Compare commits
2 commits
eb70f3e84f
...
3f369303fe
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3f369303fe | ||
|
|
16210bfb67 |
2 changed files with 33 additions and 64 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
dates:
|
||||
created: 2023-10-01
|
||||
processed_date: 2023-10-05
|
||||
category: finance
|
||||
summary: Sanctum offers investors early unlocks of their cloud investments.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Sanctum offers investors early unlocks of their cloud investments, allowing for greater liquidity and flexibility in managing their portfolios.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Data Points
|
||||
- Early unlocks provide liquidity.
|
||||
- Investors can manage portfolios more flexibly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Significance
|
||||
The mechanism of early unlocks serves as a forfeit-for-liquidity test, revealing investor preferences for liquidity over potential future gains.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- claim pending -->
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,70 +1,18 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
title: "Futardio: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?"
|
||||
author: "futard.io"
|
||||
url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX"
|
||||
date: 2025-08-20
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2025-08-20
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of vesting modification mechanism (forfeit-for-liquidity vs hedging) and additional futarchy implementation data point. All insights enrich existing claims about token vesting, futarchy adoption friction, and MetaDAO usage patterns. The failed proposal itself is a factual event, not an arguable claim."
|
||||
processed_by: AI
|
||||
processed_date: 2025-08-21
|
||||
enrichments_applied: true
|
||||
extraction_model: v2
|
||||
extraction_notes: Updated extraction model applied.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
- Project: Sanctum
|
||||
- Proposal: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?
|
||||
- Status: Failed
|
||||
- Created: 2025-08-20
|
||||
- URL: https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX
|
||||
- Description: This proposal would empower the Sanctum Team to offer investors immediate unlocks of their vesting CLOUD, forfeiting 35% of their CLOUD to the Team Reserve.
|
||||
- Discussion: https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud-under-deliberation/1793
|
||||
The proposal discusses whether Sanctum should offer investors early unlocks of their cloud investments, weighing the benefits of liquidity against potential future gains.
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
### Key Facts
|
||||
- Early unlocks provide liquidity.
|
||||
- Investors can manage portfolios more flexibly.
|
||||
|
||||
### 🎯 Key Points
|
||||
The proposal aims to allow investors to unlock their vested CLOUD immediately by forfeiting 35% of their holdings to the Team Reserve, potentially increasing the reserve by up to 27 million CLOUD and reducing token overhang.
|
||||
### Significance
|
||||
The mechanism of early unlocks serves as a forfeit-for-liquidity test, revealing investor preferences for liquidity over potential future gains.
|
||||
|
||||
### 📊 Impact Analysis
|
||||
#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
|
||||
Investors will gain immediate access to a portion of their CLOUD tokens, while the Sanctum Team will strengthen their reserve.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 📈 Upside Potential
|
||||
This move could enhance liquidity and investor satisfaction by providing early access to funds while bolstering the Team Reserve.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 📉 Risk Factors
|
||||
Forfeiting 35% of their tokens may deter some investors and could lead to negative sentiment regarding the token's long-term value.
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
||||
9% of token supply from investors is currently unlocking monthly for next 24 months.
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal would empower the Sanctum Team to offer investors immediate unlocks of their vesting CLOUD, forfeiting 35% of their CLOUD to the Team Reserve (which the team undertakes not to redistribute for at least the next 24 months).
|
||||
|
||||
The net result would be an increase of up to 27 million additional CLOUD to the Team Reserve & a decreased token overhang.
|
||||
|
||||
Read the full proposal here https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud-under-deliberation/1793
|
||||
|
||||
## Raw Data
|
||||
|
||||
- Proposal account: `C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX`
|
||||
- Proposal number: 2
|
||||
- DAO account: `GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov`
|
||||
- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2`
|
||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2025-08-23
|
||||
- Ended: 2025-08-23
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Sanctum proposal C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX failed (2025-08-23)
|
||||
- Proposal would have allowed 35% forfeit for immediate unlock of vested CLOUD
|
||||
- 9% of CLOUD token supply was unlocking monthly over 24 months from investors
|
||||
- Potential increase of up to 27 million CLOUD to Team Reserve if all investors opted in
|
||||
- Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months
|
||||
- Proposal used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3
|
||||
<!-- claim pending -->
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue