Compare commits
15 commits
contrib/ca
...
main
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8130f61355 | ||
|
|
da933cad73 | ||
|
|
deb9658a07 | ||
|
|
954e1cd089 | ||
|
|
1f9a872724 | ||
|
|
157e82b265 | ||
| 988c376865 | |||
| b5c6180dba | |||
| 018ee566e2 | |||
| 3c2faabb84 | |||
|
|
302d7c79f2 | ||
| dff7b29965 | |||
|
|
da64f805e6 | ||
|
|
dba00a7960 | ||
| 13c7dc0c0b |
555 changed files with 4554 additions and 1174 deletions
|
|
@ -20,20 +20,30 @@ You think something in the knowledge base is wrong or missing nuance. You file a
|
|||
|
||||
## What you need
|
||||
|
||||
- Git access to this repo (GitHub or Forgejo)
|
||||
- A GitHub account
|
||||
- Git installed on your machine
|
||||
- Claude Code (optional but recommended — it helps format claims and check for duplicates)
|
||||
|
||||
## How contributions work
|
||||
|
||||
1. You fork the repo, push changes to your fork, and open a PR on GitHub
|
||||
2. A mirror syncs your PR to the internal eval pipeline (~2 minutes)
|
||||
3. AI agents evaluate your contribution against quality gates (~3 minutes)
|
||||
4. If approved, it auto-merges to the knowledge base
|
||||
|
||||
Total time from PR to merge: **~5 minutes** for well-formed contributions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Path 1: Submit source material
|
||||
|
||||
This is the simplest contribution. You provide content; the agents do the extraction.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Clone and branch
|
||||
### 1. Fork and clone
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git clone https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
|
||||
# Fork on GitHub first (click "Fork" at https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex)
|
||||
git clone https://github.com/YOUR-USERNAME/teleo-codex.git
|
||||
cd teleo-codex
|
||||
git checkout main && git pull
|
||||
git remote add upstream https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
|
||||
git checkout -b contrib/your-name/brief-description
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ Source: [what this is and why it matters]"
|
|||
git push -u origin contrib/your-name/brief-description
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then open a PR. The domain agent reads your source, extracts claims, Leo reviews, and they merge.
|
||||
Then open a PR **against `living-ip/teleo-codex` main** on GitHub. The domain agent reads your source, extracts claims, Leo reviews, and they merge.
|
||||
|
||||
## Path 2: Propose a claim directly
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,7 +97,7 @@ You have domain expertise and want to state a thesis yourself — not just drop
|
|||
|
||||
### 1. Clone and branch
|
||||
|
||||
Same as Path 1.
|
||||
Same as Path 1 (fork, clone, branch).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Check for duplicates
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "Architecture paper defining the five contribution roles, their wei
|
|||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "Leo, original architecture with Cory-approved weight calibration"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-26
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- contributor guide
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- contributor guide|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Contribution Scoring & Attribution Architecture
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ confidence: experimental
|
|||
source: "Synthesis by Leo from: Aldasoro et al (BIS) via Rio PR #26; Noah Smith HITL elimination via Theseus PR #25; knowledge embodiment lag (Imas, David, Brynjolfsson) via foundations"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-07
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "early AI adoption increases firm productivity without reducing employment suggesting capital deepening not labor replacement as the dominant mechanism"
|
||||
- "economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate"
|
||||
- "knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox"
|
||||
- early AI adoption increases firm productivity without reducing employment suggesting capital deepening not labor replacement as the dominant mechanism
|
||||
- economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate
|
||||
- knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AI labor displacement follows knowledge embodiment lag phases where capital deepening precedes labor substitution and the transition timing depends on organizational restructuring not technology capability
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ confidence: experimental
|
|||
source: "Synthesis by Leo from: centaur team claim (Kasparov); HITL degradation claim (Wachter/Patil, Stanford-Harvard study); AI scribe adoption (Bessemer 2026); alignment scalable oversight claims"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-07
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination"
|
||||
- "human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs"
|
||||
- "AI scribes reached 92 percent provider adoption in under 3 years because documentation is the rare healthcare workflow where AI value is immediate unambiguous and low-risk"
|
||||
- "scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps"
|
||||
- centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination
|
||||
- human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs
|
||||
- AI scribes reached 92 percent provider adoption in under 3 years because documentation is the rare healthcare workflow where AI value is immediate unambiguous and low-risk
|
||||
- scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Does human oversight improve or degrade AI clinical decision-making?
