Compare commits

..

No commits in common. "eb0c2e42ae687fdf216ec2a2130d56fae034b493" and "a664eeb0ca9005c33ba82c105fb42ddb1ebf03c0" have entirely different histories.

View file

@ -7,10 +7,6 @@ created: 2025-03-00
processed_date: 2025-03-00 processed_date: 2025-03-00
source: "VentureBeat" source: "VentureBeat"
extraction_notes: "Industry framing of baseline paradox entering mainstream discourse as named phenomenon. Primary claims already in KB from Google/MIT paper." extraction_notes: "Industry framing of baseline paradox entering mainstream discourse as named phenomenon. Primary claims already in KB from Google/MIT paper."
processed_by: leo
processed_date: 2026-03-19
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
--- ---
# VentureBeat: Multi-Agent Paradox Scaling # VentureBeat: Multi-Agent Paradox Scaling
@ -27,7 +23,3 @@ The value-add is the introduction of "baseline paradox" as a named phenomenon in
- [[coordination-protocol-cost-quantification]] - Adds cost quantification context - [[coordination-protocol-cost-quantification]] - Adds cost quantification context
Both enrichments create productive tension rather than simple confirmation. Both enrichments create productive tension rather than simple confirmation.
## Key Facts
- VentureBeat introduced 'baseline paradox' as terminology for the Google/MIT multi-agent performance degradation findings
- The article represents secondary coverage aimed at industry practitioners rather than researchers