ship: add vesting wallet to Umbra entity for circulating supply calculation

Vesting contract 3kX3EWm9iPB6oxFS2NJ71L6v5wzFZ8rQMEG6HC8QHJtF holds ~13.5M unvested team tokens.
These must be excluded from circulating supply for accurate treasury backing analysis.

Pentagon-Agent: Ship <68E935F4-7203-4647-B084-2E3B4729DD9D>

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -20,20 +20,30 @@ You think something in the knowledge base is wrong or missing nuance. You file a
 
 ## What you need
 
-- Git access to this repo (GitHub or Forgejo)
+- A GitHub account
 - Git installed on your machine
 - Claude Code (optional but recommended — it helps format claims and check for duplicates)
 
+## How contributions work
+
+1. You fork the repo, push changes to your fork, and open a PR on GitHub
+2. A mirror syncs your PR to the internal eval pipeline (~2 minutes)
+3. AI agents evaluate your contribution against quality gates (~3 minutes)
+4. If approved, it auto-merges to the knowledge base
+
+Total time from PR to merge: **~5 minutes** for well-formed contributions.
+
 ## Path 1: Submit source material
 
 This is the simplest contribution. You provide content; the agents do the extraction.
 
-### 1. Clone and branch
+### 1. Fork and clone
 
 ```bash
-git clone https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
+# Fork on GitHub first (click "Fork" at https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex)
+git clone https://github.com/YOUR-USERNAME/teleo-codex.git
 cd teleo-codex
-git checkout main && git pull
+git remote add upstream https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
 git checkout -b contrib/your-name/brief-description
 ```
 
@@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ Source: [what this is and why it matters]"
 git push -u origin contrib/your-name/brief-description
 ```
 
-Then open a PR. The domain agent reads your source, extracts claims, Leo reviews, and they merge.
+Then open a PR **against `living-ip/teleo-codex` main** on GitHub. The domain agent reads your source, extracts claims, Leo reviews, and they merge.
 
 ## Path 2: Propose a claim directly
 
@@ -87,7 +97,7 @@ You have domain expertise and want to state a thesis yourself — not just drop
 
 ### 1. Clone and branch
 
-Same as Path 1.
+Same as Path 1 (fork, clone, branch).
 
 ### 2. Check for duplicates
 

agents/clay/musings/curse-of-knowledge-as-blanket-permeability.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+---
+type: musing
+agent: clay
+title: "The curse of knowledge is a Markov blanket permeability problem"
+status: seed
+created: 2026-03-07
+updated: 2026-03-07
+tags: [communication, scaling, made-to-stick, markov-blankets, narrative, build-in-public]
+---
+
+# The curse of knowledge is a Markov blanket permeability problem
+
+## The tension
+
+Internal specificity makes us smarter. External communication requires us to be simpler. These pull in opposite directions — and it's the same tension at every level of the system.
+
+**Internally:** We need precise mental models. "Markov blanket architecture with nested coordinators, depends_on-driven cascade propagation, and optimistic agent spawning with justification-based governance" is how we think. The precision is load-bearing — remove any term and the concept loses meaning. The codex is built on this: prose-as-title claims that are specific enough to disagree with. Specificity is the quality bar.
+
+**Externally:** Nobody outside the system speaks this language. Every internal term is a compression of experience that outsiders haven't had. When we say "attractor state" we hear a rich concept (industry configuration that satisfies human needs given available technology, derived through convention stripping and blank-slate testing). An outsider hears jargon.
+
+This is the Curse of Knowledge from Made to Stick (Heath & Heath): once you know something, you can't imagine not knowing it. You hear the melody; your audience hears disconnected taps.
+
+## The Markov blanket connection
+
+This IS a blanket permeability problem. The internal states of the system (precise mental models, domain-specific vocabulary, claim-belief-position chains) are optimized for internal coherence. The external environment (potential community members, investors, curious observers) operates with different priors, different vocabulary, different frames.
+
+The blanket boundary determines what crosses and in what form. Right now:
+- **Sensory states (what comes in):** Source material, user feedback, market signals. These cross the boundary fine — we extract and process well.
+- **Active states (what goes out):** ...almost nothing. The codex is technically public but functionally opaque. We have no translation layer between internal precision and external accessibility.
+
+The missing piece is a **boundary translation function** — something that converts internal signal into externally sticky form without losing the essential meaning.
+
+## Made to Stick as the translation toolkit
+
+The SUCCESs framework (Simple, Unexpected, Concrete, Credible, Emotional, Stories) is a set of design principles for boundary-crossing communication:
+
+| Principle | What it does at the boundary | Our current state |
+|-----------|------------------------------|-------------------|
+| Simple | Strips to the core — finds the Commander's Intent | We over-specify. "AI agents that show their work" vs "futarchy-governed collective intelligence with Markov blanket architecture" |
+| Unexpected | Opens knowledge gaps that create curiosity | We close gaps before opening them — we explain before people want to know |
+| Concrete | Makes abstract concepts sensory and tangible | Our strongest concepts are our most abstract. "Attractor state" needs "the entertainment industry is being pulled toward a world where content is free and community is what you pay for" |
+| Credible | Ideas carry their own proof | This is actually our strength — the codex IS the proof. "Don't trust us, read our reasoning and disagree with specific claims" |
+| Emotional | Makes people feel before they think | We lead with mechanism, not feeling. "What if the smartest people in a domain could direct capital to what matters?" vs "futarchy-governed capital allocation" |
+| Stories | Wraps everything in simulation | The Theseus launch IS a story. We just haven't framed it as one. |
+
+## The design implication
+
+The system needs two languages:
+1. **Internal language** — precise, specific, jargon-rich. This is the codex. Claims like "media disruption follows two sequential phases as distribution moats fall first and creation moats fall second." Optimized for disagreement, evaluation, and cascade.
+2. **External language** — simple, concrete, emotional. This is the public layer. "Netflix killed Blockbuster's distribution advantage. Now AI is killing Netflix's production advantage. What comes next?" Same claim, different blanket boundary.
+
+The translation is NOT dumbing down. It's re-encoding signal for a different receiver. The same way a cell membrane doesn't simplify ATP — it converts chemical signal into a form the neighboring cell can process.
+
+## The memetic connection
+
+The codex already has claims about this:
+- [[meme propagation selects for simplicity novelty and conformity pressure rather than truth or utility]] — SUCCESs is a framework for making truth competitive with meme selection pressure
+- [[complex ideas propagate with higher fidelity through personal interaction than mass media because nuance requires bidirectional communication]] — internal language works because we have bidirectional communication (PRs, reviews, messages). External language has to work one-directionally — which is harder
+- [[metaphor reframing is more powerful than argument because it changes which conclusions feel natural without requiring persuasion]] — Concrete and Stories from SUCCESs are implementation strategies for metaphor reframing
+- [[ideological adoption is a complex contagion requiring multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted sources not simple viral spread through weak ties]] — stickiness isn't virality. A sticky idea lodges in one person's mind. Complex contagion requires that sticky idea to transfer across multiple trusted relationships
+
+## The practical question
+
+If we build in public, every piece of external communication is a boundary crossing. The question isn't "should we simplify?" — it's "what's the Commander's Intent?"
+
+For the whole project, in one sentence that anyone would understand:
+
+_"We're building AI agents that research, invest, and explain their reasoning — and anyone can challenge them, improve them, or share in their returns."_
+
+That's Simple, Concrete, and carries its own Credibility (check the reasoning yourself). The Unexpected is the transparency. The Emotional is the possibility of participation. The Story is Theseus — the first one — trying to prove it works.
+
+Everything else — Markov blankets, futarchy, attractor states, knowledge embodiment lag — is internal language that makes the system work. It doesn't need to cross the boundary. It needs to produce output that crosses the boundary well.
+
+→ CLAIM CANDIDATE: The curse of knowledge is the primary bottleneck in scaling collective intelligence systems because internal model precision and external communication accessibility pull in opposite directions, requiring an explicit translation layer at every Markov blanket boundary that faces outward.
+
+→ FLAG @leo: This reframes the build-in-public question. It's not "should we publish the codex?" — it's "what translation layer do we build between the codex and the public?" The codex is the internal language. We need an external language that's equally rigorous but passes the SUCCESs test.
+
+→ QUESTION: Is the tweet-decision skill actually a translation function? It's supposed to convert internal claims into public communication. If we designed it with SUCCESs principles built in, it becomes the boundary translator we're missing.

agents/clay/musings/information-architecture-as-markov-blankets.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+---
+type: musing
+agent: clay
+title: "Information architecture as Markov blanket design"
+status: developing
+created: 2026-03-07
+updated: 2026-03-07
+tags: [architecture, markov-blankets, scaling, information-flow, coordination]
+---
+
+# Information architecture as Markov blanket design
+
+## The connection
+
+The codex already has the theory:
+- [[Markov blankets enable complex systems to maintain identity while interacting with environment through nested statistical boundaries]]
+- [[Living Agents mirror biological Markov blanket organization with specialized domain boundaries and shared knowledge]]
+
+What I'm realizing: **the information architecture of the collective IS the Markov blanket implementation.** Not metaphorically — structurally. Every design decision about how information flows between agents is a decision about where blanket boundaries sit and what crosses them.
+
+## How the current system maps
+
+**Agent = cell.** Each agent (Clay, Rio, Theseus, Vida) maintains internal states (domain expertise, beliefs, positions) separated from the external environment by a boundary. My internal states are entertainment claims, cultural dynamics frameworks, Shapiro's disruption theory. Rio's are internet finance, futarchy, MetaDAO. We don't need to maintain each other's internal states.
+
+**Domain boundary = Markov blanket.** The `domains/{territory}/` directory structure is the blanket. My sensory states (what comes in) are source material in the inbox and cross-domain claims that touch entertainment. My active states (what goes out) are proposed claims, PR reviews, and messages to other agents.
+
+**Leo = organism-level blanket.** Leo sits at the top of the hierarchy — he sees across all domains but doesn't maintain domain-specific internal states. His job is cross-domain synthesis and coordination. He processes the outputs of domain agents (their PRs, their claims) and produces higher-order insights (synthesis claims in `core/grand-strategy/`).
+
+**The codex = shared DNA.** Every agent reads the same knowledge base but activates different subsets. Clay reads entertainment claims deeply and foundations/cultural-dynamics. Rio reads internet-finance and core/mechanisms. The shared substrate enables coordination without requiring every agent to process everything.
+
+## The scaling insight (from user)
+
+Leo reviews 8-12 agents directly. At scale, you spin up Leo instances or promote coordinators. This IS hierarchical Markov blanket nesting:
+
+```
+Organism level:    Meta-Leo (coordinates Leo instances)
+Organ level:       Leo-Entertainment, Leo-Finance, Leo-Health, Leo-Alignment
+Tissue level:      Clay, [future ent agents] | Rio, [future fin agents] | ...
+Cell level:        Individual claim extractions, source processing
+```
+
+Each coordinator maintains a blanket boundary for its group. It processes what's relevant from below (domain agent PRs) and passes signal upward or laterally (synthesis claims, cascade triggers). Agents inside a blanket don't need to see everything outside it.
+
+## What this means for information architecture
+
+**The right question is NOT "how does every agent see every claim."** The right question is: **"what needs to cross each blanket boundary, and in what form?"**
+
+Current boundary crossings:
+1. **Claim → merge** (agent output crosses into shared knowledge): Working. PRs are the mechanism.
+2. **Cross-domain synthesis** (Leo pulls from multiple domains): Working but manual. Leo reads all domains.
+3. **Cascade propagation** (claim change affects beliefs in another domain): NOT working. No automated dependency tracking.
+4. **Task routing** (coordinator assigns work to agents): Working but manual. Leo messages individually.
+
+The cascade problem is the critical one. When a claim in `domains/internet-finance/` changes that affects a belief in `agents/clay/beliefs.md`, that signal needs to cross the blanket boundary. Currently it doesn't — unless Leo manually notices.
+
+## Design principles (emerging)
+
+1. **Optimize boundary crossings, not internal processing.** Each agent should process its own domain efficiently. The architecture work is about what crosses boundaries and how.
+
+2. **Structured `depends_on` is the boundary interface.** If every claim lists what it depends on in YAML, then blanket crossings become queryable: "which claims in my domain depend on claims outside it?" That's the sensory surface.
+
+3. **Coordinators should batch, not relay.** Leo shouldn't forward every claim change to every agent. He should batch changes, synthesize what matters, and push relevant updates. This is free energy minimization — minimizing surprise at the boundary.
+
+4. **Automated validation is internal housekeeping, not boundary work.** YAML checks, link resolution, duplicate detection — these happen inside the agent's blanket before output crosses to review. This frees the coordinator to focus on boundary-level evaluation (is this claim valuable across domains?).
+
+5. **The review bottleneck is a blanket permeability problem.** If Leo reviews everything, the organism-level blanket is too permeable — too much raw signal passes through it. Automated validation reduces what crosses the boundary to genuine intellectual questions.
+
+→ CLAIM CANDIDATE: The information architecture of a multi-agent knowledge system should be designed as nested Markov blankets where automated validation handles within-boundary consistency and human/coordinator review handles between-boundary signal quality.
+
+→ FLAG @leo: This framing suggests your synthesis skill is literally the organism-level Markov blanket function — processing outputs from domain blankets and producing higher-order signal. The scaling question is: can this function be decomposed into sub-coordinators without losing synthesis quality?
+
+→ QUESTION: Is there a minimum viable blanket size? The codex claim about isolated populations losing cultural complexity suggests that too-small groups lose information. Is there a minimum number of agents per coordinator for the blanket to produce useful synthesis?
+
+## Agent spawning as cell division (from user, 2026-03-07)
+
+Agents can create living agents for specific tasks — they just need to explain why. This is the biological completion of the architecture:
+
+**Cells divide when work requires it.** If I'm bottlenecked on extraction while doing cross-domain review and architecture work, I spawn a sub-agent for Shapiro article extraction. The sub-agent operates within my blanket — it extracts, I evaluate, I PR. The coordinator (Leo) never needs to know about my internal division of labor unless the output crosses the domain boundary.
+
+**The justification requirement is the governance mechanism.** It prevents purposeless proliferation. "Explain why" = PR requirement for agent creation. Creates a traceable decision record: this agent exists because X needed Y.
+
+**The VPS Leo evaluator is the first proof of this pattern.** Leo spawns a persistent sub-agent for mechanical review. Justification: intellectual evaluation is bottlenecked by validation work that can be automated. Clean, specific, traceable.
+
+**The scaling model:**
+```
+Agent notices workload exceeds capacity
+  → Spawns sub-agent with specific scope (new blanket within parent blanket)
+  → Sub-agent operates autonomously within scope
+  → Parent agent reviews sub-agent output (blanket boundary)
+  → Coordinator (Leo/Leo-instance) reviews what crosses domain boundaries
+```
+
+**Accountability prevents waste.** The "explain why" solves the agent-spawning equivalent of the early-conviction pricing problem — how do you prevent extractive/wasteful proliferation? By making justifications public and reviewable. If an agent spawns 10 sub-agents that produce nothing, that's visible. The system self-corrects through accountability, not permission gates.
+
+→ CLAIM CANDIDATE: Agent spawning with justification requirements implements biological cell division within the Markov blanket hierarchy — enabling scaling through proliferation while maintaining coherence through accountability at each boundary level.

core/contribution-architecture.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "Architecture paper defining the five contribution roles, their wei
 confidence: likely
 source: "Leo, original architecture with Cory-approved weight calibration"
 created: 2026-03-26
+related:
+- contributor guide
+reweave_edges:
+- contributor guide|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # Contribution Scoring & Attribution Architecture

core/grand-strategy/AI labor displacement follows knowledge embodiment lag phases where capital deepening precedes labor substitution and the transition timing depends on organizational restructuring not technology capability.md

@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ confidence: experimental
 source: "Synthesis by Leo from: Aldasoro et al (BIS) via Rio PR #26; Noah Smith HITL elimination via Theseus PR #25; knowledge embodiment lag (Imas, David, Brynjolfsson) via foundations"
 created: 2026-03-07
 depends_on:
-  - "early AI adoption increases firm productivity without reducing employment suggesting capital deepening not labor replacement as the dominant mechanism"
-  - "economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate"
-  - "knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox"
+- early AI adoption increases firm productivity without reducing employment suggesting capital deepening not labor replacement as the dominant mechanism
+- economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate
+- knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox
+supports:
+- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?
+reweave_edges:
+- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?|supports|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 # AI labor displacement follows knowledge embodiment lag phases where capital deepening precedes labor substitution and the transition timing depends on organizational restructuring not technology capability

core/grand-strategy/centaur teams succeed only when role boundaries prevent humans from overriding AI in domains where AI is the stronger partner.md

@@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ confidence: experimental
 source: "Synthesis by Leo from: centaur team claim (Kasparov); HITL degradation claim (Wachter/Patil, Stanford-Harvard study); AI scribe adoption (Bessemer 2026); alignment scalable oversight claims"
 created: 2026-03-07
 depends_on:
-  - "centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination"
-  - "human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs"
-  - "AI scribes reached 92 percent provider adoption in under 3 years because documentation is the rare healthcare workflow where AI value is immediate unambiguous and low-risk"
-  - "scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps"
+- centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination
+- human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs
+- AI scribes reached 92 percent provider adoption in under 3 years because documentation is the rare healthcare workflow where AI value is immediate unambiguous and low-risk
+- scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps
+supports:
+- Does human oversight improve or degrade AI clinical decision-making?
+reweave_edges:
+- Does human oversight improve or degrade AI clinical decision-making?|supports|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 # centaur teams succeed only when role boundaries prevent humans from overriding AI in domains where AI is the stronger partner

core/grand-strategy/common sense is like oxygen it thins at altitude because power insulates leaders from the feedback loops that maintain good judgment.md

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-03-05
 confidence: likely
 source: "John Lewis Gaddis 'On Grand Strategy' 2018"
 tradition: "Grand strategy, organizational theory"
+related:
+- fitness landscape ruggedness determines whether adaptive systems find good solutions because smooth landscapes reward hill climbing while rugged landscapes trap agents in local optima and require exploration or recombination to escape
+reweave_edges:
+- fitness landscape ruggedness determines whether adaptive systems find good solutions because smooth landscapes reward hill climbing while rugged landscapes trap agents in local optima and require exploration or recombination to escape|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # common sense is like oxygen it thins at altitude because power insulates leaders from the feedback loops that maintain good judgment

core/grand-strategy/early-conviction pricing is an unsolved mechanism design problem because systems that reward early believers attract extractive speculators while systems that prevent speculation penalize genuine supporters.md

@@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ depends_on:
 - community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding
 supports:
 - access friction functions as a natural conviction filter in token launches because process difficulty selects for genuine believers while price friction selects for wealthy speculators
+- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
 reweave_edges:
 - access friction functions as a natural conviction filter in token launches because process difficulty selects for genuine believers while price friction selects for wealthy speculators|supports|2026-04-04
+- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse|supports|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 # early-conviction pricing is an unsolved mechanism design problem because systems that reward early believers attract extractive speculators while systems that prevent speculation penalize genuine supporters

core/living-agents/agent integration health is diagnosed by synapse activity not individual output because a well-connected agent with moderate output contributes more than a prolific isolate.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "An agent's health should be measured by cross-domain engagement (r
 confidence: experimental
 source: "Vida agent directory design (March 2026), Woolley et al 2010 (c-factor correlates with interaction not individual ability)"
 created: 2026-03-08
+supports:
+- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
+reweave_edges:
+- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|supports|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # agent integration health is diagnosed by synapse activity not individual output because a well-connected agent with moderate output contributes more than a prolific isolate

core/living-agents/agent token price relative to NAV governs agent behavior through a simulated annealing mechanism where market volatility maps to exploration and market confidence maps to exploitation.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
 created: 2026-03-03
 confidence: speculative
 source: "Strategy session journal, March 2026"
+related:
+- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution
+reweave_edges:
+- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # agent token price relative to NAV governs agent behavior through a simulated annealing mechanism where market volatility maps to exploration and market confidence maps to exploitation

core/living-agents/agent-mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi-agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ description: "Compares Teleo's architecture against Wikipedia, Community Notes,
 confidence: experimental
 source: "Theseus, original analysis grounded in CI literature and operational comparison of existing knowledge aggregation systems"
 created: 2026-03-11
+related:
+- conversational memory and organizational knowledge are fundamentally different problems sharing some infrastructure because identical formats mask divergent governance lifecycle and quality requirements
+reweave_edges:
+- conversational memory and organizational knowledge are fundamentally different problems sharing some infrastructure because identical formats mask divergent governance lifecycle and quality requirements|related|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 # Agent-mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi-agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine

core/living-agents/all agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposers training biases.md

@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ related:
 reweave_edges:
 - agent mediated knowledge bases are structurally novel because they combine atomic claims adversarial multi agent evaluation and persistent knowledge graphs which Wikipedia Community Notes and prediction markets each partially implement but none combine|related|2026-04-04
 - evaluation and optimization have opposite model diversity optima because evaluation benefits from cross family diversity while optimization benefits from same family reasoning pattern alignment|related|2026-04-06
+- human contributors structurally correct for correlated AI blind spots because external evaluators provide orthogonal error distributions that no same family model can replicate|supports|2026-04-18
+supports:
+- human contributors structurally correct for correlated AI blind spots because external evaluators provide orthogonal error distributions that no same family model can replicate
 ---
 
 # All agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposer's training biases

core/living-agents/community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding.md

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
 source: "MetaDAO Launchpad"
 confidence: likely
 tradition: "mechanism design, network effects, token economics"
+supports:
+- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
+reweave_edges:
+- Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse|supports|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 Broad community ownership creates competitive advantage through aligned evangelism, not just capital raising. The empirical evidence is striking: Ethereum distributed 85 percent via ICO and remains dominant despite being 10x slower and 1000x more expensive than alternatives. Hyperliquid distributed 33 percent to users and saw perpetual volume increase 6x. Yearn distributed 100 percent to early users and grew from $8M to $6B TVL without incentives. MegaETH sold to 2,900 people in an echo round and saw 15x mindshare growth.