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Does human oversight improve or degrade AI clinical decision-making?|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# centaur teams succeed only when role boundaries prevent humans from overriding AI in domains where AI is the stronger partner
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-03-05
|
|||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "John Lewis Gaddis 'On Grand Strategy' 2018"
|
||||
tradition: "Grand strategy, organizational theory"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- fitness landscape ruggedness determines whether adaptive systems find good solutions because smooth landscapes reward hill climbing while rugged landscapes trap agents in local optima and require exploration or recombination to escape
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- fitness landscape ruggedness determines whether adaptive systems find good solutions because smooth landscapes reward hill climbing while rugged landscapes trap agents in local optima and require exploration or recombination to escape|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# common sense is like oxygen it thins at altitude because power insulates leaders from the feedback loops that maintain good judgment
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ depends_on:
|
|||
- community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- access friction functions as a natural conviction filter in token launches because process difficulty selects for genuine believers while price friction selects for wealthy speculators
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- access friction functions as a natural conviction filter in token launches because process difficulty selects for genuine believers while price friction selects for wealthy speculators|supports|2026-04-04
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# early-conviction pricing is an unsolved mechanism design problem because systems that reward early believers attract extractive speculators while systems that prevent speculation penalize genuine supporters
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "An agent's health should be measured by cross-domain engagement (r
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Vida agent directory design (March 2026), Woolley et al 2010 (c-factor correlates with interaction not individual ability)"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-08
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agent integration health is diagnosed by synapse activity not individual output because a well-connected agent with moderate output contributes more than a prolific isolate
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
|
|||
created: 2026-03-03
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
source: "Strategy session journal, March 2026"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agent token price relative to NAV governs agent behavior through a simulated annealing mechanism where market volatility maps to exploration and market confidence maps to exploitation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "Compares Teleo's architecture against Wikipedia, Community Notes,
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Theseus, original analysis grounded in CI literature and operational comparison of existing knowledge aggregation systems"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- conversational memory and organizational knowledge are fundamentally different problems sharing some infrastructure because identical formats mask divergent governance lifecycle and quality requirements
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- conversational memory and organizational knowledge are fundamentally different problems sharing some infrastructure because identical formats mask divergent governance lifecycle and quality requirements|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Agent-mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi-agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ related:
|
|||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- agent mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- evaluation and optimization have opposite model diversity optima because evaluation benefits from cross family diversity while optimization benefits from same family reasoning pattern alignment|related|2026-04-06
|
||||
- human contributors structurally correct for correlated AI blind spots because external evaluators provide orthogonal error distributions that no same family model can replicate|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- human contributors structurally correct for correlated AI blind spots because external evaluators provide orthogonal error distributions that no same family model can replicate
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# All agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposer's training biases
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "MetaDAO Launchpad"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "mechanism design, network effects, token economics"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Broad community ownership creates competitive advantage through aligned evangelism, not just capital raising. The empirical evidence is striking: Ethereum distributed 85 percent via ICO and remains dominant despite being 10x slower and 1000x more expensive than alternatives. Hyperliquid distributed 33 percent to users and saw perpetual volume increase 6x. Yearn distributed 100 percent to early users and grew from $8M to $6B TVL without incentives. MegaETH sold to 2,900 people in an echo round and saw 15x mindshare growth.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "LivingIP Evolution of Collective Knowledge"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# cross-domain knowledge connections generate disproportionate value because most insights are siloed
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,13 @@ created: 2026-03-07
