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Insert Coin Labs: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,21 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
twap_requirement: "3% increase (523k to 539k USDC MCAP)"
|
||||
target_dean_price: "0.005383 USDC (from 0.005227)"
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model\"}"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|supports|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,8 +17,14 @@ created: 2026-03-24
|
|||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-launchpet.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- algorithm driven social feeds create attention to liquidity conversion in meme token markets
|
||||
- prosocial fee allocation in crypto platforms functions as a retention mechanism by attaching charitable identity to speculative trading
|
||||
- PURR
|
||||
- "SizeMatters: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- algorithm driven social feeds create attention to liquidity conversion in meme token markets|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- prosocial fee allocation in crypto platforms functions as a retention mechanism by attaching charitable identity to speculative trading|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- PURR|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- "SizeMatters: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Launchpet: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "LobsterFutarchy raised $1,183 of $500,000 target (0.2% fill rate) for
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-06-futardio-launch-lobsterfutarchy.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "SizeMatters: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "Superclaw: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "SizeMatters: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Superclaw: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# LobsterFutarchy: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ summary: "Allocate $1.5M USDC for LOYAL buyback at max $0.238/token to protect t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Loyal: Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Withdraw 90% of tokens from single-sided Meteora DAMM v2 pool and burn
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV'}"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,22 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
duration: "1 day"
|
||||
oversubscription_ratio: 0.0017
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-manna-finance.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- "Hurupay: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "Insert Coin Labs: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "Paystream: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "SeekerVault: Futardio Fundraise"
|
||||
- "Solomon: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Hurupay: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Insert Coin Labs: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Paystream: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "SeekerVault: Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Solomon: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Manna Finance: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-26-futardio-proposal-appoint-nallok-and-proph3t-benevolent-dictators-for-three-mo.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "MetaDAO Q3 roadmap focusing on market-based grants product launch, SF
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ category: treasury
|
|||
summary: "Burn ~979,000 of 982,464 treasury-held META tokens to reduce FDV and attract investors"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "tokenomics", "treasury-management", "meta-token"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-03-futardio-proposal-burn-993-of-meta-in-treasury.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Burn 99.3% of META in Treasury
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,19 @@ category: hiring
|
|||
summary: "Convex payout: 2% supply per $1B market cap increase (max 10% at $5B), $90K/yr salary each, 4-year vest starting April 2028"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "compensation", "founder-incentives", "mechanism-design"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-27-futardio-proposal-approve-performance-based-compensation-package-for-proph3t-a.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,14 @@ category: strategy
|
|||
summary: "Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "futardio", "governance-filtering"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-21-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-create-futardio.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Proposal #1"
|
||||
- "Test DAO: Testing indexer changes"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Proposal #1|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Test DAO: Testing indexer changes|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ summary: "Proposal to create a spot market for $META tokens through a public tok
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-01-12-futardio-proposal-create-spot-market-for-meta.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Prioritize Listing META?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-
|
|||
supports:
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs by 99 percent versus clob by eliminating orderbook storage requirements
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs from 135 225 sol annually to near zero by replacing clob market pairs
|
||||
- joebuild
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs by 99 percent versus clob by eliminating orderbook storage requirements|supports|2026-04-04
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs from 135 225 sol annually to near zero by replacing clob market pairs|supports|2026-04-04
|
||||
- joebuild|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,28 @@ category: strategy
|
|||
summary: "Fund $96K to build futarchy-as-a-service platform enabling other Solana DAOs to adopt futarchic governance"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "faas", "product-development", "solana-daos"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-13-futardio-proposal-develop-futarchy-as-a-service-faas.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
|
||||
- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development"
|
||||
- "LobsterFutarchy: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "LobsterFutarchy: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ tags: [metadao, lst, marinade, bribe-market, first-proposal]
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-11-18-futardio-proposal-develop-a-lst-vote-market.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,29 @@ tags: [metadao, futardio, memecoin, launchpad, failed]
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-14-futardio-proposal-develop-memecoin-launchpad.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Futardio Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
|
||||
- "Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: Futardio Launch"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop Memecoin Launchpad?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to develop multi-modal proposal functionality allowing multip
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-20-futardio-proposal-develop-multi-option-proposals.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- agrippa
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- agrippa|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,23 @@ summary: "Proposal to build a Saber vote market platform funded by $150k consort
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-12-16-futardio-proposal-develop-a-saber-vote-market.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market"
|
||||
- Saber