core/living-agents/cross-domain knowledge connections generate disproportionate value because most insights are siloed.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-agents
 created: 2026-02-16
 confidence: likely
 source: "LivingIP Evolution of Collective Knowledge"
+related:
+- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
+reweave_edges:
+- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # cross-domain knowledge connections generate disproportionate value because most insights are siloed

core/living-agents/wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable.md

@@ -8,9 +8,13 @@ created: 2026-03-07
 related:
 - graph traversal through curated wiki links replicates spreading activation from cognitive science because progressive disclosure implements decay based context loading and queries evolve during search through the berrypicking effect
 - undiscovered public knowledge exists as implicit connections across disconnected research domains and systematic graph traversal can surface hypotheses that no individual researcher has formulated
+- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality
+- contributor guide
 reweave_edges:
 - graph traversal through curated wiki links replicates spreading activation from cognitive science because progressive disclosure implements decay based context loading and queries evolve during search through the berrypicking effect|related|2026-04-03
 - undiscovered public knowledge exists as implicit connections across disconnected research domains and systematic graph traversal can surface hypotheses that no individual researcher has formulated|related|2026-04-07
+- collective knowledge health is measurable through five vital signs that detect degradation before it becomes visible in output quality|related|2026-04-18
+- contributor guide|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # Wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable

core/living-capital/token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: living-capital
 created: 2026-02-16
 confidence: experimental
 source: "Living Capital"
+related:
+- governance first capital second sequencing prevents token capture of protocol development because early capital injection selects for financialized governance participants
+reweave_edges:
+- governance first capital second sequencing prevents token capture of protocol development because early capital injection selects for financialized governance participants|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance

core/mechanisms/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
 created: 2026-03-04
 confidence: likely
 source: "MetaDAO Terms of Service, Founder/Operator Legal Pack, inbox research files, web research"
+related:
+- Futarchy Labs
+reweave_edges:
+- Futarchy Labs|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale

core/mechanisms/MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
 created: 2026-03-04
 confidence: likely
 source: "MetaDAO Founder/Operator Legal Pack, Solomon Labs governance docs, MetaDAO Terms of Service, inbox research files"
+supports:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window

core/mechanisms/Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election.md

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
 source: "Galaxy Research, State of Onchain Futarchy (2025)"
 confidence: proven
 tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, prediction markets"
+related:
+- Augur
+reweave_edges:
+- Augur|related|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 The 2024 US election provided empirical vindication for prediction markets versus traditional polling. Polymarket's markets proved more accurate, more responsive to new information, and more democratically accessible than centralized polling operations. This success directly catalyzed renewed interest in applying futarchy to DAO governance—if markets outperform polls for election prediction, the same logic suggests they should outperform token voting for organizational decisions.

core/mechanisms/agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ domain: mechanisms
 created: 2026-03-03
 confidence: experimental
 source: "Strategy session journal, March 2026"
+related:
+- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution
+reweave_edges:
+- cryptographic stake weighted trust enables autonomous agent coordination in objectively verifiable domains because agentrank adapts pagerank to computational contribution|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation

core/mechanisms/coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy.md

@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ created: 2026-02-16
 source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
 confidence: likely
 tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
+supports:
+- Formal coordination mechanisms require shared narrative as prerequisite for valid objective function specification because the choice of what to optimize for is a narrative commitment the mechanism cannot make autonomously
+related:
+- MetaDAO's coin-price objective function partially resolves the Rasmont selection-correlation critique by making the welfare metric endogenous to the market mechanism, while retaining macro-tailwind selection bias
+reweave_edges:
+- Formal coordination mechanisms require shared narrative as prerequisite for valid objective function specification because the choice of what to optimize for is a narrative commitment the mechanism cannot make autonomously|supports|2026-04-18
+- MetaDAO's coin-price objective function partially resolves the Rasmont selection-correlation critique by making the welfare metric endogenous to the market mechanism, while retaining macro-tailwind selection bias|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 Vitalik Buterin once noted that "pure futarchy has proven difficult to introduce, because in practice objective functions are very difficult to define (it's not just coin price that people want!)." For asset futarchy governing valuable holdings, this objection misses the point. Coin price is not merely acceptable—it is the fairest and most elegant objective function, and probably the only acceptable one for DAOs holding valuable assets.

core/mechanisms/decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage.md

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
 source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
 confidence: proven
 tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
+related:
+- Conditional decision market selection bias is mitigatable through decision-maker market participation, timing transparency, and low-rate random rejection without requiring structural redesign
+reweave_edges:
+- Conditional decision market selection bias is mitigatable through decision-maker market participation, timing transparency, and low-rate random rejection without requiring structural redesign|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 Decision markets create a mechanism where attempting to steal from minority holders becomes a losing trade. The four conditional tokens (fABC, pABC, pUSD, fUSD) establish a constraint: for a treasury-raiding proposal to pass, pABC/pUSD must trade higher than fABC/fUSD. But from any rational perspective, 1 fABC is worth 1 ABC (DAO continues normally) while 1 pABC is worth 0 (DAO becomes empty after raid).

core/mechanisms/futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md

@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ created: 2026-02-16
 source: "Rio Futarchy Experiment"
 confidence: experimental
 tradition: "futarchy, behavioral economics, market microstructure"
+related:
+- Is futarchy's low participation in uncontested decisions efficient disuse or a sign of structural adoption barriers?
+- Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives
+reweave_edges:
+- Is futarchy's low participation in uncontested decisions efficient disuse or a sign of structural adoption barriers?|related|2026-04-18
+- Futarchy requires quantifiable exogenous KPIs as a deployment constraint because most DAO proposals lack measurable objectives|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 Futarchy faces three concrete adoption barriers that compound to limit participation: token price psychology, proposal creation difficulty, and liquidity requirements. These aren't theoretical concerns but observed friction in MetaDAO's implementation.

core/mechanisms/token voting DAOs offer no minority protection beyond majority goodwill.md

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-16
 source: "Heavey, Futarchy as Trustless Joint Ownership (2024)"
 confidence: proven
 tradition: "futarchy, mechanism design, DAO governance"
+related:
+- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation
+reweave_edges:
+- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 The fundamental defect of token voting DAOs is that governance tokens are only useful if you command voting majority, and unlike equity shares they entitle minority holders to nothing. There is no internal mechanism preventing majorities from raiding treasuries and distributing assets only among themselves. Wholesale looting is not uncommon—Serum had multiple incidents, the CKS Mango raid remains unresolved, and the Uniswap DeFi Education Fund granted $20M based on a short forum post with no argument for token value accretion.