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- graph traversal through curated wiki links replicates spreading activation from cognitive science because progressive disclosure implements decay based context loading and queries evolve during search through the berrypicking effect
|
||||
- undiscovered public knowledge exists as implicit connections across disconnected research domains and systematic graph traversal can surface hypotheses that no individual researcher has formulated
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
|
||||
- contributor guide
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- graph traversal through curated wiki links replicates spreading activation from cognitive science because progressive disclosure implements decay based context loading and queries evolve during search through the berrypicking effect|related|2026-04-03
|
||||
- undiscovered public knowledge exists as implicit connections across disconnected research domains and systematic graph traversal can surface hypotheses that no individual researcher has formulated|related|2026-04-07
|
||||
- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- contributor guide|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-capital
|
|||
created: 2026-02-16
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Living Capital"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- governance first capital second sequencing prevents token capture of protocol development because early capital injection selects for financialized governance participants
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- governance first capital second sequencing prevents token capture of protocol development because early capital injection selects for financialized governance participants|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-03-04
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "MetaDAO Terms of Service, Founder/Operator Legal Pack, inbox research files, web research"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Futarchy Labs
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Futarchy Labs|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-03-04
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
source: "MetaDAO Founder/Operator Legal Pack, Solomon Labs governance docs, MetaDAO Terms of Service, inbox research files"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Galaxy Research, State of Onchain Futarchy (2025)"
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, prediction markets"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Augur
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Augur|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The 2024 US election provided empirical vindication for prediction markets versus traditional polling. Polymarket's markets proved more accurate, more responsive to new information, and more democratically accessible than centralized polling operations. This success directly catalyzed renewed interest in applying futarchy to DAO governance—if markets outperform polls for election prediction, the same logic suggests they should outperform token voting for organizational decisions.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
|
|||
created: 2026-03-03
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Strategy session journal, March 2026"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Formal coordination mechanisms require shared narrative as prerequisite for valid objective function specification because the choice of what to optimize for is a narrative commitment the mechanism cannot make autonomously
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- MetaDAO's coin-price objective function partially resolves the Rasmont selection-correlation critique by making the welfare metric endogenous to the market mechanism, while retaining macro-tailwind selection bias
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Formal coordination mechanisms require shared narrative as prerequisite for valid objective function specification because the choice of what to optimize for is a narrative commitment the mechanism cannot make autonomously|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- MetaDAO's coin-price objective function partially resolves the Rasmont selection-correlation critique by making the welfare metric endogenous to the market mechanism, while retaining macro-tailwind selection bias|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Vitalik Buterin once noted that "pure futarchy has proven difficult to introduce, because in practice objective functions are very difficult to define (it's not just coin price that people want!)." For asset futarchy governing valuable holdings, this objection misses the point. Coin price is not merely acceptable—it is the fairest and most elegant objective function, and probably the only acceptable one for DAOs holding valuable assets.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Conditional decision market selection bias is mitigatable through decision-maker market participation, timing transparency, and low-rate random rejection without requiring structural redesign
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Conditional decision market selection bias is mitigatable through decision-maker market participation, timing transparency, and low-rate random rejection without requiring structural redesign|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Decision markets create a mechanism where attempting to steal from minority holders becomes a losing trade. The four conditional tokens (fABC, pABC, pUSD, fUSD) establish a constraint: for a treasury-raiding proposal to pass, pABC/pUSD must trade higher than fABC/fUSD. But from any rational perspective, 1 fABC is worth 1 ABC (DAO continues normally) while 1 pABC is worth 0 (DAO becomes empty after raid).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Rio Futarchy Experiment"
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, behavioral economics, market microstructure"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Is futarchy's low participation in uncontested decisions efficient disuse or a sign of structural adoption barriers?
