Compare commits

..

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
a60472a5fd rio: extract from 2024-08-27-futardio-proposal-fund-the-drift-superteam-earn-creator-competition.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-08-27-futardio-proposal-fund-the-drift-superteam-earn-creator-competition.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 14:54:25 +00:00
3 changed files with 15 additions and 14 deletions

View file

@ -19,21 +19,19 @@ created: 2026-03-11
# Drift: Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition
## Summary
Proposal to allocate $8,250 from the Drift Foundation Grants Program to fund a creator competition on Superteam Earn, celebrating the launch of B.E.T (Solana's first capital efficient prediction market). The competition included three bounty tracks (video, Twitter thread, trade ideas) plus a grand prize, each with tiered rewards.
Proposal to fund a $8,250 prize pool distributed across three content creation tracks (video, Twitter threads, trade ideas) plus a $3,000 grand prize to promote B.E.T, Solana's first capital efficient prediction market built on Drift Protocol. Competition would be run through Superteam Earn platform and funded in DRIFT tokens by the Drift Foundation Grants Program.
## Market Data
- **Outcome:** Failed
- **Proposer:** proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
- **Created:** 2024-08-27
- **Completed:** 2024-08-31
- **Prize Pool:** $8,250 in DRIFT tokens
- Grand prize: $3,000
- Three tracks at $1,750 each (1st: $1,000, 2nd: $500, 3rd: $250)
- **Prize Structure:** Grand prize ($3,000), three tracks at $1,750 each (1st: $1,000, 2nd: $500, 3rd: $250)
## Significance
Represents an early futarchy-governed marketing/community engagement decision for a DeFi protocol. The proposal tested whether prediction market governance could effectively allocate marketing spend for product launches. The failure suggests either insufficient market conviction in the ROI of creator bounties or broader skepticism about the B.E.T product launch timing.
Represents an early futarchy-governed grants decision for community engagement and marketing spend. The proposal's failure suggests either insufficient market confidence in the ROI of creator bounties or limited liquidity/participation in the decision market. Tests whether futarchy markets can effectively price cultural spending and community growth initiatives.
## Relationship to KB
- [[drift]] - parent entity governance decision
- [[futardio]] - governance platform
- [[metadao]] - futarchy implementation provider
- [[drift]] - governance decision
- [[futardio]] - platform
- [[futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs]] - relevant mechanism question

View file

@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Perpetuals DEX on Solana — one of the largest decentralized derivatives platfo
- **2024-12-19** — AI Agents Grants program: 50K DRIFT for trading, yield, info, and social agents
- **2025-02-13** — Drift Working Group funded via futarchy
- **2024-08-27** - [[drift-fund-the-drift-superteam-earn-creator-competition]] failed: $8,250 creator competition proposal for B.E.T launch rejected by futarchy markets
- **2024-08-27** [[drift-fund-the-drift-superteam-earn-creator-competition]] failed: $8,250 creator competition proposal for B.E.T promotion rejected by futarchy market
## Competitive Position
- **Futarchy validation**: Drift using MetaDAO's governance system is the strongest external validation signal — a major protocol choosing futarchy over traditional token voting for real treasury decisions.
- **Future leverage threat**: Drift listing META perps would directly compete with OmniPair for leverage demand. This is OmniPair's identified "key vulnerability" — the moat is temporary.

View file

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Single failed governance proposal with no novel mechanism insights. Entity extraction only - no claims warranted. The proposal is routine marketing spend allocation with no broader implications for futarchy design or adoption patterns. Drift entity already exists in KB, added timeline entry and created decision_market entity per schema."
extraction_notes: "Single failed proposal for grants/marketing spend. No novel mechanism insights - standard creator bounty structure through existing platform (Superteam Earn). Entity extraction only, no claims warranted. Proposal failure is data point for existing claim about futarchy pricing cultural spending."
---
## Proposal Details
@ -83,7 +83,10 @@ Link to campaign details and evaluation criteria: [Link](https://docs.google.com
## Key Facts
- Drift is the largest open-sourced perpetual futures exchange on Solana
- B.E.T is Solana's first capital efficient prediction market (Drift product)
- Proposal 4 on Drift DAO (account: AKMnVnSC8DzoZJktErtzR2QNt1ESoN8i2DdHPYuQTMGY)
- Superteam Earn is a bounty platform used for crypto project competitions
- Autocrat version 0.3 was the governance implementation
- B.E.T is Solana's first capital efficient prediction market built on Drift
- Proposal prize pool: $8,250 total ($3,000 grand prize + three $1,750 tracks)
- Competition would run through Superteam Earn platform
- Funding source: Drift Foundation Grants Program in DRIFT tokens
- Proposal account: AKMnVnSC8DzoZJktErtzR2QNt1ESoN8i2DdHPYuQTMGY
- DAO account: 5vVCYQHPd8o3pGejYWzKZtnUSdLjXzDZcjZQxiFumXXx
- Autocrat version: 0.3