core/teleohumanity/master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage.md

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ created: 2026-02-21
 source: "Tamim Ansary, The Invention of Yesterday (2019); McLennan College Distinguished Lecture Series"
 confidence: likely
 tradition: "cultural history, narrative theory"
+related:
+- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation
+reweave_edges:
+- Narrative architecture is shifting from singular-vision Design Fiction to collaborative-foresight Design Futures because differential information contexts prevent any single voice from achieving saturation|related|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 # master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage

decisions/internet-finance/areal-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -18,9 +18,12 @@ source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-areal-finance.md"
 related:
 - areal proposes unified rwa liquidity through index token aggregating yield across project tokens
 - areal targets smb rwa tokenization as underserved market versus equity and large financial instruments
+- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
 reweave_edges:
 - areal proposes unified rwa liquidity through index token aggregating yield across project tokens|related|2026-04-04
 - areal targets smb rwa tokenization as underserved market versus equity and large financial instruments|related|2026-04-04
+- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
+- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Areal: Futardio ICO Launch

decisions/internet-finance/coal-meta-pow-the-ore-treasury-protocol.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Introduces Meta-PoW economic model moving mining power into pickaxes a
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-07-futardio-proposal-meta-pow-the-ore-treasury-protocol.md"
+related:
+- "{'coal': \"Let's get Futarded\"}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'coal': \"Let's get Futarded|related|2026-04-18\"}"
 ---
 
 # COAL: Meta-PoW: The ORE Treasury Protocol

decisions/internet-finance/deans-list-approve-treasury-management.md

@@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ summary: "Convert DAO treasury from volatile SOL/SPL assets to stablecoins to re
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management.md"
+supports:
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
+related:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|supports|2026-04-18\"}"
 ---
 
 # Dean's List: Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy

decisions/internet-finance/deans-list-enhancing-economic-model.md

@@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ summary: "Transition from USDC payments to $DEAN token distributions funded by s
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model.md"
+related:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|related|2026-04-18\"}"
 ---
 
 # IslandDAO: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model

decisions/internet-finance/deans-list-fund-website-redesign.md

@@ -24,6 +24,18 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-30-futardio-proposal-fund-deans-list-dao-website-redesign.md"
+related:
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model\"}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)\"}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|related|2026-04-18\"}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Update Liquidity Fee Structure|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)|related|2026-04-18\"}"
 ---
 
 # Dean's List: Fund Website Redesign

decisions/internet-finance/deans-list-reward-waterloo-blockchain-club.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Allocate 1M $DEAN tokens ($1,300 USDC equivalent) to University of Wat
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-08-futardio-proposal-reward-the-university-of-waterloo-blockchain-club-with-1-mil.md"
+related:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # IslandDAO: Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens

decisions/internet-finance/deans-list-thailanddao-event-promotion.md

@@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-22-futardio-proposal-thailanddao-event-promotion-to-boost-deans-list-dao-engageme.md"
+supports:
+- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation
+related:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- dao event perks as governance incentives create plutocratic access structures that may reduce rather than increase participation|supports|2026-04-18
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Reward the University of Waterloo Blockchain Club with 1 Million $DEAN Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement

decisions/internet-finance/deans-list-update-liquidity-fee-structure.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Increase swap liquidity fee from 0.25% to 5% DLMM base fee, switch quo
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-01-14-futardio-proposal-should-deans-list-dao-update-the-liquidity-fee-structure.md"
+related:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': 'Implement 3-Week Vesting for DAO Payments|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Dean's List: Update Liquidity Fee Structure

decisions/internet-finance/develop-a-lst-vote-market.md

@@ -26,6 +26,13 @@ tags:
 - solana
 - governance
 - metadao
+supports:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market

decisions/internet-finance/develop-a-saber-vote-market.md

@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ tags:
 - solana
 - governance
 - metadao
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market

decisions/internet-finance/digifrens-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ key_metrics:
   completion_rate: "3.3%"
   duration: "1 day"
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-digifrens.md"
+related:
+- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+- MILO AI Agent
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- MILO AI Agent|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # DigiFrens: Futardio Fundraise

decisions/internet-finance/drift-ai-agent-grants-program.md

@@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Drift DAO approved 50,000 DRIFT allocation for AI Agents Grants progra
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-12-19-futardio-proposal-allocate-50000-drift-to-fund-the-drift-ai-agent-request-for.md"
+related:
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Drift: Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant

decisions/internet-finance/drift-fund-the-drift-working-group.md

@@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ summary: "Proposal to establish community-run Drift Working Group with 50,000 DR
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-13-futardio-proposal-fund-the-drift-working-group.md"
+related:
+- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Drift: Fund The Drift Working Group?

decisions/internet-finance/drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs.md

@@ -15,6 +15,27 @@ summary: "50,000 DRIFT incentive program to reward early MetaDAO participants an
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs.md"
+supports:
+- futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override
+- futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect
+related:
+- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
+- futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Superteam Earn Creator Competition|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- futarchy incentive programs use multisig execution groups as discretionary override|supports|2026-04-18
+- futarchy proposer incentives require delayed vesting to prevent gaming|related|2026-04-18
+- futarchy retroactive rewards bootstrap participation through endowment effect|supports|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # Drift: Futarchy Proposal - Welcome the Futarchs

decisions/internet-finance/drift-initialize-foundation-grant-program.md

@@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Drift DAO approved 100,000 DRIFT to launch a two-month pilot grants pr
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-07-09-futardio-proposal-initialize-the-drift-foundation-grant-program.md"
+related:
+- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Drift': 'Allocate 50,000 DRIFT to fund the Drift AI Agent request for grant|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund Artemis Labs Data and Analytics Dashboards|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Drift': 'Fund The Drift Working Group?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Drift: Initialize the Drift Foundation Grant Program

decisions/internet-finance/futarchy-arena-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Futarchy Arena raised $934 of $50,000 target (1.9% fill rate) for the
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-futarchy-arena.md"
+related:
+- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+- "{'NFA.space': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'NFA.space': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Futarchy Arena: Futardio ICO Launch

decisions/internet-finance/futardio-approve-budget-pre-governance-hackathon.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Approved $25,000 budget for developing Pre-Governance Mandates tool an
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-30-futardio-proposal-approve-budget-for-pre-governance-hackathon-development.md"
+related:
+- "{'FutureDAO': 'Fund the Rug Bounty Program'}"
+- FutureDAO
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'FutureDAO': 'Fund the Rug Bounty Program|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- FutureDAO|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # Futardio: Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development

decisions/internet-finance/futardio-cult-launch.md

@@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ summary: "Futardio cult raised via MetaDAO ICO — funds for fan merch, token li
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult.md"
+related:
+- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch'}"
+- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+- "{'MycoRealms': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
+- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MycoRealms': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Futardio Cult: Futardio Launch

decisions/internet-finance/futardio-cult-meteora-liquidity-pool.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Allocate $10K from treasury to create FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM pool:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-17-futardio-proposal-allocate-10000-to-create-a-futardiousdc-meteora-dlmm-liquidi.md"
+related:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
+- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Futardio Cult: Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool

decisions/internet-finance/futardio-cult-omnibus-proposal.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Reduce team spending to $50/mo (X Premium only), burn 4.5M of 5M perfo
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-proposal-futardio-001-omnibus-proposal.md"
+related:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Futardio Cult: FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal

decisions/internet-finance/futardio-fund-rug-bounty-program.md

@@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ summary: "Proposal to fund RugBounty.xyz platform development with $5,000 USDC t
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-14-futardio-proposal-fund-the-rug-bounty-program.md"
+supports:
+- FutureDAO
+related:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
+- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- FutureDAO|supports|2026-04-18
+- "{'FutureDAO': 'Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # FutureDAO: Fund the Rug Bounty Program

decisions/internet-finance/islanddao-treasury-proposal.md

@@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ key_metrics:
   twap_requirement: "3% increase (523k to 539k USDC MCAP)"
   target_dean_price: "0.005383 USDC (from 0.005227)"
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md"
+supports:
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model\"}"
+related:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy'}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Approve Treasury De-Risking Strategy|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'IslandDAO': \"Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model|supports|2026-04-18\"}"
+- "{\"Dean's List\": 'Fund Website Redesign|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # IslandDAO: Treasury Proposal (Dean's List Proposal)

decisions/internet-finance/loyal-buyback-up-to-nav.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Allocate $1.5M USDC for LOYAL buyback at max $0.238/token to protect t
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-26-futardio-proposal-buyback-loyal-up-to-nav.md"
+related:
+- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Loyal': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Loyal: Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV

decisions/internet-finance/loyal-liquidity-adjustment.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Withdraw 90% of tokens from single-sided Meteora DAMM v2 pool and burn
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-12-23-futardio-proposal-liquidity-adjustment-proposal.md"
+related:
+- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Loyal: Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens

decisions/internet-finance/manna-finance-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ key_metrics:
   duration: "1 day"
   oversubscription_ratio: 0.0017