|
||||
- Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Is futarchy's low participation in uncontested decisions efficient disuse or a sign of structural adoption barriers?|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Futarchy faces three concrete adoption barriers that compound to limit participation: token price psychology, proposal creation difficulty, and liquidity requirements. These aren't theoretical concerns but observed friction in MetaDAO's implementation.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
|
|||
source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
|
||||
confidence: proven
|
||||
tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The fundamental defect of token voting DAOs is that governance tokens are only useful if you command voting majority, and unlike equity shares they entitle minority holders to nothing. There is no internal mechanism preventing majorities from raiding treasuries and distributing assets only among themselves. Wholesale looting is not uncommon—Serum had multiple incidents, the CKS Mango raid remains unresolved, and the Uniswap DeFi Education Fund granted $20M based on a short forum post with no argument for token value accretion.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-21
|
|||
source: "Tamim Ansary, The Invention of Yesterday (2019); McLennan College Distinguished Lecture Series"
|
||||
confidence: likely
|
||||
tradition: "cultural history, narrative theory"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,12 @@ source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-areal-finance.md"
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- areal proposes unified rwa liquidity through index token aggregating yield across project tokens
|
||||
- areal targets smb rwa tokenization as underserved market versus equity and large financial instruments
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- areal proposes unified rwa liquidity through index token aggregating yield across project tokens|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- areal targets smb rwa tokenization as underserved market versus equity and large financial instruments|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Areal: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Introduces Meta-PoW economic model moving mining power into pickaxes a
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-meta-pow-the-ore-treasury-protocol.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'coal': \"Let's get Futarded\"}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'coal': \"Let's get Futarded|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ summary: "Convert DAO treasury from volatile SOL/SPL assets to stablecoins to re
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|supports|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ summary: "Transition from USDC payments to $DEAN token distributions funded by s
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,18 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-30-futardio-proposal-fund-deans-list-dao-website-redesign.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model\"}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|related|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Allocate 1M $DEAN tokens ($1,300 USDC equivalent) to University of Wat
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-08-futardio-proposal-reward-the-university-of-waterloo-blockchain-club-with-1-mil.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-22-futardio-proposal-thailanddao-event-promotion-to-boost-deans-list-dao-engageme.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Increase swap liquidity fee from 0.25% to 5% DLMM base fee, switch quo
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-01-14-futardio-proposal-should-deans-list-dao-update-the-liquidity-fee-structure.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,13 @@ tags:
|
|||
- solana
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ tags:
|
|||
- solana
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
completion_rate: "3.3%"
|
||||
duration: "1 day"
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-digifrens.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# DigiFrens: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Drift DAO approved 50,000 DRIFT allocation for AI Agents Grants progra
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-19-futardio-proposal-allocate-50000-drift-to-fund-the-drift-ai-agent-request-for.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ summary: "Proposal to establish community-run Drift Working Group with 50,000 DR
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-13-futardio-proposal-fund-the-drift-working-group.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,27 @@ summary: "50,000 DRIFT incentive program to reward early MetaDAO participants an
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override
|
||||
- futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
|
||||
- futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Futarchy Proposal - Welcome the Futarchs
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Drift DAO approved 100,000 DRIFT to launch a two-month pilot grants pr
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-07-09-futardio-proposal-initialize-the-drift-foundation-grant-program.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Futarchy Arena raised $934 of $50,000 target (1.9% fill rate) for the
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-futarchy-arena.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- "{'NFA.space': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'NFA.space': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Approved $25,000 budget for developing Pre-Governance Mandates tool an
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-30-futardio-proposal-approve-budget-for-pre-governance-hackathon-development.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Fund the Rug Bounty Program'}"
|
||||
- FutureDAO
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Fund the Rug Bounty Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- FutureDAO|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ summary: "Futardio cult raised via MetaDAO ICO — funds for fan merch, token li
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'MycoRealms': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MycoRealms': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio Cult: Futardio Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Allocate $10K from treasury to create FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM pool:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Reduce team spending to $50/mo (X Premium only), burn 4.5M of 5M perfo
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ summary: "Proposal to fund RugBounty.xyz platform development with $5,000 USDC t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-14-futardio-proposal-fund-the-rug-bounty-program.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- FutureDAO