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- Saber|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-05-futardio-proposal-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,24 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tags: [metadao, market-making, liquidity, cex-listing, passed]
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Prioritize Listing META?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Drift: Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,28 @@ category: fundraise
|
|||
summary: "Raise $1.5M by selling up to 4,000 META to VCs and angels at minimum $375/META ($7.81M FDV), no discount, no lockup"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "fundraise", "capital-formation", "venture-capital"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-26-futardio-proposal-approve-metadao-fundraise-2.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Approve Fundraise #2
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ summary: "Hire Advaith Sekharan as founding engineer with $180K salary and 237 M
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-22-futardio-proposal-hire-advaith-sekharan-as-founding-engineer.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Hire Advaith Sekharan as Founding Engineer?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,15 @@ category: hiring
|
|||
summary: "Hire Robin Hanson (inventor of futarchy) as advisor — 0.1% supply (20.9 META) vested over 2 years for mechanism design and strategy"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "robin-hanson", "advisory", "mechanism-design"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-10-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-hire-robin-hanson-as-an-advisor.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- Robin Hanson|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Robin Hanson
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Hire Robin Hanson as Advisor
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,24 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-26-futardio-proposal-increase-meta-liquidity-via-a-dutch-auction.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Increase META Liquidity via a Dutch Auction
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,21 @@ category: "mechanism"
|
|||
summary: "Upgrade Autocrat program to v0.1 with configurable proposal durations (default 3 days) and migrate 990K META, 10K USDC, 5.5 SOL to new treasury"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,14 @@ category: mechanism
|
|||
summary: "Upgrade Autocrat to v0.2 with reclaimable rent, conditional token merging, improved metadata, and lower pass threshold (5% to 3%)"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "autocrat", "mechanism-upgrade", "solana"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-28-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v02.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,19 @@ category: mechanism
|
|||
summary: "1:1000 token split, mintable supply, new DAO v0.5 (Squads), LP fee reduction from 4% to 0.5%"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "token-migration", "elastic-supply", "squads", "meta-token"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-08-07-futardio-proposal-migrate-meta-token.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update"
|
||||
- MetaDAO treasury exhaustion forces token architecture migration because fixed supply prevents future governance flexibility
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- MetaDAO treasury exhaustion forces token architecture migration because fixed supply prevents future governance flexibility|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate META Token
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,6 +29,21 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tags: [metadao, migration, omnibus, futarchy-amm, legal, v0.6.1, passed]
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,28 @@ tags: [metadao, otc, ben-hawkins, liquidity, failed]
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,19 @@ summary: "Pantera Capital proposed acquiring $50,000 USDC worth of META tokens t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-50000-otc-trade-with-pantera-capital.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- Pantera Capital|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Pantera Capital
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Engage in $50,000 OTC Trade with Pantera Capital
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
**Status:** Passed
|
||||
**Category:** Liquidation
|
||||
**Parent Entity:** [[metadao]]
|
||||
**Affected Project:** [[ranger-finance]]
|
||||
**Affected Project:** [[ranger-protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Summary
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ category: strategy
|
|||
summary: "Launch permissioned launchpad for futarchy DAOs — 'unruggable ICOs' where all USDC goes to DAO treasury or liquidity pool"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "launchpad", "unruggable-ico", "capital-formation", "futardio"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-26-futardio-proposal-release-a-launchpad.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Release a Launchpad
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tags: [metadao, fundraise, otc, market-sale, passed]
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to convert $150,000 USDC (6.8% of treasury) into ISC stableco
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- ISC (Inflation-Resistant Stablecoin)
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- ISC (Inflation-Resistant Stablecoin)|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Swap $150,000 into ISC?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ category: mechanism
|
|||
summary: "1:1000 token split with mint authority to DAO governance — failed, but nearly identical proposal passed 6 months later"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "token-split", "elastic-supply", "meta-token", "governance"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-01-28-futardio-proposal-perform-token-split-and-adopt-elastic-supply-for-meta.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- MetaDAO treasury exhaustion forces token architecture migration because fixed supply prevents future governance flexibility
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- MetaDAO treasury exhaustion forces token architecture migration because fixed supply prevents future governance flexibility|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Perform Token Split and Adopt Elastic Supply for META
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,29 @@ tags:
|
|||
- governance
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-12-03-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v01.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Proposal #1"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Futardio: Proposal #1|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "MycoRealms attempted two ICO launches raising $158K then $82K against
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-mycorealms.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- myco realms demonstrates futarchy governed physical infrastructure through 125k mushroom farm raise with market controlled capex deployment
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- myco realms demonstrates futarchy governed physical infrastructure through 125k mushroom farm raise with market controlled capex deployment|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MycoRealms: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Allocate 64,000 USDC for two-part security audit: Offside Labs (manual
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Increase Omnipair monthly spending limit from $10K to $50K to hire dev
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Migrate Omnipair liquidity from Raydium CPMM to MetaDAO v0.6 futarchyA
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show more
Loading…
Reference in a new issue