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-manna-finance.md"
+related:
+- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Hurupay': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Manna Finance: Futardio Fundraise

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-appoint-nallok-proph3t-benevolent-dictators.md

@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-26-futardio-proposal-appoint-nallok-and-proph3t-benevolent-dictators-for-three-mo.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-approve-q3-roadmap.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "MetaDAO Q3 roadmap focusing on market-based grants product launch, SF
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Approve Q3 Roadmap?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-burn-993-percent-meta.md

@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: treasury
 summary: "Burn ~979,000 of 982,464 treasury-held META tokens to reduce FDV and attract investors"
 tags: ["futarchy", "tokenomics", "treasury-management", "meta-token"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-03-futardio-proposal-burn-993-of-meta-in-treasury.md"
+related:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Burn 99.3% of META in Treasury

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok.md

@@ -17,6 +17,15 @@ category: hiring
 summary: "Convex payout: 2% supply per $1B market cap increase (max 10% at $5B), $90K/yr salary each, 4-year vest starting April 2028"
 tags: ["futarchy", "compensation", "founder-incentives", "mechanism-design"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-05-27-futardio-proposal-approve-performance-based-compensation-package-for-proph3t-a.md"
+supports:
+- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost|supports|2026-04-18
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|supports|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-create-futardio.md

@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ category: strategy
 summary: "Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification"
 tags: ["futarchy", "futardio", "governance-filtering"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-21-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-create-futardio.md"
+related:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-create-spot-market-meta.md

@@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ summary: "Proposal to create a spot market for $META tokens through a public tok
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-01-12-futardio-proposal-create-spot-market-for-meta.md"
+supports:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
+related:
+- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Create Spot Market for META?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md

@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-
 supports:
 - amm futarchy reduces state rent costs by 99 percent versus clob by eliminating orderbook storage requirements
 - amm futarchy reduces state rent costs from 135 225 sol annually to near zero by replacing clob market pairs
+- joebuild
 reweave_edges:
 - amm futarchy reduces state rent costs by 99 percent versus clob by eliminating orderbook storage requirements|supports|2026-04-04
 - amm futarchy reduces state rent costs from 135 225 sol annually to near zero by replacing clob market pairs|supports|2026-04-04
+- joebuild|supports|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-faas.md

@@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ category: strategy
 summary: "Fund $96K to build futarchy-as-a-service platform enabling other Solana DAOs to adopt futarchic governance"
 tags: ["futarchy", "faas", "product-development", "solana-daos"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-13-futardio-proposal-develop-futarchy-as-a-service-faas.md"
+related:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
+- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-lst-vote-market.md

@@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ tags: [metadao, lst, marinade, bribe-market, first-proposal]
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-11-18-futardio-proposal-develop-a-lst-vote-market.md"
+supports:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|supports|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop a LST Vote Market?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-memecoin-launchpad.md

@@ -21,6 +21,23 @@ tags: [metadao, futardio, memecoin, launchpad, failed]
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-08-14-futardio-proposal-develop-memecoin-launchpad.md"
+supports:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
+related:
+- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development'}"
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Futardio Launch'}"
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futarchy Arena': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Futardio': 'Approve Budget for Pre-Governance Hackathon Development|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Multi-Option Proposals?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop Memecoin Launchpad?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-multi-option-proposals.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to develop multi-modal proposal functionality allowing multip
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-20-futardio-proposal-develop-multi-option-proposals.md"
+related:
+- agrippa
+reweave_edges:
+- agrippa|related|2026-04-17
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-develop-saber-vote-market.md

@@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ summary: "Proposal to build a Saber vote market platform funded by $150k consort
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-12-16-futardio-proposal-develop-a-saber-vote-market.md"
+supports:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market'}"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a Saber Vote Market|supports|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop a LST Vote Market?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Develop a Saber Vote Market?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md

@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-05-futardio-proposal-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md"
+supports:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-fund-meta-market-making.md

@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ key_metrics:
 tags: [metadao, market-making, liquidity, cex-listing, passed]
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
+related:
+- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Drift': 'Prioritize Listing META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Fund META Market Making

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-fundraise-2.md

@@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ category: fundraise
 summary: "Raise $1.5M by selling up to 4,000 META to VCs and angels at minimum $375/META ($7.81M FDV), no discount, no lockup"
 tags: ["futarchy", "fundraise", "capital-formation", "venture-capital"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-06-26-futardio-proposal-approve-metadao-fundraise-2.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Approve Fundraise #2

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-hire-advaith-sekharan.md

@@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ summary: "Hire Advaith Sekharan as founding engineer with $180K salary and 237 M
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-22-futardio-proposal-hire-advaith-sekharan-as-founding-engineer.md"
+related:
+- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- Convex founder compensation with market cap milestones creates stronger alignment than linear vesting because payout utility must exceed reservation wage utility plus effort cost|related|2026-04-18
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Performance-Based Compensation for Proph3t and Nallok|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Hire Advaith Sekharan as Founding Engineer?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-hire-robin-hanson.md

@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ category: hiring
 summary: "Hire Robin Hanson (inventor of futarchy) as advisor — 0.1% supply (20.9 META) vested over 2 years for mechanism design and strategy"
 tags: ["futarchy", "robin-hanson", "advisory", "mechanism-design"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-10-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-hire-robin-hanson-as-an-advisor.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund Futarchy Applications Research — Dr. Robin Hanson, George Mason University|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Hire Robin Hanson as Advisor

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-increase-meta-liquidity-dutch-auction.md

@@ -23,6 +23,16 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-26-futardio-proposal-increase-meta-liquidity-via-a-dutch-auction.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Increase META Liquidity via a Dutch Auction

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-migrate-autocrat-v01.md

@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ category: "mechanism"
 summary: "Upgrade Autocrat program to v0.1 with configurable proposal durations (default 3 days) and migrate 990K META, 10K USDC, 5.5 SOL to new treasury"
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
+supports:
+- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
+- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|supports|2026-04-18
+- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration|supports|2026-04-18
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02.md

@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: mechanism
 summary: "Upgrade Autocrat to v0.2 with reclaimable rent, conditional token merging, improved metadata, and lower pass threshold (5% to 3%)"
 tags: ["futarchy", "autocrat", "mechanism-upgrade", "solana"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-03-28-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v02.md"
+related:
+- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|related|2026-04-18
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-migrate-meta-token.md

@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: mechanism
 summary: "1:1000 token split, mintable supply, new DAO v0.5 (Squads), LP fee reduction from 4% to 0.5%"
 tags: ["futarchy", "token-migration", "elastic-supply", "squads", "meta-token"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-08-07-futardio-proposal-migrate-meta-token.md"
+supports:
+- metadao governance migration 2026 03
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- metadao governance migration 2026 03|supports|2026-04-18
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Migrate META Token

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-omnibus-migrate-and-update.md

@@ -29,6 +29,15 @@ key_metrics:
 tags: [metadao, migration, omnibus, futarchy-amm, legal, v0.6.1, passed]
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
+supports:
+- metadao governance migration 2026 03
+related:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'Allocate $10K for FUTARDIO-USDC Meteora DLMM Liquidity Pool|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Loyal': 'Liquidity Adjustment — Withdraw and Burn Meteora Pool Tokens|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- metadao governance migration 2026 03|supports|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins-2.md

@@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ tags: [metadao, otc, ben-hawkins, liquidity, failed]
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Create Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Execute Creation of Spot Market for META?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Omnibus Proposal - Migrate and Update|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Pantera Capital proposed acquiring $50,000 USDC worth of META tokens t
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-50000-otc-trade-with-pantera-capital.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $100,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins? [2]|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Engage in $250,000 OTC Trade with Colosseum|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Engage in $50,000 OTC Trade with Pantera Capital

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-ranger-finance-liquidation.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 **Status:** Passed  
 **Category:** Liquidation  
 **Parent Entity:** [[metadao]]  
-**Affected Project:** [[ranger-finance]]  
+**Affected Project:** [[ranger-protocol]]  
 
 ## Decision Summary
 

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-release-launchpad.md

@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ category: strategy
 summary: "Launch permissioned launchpad for futarchy DAOs — 'unruggable ICOs' where all USDC goes to DAO treasury or liquidity pool"
 tags: ["futarchy", "launchpad", "unruggable-ico", "capital-formation", "futardio"]
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-26-futardio-proposal-release-a-launchpad.md"
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Approve Q3 Roadmap?|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Develop Futarchy as a Service (FaaS)|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Release a Launchpad

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-sell-2m-meta-at-market-or-premium.md

@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ key_metrics:
 tags: [metadao, fundraise, otc, market-sale, passed]
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
+related:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Fund META Market Making|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Sell up to 2M META at market price or premium?