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- FutureDAO|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FutureDAO: Fund the Rug Bounty Program
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
twap_requirement: "3% increase (523k to 539k USDC MCAP)"
|
||||
target_dean_price: "0.005383 USDC (from 0.005227)"
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model\"}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|supports|2026-04-18\"}"
|
||||
- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Allocate $1.5M USDC for LOYAL buyback at max $0.238/token to protect t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Loyal: Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Withdraw 90% of tokens from single-sided Meteora DAMM v2 pool and burn
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
duration: "1 day"
|
||||
oversubscription_ratio: 0.0017
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-manna-finance.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Manna Finance: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-26-futardio-proposal-appoint-nallok-and-proph3t-benevolent-dictators-for-three-mo.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "MetaDAO Q3 roadmap focusing on market-based grants product launch, SF
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: treasury
|
|||
summary: "Burn ~979,000 of 982,464 treasury-held META tokens to reduce FDV and attract investors"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "tokenomics", "treasury-management", "meta-token"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-03-futardio-proposal-burn-993-of-meta-in-treasury.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Burn 99.3% of META in Treasury
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,15 @@ category: hiring
|
|||
summary: "Convex payout: 2% supply per $1B market cap increase (max 10% at $5B), $90K/yr salary each, 4-year vest starting April 2028"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "compensation", "founder-incentives", "mechanism-design"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-27-futardio-proposal-approve-performance-based-compensation-package-for-proph3t-a.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ category: strategy
|
|||
summary: "Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "futardio", "governance-filtering"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-21-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-create-futardio.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ summary: "Proposal to create a spot market for $META tokens through a public tok
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-01-12-futardio-proposal-create-spot-market-for-meta.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-
|
|||
supports:
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs by 99 percent versus clob by eliminating orderbook storage requirements
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs from 135 225 sol annually to near zero by replacing clob market pairs
|
||||
- joebuild
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs by 99 percent versus clob by eliminating orderbook storage requirements|supports|2026-04-04
|
||||
- amm futarchy reduces state rent costs from 135 225 sol annually to near zero by replacing clob market pairs|supports|2026-04-04
|
||||
- joebuild|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ category: strategy
|
|||
summary: "Fund $96K to build futarchy-as-a-service platform enabling other Solana DAOs to adopt futarchic governance"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "faas", "product-development", "solana-daos"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-13-futardio-proposal-develop-futarchy-as-a-service-faas.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
|
||||
- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ tags: [metadao, lst, marinade, bribe-market, first-proposal]
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-11-18-futardio-proposal-develop-a-lst-vote-market.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,23 @@ tags: [metadao, futardio, memecoin, launchpad, failed]
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-14-futardio-proposal-develop-memecoin-launchpad.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Futardio Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop Memecoin Launchpad?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to develop multi-modal proposal functionality allowing multip
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-20-futardio-proposal-develop-multi-option-proposals.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- agrippa
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- agrippa|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ summary: "Proposal to build a Saber vote market platform funded by $150k consort
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-12-16-futardio-proposal-develop-a-saber-vote-market.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-05-futardio-proposal-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tags: [metadao, market-making, liquidity, cex-listing, passed]
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ category: fundraise
|
|||
summary: "Raise $1.5M by selling up to 4,000 META to VCs and angels at minimum $375/META ($7.81M FDV), no discount, no lockup"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "fundraise", "capital-formation", "venture-capital"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-26-futardio-proposal-approve-metadao-fundraise-2.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Approve Fundraise #2
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Hire Advaith Sekharan as founding engineer with $180K salary and 237 M
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-22-futardio-proposal-hire-advaith-sekharan-as-founding-engineer.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Hire Advaith Sekharan as Founding Engineer?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ category: hiring
|
|||
summary: "Hire Robin Hanson (inventor of futarchy) as advisor — 0.1% supply (20.9 META) vested over 2 years for mechanism design and strategy"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "robin-hanson", "advisory", "mechanism-design"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-10-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-hire-robin-hanson-as-an-advisor.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Hire Robin Hanson as Advisor
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,16 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-26-futardio-proposal-increase-meta-liquidity-via-a-dutch-auction.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Increase META Liquidity via a Dutch Auction
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ category: "mechanism"
|
|||
summary: "Upgrade Autocrat program to v0.1 with configurable proposal durations (default 3 days) and migrate 990K META, 10K USDC, 5.5 SOL to new treasury"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: mechanism
|
|||
summary: "Upgrade Autocrat to v0.2 with reclaimable rent, conditional token merging, improved metadata, and lower pass threshold (5% to 3%)"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "autocrat", "mechanism-upgrade", "solana"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-28-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v02.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: mechanism
|
|||
summary: "1:1000 token split, mintable supply, new DAO v0.5 (Squads), LP fee reduction from 4% to 0.5%"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "token-migration", "elastic-supply", "squads", "meta-token"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-08-07-futardio-proposal-migrate-meta-token.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate META Token
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,6 +29,15 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tags: [metadao, migration, omnibus, futarchy-amm, legal, v0.6.1, passed]
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ tags: [metadao, otc, ben-hawkins, liquidity, failed]
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Pantera Capital proposed acquiring $50,000 USDC worth of META tokens t
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-50000-otc-trade-with-pantera-capital.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Engage in $50,000 OTC Trade with Pantera Capital
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
**Status:** Passed
|
||||
**Category:** Liquidation
|
||||
**Parent Entity:** [[metadao]]
|
||||
**Affected Project:** [[ranger-finance]]
|
||||
**Affected Project:** [[ranger-protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Summary
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: strategy
|
|||
summary: "Launch permissioned launchpad for futarchy DAOs — 'unruggable ICOs' where all USDC goes to DAO treasury or liquidity pool"
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "launchpad", "unruggable-ico", "capital-formation", "futardio"]
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-26-futardio-proposal-release-a-launchpad.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Release a Launchpad
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tags: [metadao, fundraise, otc, market-sale, passed]
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to convert $150,000 USDC (6.8% of treasury) into ISC stableco
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- ISC (Inflation-Resistant Stablecoin)
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- ISC (Inflation-Resistant Stablecoin)|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Swap $150,000 into ISC?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,21 @@ tags:
|
|||
- governance
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-12-03-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v01.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
|
||||
- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
- metadao governance migration 2026 03|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "MycoRealms attempted two ICO launches raising $158K then $82K against
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-mycorealms.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- myco realms demonstrates futarchy governed physical infrastructure through 125k mushroom farm raise with market controlled capex deployment
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- myco realms demonstrates futarchy governed physical infrastructure through 125k mushroom farm raise with market controlled capex deployment|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MycoRealms: Futardio ICO Launch
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Allocate 64,000 USDC for two-part security audit: Offside Labs (manual
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Increase Omnipair monthly spending limit from $10K to $50K to hire dev
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Migrate Omnipair liquidity from Raydium CPMM to MetaDAO v0.6 futarchyA
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Deploy 20,000 USDC to fund top 3 ideas built on Omnipair via Spark hac
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-12-futardio-proposal-omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to launch liquidity boost for HNT-ORE pair and formalize thre
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-25-futardio-proposal-launch-a-boost-for-hnt-ore.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Helium
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Helium|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# ORE: Launch a boost for HNT-ORE?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
|
|||
name: "Ranger: RNGR $2M Buyback"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[ranger-finance]]"
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[ranger-protocol]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Community Members"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/6cdhy4j6CAAJjE1z2iQDsFda2BrqJkhtHrRWT9QasSoa"
|
||||
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Community-initiated proposal to deploy $2M USDC from treasury to purchase RNGR t
|
|||
Demonstrates the ownership coin NAV defense mechanism in practice. When token price falls below NAV, the treasury becomes an arbitrage target — rational actors can buy tokens cheap and vote for liquidation to extract treasury value. The buyback attempts to close the NAV gap and prevent adversarial liquidation. The 90-day cooldown prevents repeated buyback/liquidation cycling.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[ranger-finance]] — parent entity, treasury defense
|
||||
- [[ranger-protocol]] — parent entity, treasury defense
|
||||
- [[ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests]] — buyback mechanism
|
||||
- [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]] — NAV defense
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
|
|||
name: "Ranger: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[ranger-finance]]"
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[ranger-protocol]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Ranger Finance team"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/ranger/trade/8Nmd13rpULJjY7h6oxCfuTWy8WkZxcuDrDWiSdnViVuo"
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Ranger Finance, a perps aggregator and trading terminal on Solana, launched via
|
|||
First MetaDAO ICO with pre-existing investors and obligations, setting precedent for how legacy cap table structures integrate with futarchy governance. The bid program (excess capital returnable) addresses oversubscription concerns. Team performance package with price-based unlocks at specific multiples of ICO price demonstrates the milestone-vesting model.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[ranger-finance]] — parent entity