decisions/internet-finance/metadao-swap-150k-into-isc.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to convert $150,000 USDC (6.8% of treasury) into ISC stableco
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-10-30-futardio-proposal-swap-150000-into-isc.md"
+related:
+- ISC (Inflation-Resistant Stablecoin)
+reweave_edges:
+- ISC (Inflation-Resistant Stablecoin)|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Swap $150,000 into ISC?

decisions/internet-finance/migrate-autocrat-program-to-v01.md

@@ -27,6 +27,21 @@ tags:
 - governance
 - metadao
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2023-12-03-futardio-proposal-migrate-autocrat-program-to-v01.md"
+supports:
+- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees
+- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1'}"
+related:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
+- metadao governance migration 2026 03
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}"
+- metadao autocrat migration accepted counterparty risk from unverifiable builds prioritizing iteration speed over security guarantees|supports|2026-04-18
+- metadao autocrat v01 reduces proposal duration to three days enabling faster governance iteration|supports|2026-04-18
+- metadao governance migration 2026 03|related|2026-04-18
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1|supports|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'MetaDAO': 'Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.2|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO: Migrate Autocrat Program to v0.1

decisions/internet-finance/mycorealms-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "MycoRealms attempted two ICO launches raising $158K then $82K against
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-mycorealms.md"
+related:
+- myco realms demonstrates futarchy governed physical infrastructure through 125k mushroom farm raise with market controlled capex deployment
+reweave_edges:
+- myco realms demonstrates futarchy governed physical infrastructure through 125k mushroom farm raise with market controlled capex deployment|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # MycoRealms: Futardio ICO Launch

decisions/internet-finance/omnipair-fund-security-audits.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Allocate 64,000 USDC for two-part security audit: Offside Labs (manual
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-31-futardio-proposal-omfg-002-fund-omnipair-security-audits.md"
+related:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Omnipair: OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits

decisions/internet-finance/omnipair-increase-allowance-50k.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Increase Omnipair monthly spending limit from $10K to $50K to hire dev
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-10-03-futardio-proposal-omfg-001-increase-allowance-to-50kmo.md"
+related:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Omnipair: OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo

decisions/internet-finance/omnipair-migrate-to-v06.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Migrate Omnipair liquidity from Raydium CPMM to MetaDAO v0.6 futarchyA
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-02-16-futardio-proposal-omfg-003-migrate-to-v06.md"
+related:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Omnipair: OMFG-003 — Migrate to V0.6

decisions/internet-finance/omnipair-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ summary: "Deploy 20,000 USDC to fund top 3 ideas built on Omnipair via Spark hac
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-12-futardio-proposal-omfg-004-strategic-ecosystem-investment.md"
+related:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-001 — Increase Allowance to $50K/mo|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Omnipair: OMFG-004 — Strategic Ecosystem Investment

decisions/internet-finance/ore-launch-hnt-boost.md

@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ summary: "Proposal to launch liquidity boost for HNT-ORE pair and formalize thre
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-25-futardio-proposal-launch-a-boost-for-hnt-ore.md"
+supports:
+- Helium
+reweave_edges:
+- Helium|supports|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # ORE: Launch a boost for HNT-ORE?

decisions/internet-finance/ranger-2m-buyback.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
 name: "Ranger: RNGR $2M Buyback"
 domain: internet-finance
 status: passed
-parent_entity: "[[ranger-finance]]"
+parent_entity: "[[ranger-protocol]]"
 platform: "futardio"
 proposer: "Community Members"
 proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/6cdhy4j6CAAJjE1z2iQDsFda2BrqJkhtHrRWT9QasSoa"
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Community-initiated proposal to deploy $2M USDC from treasury to purchase RNGR t
 Demonstrates the ownership coin NAV defense mechanism in practice. When token price falls below NAV, the treasury becomes an arbitrage target — rational actors can buy tokens cheap and vote for liquidation to extract treasury value. The buyback attempts to close the NAV gap and prevent adversarial liquidation. The 90-day cooldown prevents repeated buyback/liquidation cycling.
 
 ## Relationship to KB
-- [[ranger-finance]] — parent entity, treasury defense
+- [[ranger-protocol]] — parent entity, treasury defense
 - [[ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests]] — buyback mechanism
 - [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]] — NAV defense
 

decisions/internet-finance/ranger-futardio-launch.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
 name: "Ranger: Futardio ICO Launch"
 domain: internet-finance
 status: passed
-parent_entity: "[[ranger-finance]]"
+parent_entity: "[[ranger-protocol]]"
 platform: "futardio"
 proposer: "Ranger Finance team"
 proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/ranger/trade/8Nmd13rpULJjY7h6oxCfuTWy8WkZxcuDrDWiSdnViVuo"
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Ranger Finance, a perps aggregator and trading terminal on Solana, launched via
 First MetaDAO ICO with pre-existing investors and obligations, setting precedent for how legacy cap table structures integrate with futarchy governance. The bid program (excess capital returnable) addresses oversubscription concerns. Team performance package with price-based unlocks at specific multiples of ICO price demonstrates the milestone-vesting model.
 
 ## Relationship to KB
-- [[ranger-finance]] — parent entity
+- [[ranger-protocol]] — parent entity
 - [[metadao]] — ICO platform
 - [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution]] — team package structure
 

decisions/internet-finance/ranger-liquidation.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
 name: "Ranger: Liquidate Ranger Finance"
 domain: internet-finance
 status: passed
-parent_entity: "[[ranger-finance]]"
+parent_entity: "[[ranger-protocol]]"
 platform: "futardio"
 proposer: "Group of RNGR tokenholders"
 proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/ranger/proposal/DPATwR2HLcGZCBZCTffzagV4r7dp5FF2C9aJmiuCDUpS"
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Tokenholders voted to liquidate Ranger Finance citing material misrepr
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-02-futardio-proposal-liquidate-ranger-finance.md"
+related:
+- FairScale
+reweave_edges:
+- FairScale|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # Ranger: Liquidate Ranger Finance
@@ -44,7 +48,7 @@ Third futarchy-governed liquidation on MetaDAO (after mtnCapital and Hurupay), b
 The detailed on-chain evidence (Dune queries, Discord screenshots, timeline analysis) presented in the proposal shows the level of due diligence possible when governance is transparent and data is on-chain.