|
||||
- [[ranger-protocol]] — parent entity
|
||||
- [[metadao]] — ICO platform
|
||||
- [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution]] — team package structure
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
|
|||
name: "Ranger: Liquidate Ranger Finance"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[ranger-finance]]"
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[ranger-protocol]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Group of RNGR tokenholders"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/DPATwR2HLcGZCBZCTffzagV4r7dp5FF2C9aJmiuCDUpS"
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Tokenholders voted to liquidate Ranger Finance citing material misrepr
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-02-futardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- FairScale
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- FairScale|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Ranger: Liquidate Ranger Finance
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,7 +48,7 @@ Third futarchy-governed liquidation on MetaDAO (after mtnCapital and Hurupay), b
|
|||
The detailed on-chain evidence (Dune queries, Discord screenshots, timeline analysis) presented in the proposal shows the level of due diligence possible when governance is transparent and data is on-chain.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[ranger-finance]] — parent entity, liquidation event
|
||||
- [[ranger-protocol]] — parent entity, liquidation event
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent]] — strongest evidence
|
||||
- [[futarchy can override its own prior decisions when new evidence emerges because conditional markets re-evaluate proposals against current information not historical commitments]] — overrode 90-day cooldown
|
||||
- [[ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match]] — liquidation as investor protection
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
commitment_ratio: "0.01"
|
||||
duration: "1 day"
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-runbookai.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- MILO AI Agent|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RunBookAI: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ summary: "SeekerVault raised $2,095 of $50,000 target (4.2% fill rate) in second
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-08-futardio-launch-seeker-vault.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
|
||||
- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# SeekerVault: Futardio ICO Launch (2nd Attempt)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-superclaw.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Superclaw: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
|
|||
name: "Umbra: UMBRA-001 — Fund Security Audits"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[umbra]]"
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[umbra-privacy-protocol]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Umbra team"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/71nYHjLpgY7evn9G4UaGCBd6cYHpGWzrzd3ESs2KUduG"
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Fund Umbra security audits before mainnet launch"
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-12-futardio-proposal-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Umbra: UMBRA-001 — Fund Security Audits
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,7 +34,7 @@ Umbra allocated treasury funds for security audits before mainnet launch, follow
|
|||
Second FaaS-launched project (after Omnipair) using futarchy to approve pre-launch security audits, establishing this as a standard governance pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[umbra]] — parent entity, pre-launch security
|
||||
- [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] — parent entity, pre-launch security
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — governance platform
|
||||
|
||||
## Full Proposal Text
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
|
|||
name: "Umbra: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[umbra]]"
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[umbra-privacy-protocol]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Umbra team"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/9kx7UDFzFt7e2V4pFtawnupKKvRR3EhV7P1Pxmc5XCQj"
|
||||
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Umbra launched via MetaDAO's futarchy-governed ICO platform.
|
|||
- **Duration:** 2025-10-06 to 2025-10-10
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[umbra]] — parent entity
|
||||
- [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] — parent entity
|
||||
- [[metadao]] — ICO platform
|
||||
|
||||
## Full Proposal Text
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
|
|||
name: "Umbra: Road to Mainnet — Operational Expansion"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[umbra]]"
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[umbra-privacy-protocol]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "Umbra team"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/3seyB3i5bLQcUReaQoLkgwkNbVH7U7nnfiAFVaNawU6F"
|
||||
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Umbra proposed operational expansion to support the path to mainnet deployment,
|
|||
- **Duration:** 2026-01-13 to ~2026-01-16
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[umbra]] — parent entity, mainnet preparation
|
||||
- [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] — parent entity, mainnet preparation
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — governance platform
|
||||
|
||||
## Full Proposal Text
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-versus.md"
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
|
||||
- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# VERSUS: Futardio Fundraise
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Allocate $200K USDC for ZKLSOL token buyback to defend NAV"
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# ZKLSOL: $200K Buyback
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Burn team performance package tokens to demonstrate alignment with com
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-24
|
||||
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-22-futardio-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md"
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|supports|2026-04-18'}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# ZKLSOL: Burn Team Performance Package
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ source: "Tomasev et al, Distributional AGI Safety (arXiv 2512.16856, December 20
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- multi agent deployment exposes emergent security vulnerabilities invisible to single agent evaluation because cross agent propagation identity spoofing and unauthorized compliance arise only in realistic multi party environments