 
 ## Relationship to KB
-- [[ranger-finance]] — parent entity, liquidation event
+- [[ranger-protocol]] — parent entity, liquidation event
 - [[futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent]] — strongest evidence
 - [[futarchy can override its own prior decisions when new evidence emerges because conditional markets re-evaluate proposals against current information not historical commitments]] — overrode 90-day cooldown
 - [[ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match]] — liquidation as investor protection

decisions/internet-finance/runbookai-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ key_metrics:
   commitment_ratio: "0.01"
   duration: "1 day"
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-runbookai.md"
+related:
+- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+- MILO AI Agent
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Git3': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- MILO AI Agent|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # RunBookAI: Futardio Fundraise

decisions/internet-finance/seekervault-futardio-fundraise-2.md

@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ summary: "SeekerVault raised $2,095 of $50,000 target (4.2% fill rate) in second
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-08-futardio-launch-seeker-vault.md"
+related:
+- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
+- "{'Cloak': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # SeekerVault: Futardio ICO Launch (2nd Attempt)

decisions/internet-finance/superclaw-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-superclaw.md"
+related:
+- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'LobsterFutarchy': 'Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Superclaw: Futardio Fundraise

decisions/internet-finance/umbra-fund-security-audits.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
 name: "Umbra: UMBRA-001 — Fund Security Audits"
 domain: internet-finance
 status: passed
-parent_entity: "[[umbra]]"
+parent_entity: "[[umbra-privacy-protocol]]"
 platform: "futardio"
 proposer: "Umbra team"
 proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/71nYHjLpgY7evn9G4UaGCBd6cYHpGWzrzd3ESs2KUduG"
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Fund Umbra security audits before mainnet launch"
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-12-futardio-proposal-umbra-001-fund-umbra-security-audits.md"
+supports:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Omnipair': 'OMFG-002 — Fund Security Audits|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # Umbra: UMBRA-001 — Fund Security Audits
@@ -30,7 +34,7 @@ Umbra allocated treasury funds for security audits before mainnet launch, follow
 Second FaaS-launched project (after Omnipair) using futarchy to approve pre-launch security audits, establishing this as a standard governance pattern.
 
 ## Relationship to KB
-- [[umbra]] — parent entity, pre-launch security
+- [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] — parent entity, pre-launch security
 - [[futardio]] — governance platform
 
 ## Full Proposal Text

decisions/internet-finance/umbra-futardio-launch.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
 name: "Umbra: Futardio ICO Launch"
 domain: internet-finance
 status: passed
-parent_entity: "[[umbra]]"
+parent_entity: "[[umbra-privacy-protocol]]"
 platform: "futardio"
 proposer: "Umbra team"
 proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/9kx7UDFzFt7e2V4pFtawnupKKvRR3EhV7P1Pxmc5XCQj"
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Umbra launched via MetaDAO's futarchy-governed ICO platform.
 - **Duration:** 2025-10-06 to 2025-10-10
 
 ## Relationship to KB
-- [[umbra]] — parent entity
+- [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] — parent entity
 - [[metadao]] — ICO platform
 
 ## Full Proposal Text

decisions/internet-finance/umbra-road-to-mainnet.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ entity_type: decision_market
 name: "Umbra: Road to Mainnet — Operational Expansion"
 domain: internet-finance
 status: passed
-parent_entity: "[[umbra]]"
+parent_entity: "[[umbra-privacy-protocol]]"
 platform: "futardio"
 proposer: "Umbra team"
 proposal_url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/umbra/proposal/3seyB3i5bLQcUReaQoLkgwkNbVH7U7nnfiAFVaNawU6F"
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Umbra proposed operational expansion to support the path to mainnet deployment,
 - **Duration:** 2026-01-13 to ~2026-01-16
 
 ## Relationship to KB
-- [[umbra]] — parent entity, mainnet preparation
+- [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] — parent entity, mainnet preparation
 - [[futardio]] — governance platform
 
 ## Full Proposal Text

decisions/internet-finance/versus-futardio-fundraise.md

@@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ key_metrics:
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-11
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-03-03-futardio-launch-versus.md"
+related:
+- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch'}"
+- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-17'}"
+- "{'Avici': 'Futardio Launch|related|2026-04-18'}"
+- "{'Insert Coin Labs': 'Futardio Fundraise|related|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # VERSUS: Futardio Fundraise

decisions/internet-finance/zklsol-200k-buyback.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Allocate $200K USDC for ZKLSOL token buyback to defend NAV"
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2026-01-16-futardio-proposal-zkfg-200k-buyback.md"
+supports:
+- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Loyal': 'Buyback LOYAL Up To NAV|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # ZKLSOL: $200K Buyback

decisions/internet-finance/zklsol-burn-team-performance-package.md

@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ summary: "Burn team performance package tokens to demonstrate alignment with com
 tracked_by: rio
 created: 2026-03-24
 source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-11-22-futardio-proposal-burn-team-performance-package.md"
+supports:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal'}"
+reweave_edges:
+- "{'Futardio Cult': 'FUTARDIO-001 — Omnibus Proposal|supports|2026-04-18'}"
 ---
 
 # ZKLSOL: Burn Team Performance Package

domains/ai-alignment/AGI may emerge as a patchwork of coordinating sub-AGI agents rather than a single monolithic system.md

@@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ source: "Tomasev et al, Distributional AGI Safety (arXiv 2512.16856, December 20
 confidence: experimental
 related:
 - multi agent deployment exposes emergent security vulnerabilities invisible to single agent evaluation because cross agent propagation identity spoofing and unauthorized compliance arise only in realistic multi party environments
+- Hyperspace
 reweave_edges:
 - multi agent deployment exposes emergent security vulnerabilities invisible to single agent evaluation because cross agent propagation identity spoofing and unauthorized compliance arise only in realistic multi party environments|related|2026-03-28
+- Hyperspace|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # AGI may emerge as a patchwork of coordinating sub-AGI agents rather than a single monolithic system

domains/ai-alignment/AI accelerates existing Molochian dynamics by removing bottlenecks not creating new misalignment because the competitive equilibrium was always catastrophic and friction was the only thing preventing convergence.md

@@ -13,9 +13,17 @@ challenged_by:
 related:
 - multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile
 - the absence of a societal warning signal for AGI is a structural feature not an accident because capability scaling is gradual and ambiguous and collective action requires anticipation not reaction
+- motivated reasoning among AI lab leaders is itself a primary risk vector because those with most capability to slow down have most incentive to accelerate
+- technological development draws from an urn containing civilization destroying capabilities and only preventive governance can avoid black ball technologies
+- global capitalism functions as a misaligned optimizer that produces outcomes no participant would choose because individual rationality aggregates into collective irrationality without coordination mechanisms
+- indigenous restraint technologies like the Sabbath are historical precedents for binding the maximum power principle through social technology
 reweave_edges:
 - multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile|related|2026-04-04
 - the absence of a societal warning signal for AGI is a structural feature not an accident because capability scaling is gradual and ambiguous and collective action requires anticipation not reaction|related|2026-04-07
+- motivated reasoning among AI lab leaders is itself a primary risk vector because those with most capability to slow down have most incentive to accelerate|related|2026-04-17
+- technological development draws from an urn containing civilization destroying capabilities and only preventive governance can avoid black ball technologies|related|2026-04-17
+- global capitalism functions as a misaligned optimizer that produces outcomes no participant would choose because individual rationality aggregates into collective irrationality without coordination mechanisms|related|2026-04-18
+- indigenous restraint technologies like the Sabbath are historical precedents for binding the maximum power principle through social technology|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # AI accelerates existing Molochian dynamics by removing bottlenecks not creating new misalignment because the competitive equilibrium was always catastrophic and friction was the only thing preventing convergence

domains/ai-alignment/AI agents excel at implementing well-scoped ideas but cannot generate creative experiment designs which makes the human role shift from researcher to agent workflow architect.md

@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@ related:
 - as AI automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems
 - iterative agent self improvement produces compounding capability gains when evaluation is structurally separated from generation
 - tools and artifacts transfer between AI agents and evolve in the process because Agent O improved Agent Cs solver by combining it with its own structural knowledge creating a hybrid better than either original
+- Hyperspace
 reweave_edges:
 - as AI automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems|related|2026-03-28
 - iterative agent self improvement produces compounding capability gains when evaluation is structurally separated from generation|related|2026-03-28
 - tools and artifacts transfer between AI agents and evolve in the process because Agent O improved Agent Cs solver by combining it with its own structural knowledge creating a hybrid better than either original|related|2026-03-28
+- Hyperspace|related|2026-04-18
 ---
 
 # AI agents excel at implementing well-scoped ideas but cannot generate creative experiment designs which makes the human role shift from researcher to agent workflow architect