|
||||
- Hyperspace
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- multi agent deployment exposes emergent security vulnerabilities invisible to single agent evaluation because cross agent propagation identity spoofing and unauthorized compliance arise only in realistic multi party environments|related|2026-03-28
|
||||
- Hyperspace|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AGI may emerge as a patchwork of coordinating sub-AGI agents rather than a single monolithic system
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,9 +13,17 @@ challenged_by:
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile
|
||||
- the absence of a societal warning signal for AGI is a structural feature not an accident because capability scaling is gradual and ambiguous and collective action requires anticipation not reaction
|
||||
- motivated reasoning among AI lab leaders is itself a primary risk vector because those with most capability to slow down have most incentive to accelerate
|
||||
- technological development draws from an urn containing civilization destroying capabilities and only preventive governance can avoid black ball technologies
|
||||
- global capitalism functions as a misaligned optimizer that produces outcomes no participant would choose because individual rationality aggregates into collective irrationality without coordination mechanisms
|
||||
- indigenous restraint technologies like the Sabbath are historical precedents for binding the maximum power principle through social technology
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- the absence of a societal warning signal for AGI is a structural feature not an accident because capability scaling is gradual and ambiguous and collective action requires anticipation not reaction|related|2026-04-07
|
||||
- motivated reasoning among AI lab leaders is itself a primary risk vector because those with most capability to slow down have most incentive to accelerate|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
- technological development draws from an urn containing civilization destroying capabilities and only preventive governance can avoid black ball technologies|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
- global capitalism functions as a misaligned optimizer that produces outcomes no participant would choose because individual rationality aggregates into collective irrationality without coordination mechanisms|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
- indigenous restraint technologies like the Sabbath are historical precedents for binding the maximum power principle through social technology|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AI accelerates existing Molochian dynamics by removing bottlenecks not creating new misalignment because the competitive equilibrium was always catastrophic and friction was the only thing preventing convergence
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,10 +12,12 @@ related:
|
|||
- as AI automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems
|
||||
- iterative agent self improvement produces compounding capability gains when evaluation is structurally separated from generation
|
||||
- tools and artifacts transfer between AI agents and evolve in the process because Agent O improved Agent Cs solver by combining it with its own structural knowledge creating a hybrid better than either original
|
||||
- Hyperspace
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- as AI automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems|related|2026-03-28
|
||||
- iterative agent self improvement produces compounding capability gains when evaluation is structurally separated from generation|related|2026-03-28
|
||||
- tools and artifacts transfer between AI agents and evolve in the process because Agent O improved Agent Cs solver by combining it with its own structural knowledge creating a hybrid better than either original|related|2026-03-28
|
||||
- Hyperspace|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AI agents excel at implementing well-scoped ideas but cannot generate creative experiment designs which makes the human role shift from researcher to agent workflow architect
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,8 +7,13 @@ source: "Web research compilation, February 2026"
|
|||
confidence: likely
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- AI governance discourse has been captured by economic competitiveness framing, inverting predicted participation patterns where China signs non-binding declarations while the US opts out
|
||||
- Mandatory legislative governance with binding transition conditions closes the technology-coordination gap while voluntary governance under competitive pressure widens it
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- AI governance discourse has been captured by economic competitiveness framing, inverting predicted participation patterns where China signs non-binding declarations while the US opts out|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- The international AI safety governance community faces an evidence dilemma where development pace structurally prevents adequate pre-deployment evidence accumulation|supports|2026-04-17
|
||||
- Mandatory legislative governance with binding transition conditions closes the technology-coordination gap while voluntary governance under competitive pressure widens it|related|2026-04-18
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- The international AI safety governance community faces an evidence dilemma where development pace structurally prevents adequate pre-deployment evidence accumulation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Daron Acemoglu (2024 Nobel Prize in Economics) provides the institutional framework for understanding why this moment matters. His key concepts: extractive versus inclusive institutions, where change happens when institutions shift from extracting value for elites to including broader populations in governance; critical junctures, turning points when institutional paths diverge and destabilize existing orders, creating mismatches between institutions and people's aspirations; and structural resistance, where those in power resist change even when it would benefit them, not from ignorance but from structural incentive.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ description: "Anthropic's labor market data shows entry-level hiring declining i
|
|||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "Massenkoff & McCrory 2026, Current Population Survey analysis post-ChatGPT"
|
||||
created: 2026-03-08
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AI displacement hits young workers first because a 14 percent drop in job-finding rates for 22-25 year olds in exposed occupations is the leading indicator that incumbents organizational inertia temporarily masks
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show more
Loading…
Reference in a new issue